Differences in Big Five Personality Traits Between Alcohol and Polydrug Abusers: Implications for Treatment in the Therapeutic Community
- 1.1k Downloads
This pilot study examines personality characteristics using the Five Factor Model combined with measures of Sensation Seeking and religious/spiritual well-being in two Austrian samples of substance abusers. Sixty-three male addicts (33 polydrug dependents, 30 alcohol dependents) treated in a therapeutic community setting were tested with the Neo Personality Inventory Revised Version, the Sensation Seeking Scale, and the Multidimensional Inventory for Religious/Spiritual Well-Being. Results show significant personality differences between alcohol and polydrug abusers. Whereas higher levels of Neuroticism and lower levels of Openness to experience were found in both substance dependents groups, low levels of Conscientiousness and low levels of Agreeableness were merely shown in polydrug abusers. Furthermore, they exhibit less religious/spiritual well-being and high Sensation Seeking. Thus, the results seem to highlight a link between polydrug dependence and problematic personality structure. Findings have implications for understanding differences between various substance abusers and for novel treatment opportunities in the therapeutic community setting.
KeywordsSubstance use disorder Personality Big Five Polydrug Alcohol Treatment Therapeutic community
This work was supported from the “Grüner Kreis” Society, Johnsdorf. We thank the members of staff and all participants for supporting this investigation.
Disclosures and Ethics
This paper is unique and not under consideration by any other publication and has not been published elsewhere. The authors declare that they do not have any competing interests. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
- Adams, J. B., Heath, A. J., Young, S. A., Hewitt, J. K., Corley, R. P., & Stallings, M. C. (2003). Relationship between personality and preferred substance and motivations for use among adolescent substance abusers. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 29, 691–712.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Beauducel, A., Strobel, A., & Brocke, B. (2003). Psychometrische eigenschaften und normen einer deutschsprachigen fassung der sensation seeking-skalen, form V. [Psychometric characteristics and norms of an German version of the sensation seeking scale V]. Diagnostica, 49, 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Betkowska-Korpała, B. (2012). Personality in the big five model and maintaining abstinence after one year follow-up. Psychiatry Polska, 46, 387–399.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- DeLeon, G. (2000). The therapeutic community – theory, model, and method. New York: Springer Publishing Company Inc.Google Scholar
- Dilling, H., Mombour, W., Schmidt, M. H., & Schulte-Markwort, E. (2004). Internationale Klassifikation psychischer Störungen: ICD-10, Kapitel V (F) Klinisch-diagnostische Leitlinien. [The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders] (3rd ed.). Bern: Hans Huber.Google Scholar
- Hanson, G. R. (2011). Therapeutic community. Retrieved December 21, 2011, from National Institute on Drug Abuse. Research Report Series. Retrieved from http://drugabuse.gov/PDF/RRTherapeutic.pdf/.
- Koenig, H. G. (2009). Research on religion, spirituality, and mental health: a review. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 54, 283–291.Google Scholar
- Le Bon, O., Basiaux, P., Streel, E., Tecco, J., Hanak, C., Hansenne, M., et al. (2004). Personality profile and drug of choice; a multivariate analysis using Cloninger’s TCI on heroin addicts, alcoholics, and a random population group. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 73, 175–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miller, T. R. (1991). The psychotherapeutic utility of the five factor model of personality: a clinician’s experience. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 414–433.Google Scholar
- Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (1991). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Ostendorf, F., & Angleitner, A. (2004). NEO-persönlichkeitsinventar nach costa und McCrae revidierte fassung. [NEO-personality inventory-revised by Costa and McCrae]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
- Pallone, L. C., & Sims, B. (2012). Substance abuse treatment with correctional clients: Practical implications for institutional and community settings. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ruiz, M. A., Pincus, A. L., & Schinka, J. A. (2008). Externalizing pathology and the five-factor model: a meta-analysis of personality traits associated with antisocial personality disorder, substance use disorder, and their Co-occurrence. Journal of Personality Disorders, 22, 365–388.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tellegen, A., & Waller, N. G. (2003). Exploring personality through test construction: Development of the multidimensional personality questionnaire. In J. Cheek & E. M. Donahue (Eds.), Handbook of personality inventories. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
- Unterrainer, H. F., Huber, H. P., Ladenhauf, K. H., Wallner, S. J., & Liebmann, P. M. (2010). MI-RSB 48: die entwicklung eines multidimensionalen inventars zum religiös-spirituellen befinden [MI-RSB 48: the development of a multidimensional inventory of religious-spiritual well-being]. Diagnostica, 2, 82–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Worthington, E. L., Jr., Witvliet, C. V. O., Pietrini, P., & Miller, A. J. (2007). Forgiveness, health, and well-being: a review of evidence for emotional versus decisional forgiveness, dispositional forgivingness, and reduced unforgiveness. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 30, 291–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar