Making the Pack the Hero, Tobacco Industry Response to Marketing Restrictions in the UK: Findings from a Long-Term Audit

  • Crawford MoodieEmail author
  • Gerard B. Hastings


The Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Act (TAPA), introduced between 2003 and 2005 in the UK, prohibits all tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship. Packaging, however, is not covered in the Act. Two strands of a long-term audit (trade press review and panel of smokers) are examined to monitor change in tobacco packaging from January 2002 to January 2009. The trade press provides numerous examples of value based (altered pack size or price marked packaging), image based (altered pack design) and innovation based (pack additions or modifications) packaging. Some examples of value, image and innovation based packaging are reported in the trade press from 2002 to 2004, but mention of all three forms of packaging increases markedly from 2005 onwards, as other forms of marketing were restricted. These developments have been observed by a panel of smokers, from across the UK, who have been particularly attentive to, and aware of, value based packaging. Packaging has become an increasingly important promotional tool for the tobacco industry as other channels have been shut off. It is clear therefore that any comprehensive and consistent tobacco strategy should include a mandatory move to generic packaging.


Tobacco packaging Trade press Smoker’s panel Image Innovation 



We would like to thank Cancer Research UK, a major cancer charity in the UK, and the UK Centre for Tobacco Control Studies, for funding this work.


  1. CDP (1995a). Advertising support for Gratis 11 catalogue. Retrieved November 26, 2008 from
  2. CDP (1995b). Benson & Hedges 1995 Agendas. Retrieved November 27, 2008, from
  3. CDP (1995c). Generating revenue. A short presentation for the 1995 Gallaher Marketing Conference. Retrieved November 27, 2008, from
  4. CDP (1995d). Cigarette new product development. Future areas of investigation. Retrieved November 27, 2008, from
  5. CDP (1998). New campaign brief. Retrieved November 27, 2008, from
  6. Chapman, S. (2007). Australia: British American Tobacco “addresses” youth smoking. Tobacco Control, 16, 2–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Colquhoun Associates (1998). Qualitative research into RYO habits and attitudes. Retrieved December 14, 2008, from
  8. Convenience Store (2006a). The price is right. Convenience Store, 20 October 2006.Google Scholar
  9. Convenience Store (2006b). Still away puffing. Convenience Store, 2 June 2006.Google Scholar
  10. Convenience Store (2006c). Stocklines. Convenience Store, 30 June 2006.Google Scholar
  11. Convenience Store (2007a). Hot news. Convenience Store, 23 February 2007.Google Scholar
  12. Convenience Store (2007b). Stocklines hot news. Convenience Store, 23 March 2007.Google Scholar
  13. Convenience Store (2008). Stocklines — Silk Cut menthol. Convenience Store, 12 December 2008.Google Scholar
  14. Cummings, K. M., Morley, C. P., Horan, J. K., Steger, C., et al. (2002). Marketing to America’s youth: Evidence from corporate documents. Tobacco Control, 11(suppl I), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cunningham, R., & Kyle, K. (1995). The case for plain packaging. Tobacco Control, 4, 80–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis, R. M., Gilpin, E. A., Loken, B., Viswanath, K., et al. (2008). The role of the media in promoting and reducing tobacco use. NCI Tobacco Control Monograph Series No. 19. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Ferris, R. P. (1980). The influence of brand identification and imagery on subjective evaluation of cigarettes. Report No. RD.1752-C. Restricted. British-American Tobacco Co. Ltd Group, July 18, 1980. Bates No. 103411673-103411674. Retrieved December 14, 2008, from
  18. Forecourt Trader (2005) Leader of the packs. Forecourt Trader, 1 January 2005.Google Scholar
  19. Forecourt Trader (2006a). Kingsize opportunity. Forecourt Trader, 6 January 2006.Google Scholar
  20. Forecourt Trader (2006b). Don’t give up. Forecourt Trader, 6 June 2006.Google Scholar
  21. Forecourt Trader (2006c). Gantry shake-up. Forecourt Trader, 2 May 2006.Google Scholar
  22. Forecourt Trader (2006d). Silver slide is back. Forecourt Trader, 5 December 2006.Google Scholar
  23. Forecourt Trader (2007a). Tobacco double act. Forecourt Trader, 1 April 2007.Google Scholar
  24. Forecourt Trader (2007b). New taste for camel. Forecourt Trader, 1 March 2007.Google Scholar
  25. Forecourt Trader (2008a). ‘Silver’ service at JPS. Forecourt Trader, 3 November 2008.Google Scholar
  26. Forecourt Trader (2008b). Big brands get refreshed. Forecourt Trader, 4 August 2008.Google Scholar
  27. Forecourt Trader (2008c). The big smoke. Forecourt Trader, 2 June 2008.Google Scholar
  28. Forecourt Trader (2009). Pricemarked packs of RYO. Forecourt Trader, 13 January 2009.Google Scholar
  29. Freeman, B., Chapman, S., & Rimmer, M. (2008). The case for plain packaging. Addiction, 103, 580–590.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gallaher Group Plc (1996). Silk Cut Review. Retrieved December 14, 2008, from
  31. Government, H. M. (2002). Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Act. London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  32. Hammond, D. (2006). Canada: A new angle on packs. Tobacco Control, 15, 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Haslam Drury Partnership (1997). Gallaher Ltd: Project Banjo evaluating the opportunity. Retrieved December 14, 2008, from
  34. Haslam Drury Partnership (1998). Gallaher Ltd: Silk Cut packaging development qualitative debrief. Retrieved December 14, 2008, from.
  35. Hegarty, R. (2006). Shoppers up at c-stores. The Grocer, 19 May 2006.Google Scholar
  36. Hickling, J. A., & Miller, C. L. (2008). Cigarette pack and advertising displays at point of purchase: community demand for restrictions. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32, 574–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hulit, M. (1994). Marketing issues corporate affairs conference May 27, 1994 — Manila. Bates No. 2504015017/5042. Retrieved November 30, 2008, from
  38. Kidwell, H. (2007). Objects of desire — The latest in cigarette packaging. Tobacco Journal International, 11 May, 2007. Retrieved November 30, 2008, from
  39. Kin, F., Yoon, Y. C., & Lian, T. Y. (2008). Tobacco industry tactics. Cool but deadly. Retrieved January 30, 2009, from
  40. Leading Edge (1998). RYO papers exploratory study. Qualitative research report. Retrieved January 7, 2009, from
  41. Marketing Sciences (1998). Project 198 Presentation for Gallaher. Retrieved November 30, 2008, from
  42. Market Trends (1995). Young smokers’ market study. Retrieved December 15, 2008, from
  43. M&C Saatchi (1997a). Advertising ban creative briefs (1997–1999). Retrieved November 30, 2008, from
  44. M&C Saatchi (1997b). Gallaher NPD: Potential areas for research. Retrieved November 30, 2008, from
  45. M&C Saatchi (1997c). Amber Leaf briefing. Retrieved January 14, 2009, from
  46. M&C Saatchi (1998a). Sovereign and the Cheap Cigarette Market Qualitative Research Debrief (version 1 of 2). Retrieved November 29, 2008, from
  47. M&C Saatchi (1998b). RAW and drum creative briefs. Retrieved November 30, 2008, from
  48. M&C Saatchi (1999). Amber Leaf creative briefs. Retrieved November 30, 2008, from
  49. M&C Saatchi (2000). Sovereign contact reports. Retrieved December 14, 2008, from
  50. Miller, L. (1986) Principles of measurement of visual standout in pack design. Report No. RD 2039 Restricted. Group Research and Development Centre, British-American Tobacco Co Ltd, May 23, 1986. Bates No. 103522671-103522675. Retrieved January 30, 2008, from
  51. Mustoe Merriman Herring & Levy (1997). Creative Brief for L&B. Retrieved November 30, 2008, from
  52. Off Licence News (2005a). King-sized campaign’s racy look. Off Licence News, 10 June 2005.Google Scholar
  53. Off Licence News (2005b). Value brands leading the way. Off Licence News, 30 September 2005.Google Scholar
  54. Off Licence News (2006a). New look for Royals family. Off Licence News, 26 May 2006.Google Scholar
  55. Off Licence News (2006b). Number’s up for old Embassy design. Off Licence News, 10 November 2006.Google Scholar
  56. Off Licence News (2006c). Retro tins to attract rollers. Off Licence News, 29 September 2006.Google Scholar
  57. Off Licence News (2006d). Strike a Light. Off Licence News, 15 Sept 2006.Google Scholar
  58. Off Licence News (2008a). Price-marked packs cash in on crunch. Off Licence News, 12 December 2008.Google Scholar
  59. Off Licence News (2008b). Sterling taps into super value. Off Licence News, 31 October 2008.Google Scholar
  60. Off Licence News (2008c). In brief. Off Licence News, 17 October 2008.Google Scholar
  61. Off Licence News (2008d). In brief. Off Licence News, 2 May 2008.Google Scholar
  62. RMC Associates (1998). Embassy No1, Regal & Superkings: Brand review. Qualitative research. Presentation Notes. Retrieved November 30, 2008, from
  63. Shields, R. (2008). Tobacco firms target teenage girls with ‘super slim’ products cigarettes. The Independent, 19 October 2008. Retrieved January 30, 2009, from
  64. Simpson, D. (2007). South Korea: Pack design bombshell. Tobacco Control, 16, 77–78.Google Scholar
  65. Slade, J. (1997). The pack as advertisement. Tobacco Control, 6, 169–170.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Swanson, M. G. (2006). Australia: New health warning canned. Tobacco Control, 15, 151.Google Scholar
  67. The Grocer (2002a). Classic tactics for spring cigars. The Grocer, 13 April 2002.Google Scholar
  68. The Grocer (2002b). Bites. The Grocer, 22 June 2002.Google Scholar
  69. The Grocer (2003a). St. Bruno kept fresh. The Grocer, 1 March 2003.Google Scholar
  70. The Grocer (2003b). In perfect condition. The Grocer, 7 June 2003.Google Scholar
  71. The Grocer (2004a). Gallaher tests post-ban market. The Grocer, 10 April 2004.Google Scholar
  72. The Grocer (2004b). Café Crème grows tough. The Grocer, 4 September 2004.Google Scholar
  73. The Grocer (2005a). Drawing on success. The Grocer, 1 July 2005.Google Scholar
  74. The Grocer (2005b). Of Hamlet and women. The Grocer, 26 March 2005.Google Scholar
  75. The Grocer (2005c). Dunhill gets smoother. The Grocer, 18 June 2005.Google Scholar
  76. The Grocer (2006a). Budget cigarettes given stylish look by Imperial. The Grocer, 21 January 2006.Google Scholar
  77. The Grocer (2006b). Stockline. The Grocer, 6 October 2006.Google Scholar
  78. The Grocer (2007). Top products survey 2007. The Grocer, 17 December 2007.Google Scholar
  79. The Grocer (2008). Silk Cut Menthol launched. The Grocer, 22 November 2008.Google Scholar
  80. The Grocer (2009). B&H Gold and Silver get new look. The Grocer, 10 January 2009.Google Scholar
  81. Tobacco Journal International (2001). Special cigarette packaging: Brand-building: raising the voice of the pack. Tobacco Journal International, April 2001. Retrieved January 25, 2009, from
  82. Uleshka (2006). Cigarette packaging in Japan. Ping Mag, 15 February 2006. Retrieved December, 2008, from
  83. Wakefield, M., Morley, J. K., Horan, J. K., & Cummings, K. (2002). The cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents. Tobacco Control, 11, 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Walker, G. (2008). Bright Sparks: How the tobacco industry is meeting the current legislative challenges. Convenience Store, 17 October 2008.Google Scholar
  85. West, T. (2007). Restricted area. Convenience Store, 1 June 2007.Google Scholar
  86. World Health Organisation. (2003). The World Health Report 2003: Shaping the Future. World Health Organisation: Geneva.Google Scholar
  87. World Health Organisation (2009). WHO Member States (by regions) that are NOT parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Retrieved April 3, 2009, from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of StirlingStirlingUK

Personalised recommendations