Client/Clinician Discrepancies in Perceived Problem Improvement and the Potential Influence on Dropout Response
- 120 Downloads
This paper examines the possibility that clinicians working in an alcohol and other drug (AOD) treatment service may lack appreciation of problem improvement in clients who choose to dropout against clinical advice. Underlying this investigation is the belief that if clinicians are indeed unperceptive of problem improvement amongst this population then this may explain why retention based responses to client dropout continue to be promoted, despite evidence to suggest that they are ineffective and/or unnecessary. Outcome data obtained from a sample of 75 AOD treatment clients and their respective clinicians at baseline and 2-month follow-up are reported. Analysis of these data suggest a client/clinician discrepancy in perceived problem improvement was evident in the study setting: clinicians reported significantly less problem improvement in the first 2 months of service attendance as compared to their clients and this discrepancy was most pronounced if the client had dropped out of treatment.
KeywordsDropout Retention Treatment fit Treatment outcome
This study was undertaken with financial assistance from the Waitemata District Health Board and the John Dobson memorial scholarship. The authors would like to thank participating clients and staff of the AOD treatment service for their cooperation. The authors would also like to acknowledge Jenny Wolf and Robert Steenhuisen for their support of the project and Amanda Wheeler (Director, Clinical Research and Resource Centre) for her input over the course of the study.
- Adamson, S. J., Sellman, D., & De Zwart, K. (2004). National Telephone Survey of the Alcohol and Drug Workforce. Paper presented at the Cutting Edge National Addiction Conference, Palmerston North.Google Scholar
- CRUFAD (2000). K-10 symptom scale, from http://www.crufad.unsw.edu.au/K10/k10info.htm.
- Dench, S., & Bennett, G. (2000). The impact of brief motivational intervention at the start of an outpatient day programme for alcohol dependence. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 28(2), 121–130.Google Scholar
- Edlund, M. J., Wang, P. S., Berglund, P. A., Katz, S. J., Lin, E., & Kessler, R. C. (2002). Dropping out of mental health treatment: patterns and predictors among epidemiological survey respondents in the United States and Ontario. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159(5), 845–851.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Garfield, S. L. (1994). Research on Client Variables in Psychotherapy. In A. E. Bergen & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change (Fourth ed., pp. 190–228). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
- Hunsley, J., Aubry, T. D., Erstervelt, C. M., & Vito, D. (1999). Comparing therapist and client perspectives on reasons for psychotherapy termination. Psychotherapy, 36(4), 380–388.Google Scholar
- Pekarik, G. (1985b). The effects of employing different termination classification criteria in dropout research. Psychotherapy, 22(Spring), 87–91.Google Scholar
- Phillips, E. L. (1985). Psychotherapy Revised: New Frontiers in Research and Practice. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Presley, J. H. (1987). The clinical dropout: a view from the client’s perspective. Social Casework: The Journal of Contemporary Social Work, 603–608.Google Scholar