Advertisement

Plasmonics

, Volume 14, Issue 6, pp 1789–1800 | Cite as

Multiple-Band Ultra-Thin Perfect Metamaterial Absorber Using Analogy Split-Ring Resonators

  • Ben-Xin WangEmail author
  • Hua-Xin Zhu
  • Wei-Qing Huang
Article
  • 158 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents a kind of perfect metamaterial absorber that can achieve multiple-band near-perfect absorption. The basic cell of the device is designed by using an analogy split-ring resonator (ASRR), an insulating dielectric sheet, and a continuous metallic board. Three discrete absorption peaks with narrow bandwidths and high absorption rates are obtained. The ratios of the dielectric sheet thickness to the wavelengths of the three absorption peaks are respectively 1/100, 1/59, and 1/43, which are all smaller than prior triple-band absorption devices. With the aid of the field distributions, the mechanism of the device is investigated. Results also demonstrate that the device performance can be controlled by the parameters (in particular of the length) of the ASRR. Based on this, a six-band terahertz metamaterial absorber is designed via simply stacking two different dimensions of ASRRs. We found that the dual-layer structure can exhibit six narrow-band absorption bands, each of which has the absorption of over 90%. The mechanism of the six-band light absorber is caused by the combination of two sets of three different modes of the two layers.

Keywords

Metamaterial Perfect absorber Multiple-band absorption Terahertz 

Notes

Author Contributions

B.-X.W. conceived the research, conducted simulations and analyses, and wrote the manuscript. H.-X.Z. and W.-Q.H. assisted in processing the data and figures. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding Information

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant number 11647143, the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu grant number BK20160189, the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019M651692), the Jiangsu Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018K113C), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities grant number JUSRP51721B.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Yong Z, Zhang S, Gong C, He S (2016) Narrow band perfect absorber for maximum localized magnetic and electric field enhancement and sensing applications. Sci Rep 6:24063PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen WC, Cardin A, Koirala M, Liu X, Tyler T, West KG, Bingham CM, Starr T, Starr AF, Jokerst NM, Padilla WJ (2016) Role of surface electromagnetic waves in metamaterial absorbers. Opt Express 24:6783PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen HT (2012) Interference theory of metamaterial perfect absorbers. Opt Express 20:7165–7172PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huang L, Chowdhury DR, Ramani S, Reiten MT, Luo SN, Azad AK, Taylor AJ, Chen HT (2012) Impact of resonator geometry and its coupling with ground plane on ultrathin metamaterial perfect absorbers. Appl Phys Lett 101:101102Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Faniayeu I, Mizeikis V (2017) Vertical split-ring resonator perfect absorber metamaterial for IR frequencies realized via femtosecond direct laser writing. Appl Phys Express 10:062001Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wu PC, Liao CY, Chen JW, Tsai DP (2017) Isotropic absorption and sensor of vertical split-ring resonator. Adv Opt Mater 5:1600581Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang BX (2017) Quad-band terahertz metamaterial absorber based on the combining of the dipole and quadrupole resonances of two SRRs. IEEE J Select Quantum Electron 23:4700107Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu X, Bi K, Li B, Zhao Q, Zhou J (2016) Metamaterial perfect absorber based on artificial dielectric atoms. Opt Express 24:20454–20460PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chang YC, Kildishev AV, Narimanov EE, Norris TB (2016) Metasurface perfect absorber based on guided resonance of a photonic hypercrystal. Phys Rev B 94:155430Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fan K, Suen JY, Liu X, Padilla WJ (2017) All-dielectric metasurface absorbers for uncooled terahertz imaging. Optic 4:601Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu X, Fan K, Shadrivov IV, Padilla WJ (2017) Experimental realization of a terahertz all-dielectric metasurface absorber. Opt Express 25:191–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhao X, Zhang J, Fan K, Duan G, Metcalfe GD, Wraback M, Zhang X, Averitt RD (2016) Nonlinear terahertz metamaterial perfect absorbers using GaAs. Photon Res 4:A16Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Watts CM, Liu X, Padilla WJ (2012) Metamaterial electromagnetic wave absorbers. Adv Mater 24:OP98PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang BX, Zhai X, Wang GZ, Huang WQ, Wang LL (2015) Frequency tunable metamaterial absorber at deep-subwavelength scale. Opt Mater Express 5:227Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hu X, Xu G, Wen L, Wang H, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Cummong DRS, Chen Q (2016) Metamaterial absorber integrated microfluidic terahertz sensors. Laser Photon Rev 10:962–969Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kajtar G, Kafesaki M, Economou EN, Soukoulis CM (2016) Theoretical model of homogeneous metal-insulator-metal perfect multi-band absorbers for the visible spectrum. J Phys D 49:055104Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu S, Zhuge J, Ma S, Chen H, Bao D, He Q, Zhou L, Cui TJ (2016) A bi-layered quad-band metamaterial absorber at terahertz frequencies. J Appl Phys 118:245304Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li X, Lan C, Bi K, Li B, Zhao Q, Zhou J (2016) Dual band metamaterial perfect absorber based on Mie resonances. Appl Phys Lett 109:062902Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yao G, Ling F, Yue J, Luo C, Ji J, Yao J (2016) Dual-band tunable perfect metamaterial absorber in the THz range. Opt Express 24:1518–1527PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang BX, Zhai X, Wang GZ, Huang WQ, Wang LL (2015) A novel dual-band terahertz metamaterial absorber for a sensor application. J Appl Phys 117:014504Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Astorino MD, Frezza F, Tedeschi N (2017) Ultra-thin narrow-band, complementary narrow-band, and dual-band metamaterial absorbers for applications in the THz regime. J Appl Phys 121:063103Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang BX, Wang GZ, Wang LL (2016) Design of a novel dual-band terahertz metamaterial absorber. Plasmonics 11:523–530Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu X, Lan C, Li B, Zhao Q, Zhou J (2016) Dual band metamaterial perfect absorber based on artificial dielectric molecules. Sci Rep 6:28906PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang BX, Wang GZ, Sang T (2016) Simple design of novel triple-band terahertz metamaterial absorber for sensing application. J Phys D 49:165307Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang N, Zhou P, Cheng D, Weng X, Xie J, Deng L (2013) Dual-band absorption of mid-infrared metamaterial absorber based on distinct dielectric spacing layers. Opt Lett 38:1125–1127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shen X, Cui TJ, Zhao J, Ma HF, Jiang WX, Li H (2011) Polarization-independent wide-angle triple-band metamaterial absorber. Opt Express 19:9401PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shen X, Yang Y, Zang Y, Gu J, Han J, Zhang W, Cui TJ (2012) Triple-and terahertz metamaterial absorber: design, experiment, and physical interpretation. Appl Phys Lett 101:154102Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Xu J, Zhao Z, Yu H, Yang L, Gou P, Cao J, Zou Y, Qian J, Shi T, Ren Q, An Z (2016) Design of triple-band metamaterial absorbers with refractive index sensitivity at infrared frequencies. Opt Express 24:25742–25751PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang GD, Chen JF, Hu XW, Chen ZQ, Liu MH (2014) Polarization-insensitive triple-band microwave metamaterial absorber based on rotated square rings. Prog Electromagn Res 145:175–183Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang BX, Zhai X, Wang GZ, Huang WQ, Wang LL (2015) Design of a four-band and polarization-insensitive terahertz metamaterial absorber. IEEE Photon J 7:4600108Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bhattacharyya S, Srivastava KV (2014) Triple band polarization-independent ultra-thin metamaterial absorber using electric field-driven LC resonator. J Appl Phys 115:064508Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Huang X, Yang H, Yu S, Wang J, Li M, Ye Q (2013) Triple-band polarization-insensitive wide-angle ultra-thin planar spiral metamaterial absorber. J Appl Phys 113:213516Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bhattacharyya S, Ghosh S, Srivastava KV (2013) Triple band polarization-independent metamaterial absorber with bandwidth enhancement at X-band. J Appl Phys 114:094514Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Park JW, Tuong PV, Rhee JY, Kim KW, Jang WH, Choi EH, Chen LY, Lee YP (2013) Multi-band metamaterial absorber based on the arrangement of donut-type resonators. Opt Express 21:9691PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chen J, Hu Z, Wang S, Huang X, Liu M (2016) A triple-band, polarization- and incident angle-independent microwave metamaterial absorber with interference theory. Eur Phys J B 89:14Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhang B, Hendrickson J, Guo J (2013) Multispectral near-perfect metamaterial absorbers using spatially multiplexed plasmon resonance metal square structures. J Opt Soc Am B 30:656Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kollatou TM, Dimitriadis AI, Assimonis SD, Kantartzis NV, Antonopoulos CS (2014) Multi-band, high absorbing, microwave metamaterial structures. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 115:555–561Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ma B, Liu S, Bian B, Kong X, Zhang H, Mao Z, Wang B (2014) Novel three-band microwave metamaterial absorber. J Electromagn Waves Appl 28:1478–1486Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhai H, Zhan C, Li Z, Liang C (2015) A triple-band ultrathin metamaterial absorber with wide-angle and polarization stability. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag Lett 14:241–244Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Arezoomand AS, Zarrabi FB, Heydari S, Gandji NP (2015) Independent polarization and multi-band THz absorber base on Jerusalem cross. Opt Commun 352:121–126Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mishra N, Choudhary DK, Chowdhury R, Kumari K, Chaudhary RK (2017) An investigation on compact ultra-thin triple-band polarization independent metamaterial absorber for microwave frequency applications. IEEE Access 5:4370–4376Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sarkhel, A.; Chaudhuri, S.R.B. 2015 Design of a compact triple-band metamaterial absorber with wide angle of incidence using connected resonator topology. 2015 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications, 1239https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7297316. Accessed 13 June 2019
  43. 43.
    Ghosh, S.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Kaiprath, Y.; Chuaurasiya, D.; Srivastava, K.V. 2015 Triple-band polarization-independent metamaterial absorber using destructive interference. Proceedings of the 45th European Microwave Conference, 7–10 Sep., Paris, France, 335 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7345768. Accessed 13 June 2019
  44. 44.
    Shang S, Yang S, Tao L, Yang L, Cao H (2016) Ultrathin triple-band polarization-insensitive wide-angle compact metamaterial absorber. AIP Adv 6:075203Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sharma SK, Ghosh S, Srivastava KV (2016) An ultra-thin triple-band polarization-insensitive metamaterial absorber for S, C, and X band applications. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 122:1071Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bowen PT, Baron A, Simth DR (2016) Theory of patch-antenna metamaterial perfect absorbers. Phys Rev A 93:063849Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Cheng Y, Nie Y, Gong R (2013) A polarization-insensitive and omnidirectional broadband terahertz metamaterial absorber based on coplanar multi-squares films. Opt Laser Technol 48:415–421Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hendrickson J, Guo J, Zhang B, Buchwald W, Soref R (2012) Wideband perfect light absorber at midwave infrared using multiplexed metal structures. Opt Lett 37:371–373PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Viet DT, Hien NT, Tuong PV, Minh NQ, Trang PT, Le LN, Lee YP, Lam VD (2014) Perfect absorber metamaterials: peak, multi-peak and broadband absorption. Opt Commun 322:209–213Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Liu Y, Gu S, Luo C, Zhao X (2012) Ultra-thin broadband metamaterial absorber. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 108:19–24Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Linden S, Enkrich C, Wegener M, Zhou J, Koschn T, Soukoulis CM (2004) Magnetic response of metamaterials at 100 terahertz. Science 306:1351–1353PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sersic I, Frimmer M, Verhagen E, Koenderink AF (2009) Electric and magnetic dipole coupling in near-infrared split-ring metamaterial arrays. Phys Rev Lett 103:213902PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Padilla WJ, Taylor AJ, Highstrete C, Lee M, Averitt RD (2006) Dynamical electric and magnetic metamaterial response at terahertz frequencies. Phys Rev Lett 96:107401PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wang BX, Wang GZ, Wang LL, Zhai X (2016) Design of a five-band terahertz absorber based on three nested split-ring resonators. IEEE Photon Technol Lett 28:307–310Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Huang YW, Chen WT, Tsai WY, Wu PC, Wang CM, Sun G, Tsai DP (2015) Aluminum plasmonic multicolor meta-hologram. Nano Lett 15:3122–3127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Huang YW, Lee HWH, Sokhoyan R, Pala RA, Thyagarajan K, Han S, Tsai DP, Atwater HA (2016) Gate-tunable conducting oxide metasurfaces. Nano Lett 16:5319–5325PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ScienceJiangnan UniversityWuxiChina
  2. 2.School of Physics and ElectronicsHunan UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations