Frontiers of Philosophy in China

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 213–228 | Cite as

A return to intellectual history: A new approach to pre-Qin discourse on name

Research Article

Abstract

Discussions of name (ming, 名) during the pre-Qin and Qin-Han period of Chinese history were very active. The concept ming at that time can be divided into two categories, one is the ethical-political meaning of the term and the other is the linguistic-logical understanding. The former far exceeds the latter in terms of overall influence on the development of Chinese intellectual history. But it is the latter that has received the most attention in the 20th century, due to the influence of Western logic. This has led to the result of a bias in the contemporary studies of ming. Changing course by returning to the correct path of intellectual history can providing an objective and thorough ordering of the pre-Qin discourse on ming.

Keywords

Chinese philosophy pre-Qin ming discourse Western logic Chinese traditional intellectual history 

摘要

战国秦汉时期对 “名” 的讨论极为活跃。 当时的 “名” 可以分为两类, 即伦理学、 政治学意义上的 “名” 与语言学、 逻辑学意义上的 “名” 。 前者对中国古代思想史影响之大远远超过后者, 但由于受二十世纪初传入中国的西方逻辑学的影响, 以往的先秦名学研究只重视后者, 未对前者展开过系统研究, 这使名学研究偏离了思想史的实态。 因此应转换方向, 回归于思想史的正途, 对先秦名学重新作出 客观全面的梳理。

关键词

中国哲学 先秦名学 西方逻辑学 中国古代思想史 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cao Feng (2006). Inbunshi ni mieru meishiso no kenkyuu ⌈尹文子⌊ に見える名思想の研究 (A study on the thought of ming in Yinwenzi), Touyou bunka kenkyuu 东洋文化研究 (Journal of Asian Cultures), Vol. 8Google Scholar
  2. Cui Qingtian (1997). Mingxue yu Bianxue 名学与辩学 (Studies on Naming and Dialectic). Taiyuan: Shanxi Jiaoyu ChubansheGoogle Scholar
  3. Feng Youlan (1984). Zhongguo Zhexueshi Xinbian 中国哲学史新编 (A New History of Chinese Philosophy). Beijing: Renmin ChubansheGoogle Scholar
  4. Hu Shi (1996). Zhongguo Zhexueshi Dagang 中国哲学史大纲 (A Survey of the History on Chinese Philosophy). Beijing: Dongfang ChubansheGoogle Scholar
  5. Kaji Nobuyuki 加地伸行 (1983). Chuugoku ronrigakushi kenkyuu 中国论理学史研究 (Studies on the History of Chinese Logic), Part 1: Chuugoku ni okeru ronrigaku 中国における论理学 (Chinese Logic), Ch.1: Chuugoku kodai ronrigakushi kenkyuu no jyoukyou 中国古代论理学史研究の状况 (An Overview of Contemporary Studies of Ancient Chinese Logic), Section 1: Nihon niokeru baai 日本における场合 (Overview of Contemporary Japanese Studies of Ancient Chinese Logic). Tokyo: Kenbun syuppan 研文出版 (Kenbun Publishing House)Google Scholar
  6. Ren Jiyu (1983). Zhongguo Zhexue Fazhanshi 中国哲学发展史 (A History of the Development of Chinese Philosophy). Beijing: Renmin ChubansheGoogle Scholar
  7. Sun Yirang (1916). Yu Liang Zhuoru Lun Mozi Shu 与梁卓如论墨子书 (A letter regarding the Mozi to Liang Qichao). In: Zhouqing Shulin 籀庼述林 (Collected Sayings of Zhouqing), Vol.10, Sikeben 私刻本 (A Private Xylograph)Google Scholar
  8. Sun Zhongyuan (2000). Lun Zhongguo Luojishi Yanjiu zhong de Kending yu Fouding 论中国逻辑史研究中的肯定与否定 (Acceptance and Rejection in Studies of the History of Chinese Logic). Guangxi Shifan Xueyuan Xuebao, No. 4Google Scholar
  9. Takada Jyun 高田淳 (1967). Chuugoku kindai no ronri no kenkyuu 中国近代の ⌈论理⌊ 研究 (Studies in Modern Chinese Logic). In: Kouza touyoushisou 4 Chuugokushisou III 讲座东洋 思想 4 中国思想 III (Part 4 of Lectures on East Asian Thought: Chinese Thought III), Ch. 3, Section 1. Tokyo: Toudaisyuppankai 东大出版会 (Toudai Publishing House)Google Scholar
  10. Wang Guan (1992). Gongsun Long Zi Xuanjie 公孙龙子悬解 (A Tentative Explanation of the Works of Master Gongsun Long). Beijing: Zhonghua ShujuGoogle Scholar
  11. Wu Feibai (1983). Zhongguo Gumingjiayan 中国古名家言 (Sayings of the Ancient Chinese School of Names). Beijing: Zhongguo Shehui Kexue ChubansheGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhang Shizhao (1961). Luoji Zhiyao 逻辑指要 (Key Points of Logic). Beijing: Sanlian ShudianGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Literature, History, and PhilosophyShandong UniversityJinanChina

Personalised recommendations