Frontiers of Philosophy in China

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 317–323 | Cite as

On the study of foreign philosophy in Chinese cultural construction and its future

Research Article
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

Since the “Conference on Foreign Philosophy” held in Wuhu in October 1978, the study of foreign philosophy in China has undergone a prosperous stage. This article discusses the significance of the study of foreign philosophy in the context of renovation, transformation and remolding of Chinese contemporary culture, explores the role of the discipline in the context of Chinese cultural construction, and anticipates the future of this discipline. A cross-cultural perspective is needed for a proper understanding of the significance of the learning and study of foreign philosophy in Chinese cultural construction; otherwise we might fall into cultural conservationism. Secondly, to make philosophy and social sciences prosperous is also a task for foreign philosophy studies, and whether or not foreign philosophy can be well studied should be a mark of the prosperousness of the construction of Chinese culture. Finally, philosophy is a product of human beings and should eventually serve human beings. Chinese culture should open itself up to the world and so should foreign philosophy studies in China.

Keywords

foreign philosophy western philosophy transformation of Chinese culture 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Huang Jiande. Ershi Shiji Xifang Zhexue Dongjianshi Daolun (Introduction to the History of Western Philosophy’s Spreading to the Oriental World in the Twentieth Century). Beijing: Capital Normal University Press, 2002Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu Fangtong. Xifang Zhexue Yanjiu Yu Dangdai Zhongguo Makesi Zhuyi Zhexue de Fazhan (The Study of Western Philosophy and the Development of Contemporary Chinese Marxism: Reflections on the One Hundred Years’ Study of Western Philosophy II. Dongnan Xueshu (Dongnan Studies), 2001 (3)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marx K, Engels F. Manifesto of the Communist Party, Institute of Marxism-Leninism under the Central Committee of Communist Party of Soviet Union, Marx & Engels Selected Works, two-volume edition, Volume 1, Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1958Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang Xiaochao. Wenhua Hudong Zhuanxing Lun: Sin Shiji Wenhua Yanjiu Qianzhan (A Theory of Cultural Transformation by Interaction: Forecast on the Study of Culture in the New Century. Zhejiang Shehui Kexue (Zhejiang Social Sciences), 1999 (3)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang Xiaochao. Zhong Xi Wenhua Chuan bo De Shuangxiang Hudong Yu Wenhua Zhuanxing (The Interaction and Cultural Transformation of Chinese and Western Culture Spreading. Taida Lishi Xuebao (Journal of History of Taiwan University), 2002 (29)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China. Proposals on the Principles of Socialist Spirit Construction. People’s Publishing House, 1987Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marx, Doctoral Dissertation, Karl Marx & Frederick Engels, Volume 1, Karl Marx: 1835–1843, prepared jointly by Lawrence & Wishart Ltd., London, International Publishers Co. Inc., New York, and Progress Publishers, Moscow, in collaboration with the Institute of Marxism-Leninism, Moscow, 1975Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations