Advertisement

Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 493–503 | Cite as

Laser interference fabrication of large-area functional periodic structure surface

  • Lei Wang
  • Zi-Han Wang
  • Yan-Hao Yu
  • Hong-Bo Sun
Open Access
Review Article
  • 690 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Additive Manufacturing

Abstract

Functional periodic structures have attracted significant interest due to their natural capabilities in regulating surface energy, surface effective refractive index, and diffraction. Several technologies are used for the fabrication of these functional structures. The laser interference technique in particular has received attention because of its simplicity, low cost, and high-efficiency fabrication of large-area, micro/nanometer-scale, and periodically patterned structures in air conditions. Here, we reviewed the work on laser interference fabrication of large-area functional periodic structures for antireflection, self-cleaning, and superhydrophobicity based on our past and current research. For the common cases, four-beam interference and multi-exposure of two-beam interference were emphasized for their setup, structure diversity, and various applications for antireflection, self-cleaning, and superhydrophobicity. The relations between multi-beam interference and multi-exposure of two-beam interference were compared theoretically and experimentally. Nanostructures as a template for growing nanocrystals were also shown to present future possible applications in surface chemical control. Perspectives on future directions and applications for laser interference were presented.

Keywords

laser interference four-beam interference multi-exposure of two-beam interference additive fabrication 

Notes

Acknowledgements

H. B. Sun thanks the National Key Research and Development Program of China and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 2017YFB1104300, 61590930, 20150203008GX, and 61605055).

References

  1. 1.
    Clapham P B, Hutley MC. Reduction of lens reflexion by the “moth eye” principle. Nature, 1973, 244(5414): 281–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li X M, Reinhoudt D, Crego-Calama M. What do we need for a superhydrophobic surface? A review on the recent progress in the preparation of superhydrophobic surfaces. Chemical Society Reviews, 2007, 36(8): 1350–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roach P, Shirtcliffe N J, Newton M I. Progress in superhydrophobic surface development. Soft Matter, 2008, 4(2): 224–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Angelis F, Gentile F, Mecarini F, et al. Breaking the diffusion limit with super-hydrophobic delivery of molecules to plasmonic nanofocusing SERS structures. Nature Photonics, 2011, 5(11): 682–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abid M I, Wang L, Chen Q D, et al. Angle-multiplexed optical printing of biomimetic hierarchical 3D textures. Laser & Photonics Reviews, 2017, 11(2): 1600187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xia D, Ku Z, Lee S C, et al. Nanostructures and functional materials fabricated by interferometric lithography. Advanced Materials, 2011, 23(2): 147–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim K, Zhu W, Qu X, et al. 3D optical printing of piezoelectric nanoparticle—Polymer composite materials. ACS Nano, 2014, 8 (10): 9799–9806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li Y, Zhang J, Zhu S, et al. Biomimetic surfaces for highperformance optics. Advanced Materials, 2009, 21(46): 4731–4734Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen F. Micro- and submicrometric waveguiding structures in optical crystals produced by ion beams for photonic applications. Laser & Photonics Reviews, 2012, 6(5): 622–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guo R, Yuan D, Das S. Large-area microlens arrays fabricated on flexible polycarbonate sheets via single-step laser interference ablation. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2011, 21(1): 015010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim K S, Jeong H, Jeong M S, et al. Polymer-templated hydrothermal growth of vertically aligned single-crystal ZnO nanorods and morphological transformations using structural polarity. Advanced Functional Materials, 2010, 20(18): 3055–3063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang L, Lu Z H, Lin X F, et al. Rapid fabrication of large-area periodic structures by multiple exposure of two-beam interference. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2013, 31(2): 276–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lin C, Yan S, You F. Fabrication and characterization of shortperiod double-layer cross-grating with holographic lithography. Optics Communications, 2017, 383: 17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu Y F, Feng J, Yin D, et al. Viewing-angle independence of white emission from microcavity top-emitting organic light-emitting devices with periodically and gradually changed cavity length. Organic Electronics, 2013, 14(6): 1597–1601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wu D, Chen Q D, Xia H, et al. A facile approach for artificial biomimetic surfaces with both superhydrophobicity and iridescence. Soft Matter, 2010, 6(2): 263–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cho C Y, Moon J H. Hierarchically porous TiO2 electrodes fabricated by dual templating methods for dye-sensitized solar cells. Advanced Materials, 2011, 23(26): 2971–2975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen Y, Yuan D, Yang M, et al. High efficiency GaN LEDs with submicron-scale 2D periodic structures directly fabricated by laser interference ablation. Optics & Laser Technology, 2017, 90: 211–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wu D, Wu S Z, Chen Q D, et al. Curvature-driven reversible in situ switching between pinned and roll-down superhydrophobic states for water droplet transportation. Advanced Materials, 2011, 23(4): 545–549MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wu D, Wu S, Chen Q D, et al. Facile creation of hierarchical PDMS microstructures with extreme underwater superoleophobicity for anti-oil application in microfluidic channels. Lab on a Chip, 2011, 11(22): 3873–3879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cornago I, Hernández A L, Casquel R, et al. Bulk sensing performance comparison between silicon dioxide and resonant high aspect ratio nanopillars arrays fabricated by means of interference lithography. Optical Materials Express, 2016, 6(7): 2264–2272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oh Y, Lim J W, Kim J G, et al. Plasmonic periodic nanodot arrays via laser interference lithography for organic photovoltaic cells with>10% efficiency. ACS Nano, 2016, 10(11): 10143–10151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Raub A K, Li D, Frauenglass A, et al. Fabrication of 22 nm halfpitch silicon lines by single-exposure self-aligned spatial-frequency doubling. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology. B, Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures: Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena: An Official Journal of the American Vacuum Society, 2007, 25(6): 2224–2227Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kondo T, Matsuo S, Juodkazis S, et al. Femtosecond laser interference technique with diffractive beam splitter for fabrication of three-dimensional photonic crystals. Applied Physics Letters, 2001, 79(6): 725–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lei M, Yao B L, Rupp R A. Structuring by multi-beam interference using symmetric pyramids. Optics Express, 2006, 14(12): 5803–5811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wu D, Chen Q D, Xu B B, et al. Self-organization of polymer nanoneedles into large-area ordered flowerlike arrays. Applied Physics Letters, 2009, 95(9): 091902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shoji S, Sun H B, Kawata S. Photofabrication of wood-pile threedimensional photonic crystals using four-beam laser interference. Applied Physics Letters, 2003, 83(4): 608–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kawai K, Sakamoto M, Noda K, et al. Tunable dichroic polarization beam splitter created by one-step holographic photoalignment using four-beam polarization interferometry. Journal of Applied Physics, 2017, 121(1): 013102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shoji S, Sun H B, Kawata S. Photofabrication of wood-pile threedimensional photonic crystals using four-beam laser interference. Applied Physics Letters, 2003, 83(4): 608–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang L, Cao X W, Li Q K, et al. Periodic structures fabricated by nanosecond laser four-beam interference ablation. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2016, 61(6): 616–621Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lee S K, Park S G, Moon J H, et al. Holographic fabrication of photonic nanostructures for optofluidic integration. Lab on a Chip, 2008, 8(3): 388–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dobrowolski J A, Guo Y N, Tiwald T, et al. Toward perfectantireflection coatings. 3. Experimental results obtained with the use of Reststrahlen materials. Applied Optics, 2006, 45(7): 1555–1562Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Doshi P, Jellison G E, Rohatgi A. Characterization and optimization of absorbing plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposited antireflection coatings for silicon photovoltaics. Applied Optics, 1997, 36 (30): 7826–7837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ji L, Hsu H Y, Li X, et al. Localized dielectric breakdown and antireflection coating in metal-oxide-semiconductor photoelectrodes. Nature Materials, 2017, 16(1): 127–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yin D, Feng J, Ma R, et al. Efficient and mechanically robust stretchable organic light-emitting devices by a laser-programmable buckling process. Nature Communications, 2016, 7: 11573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sahoo P K, Dev Choudhury B, Joseph J, et al. ZnO nanowireenabled light funneling effect for antireflection and light convergence applications. Optics Letters, 2017, 42(1): 45–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wang L, Xu B B, Chen Q D, et al. Maskless laser tailoring of conical pillar arrays for antireflective biomimetic surfaces. Optics Letters, 2011, 36(17): 3305–3307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cai J, Qi L. Recent advances in antireflective surfaces based on nanostructure arrays. Materials Horizons, 2015, 2(1): 37–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wu D, Zhao Y B, Wu S Z, et al. Simultaneous efficiency enhancement and self-cleaning effect of white organic light-emitting devices by flexible antireflective films. Optics Letters, 2011, 36(14): 2635–2637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wu D, Wu S Z, Chen Q D, et al. Curvature-driven reversible in situ switching between pinned and roll-down superhydrophobic states for water droplet transportation. Advanced Materials, 2011, 23(4): 545–549MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wu D, Chen Q D, Xu B B, et al. Self-organization of polymer nanoneedles into large-area ordered flowerlike arrays. Applied Physics Letters, 2009, 95(9): 091902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kim J B, Lee J H, Moon C K, et al. Highly enhanced light extraction from surface plasmonic loss minimized organic light-emitting diodes. Advanced Materials, 2013, 25(26): 3571–3577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhu J, Hsu C M, Yu Z, et al. Nanodome solar cells with efficient light management and self-cleaning. Nano Letters, 2010, 10(6): 1979–1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rao J, Winfield R, Keeney L. Moth-eye-structured light-emitting diodes. Optics Communications, 2010, 283(11): 2446–2450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Qu Y, Coburn C, Fan D, et al. Elimination of plasmon losses and enhanced light extraction of top-emitting organic light-emitting devices using a reflective subelectrode grid. ACS Photonics, 2017, 4(2): 363–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Forberich K, Dennler G, Scharber M C, et al. Performance improvement of organic solar cells with moth eye anti-reflection coating. Thin Solid Films, 2008, 516(20): 7167–7170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wu S Z, Wu D, Yao J, et al. One-step preparation of regular micropearl arrays for two-direction controllable anisotropic wetting. Langmuir, 2010, 26(14): 12012–12016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wu D, Wu S Z, Zhao S, et al. Rapid, controllable fabrication of regular complex microarchitectures by capillary assembly of micropillars and their application in selectively trapping/releasing microparticles. Small, 2013, 9(5): 760–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Xu J, Wang Z, Zhang Z, et al. Fabrication of moth-eye structures on silicon by direct six-beam laser interference lithography. Journal of Applied Physics, 2014, 115(20): 203101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Burrow G M, Gaylord T K. Multi-beam interference advances and applications: Nano-electronics, photonic crystals, metamaterials, subwavelength structures, optical trapping, and biomedical structures. Micromachines, 2011, 2(4): 221–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lasagni A, Yuan D, Das S. Rapid fabrication of pentaerythritol triacrylate periodic structures on large areas by laser interference patterning with nanosecond pulses. Journal of Applied Physics, 2009, 105(2): 023101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mao W, Liang G, Zou H, et al. Design and fabrication of twodimensional holographic photonic quasi crystals with high-order symmetries. JOSA B, 2006, 23(10): 2046–2050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Jiménez-Ceniceros A, Trejo-Durán M, Alvarado-Méndez E, et al. Extinction zones and scalability in N-beam interference lattices. Optics Communications, 2010, 283(3): 362–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Abid M I, Wang L, Zhang X, et al. Silver nano islands enhanced Raman scattering on large area grating substrates fabricated by two beam laser interference. Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 2013, 29(5): 1006–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Stavenga D G, Leertouwer H L, Osorio D C, et al. High refractive index of melanin in shiny occipital feathers of a bird of paradise. Light, Science & Applications, 2015, 4(1): e243Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Shi X B, Qian M, Zhou D Y, et al. Origin of light manipulation in nano-honeycomb structured organic light-emitting diodes. Journal of Materials Chemistry. C, Materials for Optical and Electronic Devices, 2015, 3(8): 1666–1671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Bi Y G, Feng J, Li Y F, et al. Broadband light extraction from white organic light-emitting devices by employing corrugated metallic electrodes with dual periodicity. Advanced Materials, 2013, 25(48): 6969–6974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Feng J, Liu Y F, Bi Y G, et al. Light manipulation in organic lightemitting devices by integrating micro/nano patterns. Laser & Photonics Reviews, 2017, 11(2): 1600145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ou Q D, Zhou L, Li Y Q, et al. Simultaneously enhancing color spatial uniformity and operational stability with deterministic quasiperiodic nanocone arrays for tandem organic light-emitting diodes. Advanced Optical Materials, 2015, 3(1): 87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Qiao W, Huang W, Liu Y, et al. Toward scalable flexible nanomanufacturing for photonic structures and devices. Advanced Materials, 2016, 28(47): 10353–10380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Choy W C H, Chan W K, Yuan Y. Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic optoelectronic devices. Advanced Materials, 2014, 26(31): 5368–5399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Bi Y G, Feng J, Chen Y, et al. Dual-periodic-corrugation-induced broadband light absorption enhancement in organic solar cells. Organic Electronics, 2015, 27: 167–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Bi Y, Ji J, Chen Y, et al. Dual-periodic-microstructure-induced color tunable white organic light-emitting devices. Frontiers of Optoelectronics, 2016, 9(2): 283–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Matioli E, Brinkley S, Kelchner K M, et al. High-brightness polarized light-emitting diodes. Light, Science & Applications, 2012, 1(8): e22Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Xu W, Okamoto T, Li A, et al. Preparation of large-area controllable patterned silver nanocrystals for high sensitive and stable surfaceenhanced Raman spectroscopy. Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 2016, 32(3): 428–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Zhang J, Wang Z, Di X, et al. Effects of azimuthal angles on laser interference lithography. Applied Optics, 2014, 53(27): 6294–6301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Kravchenko A, Shevchenko A, Ovchinnikov V, et al. Optical interference lithography using azobenzene-functionalized polymers for micro- and nanopatterning of silicon. Advanced Materials, 2011, 23(36): 4174–4177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Bagheri S, Giessen H, Neubrech F. Large-area antenna-assisted SEIRA substrates by laser interference lithography. Advanced Optical Materials, 2014, 2(11): 1050–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Moein T, Ji D, Zeng X, et al. Holographic photopolymer linear variable filter with enhanced blue reflection. ACS Applied Materials & Interface, 2014, 6(5): 3081–3087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Gu F, Xie F, Lin X, et al. Single whispering-gallery mode lasing in polymer bottle microresonators via spatial pump engineering. Light, Science & Applications, 2017, 6(10): e17061Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, and a link is provided to the Creative Commons license, which indicates if changes are made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lei Wang
    • 1
  • Zi-Han Wang
    • 1
  • Yan-Hao Yu
    • 1
  • Hong-Bo Sun
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory on Integrated Optoelectronics, College of Electronic Science and EngineeringJilin UniversityChangchunChina

Personalised recommendations