Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 187–200 | Cite as

Prediction of cutting forces in machining of unidirectional glass fiber reinforced plastics composite

  • Surinder Kumar Gill
  • Meenu Gupta
  • P. S. Satsangi
Research Article

Abstract

Machining of plastic materials has become increasingly important in any engineering industry subsequently the prediction of cutting forces. Forces quality has greater influence on components, which are coming in contact with each other. So it becomes necessary to measure and study machined forces and its behavior. In this research work, experimental investigations are conducted to determine the effects of cutting conditions and tool geometry on the cutting forces in the turning of the unidirectional glass fiber reinforced plastics (UD-GFRP) composites. In this experimental study, carbide tool (K10) having different tool nose radius and tool rake angle is used. Experiments are conducted based on the established Taguchi’s technique L18 orthogonal array on a lathe machine. It is found that the depth of cut is the cutting parameter, which has greater influence on cutting forces. The effect of the tool nose radius and tool rake angles on the cutting forces are also considerably significant. Based on statistical analysis, multiple regression model for cutting forces is derived with satisfactory coefficient (R2). This model proved to be highly preferment for predicting cutting forces.

Keywords

unidirectional glass fiber reinforced plastics (UD-GFRP) composites machining cutting forces (tangential feed and radial force) ANOVA regression modeling carbide tool (K10) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abrate S, Walton D A. Machining of composite materials (a two part review). Composites Manufacturing, 1992, 3(2): 75–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Caprino G, Nele L. Cutting forces in orthogonal cutting of unidirectional GFRP composites. Journal Engineering Material Technology, 1996, 118(3): 419–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Koplev A, Lystrup A, Vorm T. The cutting process, chips and cutting forces in machining CFRP. Composites, 1983, 14(4): 371–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang X M, Zhang L C. Machining damage in unidirectional fibrereinforced plastics. In: Wang J, Scott W, Zhang L, eds. Abrasive Technology-Current Development and Applications. Singapor: World Scientific, 1999, 429–436Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang X M, Zhang L C. An experimental investigation into the orthogonal cutting of unidirectional fibre-reinforced plastic. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2003, 43(10): 1015–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mahdi M, Zhang L C. A finite element model for the orthogonal cutting of fibre-reinforced composite materials. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2001, 113(1–3): 373–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mahdi M, Zhang L C. An adaptive three-dimensional finite element algorithm for the orthogonal cutting of composite materials. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2001, 113(1–3): 368–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sun F H, Wu Z Y, Zhong J W, Chen M. High speed milling of SiC particle reinforced aluminum-based MMC with coated carbide inserts. Key Engineering Materials, 2004, 274–276: 457–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Palanikumar K, Davim J P. Assessment of some factors influencing tool wear on the machining of glass fibre-reinforced plastics by coated cemented carbide tools. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2009, 209(1): 511–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paulo Davim J, Silva L R, Festas A, Abrão A M. Machinability study on precision turning of PA66 polyamide with and without glass fiber reinforcing. Materials & Design, 2009, 30(2): 228–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hussain S A, Pandurangadu V, Palanikumar K. Surface roughness analysis in machining of GFRP composite by carbide tool (K20). European Journal of Scientific Research, 2010, 41(1): 84–98Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rajasekaran T, Palanikumar K, Vinayagam B K, Prakash S. Influence of machining parameters on surface roughness and material removal rate in machining carbon fiber reinforced polymer material. In: Proceedings of Frontiers in Automobile and Mechanical Engineering (FAME). 2010, 75–80Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mata F, Beamud E, Hanafi I, Khamlichi A, Jabbouri A, Bezzazi M. Multiple regression prediction model for cutting forces in turning carbon-reinforced PEEK CF30. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2010, 2010: 1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Adam Khan M, Senthil Kumar A. Machinability of glass fibre reinforced plastic (GFRP) composite using alumina-based ceramic cutting tools. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2011, 13(1): 67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rajasekaran T, Palanikumar K, Vinayagam B K. Application of fuzzy logic for modeling surface roughness in turning CFRP composites using CBN tool. Production Engineering Research and Development, 2011, 5(2): 191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hussain S A, Pandurangadu V, Kumar K P. Machinability of glass fiber reinforced plastic (GFRP) composite materials. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2011, 3(4): 103–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang C L. Optimizing the glass fiber cutting process using the Taguchi methods and grey relational analysis. New Journal of Glass and Ceramics, 2011, 1(01): 13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ntziantzias I, Kechaglas J, Fountas N, Maropoulos S. A cutting force model in turning of glass fiber reinforced polymer composite. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Economic Engineering and Manufacturing Systems, Brasov. 2011, 348–351Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ross P J. Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering. New York: McGraw-Hills Book Company, 1988Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roy R K. A Primer on Taguchi Method. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1990MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Surinder Kumar Gill
    • 1
  • Meenu Gupta
    • 1
  • P. S. Satsangi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyKurukshetraIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringPEC University of TechnologyChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations