Kinematic calibration of precise 6-DOF Stewart platform-type positioning systems for radio telescope applications
- 283 Downloads
The pose accuracy of a parallel robot is a function of the mobile platform posture. Thus, there is no a single value of the robot’s accuracy. In this paper, two novel methods for estimating the accuracy of parallel robots are presented. In the first method, the pose accuracy estimation is calculated by considering the propagation of each error, i.e., error variations are considered as a function of the actuator’s stroke. In the second method, it is considered that each actuator has a constant error at any stroke. Both methods can predict pose accuracy of precise robots at design stages, and/or can reduce calibration time of existing robots. An example of a six degree-of-freedom parallel manipulator is included to show the application of the proposed methods.
Keywordspose errors error estimation parallel robot radio telescopes
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Masory O, Wang J. On the accuracy of a stewart platform-part I: The effect of manufacturing tolerances. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Atlanta, 1993, 725–731Google Scholar
- 3.Merlet J P. Parallel Robots: Open Problems. In: ASME Conference DECT, 2002Google Scholar
- 6.Ziegert J C. Volumetric performance of hexapod machine tools, Hexapod Machine Tool Users Group. Internal report 13, 1996Google Scholar
- 7.Soons J A. Error Analysis of a hexapod machine tool. In: 3rd International Conference and Exhibition on Laser Metrology and Machine Performance, Lamdamap, 1997, 347–358Google Scholar
- 8.Rudder F F. Thermal expansion of long slender rods with forced convection cooling along the rod length. Report NISTIR, 1997, 5975: 46Google Scholar
- 10.Parenti-Castelli V, Di Gregorio R, Lenarcic J. Sensitivity to geometric parameter variation of a 3 DOF fully-parallel manipulator. In: 3rd International Conference on Advanced Mechatronics JSME, 1998, 364–369Google Scholar
- 11.Oiwa T, Tamaki M. Study on abbe’s principle in parallel kinematics. In: 2nd Chemnitz Parallel Kinematics Seminar, Chemnitz, 354–352, 2000.Google Scholar
- 13.Brogangrdh T. Device for relative movement of two elements. United States Patent 6425303, 2002.Google Scholar
- 21.Angeles J. On the Nature of the Cartesian Stiffness Matrix. Ingenieria Mecanica Tecnologia Y Desarrollo, 2010, 3(5): 163–170Google Scholar
- 22.Bohm J, Hefele J, Fritsch D. Towards on-line pose measurement for robots. In: Pattern Recognition, 23rd DAGM Symposium, LCNS-2191, 2003, 298–303Google Scholar