Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 16–22 | Cite as

Towards neutral steer and sideslip reduction for four-wheeled electric vehicles

  • Guisheng Zhai
  • Masayuki Naka
  • Tomoaki Kobayashi
  • Joe Imae
Research Article

Abstract

This paper proposes an approach to achieving both neutral steer and sideslip reduction for four-wheeled electric vehicles. The control problem is reduced to constructing a servo system tracking appropriate reference input, where the tracking is realized in the framework of H control. To deal with time-varying vehicle velocity for practical purpose, a gain scheduling strategy is developed to obtain the controller, where the lower and upper bounds of the velocity are used to obtain a polytopic range for the parameters in the system coefficient matrices. A numerical example is given to show validity of the proposed approach.

Keywords

four-wheeled electric vehicles neutral steer sideslip reduction servo system H control gain scheduling linear matrix inequality (LMI) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chan C C, Chau K T. Modern Electric Vehicle Technology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Becker T A. Electric vehicles in the United States: A new model with forecasts to 2030. Technical Brief, Center for Entrepreneurship & Technology (CET) at the University of California, Berkeley, 2009Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Williams D E, Haddad W M. Nonlinear control of roll moment distribution to influence vehicle yaw characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 1995, 3(1): 110–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abe M, Kano Y, Shibahata Y, Furukawa Y. Improvement of vehicle handling safety with vehicle side-slip control by direct yaw moment. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2000, 33: 665–679Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ono E, Doi S, Hosoe S. Vehicle running stability analysis and spin control. International Journal of Automotive Engineering, 1996, 27(3): 152–157 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johansen T A, Petersen I, Kalkkuhl J, Ludemann J. Gain-scheduled wheel slip control in automotive brake systems. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2003, 11(6): 799–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kwakernaak H. Robust control and H1-optimization: Tutorial paper. Automatica, 1993, 29(2): 255–273MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rajamani R. Vehicle Dynamics and Control (Mechanical Engineering). New York: Springer, 2010Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dorf R C, Bishop R H. Modern Control Systems. 9th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 2001Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Iwasaki T, Skelton R E, Grigoriadis K M. A Unified Algebraic Approach to Linear Control Design. London: Taylor & Francis, 1998Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boyd S, El Ghaoui L, Feron E, Balakrishnan V. Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory. Philadelphia: SIAM, 1994MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gahinet P, Nemirovski A, Laub A J, Chilali M. LMI Control Toolbox for Use with Matlab. The MathWorks Inc., 1995Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guisheng Zhai
    • 1
  • Masayuki Naka
    • 2
  • Tomoaki Kobayashi
    • 2
  • Joe Imae
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mathematical SciencesShibaura Institute of TechnologySaitamaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringOsaka Prefecture UniversityOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations