Advertisement

Journal of Geographical Sciences

, Volume 29, Issue 9, pp 1475–1490 | Cite as

Spatial-temporal variability of the fluctuation of soil temperature in the Babao River Basin, Northwest China

  • Lixin Ning
  • Changxiu ChengEmail author
  • Shi Shen
Article
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

The Babao River Basin is the “water tower” of the Heihe River Basin. The combination of vulnerable ecosystems and inhospitable natural environments substantially restricts the existence of humans and the sustainable development of society and environment in the Heihe River Basin. Soil temperature (ST) is a critical soil variable that could affect a series of physical, chemical and biological soil processes, which is the guarantee of water conservation and vegetation growth in this region. To measure the temporal variation and spatial pattern of ST fluctuation in the Babao River Basin, fluctuation of ST at various depths were analyzed with ST data at depths of 4, 10 and 20 cm using classical statistical methods and permutation entropy. The study results show the following: 1) There are variations of ST at different depths, although ST followed an obvious seasonal law. ST at shallower depths is higher than at deeper depths in summer, and vice versa in winter. The difference of ST between different depths is close to zero when ST is near 5°C in March or -5°C in September. 2) In spring, ST at the shallower depths becomes higher than at deeper depths as soon as ST is above -5°C; this is reversed in autumn when ST is below 5°C. ST at a soil depth of 4 cm is the first to change, followed by ST at 10 and 20 cm, and the time that ST reaches the same level is delayed for 10–15 days. In chilling and warming seasons, September and February are, respectively, the months when ST at various depths are similar. 3) The average PE values of ST for 17 sites at 4 cm are 0.765 in spring >0.764 in summer >0.735 in autumn >0.723 in winter, which implies the complicated degree of fluctuations of ST. 4) For the variation of ST at different depths, it appears that Max, Ranges, Average and the Standard Deviation of ST decrease by depth increments in soil. Surface soil is more complicated because ST fluctuation at shallower depths is more pronounced and random. The average PE value of ST for 17 sites are 0.863 at a depth of 4 cm >0.818 at 10 cm >0.744 at 20 cm. 5) For the variation of ST at different elevations, it appears that Max, Ranges, Average, Standard Deviation and ST fluctuation decrease with increasing elevation at the same soil depth. And with the increase of elevation, the decrease rates of Max, Range, Average, Standard Deviation at 4 cm are -0.89 °C/100 m, -0.94°C/100 m, -0.43°C/100 m, and -0.25°C/100 m, respectively. In addition, this correlation decreased with the increase of soil depth. 6) Significant correlation between PE values of ST at depths of 4, 10 and 20 cm can easily be found. This finding implies that temperature can easily be transmitted within soil at depths between 4 and 20 cm. 7) For the variation of ST on shady slope and sunny slope sides, it appears that the PE values of ST at 4, 10 and 20 cm for 8 sites located on shady slope side are 0.868, 0.824 and 0.776, respectively, whereas they are 0.858, 0.810 and 0.716 for 9 sites located on sunny slope side.

Keywords

soil temperature spatial-temporal fluctuation classical statistical methods permutation entropy Babao River Basin 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Araghi A, Mousavi-Baygi M, Adamowski J, 2017. Detecting soil temperature trends in Northeast Iran from 1993 to 2016. Soil and Tillage Research, 174: 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandt C, Pompe B, 2002. Permutation entropy: A natural complexity measure for time series. Physical Review Letters, 88(17): 174102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banwart S, Bernasconi S M, Bloem J et al., 2011. Soil processes and functions in critical zone observatories: Hypotheses and experimental design. Vadose Zone Journal, 10(3): 974–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen Y, Wang H, Zhou J et al., 2013. Minimum data set for assessing soil quality in farmland of northeast China. Pedosphere, 23(5): 564–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dozier J, 2011. Mountain hydrology, snow color, and the fourth paradigm. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 92(43): 373–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gao J, Hu J, Tung W-W et al., 2006. Assessment of long-range correlation in time series: How to avoid pitfalls. Physical Review E, 73(1): 016117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gao J, Hu J, Tung W-W, 2012. Entropy measures for biological signal analyses. Nonlinear Dynamics, 68(3): 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gao J, Liu F, Zhang J et al., 2013. Information entropy as a basic building block of complexity theory. Entropy, 15(9): 3396–3418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gao J, Sultan H, Hu J et al., 2010. Denoising nonlinear time series by adaptive filtering and wavelet shrinkage: A comparison. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 17(3): 237–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ge Y, Wang J, Heuvelink G et al., 2015. Sampling design optimization of a wireless sensor network for monitoring ecohydrological processes in the Babao River Basin, China. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29(1): 92–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Godfray H C J, Beddington J R, Crute I R et al., 2010. Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327(5967): 812–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heng L T, Heuvelink G B, Stein A, 2004. A generic framework for spatial prediction of soil variables based on regression-kriging. Geoderma, 120(1/2): 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hou Y, Liu F, Gao J et al., 2017. Characterizing complexity changes in chinese stock markets by permutation entropy. Entropy, 19(10): 514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hu Q, Feng S, 2003. A daily soil temperature dataset and soil temperature climatology of the contiguous United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 42(8): 1139–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Islam K I, Khan A, Islam T, 2015. Correlation between atmospheric temperature and soil temperature: A case study for Dhaka, Bangladesh. Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, 5(3): 200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jin R, Li X, Yan B et al., 2014. A nested ecohydrological wireless sensor network for capturing the surface heterogeneity in the midstream areas of the Heihe River Basin, China. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 11(11): 2015–2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kalpakis K, Yang S, Hu P F et al., 2015. Permutation entropy analysis of vital signs data for outcome prediction of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 56: 167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kanafi M M, Tuononen A J, 2017. Top topography surface roughness power spectrum for pavement friction evaluation. Tribology International, 107: 240–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kang J, Jin R, Li X et al., 2015. HiWATER: WATERNET observation dataset in the upper reaches of the Heihe River Basin in 2014. Heihe Plan Science Data Center.Google Scholar
  20. Kang J, Jin R, Li X et al., 2017. High spatio-temporal resolution mapping of soil moisture by integrating wireless sensor network observations and MODIS apparent thermal inertia in the Babao River Basin, China. Remote Sensing of Environment, 191: 232–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kang S, Kim S, Oh S et al., 2000. Predicting spatial and temporal patterns of soil temperature based on topography, surface cover and air temperature. Forest Ecology and Management, 136(1–3): 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Karlen D, Mausbach M J, Doran J et al., 1997. Soil quality: A concept, definition, and framework for evaluation (a guest editorial). Soil Science Society of America Journal, 61(1): 4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lan Y, Ding H, Hu X, et al., 2015. The seasonal change characteristics of temperature, precipitation in the mountain areas of the Heihe River and Their Regional Differences. Mountain Research, 33(2): 294–302.Google Scholar
  24. Li X, Li C, 2017. Pretreatment and wavelength selection method for near-infrared spectra signal based on improved CEEMDAN Energy Entropy and Permutation Entropy. Entropy, 19(7): 380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li X, Li X, Li Z et al., 2009. Watershed allied telemetry experimental research. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 114(D22).Google Scholar
  26. Lin G, Chen X, Fu Z, 2007. Temporal-spatial diversities of long-range correlation for relative humidity over China. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 383(2): 585–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter S R et al., 2007. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 317(5844): 1513–1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu Y, Liu C, Wang D, 2011. Understanding atmospheric behaviour in terms of entropy: A review of applications of the second law of thermodynamics to meteorology. Entropy, 13(1): 211–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ludescher J, Bunde A, Franzke C L et al., 2016. Long-term persistence enhances uncertainty about anthropogenic warming of Antarctica. Climate Dynamics, 46(1/2): 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Montanarella L, Vargas R, 2012. Global governance of soil resources as a necessary condition for sustainable development. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(5): 559–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ning L, Zhou Y, Yang J et al., 2018. Spatial-temporal variability of the fluctuation of water level in Poyang Lake basin, China. Open Geosciences, 10(1): 940–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. NRC, 2001. Basic Research Opportunities in Earth Science. Washington DC, USA: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  33. Pardo-Igúzquiza E, Rodríguez-Tovar F J, 2005. MAXENPER: A program for maximum entropy spectral estimation with assessment of statistical significance by the permutation test. Computers & Geosciences, 31(5): 555–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Park S-G, Yi M-H, Shin H-T et al., 2011. Temporal change of soil animals of the stockpiled forest topsoil in relation to soil temperature and soil moisture. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 56(1): 9–13.Google Scholar
  35. Pele D T, Lazar E, Dufour A, 2017. Information entropy and measures of market risk. Entropy, 19(5): 226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Qi S, Luo F, 2007. Environmental degradation problems in the Heihe River Basin, Northwest China. Water and Environment Journal, 21(2): 142–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Riedl M, Müller A, Wessel N, 2013. Practical considerations of permutation entropy. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 222(2): 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Robinson D, Hockley N, Dominati E et al., 2012. Natural capital, ecosystem services, and soil change: Why soil science must embrace an ecosystems approach. Vadose Zone Journal, 11(1).Google Scholar
  39. Schwartz T U, Walczak R, Blobel G, 2004. Circular permutation as a tool to reduce surface entropy triggers crystallization of the signal recognition particle receptor β subunit. Protein Science, 13(10): 2814–2818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shen S, Ye S, Cheng C et al., 2018. Persistence and corresponding time scales of soil moisture dynamics during summer in the Babao River Basin, Northwest China. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 123(17): 8936–8948.Google Scholar
  41. Song C, Yuan L, Yang X et al., 2017. Ecological-hydrological processes in arid environment: Past, present and future. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 27(12): 1577–1594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stosic T, Telesca L, de Souza Ferreira D V et al., 2016. Investigating anthropically induced effects in streamflow dynamics by using permutation entropy and statistical complexity analysis: A case study. Journal of Hydrology, 540: 1136–1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Toomey J, Kane D, 2014. Mapping the dynamic complexity of a semiconductor laser with optical feedback using permutation entropy. Optics Express, 22(2): 1713–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang T, Shen S, Cheng C et al., 2018. Long range correlation analysis of soil temperature and moisture on A'rou Hillsides, the Babao River Basin. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 123(22): 12606–612620.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource EcologyBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural DisasterBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.Center for Geodata and Analysis, Faculty of Geographical ScienceBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations