Advertisement

Journal of Geographical Sciences

, Volume 29, Issue 5, pp 831–845 | Cite as

Spatiotemporal heterogeneity and influencing mechanism of ecosystem services in the Pearl River Delta from the perspective of LUCC

  • Rubo Zhou
  • Meizhen LinEmail author
  • Jianzhou Gong
  • Zhuo Wu
Article
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

Land use/land cover change (LUCC) has considerable impact on ecosystem services. It is essential to quantify the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of ecosystem services from the perspective of LUCC, which will benefit regional land management and ecological protection. We analyzed land use change in the Pearl River Delta from 2000 to 2015, and we used a spatially explicit integrated modeling tool (InVEST) for quantification of ecosystem services–water yield, carbon storage, soil retention, and food supply. The results revealed increases in the areas of grassland and built-up land, and decreases in the areas of woodland, cropland, water body, and unused land during 2000 to 2015, which have caused increase in water yield and carbon storage, while decrease in soil retention and food supply. The dynamic changes of woodland, grassland, cropland, and built-up land were the main driving factors in the relationship of trade-offs and synergies among the four ecosystem services, which are ubiquitous. Those all illustrate the importance of considering ecosystem services in decision making related to land use and land management.

Keywords

LUCC ecosystem services InVEST model heterogeneity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Braat L C, Brink P T, Klok T C, 2008. Cost of Policy Inaction-COPI: The Case of Not Meeting the 2010 Biodiversity Target. Alterra: EU/IEEE Publication.Google Scholar
  2. Budyko M I, 1974. Climate and Life. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Butsic V, Shapero M, Moanga D et al., 2017. Using InVEST to assess ecosystem services on conserved properties in Sonoma County, CA. California Agriculture, 71(2): 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Costanza R, d’Arge R, Groot R D et al., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630): 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daily G C, 1997. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington D C: Island Press.Google Scholar
  6. Di Sabatino A, Coscieme L, Vignini P et al., 2013. Scale and ecological dependence of ecosystem services evaluation: Spatial extension and economic value of freshwater ecosystems in Italy. Ecological Indicators, 32(9): 259–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Droogers P, Allen R G, 2002. Estimating reference evapotranspiration under inaccurate data conditions. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 16(1): 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fu B J, Wang S, Liu Y et al., 2016. Hydrogeomorphic ecosystem responses to natural and anthropogenic changes in the Loess Plateau of China. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 45(1): 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fu B J, Zhang L W, 2014. Land-use change and ecosystem services: Concepts, methods and progress. Progress in Geography, 33(4): 441–446. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. Fu B J, Zhou G Y, Bai Y F et al., 2009. The main terrestrial ecosystem services and ecological security in China. Advances in Earth Science, 24(6): 571–576. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. Gan H H, Wu S H, Fan X D, 2003. Reserves and spatial distribution characteristics of soil organic carbon in Guangdong Province. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 14(9): 1499–1502. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. Li S C, Zhang C Y, Liu J L et al., 2013. The tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services: Research progress, development trend, and themes of geography. Geographical Research, 32(8): 1379–1390. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. Li X B, Fan R X, Liu X D, 2014. Advance in studies on carbon storage and carbon process in grassland ecosystem of China. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 23(11): 1845–1851. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. Li Y F, Luo C Y, Liu G et al., 2013. Effects of land use change on ecosystem services: A case study in Miyun reservoir watershed. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33(3): 726–736. (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu Z J, Liu Y S, Baig M H A, 2018a. Biophysical effect of conversion from croplands to grasslands in water-limited temperate regions of China. Science of the Total Environment, 648: 315–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu Z J, Liu Y S, Li Y R, 2018b. Extended warm temperate zone and opportunities for cropping system change in the Loess Plateau of China. International Journal of Climatology, 1–12.Google Scholar
  17. Leh M D K, Matlock M D, Cummings E C et al., 2013. Quantifying and mapping multiple ecosystem services change in West Africa. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 165: 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA), 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends. Washington D C: Island Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ouyang Z Y, Zheng H W, Xiao Y et al., 2016. Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science, 352(6292): 1455–1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Peng J, Hu X X, Zhao M Y et al., 2017. Research progress on ecosystem service trade-offs: From cognition to decision-making. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(6): 960–973. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  21. Pearl River Water Resources Commission (PRWRC), 2007. Soil and water loss in the Pearl River, viewed 09/03/2011. http://www.pearlwater.gov.cn/zjstbc/lsgk/201103/t20110309_40944.htm.
  22. Qian C Y, Gong J, Zhang J X et al., 2018. Change and tradeoffs-synergies analysis on watershed ecosystem services: A case study of Bailongjiang Watershed, Gansu. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(5): 868–879. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  23. Renard K G, Foster G R, Weesies G A et al., 1997. Predicting soil erosion by water: A guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). Agriculture Handbook No.703. USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  24. Rodríguez J P, Beard Jr T D, Bennett E M et al., 2006. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society, 11(1): 709–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Roose E, 1996. Land husbandry: Components and strategy. FAO Soils Bulletin. 70, Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  26. Sharpley A N, Williams J R, 1990. EPIC: The erosion-productivity impact calculator: 2. User manual. Technical Bulletin-United States Department of Agriculture, 4(4): 206–207.Google Scholar
  27. Tallis H T, Ricketts T, Guerry A D et al., 2011. InVEST 2.1 beta User’s Guide. Stanford: The Natural Capital Project.Google Scholar
  28. Tang Y, Zhu W P, Zhang H et al., 2015. A review on principle and application of the InVEST model. Ecological Science, 34(3): 204–208. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  29. Vidal-Legaz B, Martínez-Fernández J, Picón A S et al., 2013. Trade-offs between maintenance of ecosystem services and socio-economic development in rural mountainous communities in southern Spain: A dynamic simulation approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 131(1): 280–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang W Z, Jiao J Y, He X P et al., 1995. Study on rainfall erosivity in China. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, (4): 7–18. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  31. Water Resources Department of Guangdong Province, 2016. Guangdong Province Water Resources Bulletin 2015, Nan Fang Daily, 12/08/2016(A05). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  32. Wei Z Q, Wu S H, Zhou S L et al., 2014. Soil organic carbon transformation and related properties in urban soil under impervious surfaces. Pedosphere, 24(1): 56–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wu P J, Liu X P, Li X et al., 2016. Impact of urban expansion on carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems based on InVEST model and CA: A case study of Guangdong Province, China. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 32(5): 22–28, 36, 2. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  34. Wu R S, Guan D S, 2006. Spatio-temporal variation of population and its influence on the resources and environment in Pearl River Delta. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 25(12): 1586–1590. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  35. Wu W H, Peng J, Liu Y X et al., 2017. Tradeoffs and synergies between ecosystem services in Ordos City. Progress in Geography, 36(12): 1571–1581. (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xu Q Y, Huang M, Liu H S et al., 2011. Integrated assessment of eco-environmental vulnerability in Pearl River Delta based on RS and GIS. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 22(11): 2987–2995. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  37. Yang D Y, 2011. Pearl River Delta economic zone ecological environment problems and countermeasures. Urban Studies, 18(8): 59–63. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  38. Ye C S, Feng Y F, 2013. Ecological risk assessment for Pearl River Delta based on land use change. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 29(19): 224–232+294. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  39. Zhang X Y, Xu Z C, Zeng F T et al., 2011. Carbon density distribution and storage dynamics of forest ecosystem in Pearl River Delta of low subtropical. China Environmental Science, 31(Suppl.1): 69–77. (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhou C S, Dai D D, 2015. Transition of urbanization in the Pearl River Delta. Tropical Geography, 35(3): 343–353. (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press Springer-Verlag 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rubo Zhou
    • 1
  • Meizhen Lin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jianzhou Gong
    • 1
  • Zhuo Wu
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Geographical SciencesGuangzhou UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations