Journal of Geographical Sciences

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 549–562 | Cite as

Spatial relationship of high-speed transportation construction and land-use efficiency and its mechanism: Case study of Shandong Peninsula urban agglomeration

  • Xuegang Cui
  • Chuanglin FangEmail author
  • Zhenbo Wang
  • Chao Bao


Land-use efficiency is low for the urban agglomeration of China. High-speed transportation construction has been an important factor driving land use change. It is critically important to explore the spatial relationship between the high-speed transportation superiority degree and land-use efficiency. We built a model to evaluate the benefits of convenient high-speed transportation using the relative density of highways and the distance from high-speed rail stations and airports as a metric. We used 42 counties of the Shandong Peninsula urban agglomeration as an example. Land-use efficiency was calculated by a DEA model with capital, labor, economic benefits and environmental benefits as input and output factors. We examined the spatial relationships between high-speed transport superiority degree and land-use efficiency and obtained the following results. First, there are significant spatial differences in the relationships between the high-speed transportation superiority degree and land-use efficiency. Taking the two major cities of Jinan and Qingdao as the hubs, the core surrounding counties show significant spatial relationship between land-use efficiency and the high-speed transportation superiority degree. Spatial correlation declines as the distance from the hubs increases. Land-use efficiency is less than high-speed transportation convenience in areas along the transportation trunks that are distant from the hub cities. Correlation is low in areas that are away from both hub cities and transportation trunk routes. Second, high-speed transportation has a positive relationship with land-use efficiency due to the mechanism of element agglomeration exogenous growth. Third, high-speed transportation facilitates the flow of goods, services and technologies between core cities and peripheral cities as space spillover (the hub effect). This alters the spatial pattern of regional land-use efficiency. Finally, the short-board effect caused by decreased high-speed transport construction can be balanced by highway construction and the proper node layouts of high-speed rail stations and airports, resulting in a well-balanced spatial pattern of land-use efficiency.


high-speed transportation superiority degree DEA land-use efficiency spatial relationship Shandong Peninsula urban agglomeration 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akkemik K A, 2005. Labor productivity and inter-sectoral reallocation of labor in Singapore (1965–2002). Ge Growth Math Methods, 30: 1–22.Google Scholar
  2. Banker R D, Charnes A, Cooper W W et al., 1989. Constrained game formulations and interpretations for data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 40: 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cervero R, Kang C D, 2011. Bus rapid transit impacts on land uses and land values in Seoul, Korea. Transport Policy, 18(1): 102–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapin F S, Kaiser E J, 1967. Urban Land Use Planning. 3rd ed. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  5. Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E, 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6): 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Debrezion G, Pels E, Rietveld P, 2011. The impact of rail transport on real estate prices: An empirical analysis of the Dutch Housing Market. Urban Studies, 48(5): 997–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Defries R S, Foley J A, Asner G P, 2004. Land-use choices: Balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, 2(5): 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Du D, 2016. The causal relationship between land urbanization quality and economic growth: Evidence from capital cities in China. Quality & Quantity, 51: 2707–2723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fang C L, Guan X L, 2011. Comprehensive measurement and spatial distinction of input-output efficiency of urban agglomerations in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 66(8): 1011–1022. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. Gu Y Z, Zheng S Q, 2010. The impacts of rail transit on property values and land development intensity: The case of No.13 Line in Beijing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 65(2): 213–223. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. Guan Y J, Chen X J, 2013. A study on urban land use efficiency in Weinan City. Urban Problems, (10): 72–77. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. Guo Y Y, Li L, Li G C et al., 2015. Overview of interaction between urban land use and transportation. Urban Planning International, 30(3): 29–36. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. Jia Z H, Hao J M, 2011. Evaluation of urban land intensive utilization based on fuzzy comprehensive assessment method: A case study of Changzhi City. China Population, Resources and Environment, 21(12): 129–134. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. Jin F J, Wang C J, Li X W, 2008. Discrimination method and its application analysis of regional transport superiority. Acta Geographica Sinica, 63(8): 787–798. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  15. Johnson H M, 1960. Sociology: A Systematic Introduction. Paris: Allied Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Lambin E F, Geist H J, 2003. Regional differences in tropical deforestation. Environment, 45(6): 22–36.Google Scholar
  17. Li M J, Chen G H, 2003. A review on the research and application of DEA. Engineering Sciences, 5(6): 88–94. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. Li X, Xu X X, Chen H H, 2005. Temporal and spatial changes of urban efficiency in the 1990s. Acta Geographica Sinica, 60(4): 615–625. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  19. Liu C G, Gao G P, Zhuang J, 2005. An empirical analysis of urban economic development and land use efficiency in Shandong Province. China Economist, (8): 257–259. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. Liu S H, Wu C J, Chen T, 2001. A critical review on the progress of urban land use theories in the West. Geographical Research, 20(1): 111–119. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  21. Liu X W, Zhang D X, Chen B M, 2008. Characteristics of China’s town-level land use in rapid urbanization stage. Acta Geographica Sinica, 63(3): 301–310. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. Ma X, Chen X, Li X et al., 2018. Sustainable station-level planning: An integrated transport and land use design model for transit-oriented development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170(1): 1052–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meng D Y, Shen J H, Lu Y Q, 2014. Evolvement of spatial pattern of county level transportation superiority in Henan, China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 34(3): 280–287. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  24. Ou X, Feng C C, Shen Q Y, 2007. Application of synergisticity model in urban land-use potential appraisal. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 23(1): 42–45. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  25. Peneder M, 2003. Industrial structure and aggregate growth. Structural Change & Economic Dynamics, 14(4): 427–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shen T, 2013. A review on land use at home and abroad. Contemporary Economics, (24): 156–157. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  27. Wang C X, Cui X G, Wang X Q, 2014. Analysis of Chinese “Urban Agglomerations Disease” phenomenon under new urbanization background. Urban Development Studies, 21(10): 12–17. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  28. Wang C X, Wang G F, Liu R C et al., 2010. Empirical research on evaluation model of transport superiority degree: A case study of Shandong Province. Human Geography, 25(1): 73–76. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  29. Wang X W, Wang S J, Song Y et al., 2015. Changchun land use spatio-temporal variation under the transportation elements’ driving. Economic Geography, 35(4): 155–161. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  30. Wang Y P, Chen K M, Ma C Q, 2008. Quantitative analysis of coordination between rail transit network configuration and urban form. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, (11): 11–15. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  31. Wu D W, Mao H Y, Zhang X L et al., 2011. Assessment of urban land use efficiency in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 66(8): 1111–1121. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  32. Wu Y, Hui E, Zhao P et al., 2018. Land use policy for urbanization in China. Habitat International, 77: 40–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xu X, Peng H, Xu Q et al., 2009. Land changes and conflicts coordination in coastal urbanization: A case study of the Shandong Peninsula in China. Coastal Management, 37(1): 54–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yang H Q, Hu Y, Wang Q X, 2015. Evaluation of land use efficiency in three major urban agglomerations of China in 2001–2012. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 35(9): 1095–1100. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  35. Yang Q K, Duan X J, Ye L et al., 2014. Efficiency evaluation of city land utilization in the Yangtze River Delta using a SBM-Undesirable model. Resources Science, 36(4): 712–721. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  36. Yu M, 2002. Data, Models and Decision. Beijing: China Machine Press, 196–198. (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press Springer-Verlag 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xuegang Cui
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chuanglin Fang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Zhenbo Wang
    • 1
  • Chao Bao
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources ResearchCASBeijingChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations