Advertisement

Journal of Geographical Sciences

, Volume 26, Issue 12, pp 1754–1768 | Cite as

Measuring time accessibility and its spatial characteristics in the urban areas of Beijing

  • Jianghao Wang
  • Yu Deng
  • Ci Song
  • Dajiang Tian
Article

Abstract

Construction of road infrastructure is fundamental to city operation and development, as well as an important pathway and focus in physical urban-rural integration. The long-term implementation of a system of ring roads plus radiating roads in Beijing has strongly impacted urban infrastructure construction and space-time accessibility. Particularly, recent rapid growth of private car ownership in Beijing has imposed greater loads on its road system, seriously hampering urban commuting efficiency and negatively impacting quality of life. To address such challenges and enhance the rapid development of transport infrastructure, Beijing has accelerated rail transit construction since 2008 in an effort to improve commuting capacity. This paper aims to measure time accessibility and its spatial characteristics in urban areas of Beijing by applying a comprehensive method that combines vector and raster attribute data generated from road network and subway transport infrastructure. By using a dual index of accessibility and road density, the study further reveals the features of and differences in spatial accessibility and the construction of road systems in urban areas of the northern and southern parts of Beijing. The findings of this study can provide a scientific basis for future urban planning and road system construction both in general and with respect to Beijing, given its aspirations to become a world city.

Keywords

accessibility road density spatial characteristics Beijing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bowen J, 2000. Airline hubs in Southeast Asia: National economic development and nodal accessibility. Journal of Transport Geography, 8(1): 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bruinsma F R, Rietveld P, 1993. Urban agglomerations in European infrastructure networks. Urban Studies, 30(6): 919–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cao X S, Yan X P, 2003. The impact of the evolution of land network on spatial structure of accessibility in the developed areas: The case of Dongguan city in Guangdong province. Geographical Research, 22(3): 305–312. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  4. Du D B, Xu J G, 1997. An analysis on location factors affecting the spatial distribution of Shanghai land value. Acta Geographica Sinica, 52(5): 403–412. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. Dupuy G, Stransky V, 1996. Cities and highway network in Europe. Journal of Transport Geography, 4(2): 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Geertman S C M, Ritsema van Eck J R, 1995. GIS and models of accessibility potential: An application in planning. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 9(1): 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gutiérrez J, 2001. Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: An analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid–Barcelona–French border. Journal of Transport Geography, 9(4): 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gutiérrez J, González R, Gómez G, 1996. The European high speed train network: Predicted effects on accessibility patterns. Journal of Transport Geography, 4(4): 227–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gutiérrez J, Urbano P, 1996. Accessibility in the European Union: The impact of the trans-European road network. Journal of Transport Geography, 4(1): 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jiang H B, Xu J G, Qi Y, 2010. The influence of Beijing-Shanghai high-speed railways on land accessibility of regional center cities. Acta Geographica Sinica, 65(10): 1287–1298. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. Jin C, Lu Y Q, Zhang L, Xu J, 2009. An analysis of accessibility of scenic spots based on land traffic network: A case study of Nanjing. Geographical Research, 28(1): 246–258. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. Jin F J, Wang J E, 2004. Railway network expansion and spatial accessibility analysis in China: 1906-2000. Acta Geographica Sinica, 59(2): 293–302. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. Keeble D, Offord J, Walker S, 1988. Peripheral Regions in a Community of Twelve Member States. Luxembourg/Washington DC: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  14. Li P H, Lu Y Q, 2001. Metropolitan accessibility: Literature review and research progress in the west. Urban Problems, 123: 69–73. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  15. Li S M, Shum Y M, 2001. Impacts of the National Trunk Highway System on accessibility in China. Journal of Transport Geography, 9(1): 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lie W, Shao C F, 2008. Research on accessibility calculating method of regional transportation. Technology & Economy in Areas of Communications, 10(4): 85–87. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. Linneker B J, Spence N A, 1992. Accessibility measures compared in an analysis of the impact of the M25 London Orbital Motorway on Britain. Environment and Planning A, 24(8): 1137–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Linneker B, Spence N, 1996. Road transport infrastructure and regional economic development: The regional development effects of the M25 London orbital motorway. Journal of Transport Geography, 4(2): 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lutter H, Pütz T, Spangenberg M, 1992. Accessibility and Peripherality of Community Regions: The Role of Road Long Distance Railway and Airport Networks. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  20. Murayama Y, 1994. The impact of railways on accessibility in the Japanese urban system. Journal of Transport Geography, 2(2): 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nong X Z, 2003. The choice of the highest train speed in Guangzhou Metro Line 3. Urban Mass Transit, 6(3): 83–88. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. Northam R M, 1978. Urban Geography. New York: John Wiley Sons.Google Scholar
  23. Reng F T, Liu X M, Rong J et al., 2003. Traffic Engineering. Beijing: China Communications Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  24. Shi Z H, Zhou, Q R, Zheng X W et al., 2003. Code for Design of Metro (GB50157-2003). Beijing Urban Engineering Design and Research Institute. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  25. Spence N, Linneker B, 1994. Evolution of the motorway network and changing levels of accessibility in Great Britain. Journal of Transport Geography, 2(4): 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wei L H, Cong Y G, 2004. The influence of inter-cities express passenger train on spatial structure of metropolitan area: A case of Jingjintang. Economic Geography, 24(6): 834–837. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  27. Xu L, Yang X K, Ai S B et al., 2008. Study the service level of the city roads in Beijing. Traffic & Transportation, 5: 43–45. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  28. Yang S H, Chen Y Y, Cheng P et al., 2004. Technical Standard of Highway Engineering of China (JTGB01-2003). Ministry of Communications of the People’s Republic of China. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  29. Zhang L, Lu Y Q, 2006. Assessment on regional accessibility based on land transportation network: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta. Acta Geographica Sinica, 61(12): 1235–1246. (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Geographic Science and Natural Resources Research (IGSNRR), Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources ResearchCASBeijingChina
  2. 2.Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and ApplicationNanjingChina
  3. 3.The Postdoctoral Research Station of Tourism Information Research CenterBeijing Union University & University of International Business and EconomicsBeijingChina
  4. 4.School of Information Technology and ManagementUniversity of International Business and EconomicsBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations