Advertisement

Journal of Geographical Sciences

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 429–440 | Cite as

Investigation and modeling of water quality of Göksu River (Cleadnos) in an international protected area by using GIS

  • Zeynel Demirel
  • Zafer Özer
  • Olcay Özer
Article

Abstract

Göksu Delta is an important wetland where the Göksu River reaches to sea in the eastern of the town Tasucu-Ice1. The delta is classified as a Wetland of International Importance according to the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance. The amount of fertilizers used in this area was 7200 tons in 2006. These pollutants affect the surface and groundwater quality negatively. The intensively used fertilizers and pesticides contain not only N- and P compounds but also some heavy metals. The contents of all pollutants in surface waters were determined for four different seasons between 2006 and 2008 and with these data a Geographic Information System (GIS) has been constructed by using Map Info. From the photometric heavy metal analysis, it is inferred that the excess concentration of Fe, Ni, Mn, Mo and Cu at some locations is the cause of undesirable quality for drinking purposes. The source of excess concentration of various heavy metals is the agricultural activities and fertilizers. It is determined that in all periods between 2006 and 2008 the heavy metals and other pollutants in the fertilizers and pesticides transported easily to river water with irrigation return flow. The organic pollutants, including COD, BOD, NH3 and NO3 followed the sharply increasing trends from Silifke city to Mediterranean Sea. The water quality of Göksu River is modeled and determined that the waste water discharge of 10,700 m3/day from Silifke city does not create a serious problem because of the high amount of flow rate of Göksu River.

Keywords

Göksu Delta Göksu River water pollution modeling GIS 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ayaş Z, Kolonkaya D, 1996. Accumulation of some heavy metals in various environments and organisms at Göksu Delta, Türkiye. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 56(Suppl.): 65–72.Google Scholar
  2. Ayas Z, Barlas Emir N, Kolankaya D, 1997. Determination of organochlorine pesticide residues in various environments and organisms in Göksu Delta, Turkey. Aquat Toxicol, 39: 171–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birkinshaw S J, Ewen J, 2000. Nitrogen transformation component for SHETRAN catchment nitrate transport modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 230: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burrough P A, McDonnell R A, 1998. Principles of Geographical İnformation Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 333pp.Google Scholar
  5. Carey M A, Lloyd J W, 1985. Modelling non-point sources of nitrate pollution of groundwater in the great ouse chalk, UK. Journal of Hydrology, 78: 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Çetinkaya G, 1996. Göksu Deltası Tarım alanlarında kullanılan tarımsal kimyasalların Oluşturdugu Çevresel Etkiler. Ms. S. Thesis, C.Ü. Fen Bil. Ens. Peyzaj Mimarlığı Anabilimdalı, Adana.Google Scholar
  7. Dalen N, Durmuşoğlu E, Güncan A et al., 2005. Türkiye’de Pestisit Kullanımı, Kalıntıve Organizmalarda Duyarlılık Azalışı Sorunları, VI. Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisliği Teknik Kongresi, 3–7 Ocak 2005, Ankara; 2005.Google Scholar
  8. DeSimone L, Howes B, 1998. N transport and transformations in a shallow aquifer receiving wastewater discharge: A mass balance approach. Water Resources Research, 34(2): 271–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. EPA, 1995. Environmental Protection Agency. (1995). Drinking water regulations and health advisories. Office of Water, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  10. Erdoğan B, Karaca I, 2001. Mersin Special Environment Protection Report, 1–18.Google Scholar
  11. Glen F B J, Godley A K, Broderick A C, 1997. Marine turtle nesting in the Goksu Delta, Turkey, 1996. Mar Turtle Newsl, 77: 17–19Google Scholar
  12. Gusman A J, Marinõ M A, 1999. Analytical modeling of nitrogen dynamics in soils and groundwater. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 125(6): 330–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jolánkai G, 2000. Description of the CAL programme on Water Quality Modelling Version 2 Basic river and lake water quality models (with an outlook to “ecohydrological” applications), IHP-V Projects 8.1, 2.3, and 2.4 of the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization, financed by UNESCO Venice Office Budapest, May 2000.Google Scholar
  14. Ledoux E, Gomez E, Monget J M et al., 2007. Agriculture and groundwater nitrate contamination in the Seine basin. The STICS-MODCOU modelling chain. Science of the Total Environment, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv, 2006. (in press)Google Scholar
  15. Ma Jinzhu, Ding Zhenyu, Wei Guoxiao et al., 2009. Journal of Environmental Management, 90: 1168–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McLay C D A, Dragten R, Sparling G et al., 2001. Predicting groundwater nitrate concentrations in a region of mixed agricultural land use: A comparison of three approaches. Environmental Pollution, 115: 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meisinger J J, Randall G W, 1991. Estimating N budgets for soilcrop systems. In: Follet R F, Keeney D R, Cruse R M (eds.), Managing N for Groundwater Quality and Farm Profitability. Soil Science Society of America, Madison Wisconsin, 85–124.Google Scholar
  18. Oyarzun R, Arum’ı J, Salgado L et al., 2007. Sensitivity analysis and field testing of the RISK-N model in the Central Valley of Chile. Agricultural Water Management, 87: 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shamrukh M, Corapcioglu M, Hassona F, 2001. Modeling the effect of chemical fertilizers on ground water quality in the Nile Valley Aquifer, Egypt. Ground Water, 39(1): 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Streeter H W, Phelps E B, 1925. A Study of the Pollutions and Natural Purification of the Ohio River Public Health Bulletin No. 146. U.S. Public Health Service.Google Scholar
  21. Turkish Water Pollution Control Regulation, 2001. Ministry of Environment, www.cevre.gov.tr
  22. WHO, 1996. Guidelines for drinking-water quality. 2nd ed. Vol. 2. Health Criteria and Other Supporting Information. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1996, www.who.int.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science in China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Engineering DepartmentEngineering Faculty of Mersin UniversityMeskiTurkey
  2. 2.Meski, Mersin MunicipalityTurkey

Personalised recommendations