Advertisement

Pure elastic stiffness of sand represented by response envelopes derived from cyclic triaxial tests with local strain measurements

  • Lukas Knittel
  • Torsten WichtmannEmail author
  • Andrzej Niemunis
  • Gerhard Huber
  • Edgar Espino
  • Theodoros Triantafyllidis
Research Paper

Abstract

The elastic stiffness of a fine sand at small to moderate strains (\(\varepsilon \le 2 \times 10^{-4}\)) has been studied based on cyclic triaxial tests on cube-shaped samples with local strain measurements. Three samples with different densities (between very loose and very dense) were tested at up to 21 average stresses in succession (variation of mean pressure and stress ratio). At each average stress cycles were applied in six different directions, as a result of a simultaneous sinusoidal oscillation of the axial and lateral effective stress. Ten preconditioning cycles with larger strain amplitudes \(\varepsilon ^{\mathrm{ampl}}= 3 \times 10^{-4}\) per polarization were intended to induce a shakedown. An almost purely elastic response was then observed during the 5 subsequent cycles per polarization with lower strain amplitudes \(\varepsilon ^{\mathrm{ampl}}= 2 \times 10^{-4}\). The stress and strain paths measured during the latter ones were used to derive the components of the incremental elastic stiffness tensor \({\mathsf{E}}= \{E_{PP}, E_{PQ}, E_{QP}, E_{QQ}\}\) at a given average stress. The analysis of \({\mathsf{E}}\) is based on all 60 reversal points and the corresponding stress and strain points lying in a certain distance \(\Delta \varepsilon\) (e.g. \(10^{-4}\)) from the reversals. A graphical presentation of \({\mathsf{E}}\) by means of response envelopes is shown. They are used to calibrate the hyperelastic stiffness incorporated into a new hypoplastic constitutive model.

Keywords

Cyclic triaxial tests Local strain measurements Response envelopes Sand Small-strain stiffness 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The cyclic tests have been performed by the technician H. Borowski in the IBF soil mechanics laboratory.

References

  1. 1.
    Alarcon-Guzman A, Chameau JL, Leonardos GA, Frost JD (1989) Shear modulus and cyclic undrained behavior of sands. Soils Found 29(4):105–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    AnhDan L, Koseki J (2004) Effects of large number of cyclic loading on deformation characteristics of dense granular materials. Soils Found 44(3):115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    AnhDan L, Koseki J, Sato T (2002) Comparison of Young’s moduli of dense sand and gravel measured by dynamic and static methods. Geotech Test J ASTM 25(4):349–358Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bang DPV, Benedetto HD, Duttine A, Ezaoui A (2007) Viscous behaviour of dry sand. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 31(15):1631–1658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baxter CDP, Mitchell JK (2004) Experimental study on the aging of sands. J Geotech Eng ASCE 130(10):1051–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bobei DC, Wanatowski D, Rahman MM, Lo SR, Gnanendran CT (2013) The effect of drained pre-shearing on the undrained behaviour of loose sand with a small amount of fines. Acta Geotechnica 8(3):311–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chung RM, Yokel FY, Wechsler H (1984) Pore pressure buildup in resonant column tests. J Geotech Eng ASCE 110(2):247–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clayton CRI (2011) Stiffness at small strain: research and practice. Géotechnique 61(1):5–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Costanzo D, Viggiani G, Tamagnini C (2006) Directional response of a reconstituted fine-grained soil—part I: experimental investigation. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 30(13):1283–1301zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cudny M, Popielski P (2010) Analysis of excavation-induced deformation with different soil-models. Task Q 14(4):339–362Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Danne S, Hettler A (2013) Verhalten von nichtbindigen Böden bei niederzyklischer Belastung. Geotechnik 36:19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Danne S, Hettler A (2015) Experimental strain response-envelopes of granular materials for monotonous and low-cycle loading processes. In: Triantafyllidis Th (ed) Lecture notes in applied and computational mechanics. Vol. 77. Holistic simulation of geotechnical installation processes—numerical and physical modelling. Springer, Berlin, pp 229–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Di Benedetto HB, Tatsuoka F, Ishihara M (2002) Time dependent shear deformation characteristics of sand and their constitutive modelling. Soils Found 42(2):1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Doanh T (2000) Strain response envelope: a complementary tool for evaluating hypoplastic constitutive equations. In: Kolymbas D (ed) Constitutive modelling of granular materials. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Doanh T, Dubujet Ph, Protière X (2013) On the undrained strain-induced anisotropy of loose sand. Acta Geotechnica 8(3):293–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Doanh T, Dubujet Ph, Touron G (2010) Exploring the undrained induced anisotropy of Hostun RF loose sand. Acta Geotechnica 5(4):239–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Doanh T, Finge Z, Boucq S (2012) Effects of previous deviatoric strain histories on the undrained behaviour of Hostun RF loose sand. Geotech Geol Eng 30(4):697–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Doanh T, Finge Z, Boucq S, Dubujet Ph (2006) Histotropy of Hostun RF loose sand. In: Wu W, Yu H-S (eds) Modern trends in geomechanics, vol 106. Springer, Berlin, pp 399–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Duku PM, Stewart JP, Whang DH, Yee E (2008) Volumetric strains of clean sands subject to cyclic loads. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 134(8):1073–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    El Mohtar CS, Drnevich VP, Santagata M, Bobet A (2013) Combined resonant column and cyclic triaxial tests for measuring undrained shear modulus reduction of sand with plastic fines. Geotech Test J ASTM 36(4):1–9Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Finge Z, Doanh T, Dubujet P (2006) Undrained anisotropy of Hostun RF loose sand: new experimental investigations. Can Geotech J 43:1195–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Finno RJ, Cho W (2011) Recent stress-history effects on compressible Chicago glacial clays. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 137(3):197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gajo A, Piffer L (1999) The effects of preloading history on the undrained behaviour of saturated loose sand. Soils Found 39(6):43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goto S, Tatsuoka F, Shibuya S, Kim Y-S, Sato T (1991) A simple gauge for local small strain measurements in the laboratory. Soils Found 31(1):169–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gryczmanski M (2009) State of the art in modelling of soil behaviour at small strains. Archit Civ Eng Environ 2(1):61–80Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gudehus G (1979) A comparison of some constitutive laws for soils under radially symmetrical loading and unloading. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on numerical methods in geomechanics, Aachen. BalkemaGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gudehus G, Mašín D (2009) Graphical representation of constitutive equations. Géotechnique 59(2):147–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hardin BO, Drnevich VP (1972) Shear modulus and damping in soils: measurement and parameter effects. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 98(SM6):603–624Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hardin BO, Kalinski ME (2005) Estimating the shear modulus of gravelly soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 131(7):867–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hoque E, Sato T, Tatsuoka F (1997) Performance evaluation of LDTs for use in triaxial tests. Geotech Test J ASTM 20(2):149–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hoque E, Tatsuoka F (1998) Anisotropy in elastic deformation of granular materials. Soils Found 38(1):163–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hoque E, Tatsuoka F (2004) Effects of stress ratio on small-strain stiffness during triaxial shearing. Géotechnique 54(7):429–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Iwasaki T, Tatsuoka F, Takagi Y (1978) Shear moduli of sands under cyclic torsional shear loading. Soils Found 18(1):39–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jafarzadeh F, Sadeghi H (2012) Experimental study on dynamic properties of sand with emphasis on the degree of saturation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 32:26–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Karg C, Haegeman W (2009) Elasto-plastic long-term behavior of granular soils: experimental investigation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29:155–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Karimpour H, Lade PV (2013) Creep behavior in Virginia Beach sand. Can Geotech J 50:1159–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kiyota T, Tatsuoka F (2006) Viscous property of loose sand in triaxial compression, extension and cyclic loading. Soils Found 46(5):665–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kokusho T (1980) Cyclic triaxial test of dynamic soil properties for wide strain range. Soils Found 20(2):45–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kuwano R, Jardine RJ (2002) On measuring creep behaviour in granular materials through triaxial testing. Can Geotech J 39(5):1061–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lade PV, Liggio CD Jr, Nam J (2009) Strain rate, creep, and stress drop-creep experiments on crushed coral sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 135(7):941–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lanzo G, Vucetic M, Doroudian M (1997) Reduction of shear modulus at small strains in simple shear. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 123(11):1035–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lenart S, Koseki J, Miyashita Y, Sato T (2014) Large-scale triaxial tests of dense gravel material at low confining pressures. Soils Found 54(1):45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lewin PI, Burland JB (1970) Stress-probe experiments on saturated normally consolidated clay. Géotechnique 20(1):38–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Li XS, Cai ZY (1999) Effects of low-number previbration cycles on dynamic properties of dry sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 125(11):979–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Li XS, Yang WL, Chen CK, Wang WC (1998) Energy-injecting virtual mass resonant column system. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 124(5):428–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lo Presti DCF, Jamiolkowski M, Pallara O, Cavallaro A, Pedroni S (1997) Shear modulus and damping of soils. Géotechnique 47(3):603–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lo Presti DCF, Pallara O, Lancellotta R, Armandi M, Maniscalco R (1993) Monotonic and cyclic loading behaviour of two sands at small strains. Geotech Test J ASTM 4:409–424Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Loges I, Niemunis A (2015) Neohypoplasticity—estimation of small strain stiffness. In: Triantafyllidis Th (ed) Lecture notes in applied and computational mechanics. Vol. 77. Holistic simulation of geotechnical installation processes—numerical and physical modelling. Springer, Berlin, pp 163–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Masin D, Tamagnini C, Viggiani G, Constanzo D (2006) Directional response of a reconstituted fine-grained soil—part II: performance of different constitutive models. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 30:1303–1336zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Menq F-Y, Stokoe KH II (2003) Linear dynamic properties of sandy and gravelly soils from large-scale resonant tests. In: Di Benedetto (ed) Deformation characteristics of geomaterials. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, pp 63–71Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Murayama S, Michiro K, Sakagami T (1984) Creep characteristics of sands. Soils Found 24(2):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Nawir H, Tatsuoka F, Kuwano R (2003) Experimental evaluation of the viscous properties of sand in shear. Soils Found 43(6):13–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Niemunis A, Cudny M (1998) On hyperelasticity for clays. Comput Geotech 23(4):221–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Niemunis A, Grandas Tavera CE, Wichtmann T (2015) Peak stress obliquity in drained and undrained sands. Simulations with neohypoplasticity. In: Triantafyllidis Th (ed) Lecture notes in applied and computational mechanics. Vol. 80. Holistic simulation of geotechnical installation processes—benchmarks and simulations. Springer, Berlin, pp 85–114Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Niemunis A, Prada-Sarmiento LF, Grandas-Tavera CE (2011) Extended paraelasticity and its application to a boundary value problem. Acta Geotechnica 6(2):81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Niemunis A, Prada-Sarmiento LF, Grandas-Tavera CE (2011) Paraelasticity. Acta Geotechnica 6(2):67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Prada Sarmiento LF (2011) Parelastic description of small-strain soil behaviour. Dissertation, Veröffentlichungen des Institutes für Bodenmechanik und Felsmechanik am Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, Heft 173Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ray RP, Woods RD (1988) Modulus and damping due to uniform and variable cyclic loading. J Geotech Eng ASCE 114(8):861–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Royis P, Doanh T (1998) Theoretical analysis of strain response envelopes using incrementally non-linear constitutive equations. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 22(2):97–132zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Saxena SK, Reddy KR (1989) Dynamic moduli and damping ratios for Monterey No. 0 sand by resonant column tests. Soils Found 29(2):37–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Shen CK, Li XS, Gu YZ (1985) Microcomputer based free torsional vibration test. J Geotech Eng ASCE 111(8):971–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Smith PR, Jardine RJ, Hight DW (1992) The yielding of Bothkennar clay. Géotechnique 42(2):257–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Tatsuoka F, di Benedetto H, Enomoto T, Kawabe S, Kongkitkul W (2008) Various viscosity types of geomaterials in shear and their mathematical expression. Soils Found 48(1):41–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Tatsuoka F, Toki S, Miura S, Kato H, Okamoto M, Yamada S-I, Yasuda S, Tanizawa F (1986) Some factors affecting cyclic undrained triaxial strength of sand. Soils Found 26(3):99–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Vucetic M (1994) Cyclic threshold shear strains in soils. J Geotech Eng ASCE 120(12):2208–2228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Wang Y-H, Tsui K-Y (2009) Experimental characterization of dynamic property changes in aged sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 135(2):259–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Wichtmann T (2016) Soil behaviour under cyclic loading—experimental observations, constitutive description and applications. Habilitation thesis, Publications of the Institute of Soil Mechanics and Rock Mechanics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Issue No. 181Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Wichtmann T, Niemunis A, Triantafyllidis Th (2005) Strain accumulation in sand due to cyclic loading: drained triaxial tests. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25(12):967–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Wichtmann T, Niemunis A, Triantafyllidis Th (2010) Strain accumulation in sand due to drained cyclic loading: on the effect of monotonic and cyclic preloading (Miner’s rule). Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(8):736–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Wichtmann T, Triantafyllidis Th (2009) Influence of the grain size distribution curve of quartz sand on the small strain shear modulus \(G_{\max }\). J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 135(10):1404–1418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Wichtmann T, Triantafyllidis Th (2013) Effect of uniformity coefficient on \(G/G_{\max }\) and damping ratio of uniform to well graded quartz sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 139(1):59–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Wichtmann T, Triantafyllidis Th (2017) Strain accumulation due to packages of cycles with varying amplitude and/or average stress - on the bundling of cycles and the loss of the cyclic preloading memory. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 101:250–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Wu W, Kolymbas D (1990) Numerical testing of the stability criterion for hypoplastic constitutive equations. Mech Mater 9:245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Yamamuro JA, Abrantes AE, Lade PV (2011) Effect of strain rate on the stress–strain behavior of sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 137(12):1169–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Youd TL (1972) Compaction of sands by repeated shear straining. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 98(SM7):709–725Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Yu P (1988) Discussion of “Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils” by seed. J Geotech Eng ASCE 114(8):954–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Zhang J, Andrus RD, Juang CH (2005) Normalized shear modulus and material damping ratio relationships. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 131(4):453–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lukas Knittel
    • 1
  • Torsten Wichtmann
    • 2
    Email author
  • Andrzej Niemunis
    • 1
  • Gerhard Huber
    • 1
  • Edgar Espino
    • 3
  • Theodoros Triantafyllidis
    • 4
  1. 1.Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Soil Mechanics and Rock Mechanics (IBF)KarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Chair of Soil Mechanics, Foundation Engineering and Environmental GeotechnicsRuhr-University BochumBochumGermany
  3. 3.Keller Grundbau GmbHBochumGermany
  4. 4.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of PatrasPatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations