Advertisement

Study of the effect of temperature on microbially induced carbonate precipitation

  • Xiaohao Sun
  • Linchang Miao
  • Tianzhi Tong
  • Chengcheng Wang
Research Paper
  • 64 Downloads

Abstract

Temperature is a key factor that contributes to microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation. At low temperatures, low enzyme activity results in a lack of calcium precipitation. In this study, Sporosarcina pasteurii and Bacillus megaterium were compared. Firstly, the optical density curves and enzyme activity curves of both bacteria were obtained during 48-h culture. Then, optical density, enzyme activity, and productive rates for calcium carbonate were measured to analyze the influence of temperature. Finally, the effect of urea concentration on carbonate precipitation was studied by changing the urea concentration that was added during inoculation. The obtained results showed that at high temperature, the growth rate of B. megaterium was close to that of S. pasteurii, while the opposite result was found at low temperature. The urease activities of B. megaterium were similar at different temperature conditions. At high temperature, B. megaterium showed lower enzyme activity, while at low temperature, it surpassed that of S. pasteurii. The same results were found for enzyme activity and for the precipitation rates of calcium carbonate. The addition of urea to the medium increased precipitation rates, and higher urea concentrations increased the obtained precipitation rates. With 20 g/L urea, the precipitation rate of B. megaterium at 15 °C matched that without urea addition at 30 °C. Therefore, adding urea to the medium at the time of inoculation can effectively overcome the low calcium precipitation at low temperature and enable subsequent low-temperature engineering applications.

Keywords

Bacillus megaterium Carbonate precipitation Low temperature Sporosarcina pasteurii Urea addition 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51578147) and Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University (No. YBJJ1846). This work was also supported by “the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities” and “Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province” (No. KYCX18_0107). The authors thank the valuable comments from the reviewers.

References

  1. 1.
    Alexander M (1961) Introduction to soil microbiology. Wiley, New York, pp 428–472Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Al-Thawadi S (2008) High strength in situ biocementation of soil by calcite precipitating locally isolated ureolytic bacteria. Murdoch University, PerthGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    And HC, Antonietti M (1998) Crystal design of calcium carbonate microparticles using double-hydrophilic block copolymers. Langmuir 14(3):582–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bachmeier KL, Williams AE, Warmington JR, Bang SS (2002) Enzyme activity in microbiologically-induced calcite precipitation. J Biotechnol 93(2):171–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Braissant O, Cailleau G, Dupraz C, Verrecchia E (2003) Bacterially induced mineralization of calcium carbonate in terrestrial environments: the role of exopolysaccharides and amino acids. J Sediment Res 73:485–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheng L, Shahin MA, Chu J (2018) Soil bio-cementation using a new one-phase low-pH injection method. Acta Geotech.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0738-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chin Wei-Tsung, Kroontje W (1962) Conductivity method for estimation of enzyme activity. Agric Food Chem 10:347–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chu J, Ivanov V, Naeimi M, Stabnikov V, Liu HL (2014) Optimization of calcium-based bioclogging and biocementation of sand. Acta Geotech 9(2):277–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cuthbert MO, McMillan LA, Handley-Sidhu S, Riley MS, Tobler DJ, Phoenix VR (2013) A field and modeling study of fractured rock permeability reduction using microbially induced calcite precipitation. Environ Sci Technol 47(23):13637–13643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Muynck W, Verbeken K, De Belie N, Verstraete W (2013) Influence of temperature on the effectiveness of a biogenic carbonate surface treatment for limestone conservation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:1335–1347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    DeJong JT, Fritzges MB, Nusslein K (2006) Microbially induced cementation to control sand response to undrained shear. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 132(11):1381–1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    DeJong JT, Mortensen BM, Martinez BC, Nelson DC (2010) Bio-mediated soil improvement. Ecol Eng 36(2):197–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ehrlich HL (2002) Geomicrobiology. Revised and expanded, 4th edn. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ferris FG, Phoenix V, Fujita Y et al (2004) Kinetics of calcite precipitation induced by ureolytic bacteria at 10 to 20 degrees C in artificial groundwater. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 68(8):1701–1710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fredrickson JK, Fletcher M, Frederickson JK et al (2001) Subsurface microbiology and biogeochemistry. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fujita Y, Taylor JL, Gresham TLT et al (2008) Stimulation of microbial urea hydrolysis in groundwater to enhance calcite precipitation. Environ Sci Technol 42(8):3025–3032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gat D, Tsesarsky M, Shamir D, Ronen Z (2014) Accelerated microbial-induced CaCO3 precipitation in a defined coculture of ureolytic and non-ureolytic bacteria. Biogeosciences 11(10):2561–2569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gomez MG, Hunt CE, Martinez BC et al (2015) Field-scale bio-cementation tests to improve sands. Proc ICE Ground Improv 168(3):206–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hammes F, Boon N, de Villiers J, Verstraete W, Siciliano SD (2003) Strain-specific ureolytic microbial calcium carbonate precipitation. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:4901–4909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hammes F, Seka A, Van Hege K, Van de Wiele T, Vanderdeelen J, Siciliano SD, Verstraete W (2003) Calcium removal from industrial wastewater by bio-catalytic CaCO3 precipitation. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 78:670–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huang MY, Yuan LI, Yong J et al (2017) Characteristics of ground temperature variation in the northern suburb of Nanjing. J Anhui Agric Sci 45(03):222–225Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hata T, Yokoyama T, Abe H (2013) Investigation of a soil improvement technique for coastal regions on the basis of calcium carbonate precipitation by using the urea hydrolysis rate. Jpn Geotech J 8(4):505–515 (in Japanese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hattori T (1973) Microbial life in the soil: an introduction, vol 6. Dekker, New York, p 427Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hoffman M, Deccho AW (1999) Extracellular enzymes within microbial biofilmsand the role of the extracellular polymer matrix. In: Wingender J, Neu TR, Flemming HC (eds) Microbial extracellular polymeric substances: characterization, structure and function. Springer, Berlin, pp 217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ivanov V, Chu J (2008) Applications of microorganisms to geotechnical engineering for bioclogging and biocementation of soil in situ. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 7(2):139–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jiang NJ, Yoshioka H, Yamamoto K et al (2016) Ureolytic activities of a urease-producing bacterium and purified urease enzyme in the anoxic condition: implication for subseafloor sand production control by microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP). Ecol Eng 90:96–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Keykha HA, Huat BBK, Asadi A et al (2012) Electro-biogrouting and its challenges. Int J Electrochem Sci 7(7):1196–1204Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Khan MNH, Amarakoon GGNN (2015) Coral sand solidification test based on microbially induced carbonate precipitation using ureolytic bacteria. Mater Trans 56(10):1725–1732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Krajewska B, Leszko M, Zaborska W (1990) Urease immobilized on chitosan membrane: preparation and properties. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 48(3):337–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Krajewska B (2009) Ureases I. Functional, catalytic and kinetic properties: a review. J Mol Catal B Enzym 59:9–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lauchnor EG, Topp DM, Parker AE, Gerlach R (2015) Whole cell kinetics of ureolysis by Sporosarcina pasteurii. J Appl Microbiol 118(6):1321–1332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li Wei, Liu L, Chen W, Yu L, Li Wenbing, Yu H (2010) Calcium carbonate precipitation and crystal morphology induced by microbial carbonic anhydrase and other biological factors. Process Biochem 45:1017–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lian B, Hu Q, Chen J, Ji J, Teng HH (2006) Carbonate biomineralization induced by soil bacterium Bacillus megaterium. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 70(22):5522–5535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Madigan MT, Martinko JM, ve Parker J (2003) Brock biology of microorganisms,10th edn. Prentice Hall/Pearson EducationGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Martin D, Dodds K, Ngwenya BT, Butler IB, Elphick SC (2012) Inhibition of Sporosarcina pasteurii under anoxic conditions: implications for subsurface carbonate precipitation and remediation via ureolysis. Environ Sci Technol 46(15):8351–8355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Martinez B, DeJong J, Ginn T, Montoya B, Barkouki T, Hunt C, Tanyu B, Major D (2013) Experimental optimization of microbial-induced carbonate precipitation for soil improvement. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(4):587–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mitchell AC, Phillips AJ, Kaszuba JP et al (2008) Microbially enhanced carbonate mineralization and the geologic containment of CO2. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 72(12):A636Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mobley HLT, Hausinger RP (1989) Microbial ureases: significance, regulation, and molecular characterization. Microbiol Rev 53:85–108Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Montoya B, DeJong J, Boulanger R (2013) Dynamic response of liquefiable sand improved by microbial-induced calcite precipitation. Géotechnique 63(4):302–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Moyo CC, Kissel DE, Cabrera ML (1989) Temperature effects in soil enzyme activity. Soil Biol Biochem 21:935–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Muynck WD, Cox K, Belie ND et al (2008) Bacterial carbonate precipitation as an alternative surface treatment for concrete. Constr Build Mater 22(5):875–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Omoregie A, Ghaza K, Senian N et al (2017) Experimental optimisation of various cultural conditions on enzyme activity for isolated Sporosarcina pasteurii strains and evaluation of their biocement potentials. Ecol Eng 109:65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Qabany AA, Soga K, Santamarina C (2012) Factors affecting efficiency of microbially induced calcite precipitation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 138(8):992–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Qin X, Lin Q, Li S (2017) Characteristics of geotemperature field for shallow geothermal energy assessment and utilization in Hangzhou. Taiyangneng Xuebao/Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica 38(3):833–837Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ramachandran SK, Ramakrishnan V, Bang SS (2001) Remediation of concrete using micro-organisms. ACI Mater J Am Concr Inst 98(1):3–9Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ren J, Han Q, Gao H et al (2012) On the distribution law of geothermal formation in winter along Xi’an metro line. Urban Mass Transit 15(10):39–42Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rodriguez-Navarro C, Rodriguez-Gallego M, Ben Chekroun K, González-Munoz MT (2003) Conservation of ornamental stone by Myxococcus xanthus-induced carbonate biomineralization. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:2182–2193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sand KK, Rodriguezblanco JD, Makovicky E et al (2012) Crystallization of CaCO3 in water–alcohol mixtures: spherulitic growth, polymorph stabilization, and morphology change. Cryst Growth Des 12(2):842–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Soon NW, Lee LM, Khun TC, Ling HS (2013) Improvements in engineering properties of soils through microbial-induced calcite precipitation. KSCE J Civ Eng 17(4):718–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Soon NW, Lee LM, Khun TC, Ling HS (2014) Factors affecting improvement in engineering properties of residual soil through microbial-induced calcite precipitation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 140(5):04014006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Stocks-Fischer S, Galinat JK, Bang SS (1999) Microbiological precipitation of CaCO3. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1563–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Tittelboom KV, Belie ND, Muynck WD et al (2010) Use of bacteria to repair cracks in concrete. Cem Concr Res 40(1):157–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    van Paassen L (2009) Biogrout ground improvement by microbially induced carbonate precipitation. Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Vary PS (1994) Prime time for Bacillus megaterium. Microbiology 140(5):1001–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Vos P, Garrity G, Jones D, Krieg NR et al (2009) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology—volume 3: the firmicutes. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wang Y, Luo Z, Li W et al (2015) Simulation of shallow geothermal energy development and groundwater environmental influence. Taiyangneng Xuebao/Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica 36(5):1231–1238Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Whiffin VS (2004) Microbial CaCO3 precipitation for the production of biocement. Murdoch University, PerthGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Whiffin VS, van Paassen LA, Harkes MP (2007) Microbial carbonate precipitation as a soil improvement technique. Geomicrobiol J 24(5):417–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Wijngaarden W, Vermolen F, Meurs G, Vuik C (2011) Modelling biogrout: a new ground improvement method based on microbial-induced carbonate precipitation. Transp Porous Media 87(2):397–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Wu C, Chu J, Wu S et al (2018) Microbially induced calcite precipitation along a circular flow channel under a constant flow condition. Acta Geotech.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0747-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Wu Y et al (2011) Geophysical monitoring and reactive transport modeling of ureolytically-driven calcium carbonate precipitation. Geochem Trans 12(1):7MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Zhou GT, Yao QZ, Fu SQ et al (2010) Controlled crystallization of unstable vaterite with distinct morphologies and their polymorphic transition to stable calcite. Eur J Mineral 22(2):259–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Zoheir A, Talkhan F, Hammad I (2013) Enzyme activity and induction of calcium carbonate precipitation by Sporosarcina pasteurii NCIMB 8841. J Appl Sci Res 9(3):1525–1533Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaohao Sun
    • 1
  • Linchang Miao
    • 1
  • Tianzhi Tong
    • 1
  • Chengcheng Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Geotechnical EngineeringSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations