Advertisement

Acta Geotechnica

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 71–81 | Cite as

A new double-cell system for measuring volume change of a soil specimen under monotonic or cyclic loading

  • Wen-Bo Chen
  • Jian-Hua YinEmail author
  • Wei-Qiang Feng
Research Paper

Abstract

For accurately measuring the volume change of a soil specimen under monotonic and cyclic loading, a new double-cell system is described in this paper. This newly designed double-cell system is equipped with local linear variable differential transformers (LVDTs) and can also accommodate large specimens. Careful calibrations, including the effect of cell pressure change, “creep” of inner cell volume, the effect of temperature fluctuation, and loading ram movement, are presented and discussed by comparing the possible errors with those of other existing apparatuses. This system exhibits superior performances in volume change due to cell pressure, temperature sensitivity, and accuracy of loading ram movement. Three monotonic compression tests under saturated and unsaturated conditions were conducted to evaluate the performance of volume change measurement and local LVDTs. Moreover, six different frequencies were used to verify the workability and accuracy of this system in conducting cyclic testing. The results indicate that the maximum frequency this system can achieve, with a satisfactory precision, is 0.2 Hz, which is four times higher than what the previous systems could achieve. Finally, several suggestions are made on how to improve the system’s performance even better.

Keywords

Calibration Cyclic test Double-cell Triaxial Unsaturated Volume change 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work in this paper is supported by a Key Project Grant (Grant No. U1234204) from National Natural Science Foundation of China via PolyU Shenzhen Research Institute, and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, China.

References

  1. 1.
    Alva-Hurtado JE, Selig ET (1982) Survey of laboratory devices for measuring soil volume change. Geotech Test J 4(1):11–18Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aversa S, Nicotera MV (2002) A triaxial and oedometer apparatus for testing unsaturated soils. Geotech Test J 25(2):3–15Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bishop AW, Donald IB (1961) The experimental study of partly saturated soil in the triaxial apparatus. In: Proceedings 5th ICSMFE, Paris, pp 13–21Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bolton MD (1986) The strength and dilatancy of sands. Géotechnique 36(1):65–78Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cuccovillo T, Coop MR (1997) The measurement of local axial strains in triaxial tests using LVDTs. Géotechnique 47(1):167–171Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cui YJ, Tang AM, Marcial D, Terpereau JM, Marchadier G, Boulay X (2007) Use of a differential pressure transducer for the monitoring of soil volume change in cyclic triaxial test on unsaturated soils. Geotech Test J 30(3):227–233Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laloui L (2006) Advances in volume measurement in unsaturated soil triaxial tests. Soils Found 46(3):341–349Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leong EC, Agus SS, Rahardjo H (2003) Volume change measurement of soil specimen in triaxial test. Geotech Test J 27(1):1–10Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matyas EL, Radhakrishna HS (1968) Volume change characteristics of partially saturated soils. Géotechnique 18:432–448Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ng CWW, Zhan LT, Cui YJ (2002) A new simple system for measuring volume changes in unsaturated soils. Can Geotech J 39:757–764Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rampino C, Mancuso C, Vinale F (1999) Laboratory testing on an unsaturated soil: equipment, procedures, and first experimental results. Can Geotech J 36(1):1–12Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shi XS, Herle I (2014) Laboratory investigation of artificial lumpy materials. Eng Geol 183:303–314Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shi XS, Herle I (2016) Analysis of the compression behavior of artificial lumpy composite materials. Int J Numer Anal Met 40(10):1438–1453Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shi XS, Herle I (2017) Numerical simulation of lumpy soils using a hypoplastic model. Acta Geotech 12(2):349–363Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shi XS, Herle I, Muir Wood D (2017a) A consolidation model for lumpy composite soils in open-pit mining. Géotechnique 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.054
  16. 16.
    Shi XS, Herle I, Bergholz K (2017) A nonlinear Hvorslev surface for highly overconsolidated soils: elastoplastic and hypoplastic implementations. Acta Geotech 12(4):809–823Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Toyota H, Sakai N, Nishimura T (2001) Effects of stress history due to unsaturation and drainage condition on shear properties of unsaturated cohesive soil. Soil Found 41(1):13–24Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wheeler SJ (1988) The undrained shear strength of soils containing large gas bubbles. Géotechnique 38(3):399–413Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yin JH (2003) A double cell triaxial system for continuous measurement of volume changes of an unsaturated or saturated soil specimen in triaxial testing. Geotech Test J 26(3):353–358Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yin JH, Saadat F, Graham J (1990) Constitutive modelling of a compacted sand-bentonite mixture using three-modulus hypoelasticity. Can Geotech J 27:365–372Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yin ZZ (1998) Settlement and consolidation of soil mass. China Electric Publication House, Shanghai (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang XW, Mavroulidou M, Gunn MJ, Sutton J, Cabarkapa Z, Kichou Z (2014) Application of a novel laser sensor volume measurement system to the triaxial testing of an unsaturated lime-treated soil. Acta Geotech 9:945–957Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang XW, Li L, Chen G, Lytton R (2015) A photogrammetry-based method to measure total and local volume changes of unsaturated soils during triaxial testing. Acta Geotech 10:55–82Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityKowloonChina

Personalised recommendations