Acta Geotechnica

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 549–555 | Cite as

A model for decoding the life cycle of granular avalanches in a rotating drum

  • Eloïse Marteau
  • José E. AndradeEmail author
Research Paper


Granular materials can behave as harmless sand dunes or as devastating landslides. A granular avalanche marks the transition between these distinct solid-like and fluid-like states. The solid-like state is typically described using plasticity models from critical state theory. In the fluid regime, granular flow is commonly captured using a visco-plastic model. However, due to our limited understanding of the mechanism governing the solid–fluid-like transition, characterizing the material behavior throughout the life cycle of an avalanche remains an open challenge. Here, we employ laboratory experiments of transient avalanches spontaneously generated by a rotating drum. We report measurements of dilatancy and grain kinematics before, during, and after each avalanche. Those measurements are directly incorporated into a rate-dependent plasticity model that quantitatively predicts the granular flow measured in experiments. Furthermore, we find that dilatancy in the solid-like state controls the triggering of granular avalanches and therefore plays a key role in the solid–fluid-like transition. With the proposed approach, we demonstrate that the life cycle of a laboratory avalanche, from triggering to run out, can be fully explained. Our results represent an important step toward a unified understanding of the physical phenomena associated with transitional behavior in granular media.


Avalanches Dilatancy Granular materials Plasticity Rate dependent Solid/fluid transition 



The author would like to thank Ryan Hurley for his fruitful comments. This work has been partially funded by Keck Institute for Space Studies (KISS) and the California Institute of Technology; this support is gratefully acknowledged.

Supplementary material

11440_2017_609_MOESM1_ESM.docx (48 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 48 kb)
11440_2017_609_MOESM2_ESM.mp4 (19.8 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (MP4 20258 kb)


  1. 1.
    Andrade JE, Chen Q, Le PH, Avila CF, Evans TM (2012) On the rheology of dilative granular media: bridging solid and fluid-like behavior. J Mech Phys Solids 60:1122–1136MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Courrech du Pont S, Fischer R, Gondret P, Perrin B, Rabaud M (2005) Instantaneous velocity profiles during granular avalanches. Phys Rev Lett 94:048003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daerr A, Douady S (1999) Two types of avalanche behaviour in granular media. Nature 399:241–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Evesque P (1991) Analysis of the statistics of sandpile avalanches using soil-mechanics results and concepts. Phys Rev A 43:2720–2740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fischer R, Gondret P, Perrin B, Rabaud M (2008) Dynamics of dry granular avalanches. Phys Rev E 78:021302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Forterre Y, Pouliquen O (2008) Flows of dense granular media. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 40:1–24MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    George DL, Iverson RM (2014) A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy II Numerical predictions and experimental tests. Proc R Soc A 470:20130820MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gray JMNT (2001) Granular flow in partially filled slowly rotating drums. J Fluid Mech 441:1–29MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Iverson RM, George DL (2014) A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy. I physical basis. Proc R Soc A 470:20130819MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jaeger HM, Nagel SR (1992) Physics of granular state. Science 255:1523–1531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jaeger HM, Nagel SR, Behringer RP (1996) Granular solids, liquid and gases. Rev Mod Phys 68:1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jop P, Forterre Y, Pouliquen O (2005) Crucial role of side walls for granular surface flows: consequences for the rheology. J Fluid Mech 541:167–192CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jop P, Forterre Y, Pouliquen O (2006) A constitutive law for dense granular flows. Nature 441:727–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kabla AJ, Senden TJ (2009) Dilatancy in slow granular flow. Phys Rev Lett 102:28301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lowe DR (1976) Grain flow and grain flow deposits. J Sediment Petrol 46:188–199Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Midi GDR (2004) On dense granular flow. Eur Phys J E 14:341–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Orpe A, Khakhar DV (2001) Scaling relations for granular flow in quasi-two-dimensional rotating cylinders. Phys Rev E 64:031302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pailha M, Pouliquen O (2009) A two-phase flow description of the initiation of underwater granular avalanches. J Fluid Mech 633:115–136MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pailha M, Nicolas M, Pouliquen O (2008) Initiation of underwater granular avalanches: influence of the initial volume fraction. Phys Fluids 20:11701CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pan B, Qian K, Xie H, Asundi A (2009) Two-dimensional digital image correlation for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: a review. Meas Sci Technol 20:062001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peng C, Guo X, Wu W, Wang Y (2016) Unified modelling of granular media with smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Acta Geotech 11:1231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pouliquen O, Renaut N (1996) Onset of granular flows on an inclined rough surface: dilatancy effects. J Phys II Fr 6:923–935Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Prime N, Dufour F, Darve F (2014) Solid-fluid transition modelling in geomaterials and application to a mudflow interacting with an obstacle. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 38:1341–1361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rajchenbach J (1990) Flow in powders: from discrete avalanches to continuous regime. Phys Rev Lett 65:2221–2224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Reinsch CH (1967) Smoothing by spline functions. Numer Math 10:177–183MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Reynolds O (1885) On the dilatancy of media composed of rigid particle in contact. Philos Mag Ser 5(20):469–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rowe PW (1962) The stress-dilatancy relation for static equilibrium of an assembly of particles in contact. Proc R Soc Lond A 269:500–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schofield AN, Wroth P (1968) Critical state soil mechanics. McGraw-Hill, New York CityGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sutton MA, Orteu JJ, Schreier H (2009) Image correlation for shape, motion and deformation measurements: basic concepts theory and applications. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wood DM (1991) Soil behaviour and critical state soil mechanics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Engineering and Applied ScienceCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations