Advertisement

Acta Geotechnica

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 1–21 | Cite as

A unified mechanical and retention model for saturated and unsaturated soil behaviour

  • Martí Lloret-CabotEmail author
  • Simon J. Wheeler
  • Marcelo Sánchez
Research Paper

Abstract

The coupled mechanical and water retention elasto-plastic constitutive model of Wheeler, Sharma and Buisson (the Glasgow coupled model, GCM) predicts unique unsaturated isotropic normal compression and unsaturated critical state planar surfaces for specific volume and degree of saturation when soil states are at the intersection of mechanical (M) and wetting retention (WR) yield surfaces. Experimental results from tests performed by Sivakumar on unsaturated samples of compacted speswhite kaolin confirm the existence and form of these unique surfaces. The GCM provides consistent representation of transitions between saturated and unsaturated conditions, including the influence of retention hysteresis and the effect of plastic volumetric strains on retention behaviour, and it gives unique expressions to predict saturation and de-saturation conditions (air-exclusion and air-entry points, respectively). Mechanical behaviour is modelled consistently across these transitions, including appropriate variation of mechanical yield stress under both saturated and unsaturated conditions. The expressions defining the unsaturated isotropic normal compression planar surfaces for specific volume and degree of saturation are central to the development of a relatively straightforward methodology for determining values of all GCM parameters (soil constants and initial state) from a limited number of laboratory tests. This methodology is demonstrated by application to the experimental data of Sivakumar. Comparison of model simulations with experimental results for the full set of Sivakumar’s isotropic loading stages demonstrates that the model is able to predict accurately the variation of both specific volume and degree of saturation during isotropic stress paths under saturated and unsaturated conditions.

Keywords

Constitutive relations De-saturation Mechanical behaviour Retention hysteresis Saturation Saturated soils Suction Unsaturated soils Water retention 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The first author acknowledges the financial support by the Synergy Postgraduate Scholarships Scheme and the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Geotechnical Science and Engineering (CGSE).

References

  1. 1.
    Alonso EE, Gens A, Josa A (1990) A constitutive model for partially saturated soils. Géotechnique 40(3):405–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alonso EE, Olivella S, Pinyol NM (2005) A review of Beliche Dam. Géotechnique 55(4):267–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alonso EE, Pinyol NM, Gens A (2013) Compacted soil behaviour: initial state, structure and constitutive modelling. Géotechnique 63(6):463–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bishop AW (1959) The principle of effective stress. Teknisk Ukeblad 39:859–863Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borja RI (2004) Cam-Clay plasticity. Part V: A mathematical framework for three-phase deformation and strain localization analyses of partially saturated porous media. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193:5301–5338CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Borja RI, White JA (2010) Continuum deformation and stability analyses of a steep hillside slope under rainfall infiltration. Acta Geotech 5:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borja RI, Liu X, White JA (2012) Multiphysics hillslope processes triggering landslides. Acta Geotech 7:261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burton GJ, Sheng D, Airey D (2014) Experimental study on volumetric behaviour of Maryland clay and the role of degree of saturation. Can Geotech J 51:1449–1455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buscarnera G, Nova R (2009) An elasto-plastic strain hardening model for soil allowing for hydraulic bonding debonding effects. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 33:1055–1086CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Casini F (2008) Effetti del grado di saturazione sul comportamento meccanico di un limo. Ph.D. Thesis, Universitá degli Studi di Roma ‘‘La Sapienza’’Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Casini F, Serri V, Springman SM (2013) Hydromechanical behaviour of a silty sand from a steep slope triggered by artificial rainfall: from unsaturated to saturated conditions. Can Geotech J 50:28–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Della Vecchia G, Romero E, Jommi C (2013) A fully coupled elastic–plastic hydromechanical model for compacted soils accounting for clay activity. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 37:503–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D’Onza F, Gallipoli D, Wheeler SJ, Casini F, Vaunat J, Khalili N, Laloui L, Mancuso C, Mašín D et al (2011) Benchmark of constitutive models for unsaturated soils. Géotechnique 61(4):283–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D’Onza F, Wheeler SJ, Gallipoli D, Barrera M, Hofmann M, Lloret-Cabot M, Lloret A, Mancuso C, Pereira J-M et al (2015) Benchmarking selection of parameter values for the Barcelona basic model. Eng Geol 196:99–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gallipoli D, Wheeler SJ, Karstunen M (2003) Modelling the variation of degree of saturation in a deformable unsaturated soil. Géotechnique 53(1):105–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gallipoli D, Gens A, Chen G, D’Onza F (2008) Modelling unsaturated soil behaviour during normal consolidation and at critical state. Comp Geotech 35(6):825–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gens A (2010) Soil–environment interactions in geotechnical engineering. Géotechnique 60(1):3–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Houlsby GT (1997) The work input to an unsaturated granular material. Géotechnique 47(1):193–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jommi C (2000) Remarks on the constitutive modelling of unsaturated soils. In: Tarantino A, Mancuso C (eds) Experimental evidence and theoretical approaches in unsaturated soils. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 139–153Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Josa A (1988) Un modelo elastoplastico para suelos no saturados. Ph.D. Thesis, Universitat Politècnica de CatalunyaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Khalili N, Habte MA, Zargarbashi S (2008) A fully coupled flow deformation model for cyclic analysis of unsaturated soils including hydraulic and mechanical hysteresis. Comp Geotech 35(6):872–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Laloui L, Ferrari A, Li C, Eichenberger J (2016) Hydro-mechanical analysis of volcanic ash slopes during rainfall. Géotechnique 66(3):220–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lloret M. (2011) Numerical modelling of coupled behaviour in unsaturated soils. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Strathclyde and University of GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lloret-Cabot M, Sánchez M, Wheeler SJ (2013) Formulation of a three-dimensional constitutive model for unsaturated soils incorporating mechanical-water retention couplings. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 37:3008–3035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lloret-Cabot M, Wheeler SJ, Sánchez M (2014) Unification of plastic compression in a coupled mechanical and water retention model for unsaturated soils. Can Geotech J 51(12):1488–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lloret-Cabot M, Wheeler SJ, Pineda JA, Sheng D, Gens A (2014) Relative performance of two unsaturated soil models using different constitutive variables. Can Geotech J 51(12):1423–1437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mašín D (2010) Predicting the dependency of a degree of saturation on void ratio and suction using effective stress principle for unsaturated soils. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 34:73–90zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Monroy R (2006) The influence of load and suction changes on the volumetric behaviour of compacted London Clay. Ph.D. Thesis, Imperial CollegeGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Monroy R, Zdravkovic L, Ridley A (2008) Volumetric behaviour of compacted London Clay during wetting and loading. In: Toll DG, Augarde CE, Gallipoli D, Wheeler SJ (eds) Proceedings in 1st European Conference Unsaturated Soils, Durham, pp 315–320Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Monroy R, Zdravkovic L, Ridley A (2010) Evolution of microstructure in compacted London Clay during wetting and loading. Géotechnique 60(2):105–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nuth M, Laloui L (2008) Advances in modelling hysteretic water retention curve in deformable soils. Comp Geotech 35(6):835–844CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Raveendiraraj A (2009) Coupling of mechanical behaviour and water retention behaviour in unsaturated soils. Ph.D. Thesis, University of GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Romero E (1999) Characterisation and thermo-hydro-mechanical behaviour of unsaturated Boom clay: an experimental study. Ph.D. Thesis, Universitat Politècnica de CatalunyaGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Romero E, Della Vecchia G, Jommi C (2011) An insight into the water retention properties of compacted clayey soils. Géotechnique 61(4):313–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Roscoe KH, Burland JB (1968) On the generalised stress-strain behavior of ‘wet’ clay. In: Heyman J, Leckie FA (eds) Engineering plasticity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 535–609Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schrefler BA (1984) The finite element method in soil consolidation (with applications to surface subsidence). Ph.D. Thesis, University College of SwanseaGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sharma RS (1998) Mechanical behaviour of unsaturated highly expansive clays. Ph.D. Thesis, University of OxfordGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sheng D (2011) Review of fundamental principles in modelling unsaturated soil behaviour. Comput Geotech 38:757–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sheng D, Fredlund DG, Gens A (2008) A new modelling approach for unsaturated soils using independent stress variables. Can Geotech J 45:511–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sheng D, Zhou A (2011) Coupling hydraulic with mechanical models for unsaturated Soils. Can Geotech J 48:826–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sivakumar V (1993) A critical state framework for unsaturated soil. Ph.D. Thesis, University of SheffieldGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sivakumar V, Wheeler SJ (2000) Influence of compaction procedure on the mechanical behaviour of an unsaturated compacted clay, Part 1: Wetting and isotropic compression. Géotechnique 50(4):359–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Song X, Borja RI (2014) Mathematical framework for unsaturated flow in the finite deformation range. Int J Numer Meth Eng 14:658–682MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sun DA, Sheng D, Xu Y (2007) Collapse behaviour of unsaturated compacted soil with different initial densities. Can Geotech J 44:673–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tarantino A, De Col E (2008) Compaction behaviour of clay. Géotechnique 58(3):199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tarantino A (2009) A water retention model for deformable soils. Géotechnique 59(9):751–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Tarantino A, Tombolato S (2005) Coupling of hydraulic and mechanical behaviour in unsaturated compacted clay. Géotechnique 55(4):307–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Vaunat J, Romero E, Jommi C (2000) An elastoplastic hydro-mechanical model for unsaturated soils. In: Tarantino A, Mancuso C (eds) Experimental evidence and theoretical approaches in unsaturated soils. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 121–138Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wheeler SJ, Sivakumar V (1995) An elasto-plastic critical state framework for unsaturated soil. Géotechnique 45(1):35–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wheeler SJ, Näätänen A, Karstunen M, Lojander M (2003) An anisotropic elastoplastic model for soft clays. Can Geotech J 40:403–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wheeler SJ, Sharma RS, Buisson MSR (2003) Coupling of hydraulic hysteresis and stress–strain behaviour in unsaturated soils. Géotechnique 53(1):41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wong KS, Mašín D (2014) Coupled hydro-mechanical model for partially saturated soils predicting small strain stiffness. Comp Geotech 61:355–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zhou A, Sheng D (2015) An advanced hydro-mechanical constitutive model for unsaturated soils with different initial densities. Comput Geotech 63:46–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering and Built EnvironmentUniversity of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia
  2. 2.School of EngineeringUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations