Experimental study on variability in mechanical properties of a frozen sand as determined in triaxial compression tests
- 550 Downloads
Large uncertainty exists in soil testing due to the randomness in sampling and system errors, especially in tests on frozen soils. In order to reduce the randomness and improve the test accuracy, the sample preparation method is improved to obtain more homogeneous samples. The standard Chinese sand is used as the soil. An environmental material test apparatus with three-point temperature control was used. Four temperatures and four confining pressures are used for the triaxial compression tests, which makes 16 combinations. For each combination, five repeat tests were carried out to examine the scattering of the mechanical properties of the frozen sand. It is found that under a certain confining pressure, the scattering increased with the increase in temperature and vice versa. Under a certain combination of temperature at −0.5 °C and confining pressure of 10 MPa, the stress–strain curves are so different that similarity in the curves does not exist. This phenomenon is not scattering because sample randomness or system errors cannot explain it any more and is therefore called variability. It is attributed to pressure melting, pressure crush of soil particles as well as severe phase changes caused by small temperature variations. The difference in the test results is considered as an inherent feature of frozen soils. Strength and strain energy are used, along with temperature and confining pressure to analyze the cause of variability. This work shows that further work must be carried out to develop an optimum testing program in order to make a reasonable analysis for engineering constructions in which frozen soils are involved.
KeywordsFrozen sand Scattering Statistical analysis Triaxial compression Uncertainty Variability
This work is supported in part by the Importation and Development of High-Caliber Talents Project of Beijing Municipal Institutions granted to Dr. Jilin Qi (CIT&TCD20150101) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41172253 and 41201064).
- 1.Baker TH, Konrad JM (1985) Effect of sample preparation on the strength of artificially frozen sand. In: Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on ground freezing, Sapporo, Japan, vol 2. pp 171–176Google Scholar
- 4.Einstein HH, Bächer GB (1982) Probabilistic and statistical methods in engineering geology. I. Problem statement and introduction to solution. Rock Mech Supp 12:47–61Google Scholar
- 5.Kulhawy FH (1992) On evaluation of static soil properties. In: Seed RB, Boulanger RW (eds) Stability and performance of slopes and embankments II (GPS 31), Am Soc Civil Eng, pp 95–115Google Scholar
- 7.Li QZ, Lai YM, Xu XT, Yang YG, Chang XX (2010) Triaxial strength distributive of warm frozen soil and its damage statistical constitutive model. J Glaciol Geocryol 32(6):1235–1241Google Scholar
- 13.Parameswaran VR, Jones SJ (1981) Triaxial testing of frozen sand. J Glaciol 27(95):147–155Google Scholar
- 17.Qi JL, Zhang JM, Yao XX, Hu W, Fang LL (2009) Analysis of settlements of constructions in permafrost regions. Rock Soil Mech 30(Supp. 2):1–8 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- 19.Tsytovich NA (1985) The mechanics of frozen ground. Translated by Zhang CQ, Zhu YL, Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
- 20.Wu ZW, Ma W (1994) Strength and Creep of Frozen Soil. Lanzhou University Press, pp 36–87 (in Chinese)Google Scholar