Advertisement

Acta Geotechnica

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 61–70 | Cite as

Experimental study on variability in mechanical properties of a frozen sand as determined in triaxial compression tests

  • Ling Ma
  • Jilin QiEmail author
  • Fan Yu
  • Xiaoliang Yao
Research Paper

Abstract

Large uncertainty exists in soil testing due to the randomness in sampling and system errors, especially in tests on frozen soils. In order to reduce the randomness and improve the test accuracy, the sample preparation method is improved to obtain more homogeneous samples. The standard Chinese sand is used as the soil. An environmental material test apparatus with three-point temperature control was used. Four temperatures and four confining pressures are used for the triaxial compression tests, which makes 16 combinations. For each combination, five repeat tests were carried out to examine the scattering of the mechanical properties of the frozen sand. It is found that under a certain confining pressure, the scattering increased with the increase in temperature and vice versa. Under a certain combination of temperature at −0.5 °C and confining pressure of 10 MPa, the stress–strain curves are so different that similarity in the curves does not exist. This phenomenon is not scattering because sample randomness or system errors cannot explain it any more and is therefore called variability. It is attributed to pressure melting, pressure crush of soil particles as well as severe phase changes caused by small temperature variations. The difference in the test results is considered as an inherent feature of frozen soils. Strength and strain energy are used, along with temperature and confining pressure to analyze the cause of variability. This work shows that further work must be carried out to develop an optimum testing program in order to make a reasonable analysis for engineering constructions in which frozen soils are involved.

Keywords

Frozen sand Scattering Statistical analysis Triaxial compression Uncertainty Variability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported in part by the Importation and Development of High-Caliber Talents Project of Beijing Municipal Institutions granted to Dr. Jilin Qi (CIT&TCD20150101) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41172253 and 41201064).

References

  1. 1.
    Baker TH, Konrad JM (1985) Effect of sample preparation on the strength of artificially frozen sand. In: Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on ground freezing, Sapporo, Japan, vol 2. pp 171–176Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bragg RA, Andersland OB (1981) Strain rate, temperature, and sample size effects on compression and tensile properties of frozen soil. Eng Geol 18:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chamberlain E, Groves C, Perham R (1972) The mechanical behavior of frozen earth materials under high pressure triaxial test conditions. Geotechnique 22(3):469–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Einstein HH, Bächer GB (1982) Probabilistic and statistical methods in engineering geology. I. Problem statement and introduction to solution. Rock Mech Supp 12:47–61Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kulhawy FH (1992) On evaluation of static soil properties. In: Seed RB, Boulanger RW (eds) Stability and performance of slopes and embankments II (GPS 31), Am Soc Civil Eng, pp 95–115Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lai YM, Li SY, Qi JL, Gao ZH, Chang XX (2008) Strength distributions of warm frozen clay and its stochastic damage constitutive model. Cold Reg Sci Technol 53(2):200–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li QZ, Lai YM, Xu XT, Yang YG, Chang XX (2010) Triaxial strength distributive of warm frozen soil and its damage statistical constitutive model. J Glaciol Geocryol 32(6):1235–1241Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li SY, Lai YM, Zhang SJ, Liu DR (2009) An improved statistical damage constitutive model for warm frozen clay based on Mohr–Coulomb criterion. Cold Reg Sci Technol 57(2–3):154–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lumb P (1969) Safety factors and the probability distribution of soil strength. Can Geotech J 7(3):225–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ma W, Wu ZW, Zhang LX, Chang XX (1999) Analyses of process on the strength decrease in frozen soils under high confining pressures. Cold Reg Sci Technol 29(1):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miura S, Toki S (1982) A sample preparation method and its effect on static and cyclic deformation strength properties of sand. Soils Found 22(1):61–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parameswaran VR (1980) Deformation behaviour and strength of frozen sand. Can Geotech J 17(1):74–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Parameswaran VR, Jones SJ (1981) Triaxial testing of frozen sand. J Glaciol 27(95):147–155Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Phoon KK, Kulhawy FH (1999) Characterization of geotechnical variability. Can Geotech J 4(36):612–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Phoon KK, Kulhawy FH (1999) Evaluation of geotechnical property variability. Can Geotech J 4(36):625–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Qi JL, Ma W (2007) A new criterion for strength of frozen sand under quick triaxial compression considering effect of confining pressure. Acta Geotech 2(3):221–226CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Qi JL, Zhang JM, Yao XX, Hu W, Fang LL (2009) Analysis of settlements of constructions in permafrost regions. Rock Soil Mech 30(Supp. 2):1–8 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ting JM, Martin RT, Ladd C (1983) Mechanisms of strength for frozen sand. J Geotech Eng 109(10):1286–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tsytovich NA (1985) The mechanics of frozen ground. Translated by Zhang CQ, Zhu YL, Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wu ZW, Ma W (1994) Strength and Creep of Frozen Soil. Lanzhou University Press, pp 36–87 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yang YG, Lai YM, Li JB (2010) Laboratory investigation on the strength characteristic of frozen sand considering effect of confining pressure. Cold Reg Sci Technol 60(2010):245–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yang YG, Lai YM, Chang XX (2010) Laboratory and theoretical investigations on the deformation and strength behaviors of artificial frozen soil. Cold Reg Sci Technol 64(2010):39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soil Engineering, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research InstituteChinese Academy of SciencesLanzhouChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.School of Civil and Transportation EngineeringBeijing University of Architecture and Civil EngineeringBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations