Acta Geotechnica

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 153–160 | Cite as

Damage evolution of rock salt under cyclic loading in unixial tests

  • Jianfeng Liu
  • Heping Xie
  • Zhengmeng Hou
  • Chunhe Yang
  • Liang Chen
Research Paper

Abstract

Cyclic loading tests of rock salt were performed to investigate the characteristics of damage evolution of the surrounding rock in gas caverns. In this experiment, the cyclic loading process was carried out on seven stress levels from 20 to 86 % of the uniaxial compressive strength. The sine wave with a frequency of 1 Hz was adopted in the cyclic loading test. Experimental results show that at the first stress level, the damage evolution is rather limited or negligible under cyclic loading, which is controlled within the elastic limit. With the increase in stress level, the damage evolution becomes more evident. An increasing tendency of damage variable can be observed if the stress level surpasses 40 % of the uniaxial compressive strength. A maximum damage value of around 0.95 is recorded when the stress level is over 85 % of the uniaxial strength. In this paper, a damage evolution equation is also introduced and good agreement is obtained with the experimental data. Based on the experimental data, it is shown that the design practice of gas cavern concerning the degree of strength utilization of the surrounding rock is rather conservative considering the reducing effect of the minimal gas pressure on the damage evolution.

Keywords

Cyclic loading Damage evolution Gas cavern Rock salt 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51120145001, 51104101, 51134018), the National Basic Research Projects of China (Grant No. 2011CB201201, 2010CB226802, 2010CB732005), State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection (Grant No. SKLGP2013K016). The authors wish to offer their gratitude and regards to the colleagues who contributed to this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Aubertin M, Sgaoula J, Gill DE (1993) A damage model for rock salt: application to tertiary creep. In: 7th symposium on Salt, Kyoto, Japan, pp 117–125Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bagde MN, Petros V (2005) Waveform effect on fatigue properties of intact sandstone in uniaxial cyclical loading. Rock Mech Rock Eng 38(3):169–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen WZ, Tan XJ, Wu GJ, Yang JP (2009) Research on gas seepage law in laminated salt rock gas storage. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 28(7):1297–1304 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen L, Shao JF, Huang HW (2010) Coupled elastoplastic damage modeling of anisotropic rocks. Comput Geotech 37(1–2):187–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cosenza PH, Ghoreychi M, Bazargan-Sabet B, de Marsily G (1999) In situ rock salt permeability measurement for long term safety assessment of storage. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36(4):509–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eberhardt E, Stead D, Stimpson B (1999) Quantifying progressive pre-peak brittle fracture damage in rock during uniaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36(3):361–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fuenkajorn k, Phueakphum D (2010) Effects of cyclic loading on mechanical properties of Maha Sarakham salt. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 112:43–52Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hou Z, Wu W (2003) Improvement of design of storage cavity in rock salt by using the Hou/Lux constitutive model with consideration of creep rupture criterion and damage. Chin J Geotech Eng 25(1):105–108Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lemaitre J (1985) A continuous damage mechanics model for ductile fracture. J Eng Mater Technol 107(1):83–89CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lindblom UE (1997) Design criteria for the Brooklyn Union gas storage caverns at JFK airport, New York. ISRM international symposium 36th US. rock mechanics symposium. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(3–4):179e1–179e16Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu JF, Xie H, Xu J, Yang CH (2008) Experimental study on damping characteristics of rock under cyclic loading. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 27(4):712–717 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu JF, Pei JL, Ma K, Zhou H, Hou Z (2010) Damage evolution and fractal property of salt rock in tensile failure. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on underground storage of CO2 and energy, Beijing, China, pp 105–112Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu JF, Xu J, Li QS, Li GL (2010) Experimental research on damping parameters of rock under cyclic loading. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 29(5):1036–1041 (in Chinese)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lux KH, Hou Z, Duesterlohn U (1999) Some new aspects about the mechanical behavior of salt cavities and about the geotechnical proof of safety, part 1: theories analysis. Erdoel Erdgas Kohle 115(3):122–127 (in German)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mohd Salim NA, Mohamed Z (2012) Cyclic loading effect on the uniaxial compressive strength of weathered rock. In: International symposium on advances in science and technology, 6th SAS Tech 2012, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peng RD, Xie H, Ju Y (2007) Analysis of energy dissipation and damage evolution of sandstone during tensile process. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 26(12):2526–2531 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schulze T, Popp HK (2001) Development of damage and permeability in deforming rock salt. Eng Geol 61(2/3):163–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Staudtmeister K, Rokahr RB (1997) Rock mechanical design of storage caverns for natural gas in rock salt mass. ISRM international symposium. 36th US. rock mechanics symposium, Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(3–4):300e1–300e13Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    The professional standard compilation group of People’s Republic of China (1999) GB/T50266-99 Standard for tests method of engineering rock mass. China Planning Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wu W, Yang CH, Hou Z (2005) Investigation on studied situations associated with mechanical aspects and development for underground storage of petroleum and natural gas in rock salt. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 24(S2):5561–5568 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xie H, Chen ZD (1988) Study of a rock model with continuous damage mechanics. J China Coal Society 1:33–42 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Xie H, Ju Y (1997) Discuss on elastic modulus method of classical damage definition. Mech Eng 19(2):1–5 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xie H, Ju Y, Li LY, Peng RD (2008) Energy mechanism of deformation and failure of rock masses. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 27(9):1329–1340 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xie LZ, Zhou HW, Xie H (2009) Research advance of CO2 storage in rock salt caverns. Rock Soil Mech 30(11):3324–3330 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xie H, Liu JF, Ju Y, Li J, Xie LZ (2011) Fractal property of spatial distribution of acoustic emissions during the failure process of bedded rock salt. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48(8):1344–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yang CH, Liang WG, Wei DH, Yang HJ (2005) Investigation on possibility of energy storage in salt rock in China. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 24(24):4409–4417 (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jianfeng Liu
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Heping Xie
    • 1
    • 3
  • Zhengmeng Hou
    • 4
    • 5
  • Chunhe Yang
    • 6
  • Liang Chen
    • 7
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River EngineeringSichuan UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment ProtectionChengdu University of TechnologyChengduChina
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of Energy Engineering, Safety and Mechanics on DisastersSichuan University, Ministry of EducationChengduChina
  4. 4.Institute of Petroleum EngineeringClausthal University of TechnologyClausthal-ZellerfeldGermany
  5. 5.Sino-German Energy Research CenterSichuan UniversityChengduChina
  6. 6.Institute of Rock and Soil MechanicsChinese Academy of SciencesWuhanChina
  7. 7.Beijing Research Institute of Uranium GeologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations