Advertisement

Acta Geotechnica

, Volume 9, Issue 6, pp 1097–1109 | Cite as

Effect of Stern-layer on the compressibility behaviour of bentonites

  • Snehasis TripathyEmail author
  • Ramakrishna Bag
  • Hywel R. Thomas
Research Paper

Abstract

The Stern theory as applicable to interacting parallel clay platelet systems was used to study the compressibility behaviour of bentonites. For a constant surface electrical potential, the distribution of the total electrical charge among the Stern-layer and the Gouy-layer was found to have significant influence on the electrical potential at the midplane between clay platelets. Consideration of the Stern-layer was found to reduce the repulsive pressure or the swelling pressure between clay platelets at large platelet spacing, whereas the repulsive pressure increased significantly when the interacting Gouy-layers were pushed aside. A far greater repulsive pressure was noted for Ca-bentonite than that occurred for Na-bentonite at a platelet distance close to 1.0 nm. Similarly, strong interaction between clay platelets was noted due to suppressed Gouy-layers when the bulk fluid concentration was increased. The repulsive pressure generated due to the overlapping of the Stern-layers was found to be sensitive to changes in the specific adsorption potential, the dielectric constant of the pore fluid in the Stern-layer, and the surface electrical potential. Comparisons of the calculated pressure–void ratio relationships from the Stern theory and the Gouy-Chapman diffuse double layer theory with the experimental consolidation test results of Na- and divalent-rich bentonites showed that, in general, the Stern theory improved the predictions of pressure–void ratio relationships, particularly for pressures greater than 100 kPa; however, strong agreements were lacking in all the cases studied.

Keywords

Bentonite Clays Compressibility Diffuse double layer Stern theory 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The financial assistance provided by Cardiff University for this research work is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Aylmore LAG, Quirk JP (1959) Swelling of clay-water systems. Nature 183:1752–1753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baille W, Tripathy S, Schanz T (2010) Swelling pressures and one dimensional compressibility behaviour of bentonite at large pressures. Appl Clay Sci 48:324–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ben Rhaïem H, Pons CH, Tessier D (1987) Factors affecting the microstructure of smectites. Role of cations and history of applied stresses. In: Proceedings of the international clay conference, Denver, The Clay Mineral Society, pp 292–297Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bolt GH (1956) Physico-chemical analysis of the compressibility of pure clays. Géotechnique 6:86–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bucher F, Müller-Vonmoos M (1989) Bentonite as a containment barrier for the disposal of highly radioactive waste. Appl Clay Sci 4:157–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chan DYC, Pashley RM, Quirk JP (1984) Surface potentials derived from co-ion exclusion measurements on homoionic montmorillonite and illite. Clays Clay Miner 32:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chapman DL (1913) A contribution to the theory of electrocapillarity. Phil Mag 25:475–481CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cruz-Guzmán M, Celis R, Hermosín MC, Koskinen WC, Nacer EA, Cornejo J (2006) Heavy metal adsorption by montmorillonites modified with natural organic cations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dominijanni A, Manassero M (2012) Modelling the swelling and osmotic properties of clay soils. Part I: the phenomenological approach. Int J Eng Sci 51:32–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dominijanni A, Manassero M (2012) Modelling the swelling and osmotic properties of clay soils. Part II: the physical approach. Int J Eng Sci 51:51–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fleureau JM, Verbrugge JC, Huergo PJ, Correia AG, Kheirbek-Saoud S (2002) Aspects of the behaviour of compacted clayey soils on drying and wetting paths. Can Geotech J 39:1341–1357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gonçalvès J, Rousseau-Gueutin P, Revil A (2007) Introducing interacting diffuse layers in TLM calculations: a reappraisal of the influence of the pore size on the swelling pressure and the osmotic efficiency of compacted bentonites. J Colloid Interface Sci 316:92–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gouy G (1910) Electrical charge on the surface of an electrolyte. J Phys 4:457–468Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grim RE (1968) Clay mineralogy, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Horikawa Y, Murray RS, Quirk JP (1988) The effect of electrolyte concentration on the zeta potentials of homoionic montmorillonite and illite. Colloids Surf 32:181–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hou J, Li H, Zhu H (2009) Determination of clay surface potential: a more reliable approach. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:1658–1663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hunter RJ (1981) Zeta potential in colloid science. Academic press Inc., LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Israelachvili J, Wennerström H (1996) Role of hydration and water structure in biological and colloidal interactions. Nature 379:219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lagaly G, Ziesmer S (2003) Colloid chemistry of clay minerals: the coagulation of montmorillonite dispersions. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 100–102:105–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leory P, Revil A (2004) A triple-layer model of the surface electrochemical properties of clay minerals. J Colloid Interface Sci 270:371–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li H, Peng X, Wu L, Jia M, Zhu H (2009) Surface potential dependence of the Hamaker Constant. J Phys Chem C 113:4419–4425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Low PF (1981) The swelling of clay: III. Dissociation of exchangeable cations. J Soil Sci Soc Am 45:1074–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Manassero M, Dominijanni A (2010) Coupled modelling of swelling properties and electrolyte transport through geosynthetic clay liner. In: Sixth international congress on environmental geotechnics (6ICEG), New Delhi, India, 8–12 Nov 2010, pp 260–271Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marcial D, Delage P, Cui YJ (2002) On the high stress compression of bentonites. Can Geotech J 39:812–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mesri G, Olsen RE (1971) Consolidation characteristics of montmorillonite. Géotechnique 21:341–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mačelja S (1997) Hydration in electrical double layers. Nature 385:689–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McCormack D, Carnie SL, Chan DYC (1995) Calculations of electric double-layer force and interaction free energy between dissimilar surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 169:177–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Miller SE, Low PF (1990) Characterization of the electrical double layer of montmorillonite. Langmuir 6:572–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mitchell JK, Soga K (2005) Fundamentals of soil behaviour, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pashley RM (1981) DLVO and hydration forces between mica surfaces in Li+, Na+, K+, and Cs+ electrolyte solutions: a correlation of double-layer and hydration forces with surface cation exchange properties. J Colloid Interface Sci 83:531–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rowe RK, Quigley RM, Booker JR (1995) Clayey barrier systems for waste disposal facilities. E and FN Spon, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shang JQ, Lo KY, Quigley RM (1994) Quantitative determination of potential distribution in Stern-Gouy double-layer model. Can Geotech J 31:624–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sposito G (2008) The chemistry of soils, 2nd edn. Oxford University press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sridharan A (1968) Some studies on the strength of partly saturated clays. PhD thesis, Purdue University, West LafayetteGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sridharan A, Jayadeva MS (1982) Double layer theory and compressibility of clays. Géotechnique 32:133–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sridharan A, Satyamurty PV (1996) Potential-distance relationship of clay-water systems considering the Stern theory. Clays Clay Miner 44:479–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sridharan A, Rao GV (1973) Mechanisms controlling volume change of saturated clays and the role of effective stress concept. Géotechnique 23:359–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stern O (1924) Zur Theorie der elektolytischen doppelschicht. Z Elektrochem 30:508–516Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tripathy S, Schanz T (2007) Compressibility behaviour of clays at large pressures. Can Geotech J 44:355–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tripathy S, Sridharan A, Schanz T (2004) Swelling pressure of compacted bentonites from diffuse double layer theory. Can Geotech J 41:435–450Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    van Olphen H (1977) An introduction to clay colloid chemistry: for clay technologists, geologists and soil scientists, 2nd edn. Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    van Olphen H (1954) Interlayer forces in bentonite. Clays Clay Miner 327:418–438Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Verwey EJW, Overbeek JThG (1948) Theory of the stability of lyophobic colloids. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yang N, Barbour SL (1992) The impact of soil structure and confining stress on the hydraulic conductivity of clays in brine environments. Can Geotech J 29:730–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zhang ZZ, Sparks DL, Scrivner NC (1994) Characterization and modeling of Ai-oxide/aqueous solution interface: 1. Measurement of electrostatic potential at the original of diffuse layer using negative adsorption on Na+ ions. J Colloid Interface Sci 162:244–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Snehasis Tripathy
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ramakrishna Bag
    • 1
  • Hywel R. Thomas
    • 1
  1. 1.Cardiff School of EngineeringCardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations