Acta Geotechnica

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 447–464 | Cite as

Numerical modelling of the improvements to primary and creep settlements offered by granular columns

Research Paper
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Analytical vibro-replacement design approaches typically quantify the settlement reduction using a dimensionless settlement improvement factor, defined as the ratio of the settlements without and with treatment. Most approaches do not explicitly consider the improvement to creep settlement. This is unfortunate because the ‘stone column’ technique is being increasingly used to reduce settlement and improve bearing capacity in soft normally consolidated and lightly overconsolidated cohesive soils (in which creep settlement tends to account for a significant proportion of the total settlement). Analytical design approaches typically consider primary settlement only. In this study, two-dimensional axisymmetric analyses have been carried out using PLAXIS 2D to establish the variation of improvement factor with time using different soil models, one of which incorporates creep behaviour. Two different approaches have been used to establish the influence of creep on predicted settlement improvement factors. The first approach is based on a direct comparison of two different soil models (one of which incorporates creep) whereas the second approach is based solely on the model incorporating creep. The settlement improvement factors have been evaluated for different area-replacement ratios, modular ratios and column lengths. The primary settlement improvement factors are in good agreement with some of the more popular analytical design methods while the creep settlement improvement factors are either equivalent or lower (depending on the approach used). The primary settlement improvement factors show a dependence on the modular ratio whereas it appears that the corresponding creep settlement improvement factors are relatively independent of it.

Keywords

Modular ratio Primary consolidation Secondary settlement (creep) Settlement improvement factor Stone columns 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Irish Research Council for funding this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Aboshi H (1973) An experimental investigation on the similitude in the consolidation of a soft clay, including the secondary creep settlement. Paper presented at the 8th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Moscow, August 1973Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ambily AP, Gandhi SR (2007) Behavior of stone columns based on experimental and FEM analysis. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(4):405–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atkinson JH, Allman MA, Boese RJ (1992) Influence of laboratory sample preparation procedures on the strength and stiffness of intact Bothkennar soil recovered using the Laval sampler. Géotechnique 42(2):349–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balaam NP, Booker JR (1981) Analysis of rigid rafts supported by granular piles. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 5(4):379–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Balaam NP, Booker JR (1985) Effect of stone column yield on settlement of rigid foundations in stabilized clay. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 9(4):331–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barksdale RD, Bachus RC (1983) Design and construction of stone columns, vol I. Federal Highway Administration Report FHWA/RD-83/026, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bell AL (2004) The development and importance of construction technique in deep vibratory ground improvement. In: Raison CA (ed) Ground and soil improvement. Session 3:101–111Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bjerrum L (1967) Engineering geology of Norwegian normally-consolidated marine clays as related to settlements of buildings. Seventh Rankine Lecture. Géotechnique 17(2):81–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Black JA, Sivakumar V, Bell A (2011) The settlement performance of stone column foundations. Géotechnique 61(11):909–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Borges JL, Domingues TS, Cardoso AS (2009) Embankments on soft soil reinforced with stone columns: numerical analysis and proposal of a new design method. Geotech Geol Eng 27(6):667–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brinkgreve RBJ, Swolfs WM, Engin E (2011) PLAXIS 2D 2010 material models manual. PLAXIS B.VGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brinkgreve RBJ, Swolfs WM, Engin E (2011) PLAXIS 2D 2010 reference manual. PLAXIS B.VGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Buisman ASK (1936) Results of long duration settlement tests. Paper presented at the 1st international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1936Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Castro J, Sagaseta C (2009) Consolidation around stone columns. Influence of column deformation. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 33(7):851–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Castro J, Sagaseta C (2011) Consolidation and deformation around stone columns: numerical evaluation of analytical solutions. Comput Geotech 38(3):354–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Debats JM, Guetif Z, Bouassida M (2003) Soft soil improvement due to vibro-compacted columns installation. Paper presented at the international workshop “geotechnics of soft soils. Theory and practice”, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, 17–19 September 2003Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Degago SA, Grimstad G, Jostad HP, Nordal S, Olsson M (2011) Use and misuse of the isotache concept with respect to creep hypotheses A and B. Géotechnique 61(10):897–908Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Degago SA, Nordal S, Grimstad G, Jostad HP (2011) Analyses of Väsby test fill according to creep hypothesis A and B. Paper presented at the 13th international conference of the international association for computer methods and advances in geomechanics, Melbourne, 9–11 May 2011Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ellouze S, Bouassida M (2009) Prediction of the settlement of reinforced soft clay by a group of stone columns. Paper presented at the 2nd international conference on new developments in soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, East University, Nicosia, North Cyprus, 28–30 May 2009Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Feng TW (1991) Compressibility and permeability of natural soft clays and surcharging to reduce settlements. PhD Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gäb M, Schweiger HF, Kamrat-Pietraszewska D, Karstunen M (2008) Numerical analysis of a floating stone column foundation using different constitutive models. Paper presented at the 2nd international workshop on the geotechnics of soft soils–focus on ground improvement, Glasgow, 3–5 September 2008Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Garlanger JE (1972) The consolidation of soils exhibiting creep under constant effective stress. Géotechnique 22(1):71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Grimstad G, Degago SA, Nordal S, Karstunen M (2010) Modeling creep and rate effects in structured anisotropic soft clays. Acta Geotech 5(1):69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Han J, Ye SL (2001) Simplified method for consolidation rate of stone column reinforced foundations. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(7):597–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hight DW, Boeese R, Butcher AP, Clayton CRI, Smith PR (1992) Disturbance of the Bothkennar clay prior to laboratory testing. Géotechnique 42(2):199–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Imai G, Tang YX (1992) Constitutive equation of one-dimensional consolidation derived from inter-connected tests. Soils Found 32(2):83–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Killeen MM, McCabe BA (2010) A numerical study of factors affecting the performance of stone columns supporting rigid footings on soft clay. Paper presented at the 7th European conference on numerical methods in geotechnical engineering, Trondheim (Norway), 2–4 June 2010Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Konovalov PA, Bezvolev SG (2005) Analysis of results of consolidation tests of saturated clayey soils. J Soil Mech Found Eng 42(3):81–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ladd CC, Foott R, Ishihara K, Schlosser F, Poulos HG (1977) Stress-deformation and strength characteristics. Paper presented at the 9th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering (ICSMFE), Tokyo, Japan, 10–15 July 1977Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Le TM, Fatahi B, Khabbaz H (2011) Soil creep mechanisms and inducing factors. Paper presented at the international conference on advances in geotechnical engineering, Perth, Australia, 7–9 November 2011Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Leoni M, Karstunen M, Vermeer PA (2008) Anisotropic creep model for soft soils. Géotechnique 58(3):215–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    McCabe BA, Nimmons GJ, Egan D (2009) A review of field performance of stone columns in soft soils. Proc ICE Geotech Eng 162(6):323–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    McKelvey D, Sivakumar V, Bell A, Graham J (2004) Modelling vibrated stone columns in soft clay. Proc ICE Geotech Eng 157(3):137–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mesri G, Choi YK (1985) The uniqueness of the end-of-primary (EOP) void ratio-effective stress relationship. Paper presented at the 11th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering (ICSMFE), San Francisco, 12–16 August 1985Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Muir Wood D, Hu W, Nash DFT (2000) Group effects in stone column foundations: model tests. Géotechnique 50(6):689–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Munfakh GA, Sarkar SK, Castelli RJ (1983) Performance of a test embankment founded on stone columns. Paper presented at the international conference on advances in piling and ground treatment for foundations, London, 2–4 March 1983Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nash DFT, Ryde SJ (2001) Modelling consolidation accelerated by vertical drains in soils subject to creep. Géotechnique 51(3):257–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nash DFT, Powell JJM, Lloyd IM (1992) Initial investigations of the soft clay test site at Bothkennar. Géotechnique 42(2):163–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Poorooshasb HB, Meyerhof GG (1997) Analysis of behavior of stone columns and lime columns. Comput Geotech 20(1):47–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Priebe HJ (1995) The design of vibro replacement. Ground Eng 28(10):31–37Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pulko B, Majes B (2005) Simple and accurate prediction of settlements of stone column reinforced soil. Paper presented at the 16th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Osaka, Japan, 12–16 September 2005Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Pulko B, Majes B, Logar J (2011) Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: analytical calculation model. Geotext Geomembr 29(1):29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schanz T, Vermeer PA, Bonnier PG (1999) The hardening soil model: formulation and verification. Paper presented at beyond 2000 in computational geotechnics. Ten years of PLAXIS international, Amsterdam, 18–20 March 1999Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Simons NE (1974) Normally consolidated and lightly overconsolidated cohesive materials—review paper section II. Paper presented at the conference on settlement of structures, Cambridge, Massachusetts, April 1974Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Simons NE, Som NN (1970) Settlement of structures on clay: with particular emphasis on London clay. CIRIA (Construction Industry Research and Information Association) report 22Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Smith PR, Jardine RJ, Hight DW (1992) Yielding of Bothkennar clay. Géotechnique 42(2):257–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Šuklje L (1957) The analysis of the consolidation process by the isotaches method. Paper presented at the 4th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, London, August 1957Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Van Impe WF, De Beer E (1983) Improvement of settlement behaviour of soft layers by means of stone columns. Paper presented at the 8th European conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Helsinki, Finland, 23–26 May 1983Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Vermeer PA, Neher HP (1999) A soft soil model that accounts for creep. Paper presented at beyond 2000 in computational geotechnics. Ten years of PLAXIS international, Amsterdam, 18–20 March 1999Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Vermeer PA, Stolle DFE, Bonnier PG (1998) From the classical theory of secondary compression to modern creep analysis. Paper presented at the 9th international conference on computer methods and advances in geomechanics, Wuhan, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Waterman D, Broere W (2005) Practical application of the soft soil creep model—part III. Plaxis Bullletin 17, PLAXIS B.VGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Watts KS, Johnson D, Wood LA, Saadi A (2000) An instrumented trial of vibro ground treatment supporting strip foundations in a variable fill. Géotechnique 50(6):699–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Yin JH, Graham J (1989) Viscous-elastic-plastic modelling of one-dimensional time-dependent behaviour. Can Geotech J 26(2):199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Yin JH, Graham J (1994) Equivalent times and one-dimensional elastic visco-plastic modelling of time-dependent stress-strain behaviour of clays. Can Geotech J 31(1):42–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Yin JH, Graham J (1996) Elastic visco-plastic modelling of one-dimensional consolidation. Géotechnique 46(3):515–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Yin JH, Zhu JG, Graham J (2002) A new elastic viscoplastic model for time-dependent behaviour of normally and overconsolidated clays: theory and verification. Can Geotech J 39(1):157–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Yin ZY, Chang CS, Karstunen M, Hicher PY (2010) An anisotropic elastic–viscoplastic model for soft clays. Int J Solids Struct 47(5):665–677MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Yin ZY, Karstunen M, Chang CS, Koskinen M, Lojander M (2011) Modeling time-dependent behavior of soft sensitive clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137(11):1103–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Engineering and InformaticsNational University of IrelandGalwayIreland

Personalised recommendations