# A new algorithm to model the dynamics of 3-D bonded rigid bodies with rotations

- 470 Downloads
- 26 Citations

## Abstract

In this paper we propose a new algorithm to simulate the dynamics of 3-D interacting rigid bodies. Six degrees of freedom are introduced to describe a single 3-D body or particle, and six relative motions and interactions are permitted between bonded bodies. We develop a new decomposition technique for 3-D rotation and pay particular attention to the fact that an arbitrary relative rotation between two coordinate systems or two rigid bodies can not be decomposed into three mutually independent rotations around three orthogonal axes. However, it can be decomposed into two rotations, one pure axial rotation around the line between the centers of two bodies, and another rotation on a specified plane controlled by another parameter. These two rotations, corresponding to the relative axial twisting and bending in our model, are sequence-independent. Therefore all interactions due to the relative translational and rotational motions between linked bodies can be uniquely determined using such a two-step decomposition technique. A complete algorithm for one such simulation is presented. Compared with existing methods, this algorithm is physically more reliable and has greater numerical accuracy.

## Keywords

Bonded rigid-bodies Decomposition of 3-D finite rotations Quaternion## List of symbols

## Coordinate systems

*O*−*XYZ*the space-fixed system

*O*_{1}−*X*_{1}*Y*_{1}*Z*_{1}the body-fixed frame of particle 1

*O*_{2}−*X*_{2}*Y*_{2}*Z*_{2}the body-fixed frame of particle 2

*O*_{2}−*X*_{2}′*Y*_{2}′*Z*_{2}′an auxiliary body-fixed frame of particle 2, obtained by directly rotating

*X*_{2}*Y*_{2}*Z*_{2}at T = 0 such that its*Z*_{2}′-axis is pointing to particle 1. There is no relative rotation between*X*_{2}′*Y*_{2}′*Z*_{2}′ and*X*_{2}*Y*_{2}*Z*_{2}*O*_{2}−*X*_{1}′*Y*_{1}′*Z*_{1}′another auxiliary frame. The relative rotation from

*X*_{2}*Y*_{2}*Z*_{2}to*X*_{1}*Y*_{1}*Z*_{1}makes*X*_{2}′*Y*_{2}′*Z*_{2}′ rotate to*X*_{1}′*Y*_{1}′*Z*_{1}′

## Vectors

**f**total force acting on the particle, measured in the space-fixed system

*XYZ*- \({\varvec{\tau}}^{\varvec{b}}\)
total torque acting on the particle expressed in body-fixed frame

**f**_{r}normal force between two particles

**f**_{s1},**f**_{s2}shear forces between two particles

- \({\varvec{\tau}}_{\varvec{t}}\)
torque cause by twisting or torsion between two particles

- \({\varvec{\tau}}_{\varvec{{b1}}} , {\varvec{\tau}}_{\varvec{{b2}}}\)
torques cause by relative bending between two particles

- \(\Updelta {\varvec{\alpha}}_{\varvec{t}}\)
relative angular displacement caused by twisting motion

- \(\Updelta {\varvec{\alpha}}_{\varvec{{b1}}}, \Updelta \alpha_{b2}\)
relative angular displacements caused by bending motion

- Δ
**u**_{r} relative displacement in normal direction

- Δ
**u**_{s1}, Δ**u**_{s2} relative displacements in tangent directions

**r**position vector of a particle, measured in

*XYZ*- \({\varvec{\omega}}^{\varvec{b}}\)
angular velocities measured in the body-fixed frame

**r**_{10},**r**_{20}initial position of particle 1 and particle 2, measured in

*XYZ***r**_{1},**r**_{2}current positions of particle 1 and particle 2, measured in

*XYZ***r**_{0}initial position of particle 1 relative to particle 2, measured in

*X*_{2}*Y*_{2}*Z*_{2}(or*XYZ*)**r**_{c}current position of particle 1 relative to particle 2, measured in

*X*_{2}*Y*_{2}*Z*_{2}**r**_{f}current position of particle 1 relative to particle 2, measured in

*XYZ*- Δ
**r** translational displacement of particle 1 relative to particle 2, measured in

*X*_{2}*Y*_{2}*Z*_{2}**f**_{s}^{t}shear force caused by translational motion of particle 1 relative to particle 2, measured in

*X*_{2}*Y*_{2}*Z*_{2}- \({\varvec{\tau}}_{\varvec{s}}^{\varvec{t}}\)
torque generated by

*f*_{ s }^{ t }, measured in*X*_{2}*Y*_{2}*Z*_{2}**f**_{s}^{r}shear force caused by the rotation of particle 1 relative to particle 2, measured in

*X*_{2}*Y*_{2}*Z*_{2}- \({\varvec{\tau}}_{\varvec{s}}^{\varvec{r}}\)
torque generated by

*f*_{ s }^{ r }, measured in*X*_{2}*Y*_{2}*Z*_{2}- \({\varvec{\tau}}_{\varvec{b}}^{\varvec{r}}\)
bending torque cause by the rotation of particle 1 relative to particle 2, measured in

*X*_{2}*Y*_{2}*Z*_{2}- \({\varvec{\tau}}_{\varvec{t}}^{\varvec{r}}\)
twisting torque cause by the rotation of particle 1 relative to particle 2, measured in

*X*_{2}*Y*_{2}*Z*_{2}- \({\varvec{\tau}}^{\prime}_{\varvec{b}}\)
bending torque cause by the rotation of particle 1 relative to particle 2, measured in

*X*_{2}′*Y*_{2}′*Z*_{2}′- \({\varvec{\tau}}^{\prime}_{\varvec{t}}\)
twisting torque cause by the rotation of particle 1 relative to particle 2, measured in

*X*_{2}′*Y*_{2}′*Z*_{2}′**f**_{s}′shear force caused by the rotation of particle 1 relative to particle 2, measured in

*X*_{2}′*Y*_{2}′*Z*_{2}′- \({\varvec{\tau}}^{\prime}_{\varvec{s}}\)
torque generated by

*f*_{ s }, measured in*X*_{2}′*Y*_{2}′*Z*_{2}′

## Matrices

**Ω**matrix of angular velocity

- \({\dot{\varvec{Q}}}\)
matrix of quaternion derivative

**Q**_{0}(*q*)matrix linking Ω and \({\dot{Q}}\)

## Quaternions

*p*^{0},*q*^{0}initial orientations of particle 1 and particle 2, expressed in

*XYZ**p*,*q*current orientations of particle 1 and particle 2, expressed in

*XYZ**g*^{o}rotation from

*X*_{2}*Y*_{2}*Z*_{2}to*X*_{1}*Y*_{1}*Z*_{1}, expressed in*X*_{2}*Y*_{2}*Z*_{2}*g*rotation from

*X*_{2}′*Y*_{2}′*Z*_{2}′ to*X*_{1}′*Y*_{1}′*Z*_{1}′, expressed in*X*_{2}′*Y*_{2}′*Z*_{2}′*h*rotation from

*X*_{2}*Y*_{2}*Z*_{2}to*X*_{2}′*Y*_{2}′*Z*_{2}′, expressed in*X*_{2}*Y*_{2}*Z*_{2}

## Others

- ψ
twisting angle between two particles

- θ
bending angle between two particles

- φ
orientation angle determining the plane on which bending occurs

*K*_{r}normal stiffness

*K*_{s},*K*_{s1},*K*_{s2}shear stiffness

*K*_{t}twisting (torsional) stiffness

*K*_{b}*K*_{b1},*K*_{b2}bending stiffness

*M*mass of a rigid body or particle

*I*_{xx},*I*_{yy},*I*_{zz}three principle moments of inertia in the body-fixed frame

## Notes

### Acknowledgments

Funding support is gratefully acknowledged by the Australian Computational Earth Systems Simulator Major National Research Facility, The University of Queensland and SGI. The ACcESS MNRF is funded by the Australian Commonwealth Government and participating institutions (University of Queensland, Monash U, Melbourne U., VPAC, RMIT) and the Victorian State Government. The author would like to thank Dr. Louise Kettle, Mr. William Hancock and Dr. Junfang Zhang for their valuable suggestions to improve the manuscript.

## References

- 1.Allen MA, Tildesley DJ (1987) Computer simulation of liquid. Oxford Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 2.Baranowski R,Thachuk M (1999) Mobilities of NO+ drifting in helium: a molecular dynamics study. J Chem Phys 110:11383–11389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Bauchau OA,Trainelli L (2003) The vectorial parameterization of rotation. Nonlinear Dyn 32:71–92zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 4.Buss SR (2000) Accurate and efficient simulation of rigid-body rotations. J Comp Phys 164:377–406zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 5.Coleman BD, Olson WK, Swigon D (2003) Theory of sequence-dependent DNA elasticity. J Chem Phys 115:7127–7140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Cundall PA,Stack ODL (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29:47–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Dullweber A, Leimkuhler AB, McLachlan R (1997) Symplectic splitting methods for rigid-body molecular dynamic. J Chem Phys 107:5840–5851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Evans DJ (1977) On the representation of orientation space. Mol Phys 34:317–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Evans DJ, Murad S (1977) Singularity free algorithm for molecular dynamic simulation of rigid polyatomice. Mol Phys 34:327–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Fincham D (1992) Leapfrog rotational algorithm. Mol Simul 8:165–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Goldstein H (1990) Classical mechanics, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
- 12.Iwashita K, Oda M (1998) Rolling resistance at contacts in simulation of shear band development by DEM. J Eng Mech 124:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Jiang MJ, Yu HS, Harris D (2005) A novel discrete element model for granular material incorporating rolling resistance. Comput Geotech 32:340–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Johnson S, Willaims J, Cook B (2007) Quaternion-based approach for integration finite rotational motion. The proceedings of the 4th international conference on Discrete Element Method August, 2007, Brisbane, Australia, pp 27–29Google Scholar
- 15.Kol A, Laird BB, Leimkuhler BJ (1997) A symplectic method for rigid-body molecular simulation. J Chem Phys 107:2580–2588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Kuipers JB (1998) Quaternion and rotation sequences. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- 17.Miller III TF, Eleftheriou, Pattnaik MP,Vdirango,Newns AD (2002) Symplectic quaternion scheme for biophysical molecular dynamic. J Chem Phys 116:8649–8659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Mora P, Place D (1994) Simulation of the friction stick-slip instability. Pure Appl Geophys 143:61–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Munjiza A, Latham JP, John NWM (2003) 3D dynamics of discrete element systems comprising irregular discrete elements-integration solution for finite rotations in 3D. Int J Numer Meth Eng 56:35–55zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 20.Omelyan IP (1998) Algorithm for numerical integration of the rigid-body equations of motion. Phys Rev E 58:1169–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Omelyan IP (1998) On the numerical integration of motion for rigid polyatomics: the modified quaternion approach. J Comp Phys 12:97–103Google Scholar
- 22.Omelyan IP (1998) Numerical integration of the equation of motion for rigid polyatomics: the matrix method. Comput Phys Commun 109:171–183zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Place D, Mora P (1999) The lattice solid model to simulate the physics of rocks and earthquakes: incorporation of friction. J Comp Phys 150:332–372zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Potyondy D, Cundall P (2004) A bonded-particle model for rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:1329–1364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Rapaport DC (1995) The art of molecular dynamic simulation. Cambridge University press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 26.Wang YC, Abe S, Latham S, Mora P (2006) Implementation of particle-scale rotation in the 3-D lattice solid model. Pure Appl Geophys 163:1769–1785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Wang YC, Mora P (2008) Modeling wing crack extension: implications to the ingredients of discrete element model. Pure Appl Geophys (in print)Google Scholar