Abstract
The advent of atomic force microscopy (AFM) provides a powerful tool for investigating the behaviors of single living cells under near physiological conditions. Besides acquiring the images of cellular ultra-microstructures with nanometer resolution, the most remarkable advances are achieved on the use of AFM indenting technique to quantify the mechanical properties of single living cells. By indenting single living cells with AFM tip, we can obtain the mechanical properties of cells and monitor their dynamic changes during the biological processes (e.g., after the stimulation of drugs). AFM indentation-based mechanical analysis of single cells provides a novel approach to characterize the behaviors of cells from the perspective of biomechanics, considerably complementing the traditional biological experimental methods. Now, AFM indentation technique has been widely used in the life sciences, yielding a large amount of novel information that is meaningful to our understanding of the underlying mechanisms that govern the cellular biological functions. Here, based on the authors’ own researches on AFM measurement of cellular mechanical properties, the principle and method of AFM indentation technique was presented, the recent progress of measuring the cellular mechanical properties using AFM was summarized, and the challenges of AFM single-cell nanomechanical analysis were discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.



References
- 1.
Stewart MP, Toyoda Y, Hyman AA et al (2011) Force probing cell shape changes to molecular resolution. Trends Biochem Sci 36:444–450
- 2.
Chen CS (2008) Mechanotransduction: a field pulling together. J Cell Sci 121:3285–3292
- 3.
Miller CJ, Davidson LA (2013) The interplay between cell signaling and mechanics in developmental processes. Nat Rev Genet 14:733–744
- 4.
Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL (2005) Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310:1139–1143
- 5.
Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL et al (2006) Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126:677–689
- 6.
Li J, Han D, Zhao YP (2014) Kinetic behaviour of the cells touching substrate: the interfacial stiffness guides cell spreading. Sci Rep 4:3910
- 7.
Geiger B, Spatz JP, Bershadsky AD (2009) Environmental sensing through focal adhesions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10:21–33
- 8.
Lee GYH, Lim CT (2007) Biomechanics approaches to studying human diseases. Trends Biotechnol 25:111–118
- 9.
Cross SE, Jin YS, Rao JY et al (2007) Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients. Nat Nanotechnol 2:780–783
- 10.
Swaminathan V, Mythreye K, O Brien ET et al (2011) Mechanical stiffness grades metastatic potential in patient tumor cells and in cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 71:5075–5080
- 11.
Chowdhury F, Na S, Li D et al (2010) Material properties of the cell dictate stress-induced spreading and differentiation in embryonic stem cells. Nat Mater 9:82–88
- 12.
Bergert M, Chandradoss SD, Desai RA et al (2012) Cell mechanics control rapid transitions between blebs and lamellipodia during migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:14434–14439
- 13.
Plodinec M, Loparic M, Monnier CA et al (2012) The nanomechanical signature of breast cancer. Nat Nanotechnol 7:757–765
- 14.
Gossett DR, Tse HTK, Lee SA et al (2012) Hydrodynamic stretching of single cells for large population mechanical phenotyping. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:7630–7635
- 15.
Carlo DD (2012) A mechanical biomarker of cell state in medicine. J Lab Autom 17:32–42
- 16.
Cha S, Shin T, Lee SS et al (2012) Cell stretching measurement utilizing viscoelastic particle focusing. Anal Chem 84:10471–10477
- 17.
Mao X, Huang TJ (2012) Exploiting mechanical biomarkers in microfluidics. Lab Chip 12:4006–4009
- 18.
Beech JP, Holm SH, Adolfsson K et al (2012) Sorting cells by size, shape and deformability. Lab Chip 12:1048–1051
- 19.
Shojaei-Baghini E, Zheng Y, Sun Y (2013) Automated micropipette aspiration of single cells. Ann Biomed Eng 41:1208–1216
- 20.
Zhou ZL, Hui TH, Tang B et al (2014) Accurate measurement of stiffness of leukemia cells and leukocytes using an optical trap by a rate-jump method. RSC Adv 4:8453–8460
- 21.
Radmacher M (2002) Measuring the elastic properties of living cells by the atomic force microscope. Methods Cell Biol 68:67–90
- 22.
Lingwood D, Simons K (2010) Lipid rafts as a membrane-organizing principle. Science 327:46–50
- 23.
Spedden E, White JD, Naumova EN et al (2012) Elasticity maps of living neurons measured by combined fluorescence and atomic force microscopy. Biophys J 103:868–877
- 24.
Heu C, Berquand A, Elie-Caille C et al (2012) Glyphosate-induced stiffening of HaCaT keratinocytes, a peak force tapping study on living cells. J Struct Biol 178:1–7
- 25.
Alsteens D, Trabelsi H, Soumillion P et al (2013) Multiparametric atomic force microscopy imaging of single bacteriophages extruding from living bacteria. Nat Commun 4:2926
- 26.
Lam WA, Chaudhuri O, Crow A et al (2011) Mechanics and contraction dynamics of single platelets and implications for clot stiffening. Nat Mater 10:61–66
- 27.
Stewart MP, Helenius J, Toyoda Y et al (2011) Hydrostatic pressure and the actomyosin cortex drive mitotic cell rounding. Nature 469:226–230
- 28.
Taatjes DJ, Quinn AS, Rand JH et al (2013) Atomic force microscopy: high resolution dynamic imaging of cellular and molecular structure in health and disease. J Cell Physiol 228:1949–1955
- 29.
Li M, Liu LQ, Xi N et al (2013) Progress of AFM single-cell and single-molecule morphology imaging. Chin Sci Bull 58:3177–3182
- 30.
Li M, Liu LQ, Xi N et al (2013) Mapping CD20 molecules on the lymphoma cell surface using atomic force microscopy. Chin Sci Bull 58:1516–1519
- 31.
Kirmizis D, Logothetidis S (2010) Atomic force microscopy probing in the measurement of cell mechanics. Int J Nanomed 5:137–145
- 32.
Gavara N, Chadwick RS (2012) Determination of the elastic moduli of thin samples and adherent cells using conical atomic force microscope tips. Nat Nanotechnol 7:733–736
- 33.
Velegol SB, Logan BE (2002) Contributions of bacterial surface polymers, electrostatics, and cell elasticity to the shape of AFM force curves. Langmuir 18:5256–5262
- 34.
Martens JC, Radmacher M (2008) Softening of the actin cytoskeleton by inhibition of myosin II. Pflugers Arch Eur J Physiol 456:95–100
- 35.
Medalsy ID, Muller DJ (2013) Nanomechanical properties of proteins and membranes depend on loading rate and electrostatic interactions. ACS Nano 7:2642–2650
- 36.
Carl P, Schillers H (2008) Elasticity measurement of living cells with an atomic force microscope: data acquisition and processing. Eur J Physiol 457:551–559
- 37.
Oberleithner H, Callies C, Kusche-Vihrog K et al (2009) Potassium softens vascular endothelium and increases nitric oxide release. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:2829–2834
- 38.
Mahaffy RE, Shih CK, MacKintosh FC et al (2000) Scanning probe-based frequency-dependent microrheology of polymer gels and biological cells. Phys Rev Lett 85:880–883
- 39.
Nikkhah M, Strobl JS, Schmelz EM et al (2011) Evaluation of the influence of growth medium composition on cell elasticity. J Biomech 44:762–766
- 40.
Li M, Liu LQ, Xi N et al (2012) Atomic force microscopy imaging and mechanical properties measurement of red blood cells and aggressive cancer cells. Sci China Life Sci 55:968–973
- 41.
Stewart MP, Hodel AW, Spielhofer A et al (2013) Wedged AFM-cantilevers for parallel plate cell mechanics. Methods 60:186–194
- 42.
Chaudhuri O, Parekh SH, Lam WA et al (2009) Combined atomic force microscopy and side-view optical imaging for mechanical studies of cells. Nat Methods 6:383–387
- 43.
Rotsch C, Radmacher M (2000) Drug-induced changes of cytoskeleton structure and mechanics in fibroblast: an atomic force microscopy study. Biophys J 78:520–535
- 44.
Costa KD (2004) Single-cell elastography: probing for disease with the atomic force microscope. Dis Markers 19:139–154
- 45.
Rotsch C, Jacobson K, Radmacher M (1999) Dimensional and mechanical dynamics of active and stable edges in motile fibroblasts investigated by using atomic force microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:921–926
- 46.
Stolz M, Raiteri R, Daniels AU et al (2004) Dynamic elastic modulus of porcine articular cartilage determined at two different levels of tissue organization by indentation-type atomic force microscopy. Biophys J 86:3269–3283
- 47.
Kasas S, Longo G, Dietler G (2013) Mechanical properties of biological specimens explored by atomic force microscopy. J Phys D Appl Phys 46:133001
- 48.
Tao NJ, Lindsay SM, Lees S (1992) Measuring the microelastic properties of biological material. Biophys J 63:1165–1169
- 49.
Radmacher M, Monika F, Hansma PK (1995) Imaging soft samples with the atomic force microscope: gelatin in water and propanol. Biophys J 69:264–270
- 50.
Maivald P, Butt HJ, Gould SAC et al (1991) Using force modulation to image surface elasticities with the atomic force microscope. Nanotechnology 2:103–106
- 51.
Hoh JH, Schoenenberger CA (1994) Surface morphology and mechanical properties of MDCK monolayers by atomic force microscopy. J Cell Sci 107:1105–1114
- 52.
Radmacher M, Fritz M, Kacher CM et al (1996) Measuring the viscoelastic properties of human platelets with the atomic force microscope. Biophys J 79:556–567
- 53.
Cuerrier CM, Gagner A, Lebel R et al (2009) Effect of thrombin and bradykinin on endothelial cell mechanical properties monitored through membrane deformation. J Mol Recognit 22:389–396
- 54.
Pelling AE, Veraitch FS, Chu CPK et al (2009) Mechanical dynamics of single cells during early apoptosis. Cell Motil Cytoskelet 66:409–422
- 55.
Hu M, Wang J, Zhao H et al (2009) Nanostructure and nanomechanics analysis of lymphocyte using AFM: from resting, activated to apoptosis. J Biomech 42:1513–1519
- 56.
Liu Y, Feng J, Shi L et al (2012) In situ mechanical analysis of cardiomyocytes at nano scales. Nanoscale 4:99–102
- 57.
Li M, Liu L, Xi N et al (2014) Nanoscale imaging and mechanical analysis of Fc receptor-mediated macrophage phagocytosis against cancer cells. Langmuir 30:1609–1621
- 58.
Berdyyeva TK, Woodworth CD, Sokolov I (2005) Human epithelial cells increase their rigidity with ageing in vitro: direct measurements. Phys Med Biol 50:81–92
- 59.
Leporatti S, Gerth A, Kohler G et al (2006) Elasticity and adhesion of resting and lipopolysaccharide-stimulated macrophages. FEBS Lett 580:450–454
- 60.
Lulevich V, Yang H, Isseroff RR et al (2010) Single cell mechanics of keratinocyte cells. Ultramicroscopy 110:1435–1442
- 61.
Li M, Xiao X, Liu L et al (2013) Atomic force microscopy study of the antigen-antibody binding force on patient cancer cells based on ROR1 fluorescence recognition. J Mol Recognit 26:432–438
- 62.
Lekka M, Gil D, Pogoda K et al (2012) Cancer cell detection in tissue sections using AFM. Arch Biochem Biophys 518:151–156
- 63.
Zhou Z, Zheng C, Li S et al (2013) AFM nanoindentation detection of the elastic modulus of tongue squamous carcinoma cells with different metastatic potentials. Nanomedicine 9:864–874
- 64.
Mao Y, Sun Q, Wang X et al (2009) In vivo nanomechanical imaging of blood-vessel tissues directly in living mammals using atomic force microscopy. Appl Phys Lett 95:013704
- 65.
Longo G, Alonso-Sarduy L, Rio LM et al (2013) Rapid detection of bacterial resistance to antibiotics using AFM cantilevers as nanomechanical sensors. Nat Nanotechnol 8:522–526
- 66.
McKendry RA, Kappeler N (2013) Sensors: good vibrations for bad bacteria. Nat Nanotechnol 8:483–484
- 67.
Butcher DT, Alliston T, Weaver VM (2009) A tense situation: forcing tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer 9:108–122
- 68.
Janmey PA, McCulloch CA (2007) Cell mechanics: integrating cell responses to mechanical stimuli. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 9:1–34
- 69.
Fletcher DA, Mullins RD (2010) Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton. Nature 463:485–492
- 70.
Fritsch A, Hockel M, Kiessling T et al (2010) Are biomechanical changes necessary for tumour progression. Nat Phys 6:730–732
- 71.
Dufrene YF, Pelling AE (2013) Force nanoscopy of cell mechanics and cell adhesion. Nanoscale 5:4094–4104
- 72.
Muller DJ, Dufrene YF (2011) Atomic force microscopy: a nanoscopic window on the cell surface. Trends Cell Biol 21:461–469
- 73.
Wang Z, Liu L, Wang Y et al (2012) A fully automated system for measuring cellular mechanical properties. J Lab Autom 17:443–448
- 74.
Lin DC, Dimitriadis EK, Horkay F (2007) Robust strategies for automated AFM force curve analysis: I. non-adhesive indentation of soft, inhomogeneous materials. J Biomech Eng 129:430–440
- 75.
Kasas S, Wang X, Hirling H et al (2005) Superficial and deep changes of cellular mechanical properties following cytoskeleton disassembly. Cell Motil Cytoskelet 62:124–132
- 76.
Rosenbluth MJ, Lam WA, Fletcher DA (2006) Force microscopy of nonadherent cells: a comparison of leukemia cell deformability. Biophys J 90:2994–3003
- 77.
Roduit C, Sekatski S, Dietler G et al (2009) Stiffness tomography by atomic force microscopy. Biophys J 97:674–677
- 78.
Labernadie A, Thibault C, Vieu C et al (2010) Dynamics of podosome stiffness revealed by atomic force microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:21016–21021
- 79.
Chahine NO, Blanchette C, Thomas CB et al (2013) Effect of age and cytoskeletal elements on the indentation-dependent mechanical properties of chondrocytes. PLoS One 8:e61651
- 80.
Krause M, Riet J, Wolf K (2013) Probing the compressibility of tumor cell nuclei by combined atomic force-confocal microscopy. Phys Biol 10:065002
- 81.
Yu JQ, Yuan JH, Zhang XJ et al (2013) Nanoscale imaging with an integrated system combining stimulated emission depletion microscope and atomic force microscope. Chin Sci Bull 58:4045–4050
- 82.
Suzuki Y, Sakai N, Yoshida A et al (2013) High-speed atomic force microscopy combined with inverted optical microscopy for studying cellular events. Sci Rep 3:2131
- 83.
Fukuda S, Uchihashi T, Iino R et al (2013) High-speed atomic force microscope combined with single-molecule fluorescence microscope. Rev Sci Instrum 84:073706
- 84.
Colom A, Casuso I, Rico F et al (2013) A hybrid high-speed atomic force-optical microscope for visualizing single membrane proteins on eukaryotic cells. Nat Commun 4:2155
- 85.
Churnside AB, Sullan RMA, Nguyen DM et al (2012) Routine and timely sub-piconewton force stability and precision for biological applications of atomic force microscopy. Nano Lett 12:3557–3561
- 86.
Linkov P, Artemyev M, Efimov AE et al (2013) Comparative advantages and limitations of the basic metrology methods applied to the characterization of nanomaterials. Nanoscale 5:8781–8798
- 87.
Bhatia B, Karthik J, Gahill DG et al (2011) High-temperature piezoresponse force microscopy. Appl Phys Lett 99:173103
- 88.
Stan G, Solares SD, Pittenger B et al (2014) Nanoscale mechanics by tomographic contact resonance atomic force microscopy. Nanoscale 6:962–969
- 89.
Dufrene YF, Martinez-Martin D, Medalsy I et al (2013) Multiparametric imaging of biological systems by force-distance curve-based AFM. Nat Methods 10:847–854
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61175103, 61327014) and CAS FEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding authors
About this article
Cite this article
Li, M., Liu, L., Xi, N. et al. Research progress in quantifying the mechanical properties of single living cells using atomic force microscopy. Chin. Sci. Bull. 59, 4020–4029 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0581-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
Keywords
- Atomic force microscopy
- Cellular mechanical properties
- Indentation
- Force curve
- Elastic modulus