Chinese Science Bulletin

, Volume 58, Issue 33, pp 4161–4170 | Cite as

Investigation of the consistency of atmospheric CO2 retrievals from different space-based sensors: Intercomparison and spatiotemporal analysis

  • TianXing WangEmail author
  • JianCheng Shi
  • YingYing Jing
  • YanHui Xie
Open Access
Article Atmospheric Science


In recent years, global warming caused by emission of CO2 has attracted considerable attention from the public. Although the measurements from AIRS, GOSAT, SCIAMACHY and IASI have been frequently used to derive atmospheric CO2 concentration, comprehensive quantification of the differences among these CO2 products is still not fully investigated yet. In this paper, a series of strategies have been proposed to allow the CO2 products from different instruments to be physically inter-comparable. Based on this, these CO2 products are inter-compared in terms of magnitude and their spatiotemporal distributions. The results reveal that the correlations among these CO2 products are relatively weak, and some discrepancies are detected in terms of the CO2 spatiotemporal characteristics, demonstrating more efforts should be made in the future to improve the retrievals of CO2. Their spatial coverage differences reflected in this study imply the great necessity to generate consistent products with improved spatial and temporal continuities by combining these CO2 measurements.




  1. 1.
    Morino I, Uchino O, Inoue M, et al. Preliminary validation of column-averaged volume mixing ratios of carbon dioxide and methane retrieved from GOSAT short-wavelength infrared spectra. Atmos Meas Tech, 2011, 4:1061–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Butz A, Hasekamp O P, Frankenberg C, et al. Retrievals of atmospheric CO2 from simulated space-borne measurements of backscattered near-infrared sunlight: Accounting for aerosol effects. Appl Opt, 2009, 48:3322–3336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O’Dell C W, Connor B, Bösch H, et al. The ACOS CO2 retrieval algorithm-Part 1: Description and validation against synthetic observations, Atmos Meas Tech, 2012, 5:99–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gautier C, Shiren Y, Hofstadter M D. AIRS Vis/Near IR instrument. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing, 2003, 41:330–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chahine M T, Gautier C, Goldberg M D, et al. AIRS/AMSU/HSB on the Aqua mission: Design, science objectives, data products, and processing systems. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing, 2003, 41:253–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Phulpin T, Cayla F R, Chalon G, et al. IASI on board Metop: Project status and scientific preparation, paper presented at 12th International TOVS Study Conference, Lorne, Vi ctoria, Australia, 2002Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bovensmann H, Burrows J P, Buchwitz M, et al. SCIAMACHY-Mission objectives and measurement modes. J Atmos Sci, 1999, 56:127–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuze A, Suto H, Nakajima M, et al. Thermal and near infrared sensor for carbon observation Fourier-transform spectrometer on the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite for greenhouse gases monitoring. Appl Opt, 2009, 48:6716–6733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yokota T, Yoshida Y, Eguchi N, et al. Global Concentrations of CO2 and CH4 Retrieved from GOSAT: First Preliminary Results, SOLA, 2009, 5:160–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reuter M, Buchwitz M, Schneising O, et al. A method for improved SCIAMACHY CO2 retrieval in the presence of optically thin clouds. Atmos Meas Tech, 2010, 3:209–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Crisp D, Atlas R M, Breon F M, et al. The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) mission. Adv Space Res, 2004, 34:700–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chahine M, Barnet C, Olsen E T, et al. On the determination of atmospheric minor gases by the method of vanishing partial derivatives with application to CO2. Geophys Res Lett, 2005, 32:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crisp D, Fisher B M, O’Dell C, et al. The ACOS XCO2 retrieval algorithm, Part 2: Global XCO2 data characterization. Atmos Meas Tech, 2012, 5:1–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Buchwitz M, Rozanov V V, Burrows J P. A near-infrared optimized DOAS method for the fast global retrieval of atmospheric CH4, CO, CO2, H2O, and N2O total column amounts from SCIAMACHY Envisat-1 nadir radiances. 1 nadir radiances. J Geophys Res, 2000, 105:15231–15245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Buchwitz M, Beek R, Burrows J P, et al. Atmospheric methane and carbon dioxide from SCIAMACHY satellite data: Initial comparison with chemistry and transport models. Atmos Chem Phys, 2005, 5:941–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Buchwitz M, Beek R de, Noël S, et al. Carbon monoxide, methane and carbon dioxide columns retrieved from SCIAMACHY by WFM-DOAS: Year 2003 initial data set. Atmos Chem Phys, 2005, 5: 3313–3329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Houweling S, Hartmann W, Aben I, et al. Evidence of systematic errors in SCIAMACHY-observed CO2 due to aerosols. Atmos Chem Phys, 2005, 5:3003–3013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barkley M P, Frieβ U, Monks P S. Measuring atmospheric CO2 from space using Full Spectral Initiation (FSI) WFM-DOAS. Atmos Chem Phys, 2006, 6:3517–3534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bösch H, Toon G C, Sen B, et al. Space-based near-infrared CO2 measurements: Testing the orbiting carbon observatory retrieval algorithm and validation concept using SCIAMACHY observations over Park Falls, Wisconsin. J Geophys Res, 2006, 111:d23302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schneising O, Buchwitz M, Burrows J P, et al. Three years of greenhouse gas column-averaged dry air mole fractions retrieved from satellite-Part 1: Carbon dioxide. Atmos Chem Phys, 2008, 8:3827–3853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reuter M, Bovensmann H, Buchwitz M, et al. Retrieval of atmospheric CO2 with enhanced accuracy and precision from SCIAMA-CHY: Validation with FTS measurements and com-parison with model results. J Geophys Res, 2011, 116:D04301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Turquety S, Hadji-Lazaro J, Clerbaux C, et al. Operational trace gas retrieval algorithm for the infrared atmospheric sounding interferometer. J Geophys Res, 109:D21301Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schlüssel P, Hultberg T H, Phillips P L, et al. The operational IASI Level 2 processor. Adv Space Res, 2005, 36:982–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peters W, Jacobson A R, Sweeney C, et al. An atmospheric perspective on North America carbon dioxide exchange: Carbon Tracker. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007, 104:18925–18930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rodgers C D. Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Ltd., 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wunch D, Wennberg P O, Toon G C, et al. A method for evaluating bias in global measurements of CO2 total columns from space. Atmos Chem Phys, 2011, 11:12317–12337CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • TianXing Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • JianCheng Shi
    • 1
  • YingYing Jing
    • 1
  • YanHui Xie
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Jointly Sponsored by the Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital EarthChinese Academy of Sciences and Beijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations