Download PDF

Chinese Science Bulletin

, Volume 57, Issue 22, pp 2941–2946 | Cite as

Role of step-shape structures and critical failure bubble volume in micro bubble constraint

Open Access
Article Mechanical Engineering
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
  • 421 Downloads

Abstract

Micro fluid devices using micro bubbles have attracted much attention for their special advantages. In many cases, the bubbles must be constrained to a certain position so as to grow or shrink under control. In this paper, we discuss the effect of step-shape structures in constraining bubbles against the surface force, which plays a dominant role on the micro scale. We fabricate specimens with a step and electrodes and carry out electrolysis experiments in water to observe bubble growth. We observe the constraining effect of steps as well as failure phenomena. Based on numerical simulations and theoretical analysis, we introduce the critical failure bubble volume and present the analytic solution in a 2-D model. Using step-shape structures is an easy method of constraining bubbles within the critical failure volume..

Keywords

micro bubbles position constraint step-shape structures contact angle 
Download to read the full article text

References

  1. 1.
    Zhang K, Jian A Q, Zhang X M, et al. Laser-induced thermal bubbles for microfluidic applications. Lab Chip, 2011, 11: 1389–1395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ateya D A, Shah A A, Hua S Z. An electrolytically actuated micropump. Rev Sci Instrum, 2004, 75: 915–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ryu K, Chung S K, Cho S K. Micropumping by an acoustically excited oscillating bubble for automated implantable microfluidic devices. J Assoc Lab Automat, 2010, 15: 163–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chiu S H, Liu C H. An air-bubble-actuated micropump for on-chip blood transportation. Lab Chip, 2009, 9: 1524–1533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tsou C, Huang C. Thermal bubble microfluidic gate based on SOI wafer. J MEMS, 2009, 18: 852–859Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Son S U, Lee S S. Microfocusing using the thermal actuation of microbubbles. Microfluid Nanofluid, 2009, 6: 77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mao X, Juluri B K, Lapsley M I, et al. Milliseconds microfluidic chaotic bubble mixer. Microfluid Nanofluid, 2010, 8: 139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ahmed D, Mao X, Juluri B K, et al. A fast microfluidic mixer based on acoustically driven sidewall-trapped microbubbles. Microfluid Nanofluid, 2009, 7: 727–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ahmed D, Mao X, Shi J, et al. A millisecond micromixer via single-bubble-based acoustic streaming. Lab Chip, 2009, 9: 2738–2741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kato H, Yamaguchi M. Enhancement of mixing by microbubble emission boiling in a microfluidic device. J Visualiz, 2009, 12: 267–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chan S C, Chen C R, Liu C H. A bubble-activated micropump with high-frequency flow reversal. Sens Actuators A, 2010, 163: 501–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liao K M, Chen R, Chou B C S. A novel thermal-bubble-based micromachined accelerometer. Sens Actuators A, 2006, 130: 282–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liao K M, Chen R. Novel two-dimensional micromachined accelerometer based on thermocapillary heat transfer. J Micro/Nanolith MEMS MOEMS, 2008, 7: 033011Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kang E, Lee D H, Kim C B, et al. A hemispherical microfluidic channel for the trapping and passive dissipation of microbubbles. J Micromech Microeng, 2010, 20: 045009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gau H, Herminghaus S, Lenz P, et al. Liquid morphologies on structured surfaces: From microchannels to microchips. Science, 1999, 283: 46–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhao B, Moore J S, Beebe D J. Surface-directed liquid flow inside microchannels. Science, 2001, 291: 1023–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ling W Y L, Ng T W, Neild A. Effect of an encapsulated bubble in inhibiting droplet sliding. Langmuir, 2010, 26: 17695–17702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hirt C W, Nichols B D. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J Comput Phys, 1981, 39: 201–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brackbill J U, Kothe D B, Zemach C. A continuum method for modeling surface tension. J Comput Phys, 1992, 100: 335–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Tribology, Department of Precision Instruments and MechanologyTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations