Chinese Science Bulletin

, Volume 57, Issue 11, pp 1223–1234 | Cite as

A brief review of graphene-based material synthesis and its application in environmental pollution management

Open Access
Invited Review Materials Science

Abstract

Graphene is an interesting two-dimensional carbon allotrope that has attracted considerable research interest because of its unique structure and physicochemical properties. Studies have been conducted on graphene-based nanomaterials including modified graphene, graphene/semiconductor hybrids, graphene/metal nanoparticle composites, and graphene-complex oxide composites. These nanomaterials inherit the unique properties of graphene, and the addition of functional groups or the nanoparticle composites on their surfaces improves their performance. Applications of these materials in pollutant removal and environmental remediation have been explored. From the viewpoint of environmental chemistry and materials, this paper reviews recent important advances in synthesis of graphene-related materials and their application in treatment of environmental pollution. The roles of graphene-based materials in pollutant removal and potential research are discussed.

Keywords

graphene graphene-based material environmental remediation pollution 

References

  1. 1.
    Lee C, Wei X, Kysar J W, et al. Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science, 2008, 321: 385–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balandin A A, Ghosh S, Bao W, et al. Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett, 2008, 8: 902–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Park S, Ruoff R S. Chemical methods for the production of graphenes. Nat Nanotechnol, 2009, 4: 217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rao C N R, Sood A K, Subrahmanyam K S, et al. Graphene: The new two-dimensional nanomaterial. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2009, 48: 7752–7777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ma Y W, Zhang L R, Li J J, et al. Carbon-nitrogen/graphene composite as metal-free electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. Chin Sci Bull, 2011, 56: 3583–3589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tian L L, Zhuang Q C, Li J, et al. Mechanism of intercalation and deintercalation of lithium ions in graphene nanosheets. Chin Sci Bull, 2011, 56: 3204–3212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang H W, Wu H Y, Chang Y Q, et al. Tert-butylhydroquinone-docorated graphene nanosheets and their enhanced capacitive behaviors. Chin Sci Bull, 2011, 56: 2092–2097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang Q O, He Y Q, Chen X G, et al. Structure and photocatalytic properties of ThO2-graphene oxide intercalated composite. Chin Sci Bull, 2011, 56: 331–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang H, Fu Q, Cui Y, et al. Fabrication of metal nanoclusters on graphene grown on Ru(0001). Chin Sci Bull, 2009, 54: 2446–2450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang M Y, Wang Y, Zhao D Y, et al. Immobilization of arsenic in soils by stabilized nanoscale zero-valent iron, iron sulfide (FeS), and magnetite (Fe3O4) particles. Chin Sci Bull, 2010, 55: 365–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meyer J C, Geim A, Katsnelson M, et al. The structure of suspended graphene sheets. Nature, 2007, 446: 60–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ferrari A, Meyer J, Scardaci V, et al. Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers. Phys Rev Lett, 2006, 97: 187401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li X, Cai W, An J, et al. Large-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene films on copper foils. Science, 2009, 324: 1312–1314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reina A, Jia X, Ho J, et al. Large area, few-layer graphene films on arbitrary substrates by chemical vapor deposition. Nano Lett, 2008, 9: 30–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Srivastava A, Galande C, Ci L, et al. Novel liquid precursor-based facile synthesis of large-area continuous, single, and few-layer graphene films. Chem Mater, 2010, 22: 3457–3461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sutter P W, Flege J I, Sutter E A. Epitaxial graphene on ruthenium. Nat Mater, 2008, 7: 406–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vang R T, Honkala K, Dahl S, et al. Controlling the catalytic bond-breaking selectivity of Ni surfaces by step blocking. Nat Mater, 2005, 4: 160–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nandamuri G, Roumimov S, Solanki R. Chemical vapor deposition of graphene films. Nanotechnology, 2010, 21: 145604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aristov V Y, Urbanik G, Kummer K, et al. Graphene synthesis on cubic SiC/Si wafers. Perspectives for mass production of graphene-based electronic devices. Nano Lett, 2010, 10: 992–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Deng D, Pan X, Zhang H, et al. Freestanding graphene by thermal splitting of silicon carbide granules. Adv Mater, 2010, 22: 2168–2171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Emtsev K V, Bostwick A, Horn K, et al. Towards wafer-size graphene layers by atmospheric pressure graphitization of silicon carbide. Nat Mater, 2009, 8: 203–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shivaraman S, Barton R A, Yu X, et al. Free-standing epitaxial graphene. Nano Lett, 2009, 9: 3100–3105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Subrahmanyam K, Panchakarla L, Govindaraj A, et al. Simple method of preparing graphene flakes by an arc-discharge method. J Phys Chem C, 2009, 113: 4257–4259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wu Z S, Ren W, Gao L, et al. Synthesis of graphene sheets with high electrical conductivity and good thermal stability by hydrogen arc discharge exfoliation. Acs Nano, 2009, 3: 411–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hirsch A. Unzipping carbon nanotubes: A peeling method for the formation of graphene nanoribbons. Ang Chem Int Ed, 2009, 48: 6594–6596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jiao L, Zhang L, Wang X, et al. Narrow graphene nanoribbons from carbon nanotubes. Nature, 2009, 458: 877–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kosynkin D V, Higginbotham A L, Sinitskii A, et al. Longitudinal unzipping of carbon nanotubes to form graphene nanoribbons. Nature, 2009, 458: 872–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Guo H L, Wang X F, Qian Q Y, et al. A green approach to the synthesis of graphene nanosheets. Acs Nano, 2009, 3: 2653–2659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shao Y, Wang J, Engelhard M, et al. Facile and controllable electrochemical reduction of graphene oxide and its applications. J Mater Chem, 2009, 20: 743–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhou M, Wang Y, Zhai Y, et al. Controlled synthesis of large-area and patterned electrochemically reduced graphene oxide films. Chem Eur J, 2009, 15: 6116–6120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Simpson C D, Brand J D, Berresheim A J, et al. Synthesis of a giant 222 carbon graphite sheet. Chem Eur J, 2002, 8: 1424–1429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Berresheim A J, Müller M, Müllen K. Polyphenylene nanostructures. Chem Rev, 1999, 99: 1747–1786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sakamoto J, van Heijst J, Lukin O, et al. Two-dimensional polymers: Just a dream of synthetic chemists? Angew Chem Int Ed, 2009, 48: 1030–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wu J, Gherghel L, Watson M D, et al. From branched polyphenylenes to graphite ribbons. Macromolecules, 2003, 36: 7082–7089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wu J, Pisula W, Müllen K. Graphenes as potential material for electronics. Chem Rev, 2007, 107: 718–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yan X, Cui X, Li B, et al. Large, solution-processable graphene quantum dots as light absorbers for photovoltaics. Nano Lett, 2010, 10: 1869–1873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yang X, Dou X, Rouhanipour A, et al. Two-dimensional graphene nanoribbons. J Am Chem Soc, 2008, 130: 4216–4217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Compton O C, Nguyen S B T. Graphene oxide, highly reduced graphene oxide, and graphene: Versatile building blocks for carbon-based materials. Small, 2010, 6: 711–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rao C, Sood A, Subrahmanyam K, et al. Graphene: The new two-dimensional nanomaterial. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2009, 48: 7752–7777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Li Y, Zhang P, Du Q, et al. Adsorption of fluoride from aqueous solution by graphene. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2011, 363: 348–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ramesha G, Vijaya K A, Muralidhara H, et al. Graphene and graphene oxide as effective adsorbents toward anionic and cationic dyes. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2011, 361: 270–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhao G, Ren X, Gao X, et al. Removal of Pb(II) ions from aqueous solutions on few-layered graphene oxide nanosheets. Dalton Trans, 2011, 40: 10945–10952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yang S T, Chen S, Chang Y, et al. Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution by graphene oxide. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2011, 359: 24–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Deng X, Lü L, Li H, et al. The adsorption properties of Pb(II) and Cd(II) on functionalized graphene prepared by electrolysis method. J Hazard Mater, 2010, 183: 923–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zhao G, Jiang L, He Y, et al. Sulfonated graphene for persistent aromatic pollutant management. Adv Mater, 2011, 23: 3959–3963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shen J, Hu Y, Shi M, et al. One step synthesis of graphene oxide-magnetic nanoparticle composite. J Phys Chem C, 2010, 114: 1498–1503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shen X, Wu J, Bai S, et al. One-pot solvothermal syntheses and magnetic properties of graphene-based magnetic nanocomposites. J Alloy Comp, 2010, 506: 136–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wang C, Feng C, Gao Y, et al. Preparation of a graphene-based magnetic nanocomposite for the removal of an organic dye from aqueous solution. Chem Eng J, 2011, 173: 92–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    He F, Fan J, Ma D, et al. The attachment of Fe3O4 nanoparticles to graphene oxide by covalent bonding. Carbon, 2010, 48: 3139–3144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Chandra V, Park J, Chun Y, et al. Water-dispersible magnetite-reduced graphene oxide composites for arsenic removal. ACS Nano, 2010, 4: 3979–3986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Liang Y, Wang H, Sanchez C H, et al. TiO2 nanocrystals grown on graphene as advanced photocatalytic hybrid materials. Nano Res, 2010, 3: 701–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zhang H, Lv X, Li Y, et al. P25-graphene composite as a high performance photocatalyst. ACS Nano, 2009, 4: 380–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zhang L, Xu T, Cheng H, et al. Significantly enhanced photocatalytic performance of ZnO via graphene hybridization and the mechanism study. Appl Catal B: Environ, 2011, 101: 382–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Nethravathi C, Nisha T, Ravishankar N, et al. Graphene-nanocrystalline metal sulphide composites produced by a one-pot reaction starting from graphite oxide. Carbon, 2009, 47: 2054–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wang K, Liu Q, Wu X Y, et al. Graphene enhanced electrochemiluminescence of CdS nanocrystal for H2O2 sensing. Talanta, 2010, 82: 372–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Chang H, Lü X, Zhang H, et al. Quantum dots sensitized graphene: In situ growth and application in photoelectrochemical cells. Electrochem Commun, 2010, 12: 483–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Liu X, Pan L, Lü T, et al. Microwave-assisted synthesis of CdS Creduced graphene oxide composites for photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI). Chem Commun, 2011, 47: 11984–11986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Muszynski R, Seger B, Kamat P V. Decorating graphene sheets with gold nanoparticles. J Phys Chem C, 2008, 112: 5263–5266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Scheuermann G M, Rumi L, Steurer P, et al. Palladium nanoparticles on graphite oxide and its functionalized graphene derivatives as highly active catalysts for the Suzuki-Miyaura coupling reaction. J Am Chem Soc, 2009, 131: 8262–8270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Goncalves G, Marques P A A P, Granadeiro C M, et al. Surface modification of graphene nanosheets with gold nanoparticles: The role of oxygen moieties at graphene surface on gold nucleation and growth. Chem Mater, 2009, 21: 4796–4802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Zhang H, Chen S, Quan X, et al. In situ controllable growth of noble metal nanodot on graphene sheet. J Mater Chem, 2011, 21: 12986–12990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Kamat P V. Graphene-based nanoarchitectures. Anchoring semiconductor and metal nanoparticles on a two-dimensional carbon support. J Phys Chem Lett, 2009, 1: 520–527Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Guo S, Dong S, Wang E. Three-dimensional Pt-on-Pd bimetallic nanodendrites supported on graphene nanosheet: Facile synthesis and used as an advanced nanoelectrocatalyst for methanol oxidation. ACS Nano, 2009, 4: 547–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Liu J, Fu S, Yuan B, et al. Toward a universal adhesive nanosheet for the assembly of multiple nanoparticles based on a protein-induced reduction/decoration of graphene oxide. J Am Chem Soc, 2010, 132: 7279–7281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Zhao H, Yang J, Wang L, et al. Fabrication of a palladium nanoparticle/ graphene nanosheet hybrid via sacrifice of a copper template and its application incatalytic oxidation of formic acid. Chem Commun, 2011, 47: 2014–2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sreeprasad T, Maliyekkal S M, Lisha K, et al. Reduced graphene oxide-metal/metal oxide composites: Facile synthesis and application in water purification. J Hazard Mater, 2011, 186: 921–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Li N, Zheng M, Chang X, et al. Preparation of magnetic CoFe2O4-functionalized graphene sheets via a facile hydrothermal method and their adsorption properties. J Solid State Chem, 2011, 184: 953–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Fu Y, Chen H, Sun X, et al. Combination of cobalt ferrite and graphene: High-performance and recyclable visible-light photocatalysis. Appl Catal B: Environ, 2011, doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.10.009Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Fu Y, Wang X. Magnetically separable ZnFe2O4-graphene catalyst and its high photocatalytic performance under visible light irradiation. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2011, 50: 7210–7218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Li Y H, Ding J, Luan Z, et al. Competitive adsorption of Pb2+, Cu2+ and Cd2+ ions from aqueous solutions by multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Carbon, 2003, 41: 2787–2792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Zhao G X, Li J X, Ren X M, et al. Few-layered graphene oxide nanosheets as superior sorbents for heavy metal ion pollution management. Environ Sci Technol, 2011, 45: 10454–10462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Zhao G X, Li J X, Wang X K. Kinetic and thermodynamic study of 1-naphthol adsorption from aqueous solution to sulfonated graphene nanosheets. Chem Eng J, 2011, 173: 185–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Yang S B, Hu J, Chen C L, et al. Mutual effect of Pb(II) and humic acid adsorption onto multiwalled carbon nanotubes/poly(acrylamide) composites from aqueous solution. Environ Sci Technol, 2011, 45: 3621–3627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Shao D D, Hu J, Jiang Z Q, et al. Removal of 4,4′-dichlorinated biphenyl from aqueous solution using methyl methacrylate grafted multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Chemosphere, 2011, 82: 751–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Shao D D, Sheng G D, Chen C L, et al. Removal of polychlorinated biphenyls from aqueous solutions using β-cyclodextrin grafted multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Chemosphere, 2010, 779: 679–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Zhao D L, Chen C L, Sheng G D, et al. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue under visible irradiation on graphene@ TiO2 Drade structure. Appl Catal B: Environ, 2012, 111–112: 303–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Audit Information EngineeringNanjing Audit UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Novel Thin Film Solar Cells, Institute of Plasma PhysicsChinese Academy of SciencesHefeiChina

Personalised recommendations