Advertisement

Chinese Science Bulletin

, 56:1921 | Cite as

The quasi-biennial and semi-annual oscillation features of tropical O3, NO2, and NO3 revealed by GOMOS satellite observations for 2002–2008

  • Yi Liu
  • ChunHui Lu
  • Yong Wang
  • Erkki Kyrölä
Open Access
Article Atmospheric Science

Abstract

The quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) and semi-annual oscillation (SAO) characteristics of O3, NO2, and NO3 from 2002 to 2008 were analyzed using Global Ozone Monitoring by Occultation of Stars (GOMOS) satellite observations. From investigations of the vertical and latitudinal structures of interannual anomalies for O3 and the vertical velocity of the residual circulation (w-star), we conclude that dynamic transport is the principal factor controlling the QBO pattern of O3. Under the influence of vertical transport, the QBO signals of O3 originate in the middle stratosphere and propagate downward along with the w-star anomalies over the equator. The residual circulation has a significant role in tropical regions, regardless of altitude, while in extratropical regions, dynamic effects are important in some years in the lower stratosphere. In the middle stratosphere, dynamic transport is most efficient in the Southern Hemisphere. We also analyzed NO2 anomalies and found that their QBO pattern was deep and stationary in the middle and upper stratosphere over the equator. This was due to the large depth over which w-star was anomalous. The latitudinal structure of NO2 was asymmetric in extratropical areas in the middle stratosphere, but in the upper layers, the QBO pattern and dynamic influences were only observed in tropical zones. The interannual anomalies of NO3 had an apparent SAO pattern in the tropical upper stratosphere because of different dynamic and chemical effects in different SAO phases. Chemical reactions may also have contributed to the QBO-type distribution of NO2 and the SAO-type distribution of NO3.

Keywords

quasi-biennial oscillation semi-annual oscillation GOMOS satellite observation stratospheric ozone dynamic transport 

References

  1. 1.
    Wallace J M, Holton J R. A diagnostic numerical model of the quasibiennial oscillation. J Atmos Sci, 1968, 25: 280–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wallace J M, Panetta R L, Estberg J. Representation of the equatorial stratospheric quasi-biennial oscillation in EOF phase space. J Atmos Sci, 1993, 50: 1751–1762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Holton J R, Tan H C. The influence of the equatorial quasi-biennial oscillation on the global circulation at 50 mb. J Atmos Sci, 1980, 37: 2200–2208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Plumb R A. The interaction of two internal waves with the mean flow: Implications for the theory of the quasi-biennial oscillation. J Atmos Sci, 1977, 34: 1847–1858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tung K, Yang H. Global QBO in circulation and ozone, part I, reexamination of observational evidence. J Atmos Sci, 1994, 51: 2699–2707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tung K, Yang H. Global QBO in circulation and ozone, part II, a simple mechanistic model. J Atmos Sci, 1994, 51: 2708–2721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Logan J A, Jones D B, Megretskaia I A, et al. Quasi-biennial oscillation in tropical ozone as revealed by ozone-sonde and satellite data. J Geophys Res, 2003, 108: 4244, doi: 10.1029/2002JD002170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen Y J, Zheng B, Zhang H. The features of ozone quasi-biennial oscillation in tropical stratosphere and its numerical simulation. Adv Atmos Sci, 2002, 19: 777–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zheng B, Shi C H, Chen Y J. Anti-symmetric transport of middle stratospheric methane with respect to the equator. Chinese Sci Bull, 2006, 51: 1761–1765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kyrölä E, Tamminen J, Leppelmeier G W, et al. Nighttime ozone profiles in the stratosphere and mesosphere by the global ozone monitoring by occultation of stars on envisat. J Geophys Res, 2006, 111: D24306, doi: 10.1029/2006JD007193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hauchecorne A, Bertaux J L, Dalaudier F, et al. First simultaneous global measurements of nighttime stratospheric NO2 and NO3 observed by global ozone monitoring by occultation of stars in 2003. J Geophys Res, 2005, 110: D18301, doi: 10.1029/2004JD005711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kyrölä E, Tamminen J, Sofieva V. Gomos O3, NO2, and NO3 observations in 2002–2008. Atmos Chem Phys, 2010, 10: 7723–7738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hauchecorne A, Bertaux J, Dalaudier F, et al. Response of tropical stratospheric O3, NO2 and NO3 to the equatorial quasi-biennial oscillation and to temperature as seen from Gomos/Envisat. Atmos Chem Phys, 2010, 10: 8873–8879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu C X, Liu Y, Cai Z N, et al. A Madden-Julian oscillation triggered record ozone minimum over the Tibetan Plateau in December 2003 and its association with stratospheric “low-ozone pockets”. Geophys Res Lett, 2009, 36: L15830, doi: 10.1029/2009GL039025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu Y, Cai Z N, Kyrölä E. Comparison of Envisat Gomos and Mipas ozone profiles with balloon sonde measurements from Beijing. Proc Dragon Program Final Results 2004–2007, 2008Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Gijsel J, Swart D, Baray J, et al. Gomos ozone profile validation using ground-based and balloon sonde measurements. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss, 2010, 10: 8515–8551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dee D, Uppala S. Variational bias correction of satellite radiance data in the Era-interim reanalysis. Quart J R Meteorol Soc, 2009, 135: 1830–1841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shi C H, Zheng B, Chen Y J, et al. The quasi-biennial oscillation of water vapor in tropical stratosphere (in Chinese). Chin J Geophys, 2009, 52: 2428–2435Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marchand M, Bekki S, Lefevre F, et al. Temperature retrieval from stratospheric O3 and NO3 Gomos data. Geophys Res Lett, 2007, 34: L24809, doi: 10.1029/2007GL030280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Butchart N, Scaife A, Austin A, et al. Quasi-biennial oscillation in ozone in a coupled chemistry-climate model. J Geophys Res, 2003, 108: 4486, doi: 10.1029/2002JD003004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tian W S, Chipperfiled M, Gray L, et al. Quasi-biennial oscillation and tracer distributions in a coupled chemistry-climate model. J Geophys Res, 2006, doi: 10.1029/2005JD006871Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chipperfield M, Gray L, Kinnersley J, et al. A two-dimensional model study of the qbo signal in Sage NO2 and O3. Geophys Res Lett, 1994, 21: 589–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jin J J, Semeniuk K, Beagley S, et al. Comparison of cmam simulations of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4) with observations from Odin/Smr, Ace-Fts, and Aura/Mls. Atmos Chem Phys, 2009, 9: 3233–3252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brasseur G P, Solomon S. Aeronomy of the Middle Atmosphere: Chemistry and Physics of the Stratosphere and Mesosphere. 3rd ed. Heidelberg: Springer, 2005Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yi Liu
    • 1
  • ChunHui Lu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yong Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Erkki Kyrölä
    • 3
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Middle Atmosphere and Global Environment Observation, Institute of Atmospheric PhysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Earth ObservationFinnish Meteorological InstituteHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations