Advertisement

Chinese Science Bulletin

, Volume 55, Issue 27–28, pp 3205–3214 | Cite as

Spatial differences in rock uplift rates inferred from channel steepness indices along the northern flank of the Qilian Mountain, northeast Tibetan Plateau

  • XiaoFei HuEmail author
  • BaoTian Pan
  • Eric Kirby
  • QingYang Li
  • HaoPeng Geng
  • JiFeng Chen
Article Geography

Abstract

The rate and distribution of deformation along the Qilian Mountain, on the northeastern Tibetan Plateau, is needed to understand the evolution of high topography associated with the plateau. Recently, a number of empirical studies have provided support for the contention, common to most models of fluvial incision, that rock uplift rate exerts a first-order control on the gradient of longitudinal river profiles. Along the northern Qilian Mountain, this method is used to extract information about the spatial patterns of differential rock uplift. Analysis of the longitudinal profiles of bedrock channels reveals systematic differences in the channel steepness index along the trend of the frontal ranges. Local comparisons of channel steepness reveal that lithology and precipitation have limited influence on channel steepness. Similarly, there is little evidence suggesting that channel steepness is influenced by differences in the sediment loads. We argue that the distribution of channel steepness in the Qilian Mountain is mostly the result of differential rates of rock uplift. Thus, channel steepness indices reveal a lower rock uplift rate in the eastern portion of the Qilian Mountain and a higher rate in the middle and west. The highest rates appear to occur in the middle-west portions of the range, just to the west of the Yumu Shan.

Keywords

Qilian Mountain stream power erosion model channel steepness rock uplift rate river profile 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pan B T, Wu G J, Wang Y X, et al. Age and genesis of the Shagou River terraces in eastern Qilian Mountain. Chinese Sci Bull, 2001, 46: 509–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Geoge A D, Marshallsea S J, Wyrwoll K-H, et al. Miocene cooling in the northern Qilian Shan, northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau, revealed by apatite fission-track and vitrinite-reflectance analysis. Geology, 2001, 29: 939–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fang X M, Zhao Z J, Li J J, et al. Magnetostratigraphy of the late Cenozoic Laojunmiao anticline in the northern Qilian Mountain and its implications for the northern Tibetan Plateau uplift. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci, 2005, 48: 1040–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tapponnier P, Xu Z Q, Roger F, et al. Oblique stepwise rise and growth of the Tibetan Plateau. Science, 2001, 294: 1571–1677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Meyer B, Tapponnier P, Bourjot L, et al. Crustal thickening in Gansu-Qinghai, lithospheric mantle subduction, and oblique, strike-slip controlled growth of the Tibetan Plateau. Geophys J Int, 1998, 135: 1–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tapponnier P, Ryerson F J, Van der Woerd J, et al. Long-term slip rates and characteristic slip: Keys to active fault behaviour and earthquake hazard. C R Acad Sci Paris, Earth Planet Sci, 2001, 333: 483–494Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yin A, Harrison T M. Geologic evolution of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci, 2000, 28: 211–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yin A, Dang Y Q, Wang L C, et al. Cenozoic tectonic evolution of Qaidam basin and its surrounding regions (Part 1): The southern Qi-lian Shan-Nan Shan thrust belt and northern Qaidam basin. Geol Soc Am Bull, 2008, 120: 813–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang X M, Wang B Y, Qiu Z X, et al. Danghe area (western Gansu, China) biostratigraphy and implications for depositional history and tectonics of northern Tibetan Plateau. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2003, 208: 253–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Metivier F, Gaudemer Y, Tapponnier P, et al. Northeastward growth of the Tibetan Plateau deduced from balanced reconstruction of two depositional areas: The Qaidam and Hexi Corridor basins, China. Tectonics, 1998, 17: 823–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gaudemer Y, Tapponnier P, Meyer B, et al. Partitioning of crustal slip between linked, active faults in the eastern Qilian Shan, and evidence for a major seismic gap, the ‘Tianzhu gap’, on the western Haiyuan Fault, Gansu (China). Geophys J Int, 1995, 120: 599–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tapponnier P, Meyer B, Avouac J P, et al. Active thrusting and folding in the Qilian Shan, and decoupling between upper crust and mantle in northeastern Tibet. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 1990, 97: 382–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hetzel R, Niedermann S, Tao M X, et al. Low slip rates and long-term preservation of geomorphic features in Central Asia. Science, 2002, 417: 428–432Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hetzel R, Tao M X, Stokes S, et al. Late Pleistocene/Holocene slip rate of the Zhangye thrust (Qilian Shan, China) and implications for the active growth of the northeastern Tibetan Plateau. Tectonics, 2004, 23: TC6006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hetzel R, Niedermann S, Tao M X, et al. Climatic versus tectonic control on river incision at the margin of NE Tibet: Be(10) exposure dating of river terraces at the mountain front of the Qilian Shan. J Geophys Res, 2006, 111: F03012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pan B T, Gao H S, Wu G J, et al. Dating of erosion surface and terraces in the eastern Qilian Shan, northwest China. Earth Surf Proc Land, 2007, 32: 143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang P Z, Shen Z K, Wang M, et al. Continuous deformation of the Tibetan Plateau from global positioning system data. Geology, 2004, 32: 809–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Howard A D, Kerby G. Channel changes in Badlands. Geol Soc Am Bull, 1983, 94: 739–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Howard A D, Dietrich W E, Seidl M A. Modeling fluvial erosion on regional to continental scales. J Geophys Res-Earth, 1994, 99: 13971–13986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Whipple K X, Tucker G E. Dynamics of the stream-power river incision model: Implications for height limits of mountain ranges, landscape response timescales, and research needs. J Geophys Res-Solid Earth, 1999, 104: 17661–17674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Snyder N P, Whipple K X, Tucker G E, et al. Landscape response to tectonic forcing: Digital elevation model analysis of stream profiles in the Mendocino triple junction region, northern California. Geol Soc Am Bull, 2000, 112: 1250–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wobus C, Whipple K X, Kirby E, et al. Tectonics from topography: Procedure, promise, and pitfalls. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap, 2006, 398: 55–74Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Duvall A, Kirby E, Burbank D. Tectonic and lithologic controls on bedrock channel profiles and processes in coastal California. J Geophys Res-Earth, 2004, 109: F03002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kirby E, Whipple K X, Tang W Q, et al. Distribution of active rock uplift along the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau: Inferences from bedrock channel longitudinal profiles. J Geophys Res-Solid Earth, 2003, 108: B42217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Institute of Geology, CEA, and Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, CEA. The Qilian Mountain-Hexi Corridor Active Fault System (in Chinese). Beijing: Seismological Publishing House, 1993. 74–94Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chengdu Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, CAGS. The Geology Map of Tibet Plateau and Adjacent Areas (in Chinese). Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2007. 3–41Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stock J D, Montgomery D R. Geologic constraints on bedrock river incision using the stream power law. J Geophys Res-Solid Earth, 1999, 104: 4983–4993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hack J T. Studies of longitudinal stream profiles in Virginia and Maryland. US Geol Surv Prof Pap, 1957, 294: 45–97Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Flint J J. Stream gradient as a function of order, magnitude, and discharge. Water Resour Res, 1974, 10: 969–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kirby E, Whipple K X. Quantifying differential rock-uplift rates via stream profile analysis. Geology, 2001, 29: 415–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sklar L S, Dietrich W E. Sediment and rock strength controls on river incision into bedrock. Geology, 2001, 29: 1087–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Snyder N P, Whipple K X, Tucker G E, et al. Channel response to tectonic forcing: Field analysis of stream morphology and hydrology in the Mendocino triple junction region, northern California. Geomorphology, 2003, 53: 97–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Whipple K X, Hancock G S, Anderson R S. River incision into bedrock: Mechanics and relative efficacy of plucking, abrasion, and cavitation. Geol Soc Am Bull, 2000, 112: 490–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Montgomery D R, Gran K B. Downstream variations in the width of bedrock channels. Water Resour Res, 2001, 37: 1841–1846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Montgomery D R. Observations on the role of lithology in strath terrace formation and bedrock channel width. Am J Sci, 2004, 304: 454–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Finnegan N J, Roe G, Montgomery D R, et al. Controls on the channel width of rivers: Implications for modeling fluvial incision of bedrock. Geology, 2005, 33: 229–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Moglen G E, Bras R L. The Effect of Spatial Heterogeneities on Geomorphic Expression in a Model of Basin Evolution. Water Resour Res, 1995, 31: 2613–2623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zaprowski B J, Pazzaglia F J, Evenson E B. Climatic influences on profile concavity and river incision. J Geophys Res-Earth, 2005, 110: F03004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sklar L S, Dietrich W E. River longitudinal profiles and bedrock incision models: Stream power and the influence of sediment supply. In: Tinkler K J, Wohl E E, eds. Rivers Over Rock: Fluvial Processes in Bedrock Channels. Washington D C: American Geophysical Union, 1998. 237–260Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sklar L S, Dietrich W E. A mechanistic model for river incision into bedrock by saltating bed load. Water Resour Res, 2004, 40: W06301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sklar L S, Dietrich W E. The role of sediment in controlling steady-state bedrock channel slope: Implications of the saltation-abrasion incision model. Geomorphology, 2006, 82: 58–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Whipple K X. Fluvial landscape response time: How plausible is steady-state denudation? Am J Sci, 2001, 301: 313–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Molnar P, Anderson R S, Anderson S P. Tectonics, fracturing of rock, and erosion. J Geophys Res-Earth, 2007, 112: F03014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zhao J D, Zhou S Z, Pan X D, et al. ESR chronology of Bailanghe valley and new understanding of Qilianshan Quaternary glaciation (in Chinese). J Mt Sci, 2001, 19: 481–488Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Chen J, Lu Y C, Ding G Y. The latest Quaternary tectonic deformation of terraces of Jiuxi basin in west Qilian Mountain (in Chinese). Northwest Seismol J, 1998, 20: 28–36Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • XiaoFei Hu
    • 1
    Email author
  • BaoTian Pan
    • 1
  • Eric Kirby
    • 2
  • QingYang Li
    • 1
  • HaoPeng Geng
    • 1
  • JiFeng Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Western China’s Environmental Systems (MOE)Lanzhou UniversityLanzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of GeosciencesPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations