Chinese Science Bulletin

, Volume 55, Issue 24, pp 2697–2703 | Cite as

Mercury speciation and spatial distribution in surface waters of the Yarlung Zangbo River, Tibet

  • Wei Zheng
  • ShiChang Kang
  • XinBin Feng
  • QiangGong Zhang
  • ChaoLiu Li
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

The Yarlung Zangbo River is the highest river in the world. It flows from west to east through the southern part of Tibet. The mercury (Hg) speciation and distribution in surface waters and soils near the bank of the Yarlung Zangbo River and its two tributaries, the Lhasa and Niyang Rivers, were investigated in June 2007. Simultaneously, major water quality parameters were also measured at the same stations. Total Hg (THg) and total methylmercury (TMeHg) concentrations in surface waters of the Yarlung Zangbo River ranged from 1.46 to 4.99 ng/L and from 0.06 to 0.29 ng/L, respectively, representing the background levels in river systems of the Tibetan Plateau. Particulate Hg (PHg) accounted for 69% of the THg, and the two Hg species had a significant relationship (r=0.990, P<0.01). Approximately 61% of the spatial distribution of THg was controlled by the concentrations of total suspended particles (TSP). Reactive Hg (RHg) concentrations ranged from 0.10 to 0.36 ng/L, and this fraction may play a weak role in terms of the transport and fate of Hg in surface waters. Dissolved methylmercury (DMeHg) constituted 71% of the TMeHg and was significantly correlated with TMeHg (r=0.746, P<0.01). The spatial distribution of TMeHg is not strongly affected by environmental factors such as THg, RHg, temperature, pH, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and TSP. In addition, the inflow of both the Lhasa and Niyang Rivers probably influences the concentrations of THg in surface waters of the mainstream, but such an effect is not obvious for TMeHg.

Keywords

Yarlung Zangbo River mercury speciation spatial distribution Tibet 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lindqvist O. Special issue of first international on mercury as a global pollutant. Water Air Soil Pollut, 1991, 56: 1Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schroeder W H, Munthe J. Atmospheric mercury: An overview. Atmos Environ, 1998, 32: 809–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zheng D, Lin Z Y, Zhang X Q. Progress in studies of Tibetan Plateau and global environmental change (in Chinese). Earth Sci Front, 2002, 9: 95–102Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yao T D, Zhu L P. The response of environmental changes on Tibetan Plateau to global changes and adaptation strategy (in Chinese). Adv Earth Sci, 2006, 21: 459–464Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pirrone N, Keeler G J, Nriagu J O. Regional differences in worldwide emissions of mercury to the atmosphere. Atmos Environ, 1996, 30: 2981–2987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu T C. hydrological characteristics of Yarlung Zangbo River (in Chinese). Acta Geogr Sin, 1999, 54(Supp): 157–164Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Method 1631, revision C: mercury in water by oxidation, purge and trap, and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry. EPA-821-R-01-024. 2001Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Method 1630: methyl mercury in water by distillation, aqueous ethylation, purge and trap, and CVAFS. EPA-821-R-01-020. 2001Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yan H Y, Feng X B, Shang L H, et al. Speciation analysis of ultratrace levels of mercury in natural waters (in Chinese). J Inst Anal, 2003, 22: 10–13Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    He T R. Geochemical cycling of mercury in Hongfeng Reservoir, Guizhou, China (in Chinese). Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Guiyang: Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2007. 23–24Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li W, Wu F C, Fu P Q, et al. Profile characteristics and seasonal variation of dissolved organic matter in Hongfeng Lake, Guizhou (in Chinese). Environ Sci, 2006, 27: 1979–1985Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jiang H M, Feng X B, Liang L, et al. Determination of methyl mercury in waters by distillation-GC-CVAFS technique (in Chinese). Chin J Environ Sci, 2004, 24: 568–571Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li Z G, Feng X B, He T R, et al. Determination of total mercury in soil and sediment by aqua regia digestion in the water bath coupled with cold vapor atom fluorescence spectrometry (in Chinese). Bull Mineral Petrol Geochem, 2005, 24: 140–143Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    We X G. Progress in the study of biogeochemistry of riverine organic matter (in Chinese). Ecol Environ, 2007, 16: 1063–1067Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen J S. Principle of Riverine Water Quality and Riverine Water Quality in China. Beijing: Science Press, 2006. 92Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li H W, Yan B X, Xu Z G, et al. Spatial and temporal distribution of total mercury (T-Hg) in water of the Songhua River (in Chinese). Acta Sci Circum, 2006, 26: 840–845Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yu C R, Wang W, Liang D M, et al. A study on the pollution characteristics of total mercury and methylmercury in Songhua River (in Chinese). J Changchun Univ Earth Sci, 1994, 24: 102–108Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jiang H M, Feng X B, Dai Q J, et al. Preliminary study of speciation and distribution of mercury in Wujiang River (in Chinese). Environ Chem, 2004, 23: 556–561Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ding Z H, Wang W H, Liu C E, et al. Distribution and species of mercury in water and sediments from Huangpu River (in Chinese). Environ Sci, 2005, 26: 62–66Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lyons W B, Fitzgibbon T O, Welch K A, et al. Mercury geochemistry of the Scioto River, Ohio: Impact of agriculture and urbanization. Appl Geochem, 2006, 21: 1880–1888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Paller M H, Jagoe C H, Bennett H, et al. Influence of methylmercury from tributary streams on mercury levels in Savannah River Asiatic clams. Sci Total Environ, 2004, 325: 209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bonzongo J C, Heim K J, Warwick J J, et al. Mercury levels in surface waters of the Carson River-Lahontan Reservoir system, Nevada: influence of historic mining activities. Environ Pollut, 1996, 92: 193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Benoit J M, Gilmour C C, Mason R P, et al. Behavior of mercury in the Patuxent River estuary. Biogeochemistry, 1998, 40: 249–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ullrich S M, Ilyushchenko M A, Uskov G A, et al. Mercury distribution and transport in a contaminated river system in Kazakhstan and associated impacts on aquatic biota. Appl Geochem, 2007, 22: 2706–2734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Donkor A K, Bonzongo J C, Nartey V K, et al. Mercury in different environmental compartments of the Pra River Basin, Ghana. Sci Total Environ, 2006, 368: 164–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mason R P, Fitzgerald W F. Alkylmercury species in the equatorial pacific. Nature, 1990, 347: 779–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Balogh S J, Meyer M L, Johnson D K. Transport of mercury in three contrasting river basins. Environ Sci Technol, 1998, 32: 456–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chapman D. Water Quality Assessments: A Guide to the Use of Biota, Sediments and Water in Environmental Monitoring. London: Chapman and Hall Ltd, 1992. 586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mierle G, Ingram R. The role of humic substances in the mobilization of mercury from watersheds. Water Air Soil Pollut, 1991, 56: 349–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Watras C J, Morrison K A, Host J S, et al. Concentration of mercury species in relationship to other site-specific factors in the surface waters of Northern Wisconsin Lakes. Limnol Oceanogr, 1995, 40: 556–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jiang H M. Effects of hydroelectric reservoir on the biogeochemical cycle of mercury in the Wujiang River (in Chinese). Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Guiyang: Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2005. 37–38Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ullrich S M, Tanton T W, Abdrashitova S A. Mercury in the aquatic environment: A review of factors affecting methylation. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol, 2001, 31: 241–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    He T R, Feng X B, Li Z G, et al. Buildup of methyl mercury in a seasonal anoxic reservoir and impact on downstream (in Chinese). J Lake Sci, 2006, 18: 565–571Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hurley J P, Benoit J M, Babiarz C L, et al. Influences of watershed characteristics on mercury levels in Wisconsin rivers. Environ Sci Technol, 1995, 29: 1867–1875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mason R P, Fitzgerald W F, Morel F M M. The biogeochemical cycling of elemental mercury: Anthropogenic influences. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 1994, 58: 3191–3198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Liu Y M, Qu P Y. A study on the environmental background value of total mercury and methylmercury (in Chinese). Design Hydroele Power Station, 1998, 14: 48–55Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wei Zheng
    • 1
    • 2
  • ShiChang Kang
    • 1
    • 3
  • XinBin Feng
    • 4
  • QiangGong Zhang
    • 1
  • ChaoLiu Li
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Tibetan Environment Changes and Land Surface Processes, Institute of Tibetan Plateau ResearchChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Academy for Environmental PlanningMinistry of Environmental ProtectionBeijingChina
  3. 3.The State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric SciencesLanzhouChina
  4. 4.The State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of GeochemistryChinese Academy of SciencesGuiyangChina

Personalised recommendations