Chinese Science Bulletin

, 53:555

Identification and field evaluation of the sex pheromone of an invasive pest, the fall webworm Hyphantria cunea in China

  • Su MaoWen 
  • Fang YuLing 
  • Tao WanQiang 
  • Yan GuoZeng 
  • Ma WanE 
  • Zhang ZhongNing 
Articles Entomology

Abstract

Pheromone gland extracts of the fall webworm, Hyphantria cunea (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Based on comparison of retention times and mass spectra of synthetic standards, four compounds were identified as (9Z,12Z)-octadecadienal, (9Z,12Z,15Z)-octadecatrienal, (3Z,6Z,9S,10R)-9,10-epoxy-3,6-heneico-sadiene and (3Z,6Z,9S,10R)-9,10-epoxy-1,3,6-heneicosatriene with a ratio of 2:33.6:58.4:6. Trapping tests showed that quaternary blend of these compounds was highly attractive to male H. cunea. Unitraps baited with the quaternary blend loading of 200–300 μg on a gray rubber septum were very effective for monitoring H. cunea populations.

Keywords

identification sex pheromone Hyphantria cunea Lepidoptera population monitoring field trapping 

References

  1. 1.
    Liu H J, Luo Y Q, Wen J B, et al. Pest risk assessment of Dendroctonus valens, Hyphantria cunea and Apriona swainsoni in Beijing. Front For China, 2006, 1: 328–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Warren L O, Tadic M. The fall webworm, Hyphantria cunea (Drury). Ark Agric Exp Sta Bull, 1970, 759: 1–106Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Umeya K, Itô Y. Invasion and establishment of a new insect pest in Japan. In: Hidaka T, ed. Adaptation and Speciation in the Fall Webworm. Tokyo: Kodansha, 1977. 1–12Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hill A S, Kovalev B G, Nikolaeva L N, et al. Sex pheromone of the fall webworm moth, Hyphantria cunea. J Chem Ecol, 1982, 8: 383–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Toth M, Buser H R, Pena A. et al. Identification of (3Z,6Z)-1,3,6-9,10-epoxyhenicosatriene and (3Z,6Z)-1,3,6-9,10-epoxycosa-triene in the sex pheromone of Hyphantria cunea. Tetrahedron Lett, 1989, 30: 3405–3408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    El-Sayed A M, Gibb A R, Suckling D M. Chemistry of the sex pheromone gland of the fall webworm, Hyphantria cunea, discovered in New Zealand. N Z Plant Protect, 2005, 58: 31–36Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Trematerra P, Ferrario P, Binda M. Studies on trapping of fall webworm moth, Hyphantria cunea Drury (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Anz Schädl, 1993, 66: 51–56Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang Q H, Schlyter F, Chu D, et al. Female calling behaviour and response of males to synthetic pheromone and virgin females in spring and summer generations of Hyphantria cunea (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) (Drury) in Northeastern China. J Appl Entoml, 1996, 120: 467–476Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang Q H, Schlyter F, Chu D, et al. Diurnal and seasonal flight activity of males and population dynamics of fall webworm moth, Hyphantria cunea, (Drury) (Lep., Arctiidae) monitored by pheromone traps. J Appl Entomol, 1998, 122: 523–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klun J A, Anglade P L, Baca F, et al. Insect sex pheromones: Intraspecific pheromone variability of Ostrinia nubilalis in North America and Europe. Environ Entomol, 1975, 4: 891–894Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miller J R, Roelofs W L. Individual variation in sex pheromone component ratios in two populations of the redbanded leafroller moth, Argyrotaenia velutinana. Environ Entomol, 1980, 9: 359–363Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Löfstedt C, Löfqvist J, Lanne B S, et al. Pheromone dialects in European turnip moths Agrotis segetum. Oikos, 1986, 46: 250–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hansson B S, Toth M, Löfstedt C, et al. Pheromone variation among eastern European and a western Asian population of the turnip moth Agrotis segetum. J Chem Ecol, 1990, 16: 1611–1622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jallon J M, David J R. Variations in cuticular hydrocarbons among the eight species of the Drosophila melaonogaster subgroup. Evolution, 1987, 41: 294–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Markow T A. Pheromone isolation among populations of Drosophila mojavensis. Evolution, 1991, 45: 1525–1529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huang Y P, Takanashi T, Hoshizaki S, et al. Geographic variation in sex pheromone of Asian corn borer, Ostrinia furnacalis, in Japan. J Chem Ecol, 1998, 24: 2079–2088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gemeno C, Lutfallah A F, Haynes K F. Pheromone blend variation and cross-attraction among populations of the black cutworm moth (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am, 2000, 93: 1322–1328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kawazu K, Hasegawa J I, Honda H, et al. Geographical variation in female sex pheromones of the rice leaffolder moth, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis: Identification of pheromone components in Japan. Entomol Exp Appl, 2000, 96(2): 103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McElfresh J S, Millar J G. Geographic variation in the pheromone system of the saturniid moth Hemileuca eglanterina. Ecology, 2001, 82(12): 3505–3518Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    El-Sayed A M, Delisle J, De Lury N, et al. Geographic variation in pheromone chemistry, antennal electrophysiology, and pheromone-mediated trap catch of North American populations of the obliquebanded leafroller. Environ Entomol, 2003, 32: 470–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Luciane G, Batista-Pereira, Stein K, et al. Isolation, identification, synthesis, and field evaluation of the sex pheromone of the Brazilian population of Spodoptera frugiperda. J Chem Ecol, 2006, 32: 1085–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vereecken N J, Mant J, Schiestl F P. Population differentiation in female sex pheromone and male preferences in a solitary bee. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 2007, 61: 811–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Che C, Zhang Z N. Concise total synthesis of (3Z,6Z,9S, 10R)-9,10-epoxy-1,3,6-heneicosatriene, sex pheromone component of Hyphantria cunea. Tetrahedron, 2005, 61: 2187–2193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Che C, Zhang Z N. A facile synthetic method for (3Z,6Z,9S,10R)-9,10-Epoxy-3,6-heneicosadiene, sex pheromone component of Hyphantria cunea (Drury). Chin Chem Lett, 2005, 16: 468–470Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fang Y L, Sun J H, Zhao C H, et al. Sex pheromone components of the sandthorn carpenter worm, Holcocerus hippophaecolus. J Chem Ecol, 2005, 31: 39–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lee J J, Lee H P, L K R. Morphological studies on sex pheromone gland and chemoreceptor of the fall webworm, Hyphantria cunea Drury. Korean J Entomol, 1983, 13: 61–66Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang A J, Polavarapu S. Sex pheromone of the cranberry blossom worm, Epiglaea apiata. J Chem Ecol, 2003, 29(9): 2153–2164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Senda S, Omata T, Aburatani M et al. Attractant comositions for fall webworm. European Patent, 0474486A2, 1992-11-03Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science in China Press 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Su MaoWen 
    • 1
    • 2
  • Fang YuLing 
    • 1
  • Tao WanQiang 
    • 3
  • Yan GuoZeng 
    • 3
  • Ma WanE 
    • 3
  • Zhang ZhongNing 
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents, Institute of ZoologyChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.The Graduate University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Beijing Forestry Protection StationBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations