A Cambrian micro-lobopodian and the evolution of arthropod locomotion and reproduction
The evolutionary success of arthropods, the most abundant and diverse animal group, is mainly based on their segmented body and jointed appendages, features that had evolved most likely already before the Cambrian. The first arthropod-like animals, the lobopodians from the Early Cambrian, were unsclerotized and worm-like, and they had unjointed tubular legs. Here we describe the first three-dimensionally preserved Cambrian lobopodian. The material presented of Orstenotubulus evamuellerae gen. et sp. nov. is the smallest and youngest of a lobopodian known. O. evamuellerae shows strikingly detailed similarities to Recent tardigrades and/or onychophorans in its cellular-structured cuticle and the telescopic spines. It also shows similarities to other, longer known lobopodians, but which are ten times as large as the new form. These similarities include the finely annulated body and legs, which is characteristic also for Recent onychophorans, and paired humps continuing into spines situated dorsally to the leg insertions, a feature lacking in the extant forms. The morphology of O. evamuellerae not only elucidates our knowledge about lobopodians, but also aids in a clearer picture of the early evolution of arthropods. An example is the single ventral gonopore between a limb pair of O. evamuellerae, which indicates that a single gonopore, as developed in onychophorans, tardigrades, pentastomids, myriapods and insects, might represent the plesiomorphic state for Arthropoda, while the paired state in chelicerates and crustaceans was convergently achieved. Concerning life habits, the lateral orientation of the limbs and their anchoring spines of the new lobopodian imply that early arthropods were crawlers rather than walkers.
Key wordslobopodians Arthropoda evolution phylogeny reproductive system locomotion
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Conway Morris S, Whittington H B, Briggs D E G, et al. Atlas of the Burgess Shale. London: The Palaeontological Association, 1982Google Scholar
- 6.Chen J Y, Zhou G Q, Ramsköld, L. A new Early Cambrian onychophoran-like animal, Paucipodia gen. nov., from the Chengjiang fauna, China. Trans R Soc Edinb, Earth Sci, 1994, 85: 275–282Google Scholar
- 8.Budd G E, Peel J S. A new xenusiid lobopod from the Early Cambrian Sirius Passet fauna of north Greenland. Palaeontology, 1998, 41: 1201–1213Google Scholar
- 9.Ramsköld L, Chen J Y. Cambrian lobopodians: morphology and phylogeny. In: Edgecombe G D, ed. Arthropod Fossils and Phylogeny. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998. 107–150Google Scholar
- 11.Monge-Nájera J, Hou X G. Disparity, decimation and the Cambrian ‘explosion’: comparison of early Cambrian and present faunal communities with emphasis on velvet worms (Onychophora). Rev Biol Trop, 2002, 48: 333–351Google Scholar
- 14.Bergström J, Hou X G. Chengjiang arthropods and their bearing on early arthropod evolution. In: Edgecombe G D, ed. Arthropod Fossils and phylogeny. New York: Columbia Univ Press, 1998. 151–184Google Scholar
- 16.Hou X G, Aldridge R J, Bergström J, et al. The Cambrian fossils of Chengjiang, China—The Flowering of Early Animal Life. Malden: Blackwell, 2004Google Scholar
- 17.Liu J, Shu D G, Han J, et al. A large xenusiid lobopod with complex appendages from the Lower Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstätte. Acta Pal Pol, 2006, 51: 215–222Google Scholar
- 20.Storch V, Ruhberg H. Onychophora. In: Harrison F W, Rice M E, eds. Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates. New York: Wiley, 1993. 11–56Google Scholar
- 22.Conway Morris S. A new Metazoan from the Cambrian Burgess Shale of British Columbia. Palaeontology, 1977, 20: 623–640Google Scholar
- 25.Kristensen R M, Higgins R P. Revision of Styraconyx (Tardigrada: Halechiniscidae), with Description of Two New Species from Disko Bay, West Greenland. Smith Contr Zool, 1984, 391: 1–40Google Scholar
- 29.Bertolani R, Grimaldi De Zio S, D’Addabbo Gallo M, et al. Postembryonic development in heterotardigrades. Monitore Zoologico Italiano (N.S.), 1984, 18: 307–320Google Scholar