Chinese Science Bulletin

, Volume 52, Issue 24, pp 3376–3384

Neolithic rice paddy from the Zhaojiazhuang site, Shandong, China

  • Jin GuiYun 
  • Yan ShengDong 
  • Tetsuro Udatsu
  • Lan YuFu 
  • Wang ChunYan 
  • Tong PeiHua 
Articles Geology


To identify and study the Neolithic rice paddy in Shandong, eastern China, is not only an important issue in the development of Chinese rice agriculture, but also a key part of the study on rice spread in East Asia. Due to the limitation of archaeological materials and the research methods, there have been no discoveries about the Neolithic rice paddy in Shandong Province for a long time. Based on the identification of possible rice paddy by archaeological excavation, phytolith analysis of soil samples from this “paddy” has been systematically carried out and the results have shown a 4600–4300 years old rice paddy preserved at the Zhaojiazhuang site. This is the first examination and study of the rice paddy in North China by systematic phytolith analysis, which is very important for the Neolithic archaeological research and the study of the eastward spread of rice agricultural techniques in East Asia.


Zhaojiazhuang site Longshan culture rice paddy phytolith analysis prehistoric rice agriculture rice spread in East Asia 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Yan W M. Perspective of environmental archaeology, In: Yan W M, ed. Archaeology Towards 21 Century (in Chinese), Xi’an: Sanqin Press, 1997. 123–128Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Investigation Group of Archaeology National Planning Office of Social Science, Findings report of the development of Chinese Archaeology. Huaxia Archaeol (in Chinese), 2001, (3): 105–112Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yan W M. The dawn of the East Asia civilization—A tentative study on the origin of Chinese civilization. In: Yan W M, ed. The Origin of Agriculture and the Rise of Civilization (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press, 2000. 137–147Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jin G Y, Luan F S. The development and question of rice agriculture in the Haidai Region during the Longshan period. Agr Archaeol (in Chinese), 2006, (1): 46–55Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen W H. Several questions about Chinese rice agriculture origin. Agr Archaeol (in Chinese), 1989, (2): 84–98Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Higuchi T, Cai F S (translated). Where Come from the Japanese (in Chinese). Jinan: Press of Shandong University, 1996. 101–107Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    An Z M. Effect of the prehistoric cultures in the lower reaches of Changjiang River on ancient Japan. Archaeology (in Chinese), 1984, (5): 439–448Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhao X B. Discussion on the agricultural pattern of the Hemudu site. Agr Archaeol (in Chinese), 2002, (1): 53–57Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Museum of Suzhou City, Cultural Relics Bureau of Kunshan City, Town government of Yizheng of Kunshan City. Preliminary report on the first to fifth excavations of Chuodun site, Kunshan, Jiangsu. Southeast Culture (in Chinese), 2003, (Suppl. I): 1–41Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tang L H, Zou J S, Wang C L, et al. Investigation on ancient rice cropping at Longnan site in Meinian, Jiangsu, Agr Archaeol (in Chinese), 1992, (1): 70–73Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gu J X, Zou H B, Li M C et al. Preliminary remarks on rice farming at the archaeological site of Caoxieshan at Majiabang Culture Stage. Southeast Culture (in Chinese), 1998, (3): 15–24Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ding J L. The Neolithic rice field in the low region of Changjiang River and the origin of the cultured rice agriculture. Southeast Culture (in Chinese), 2004, (2): 19–23Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    The Institute of Archaeology of Hunan. The 1997 and 1998 seasons of excavation of a city site at Chengtoushan, Lixian, Hunan. Cultural Relics (in Chinese), 1999, (6): 4–17Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nakamura S. Rice Archaeology (in Japanese). Tokyo: Dosesya Press, 2002. 194–205Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yan W M. More comments on the origin of rice growing agriculture in China. Agr Archaeol (in Chinese), 1989, (2): 72–83Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miyamoto K. The emergence and spread of agriculture in the Northeast Asia. In: Oriental Archaeology (in Chinese) (1), Beijing: Science Press, 2004, 189–197Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jin G Y. Study on rice paddy in Japan. Cultural Relics Newsletter of China (in Chinese), January 27, 2006, 7th printing plateGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Udatsu T, Tang L H, Wang C L, et al. Prospecting of rice paddy in China. Agr Archaoel (in Chinese), 1998, (1): 138–155Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yan S D, Lan Y F. The important achievement on the Pre-Qin settlement archaeology in Zhaojiazhuang site, Jiaozhou City, Shandong. Cultural Relics Newsletter of China (in Chinese), April 28, 2006, 1st printing plateGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Luan F S. The period and type of Longshan Culture in Haidai Region, In: Luan F S, ed. Archaeology Study of Haidai Region (in Chinese), Jinan: Press of Shandong University, 1997. 229–282Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fujiwara H. Fundamental studies of plant opal analysis—On the silica bodies of motor cell of rice plants and their near relatives, and the method of quantitative analysis. Archaeol Natl Sci (in Japanese), 1976, 9: 15–29Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang C L, Udatsu T, Tang L H, et al. Method of analysis of plant opal and its use in archaeology. Southeast Culture (in Chinese), 1997, (3): 14–22Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang Y J, Lu H Y. Phytolith Analysis and Its Application (in Chinese). Beijing: Ocean Press, 1993, 70–77, 105–108 and plates 8, 62–69, 77–79, 95Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lu H Y, Liu Z X, Wu N Q, et al. Rice domestication and climatic change: Phytolith evidence from East China. Boreas, 2002, 31: 378–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fujiwara H. Research into the history of rice cultivation using plant opal analysis. In: Pearsall D M, Piperno D R, eds. Current Research in Phytolith Analysis: Applications in Archaeology and Paleoecology, MASCA. Phiadelphis: University of Pennsylvania Museum. 1993. 147–158Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Han D Q. Investigation on farming methods of upland and agricultural institution of ancient Korean peninsula. Chin Agr History (in Chinese), 2003, (3): 15–20Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yan W M. Discussion on the relationship between Qingliangang Culture and Dawenkou Culture. Collection of Papers on Cultural Relics (in Chinese), 1980, (1): 116–124Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tasaki H. Incipient rice agriculture in the Korean peninsula—survey the early rice-paddy and rice agricultural tools, In: Nishitani T, ed. Papers for Korean Archaeology (in Japanese). Tokyo: Suzusawa Press, 2002, 51–87Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sino-American Collaborative Archaeological Team in the Liangcheng area. 1998–2001 excavation on the Liangchengzhen site in Rizhao City, Shandong. Archaeology (in Chinese), 2004, (9): 7–18Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lin L G. Consideration on the archaeological discovery in Tenghualuo site. Cultural Relics Newsletter of China (in Chinese), July 19, 2000, 1st printing plateGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science in China Press 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jin GuiYun 
    • 1
  • Yan ShengDong 
    • 2
  • Tetsuro Udatsu
    • 3
  • Lan YuFu 
    • 4
  • Wang ChunYan 
    • 1
  • Tong PeiHua 
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for East Asia Archaeology StudiesShandong UniversityJinanChina
  2. 2.School of Archaeology and MuseologyPeking UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.Faculty of AgricultureMiyazaki UniversityMiyazakiJapan
  4. 4.Provincial Archaeology Institute of ShandongJinanChina

Personalised recommendations