Chinese Science Bulletin

, Volume 51, Issue 21, pp 2651–2656 | Cite as

Analyses of the predicted changes of the global oceans under the increased greenhouse gases scenarios

  • Mu Lin Email author
  • Wu Dexing 
  • Chen Xue’en 
  • J. Jungclaus


A new climate model (ECHAM5/MPI-OM1) developed for the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) at Max-Planck Institute for Meteorology is used to study the climate changes under the different increased CO2 scenarios (B1, A1B and A2). Based on the corresponding model results, the sea surface temperature and salinity structure, the variations of the thermohaline circulation (THC) and the changes of sea ice in the northern hemisphere are analyzed. It is concluded that from the year of 2000 to 2100, under the B1, A1B and A2 scenarios, the global mean sea surface temperatures (SST) would increase by 2.5°C, 3.5°C and 4.0°C respectively, especially in the region of the Arctic, the increase of SST would be even above 10.0°C; the maximal negative value of the variation of the fresh water flux is located in the subtropical oceans, while the precipitation in the eastern tropical Pacific increases. The strength of THC decreases under the B1, A1B and A2 scenarios, and the reductions would be about 20%, 25% and 25.1% of the present THC strength respectively. In the northern hemisphere, the area of the sea ice cover would decrease by about 50% under the A1B scenario.


greenhouse gases THC IPCC 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Houghton J T, Ding Y, Griggs D J, et al. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2001: The scientific basis. Contributions of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, 525–583Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Broecker W S. The great ocean conveyor. Oceanography, 1991, 4: 79–89Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schmitz Jr W J. On the interbasin-scale thermohaline circulation. Rev Geophys, 1995, 33:151–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhou T J, Wang S W. Preliminary evaluation on the decadal scale variability of the North Atlantic Thermohaline Circulation during 20th Century. Clim Environ Res (in Chinese), 2001, 6(3): 294–304Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Manabe S, Wetherald R T. The effect of doubling CO2 concentration on the climate of the general circulation model. J Atmos Sci, 1975, 32:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marotzke J. Abrupt Climate Change and Thermohaline Circulation: Mechanisms and Predictablity. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA, 2000, 97: 1347–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Manabe S, Bryan Jr K. CO2-induced change in a coupled ocean-atmosphere model and its paleoclimatic implications. J Geophys Res, 1985, 90(C11):11689–11707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhou T J, Yu R C, Liu X Y, et al. Weak response of the Atlantic thermohaline circulation to an increase of atmospheric carbon dioxide in IAP/LASG Climate System Model. Chin Sci Bull, 2005, 50(6): 592–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roeckner E G, Bäuml L, Bonaventura R, et al. The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM5, part I: Model description. Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie—Report, 2003, No. 349Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jungclaus J H, Botzet M, Maak H, et al. Ocean circulation and tropical variability in the coupled model ECHAM5/MPI-OM. J Climate, 2006, 19: 3952–3972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dixon K W, Delworth T L, Knutson T R, et al. A comparison of climate change simulations produced by two GFDL coupled climate models. Global & Planetary Change, 2003, 37(1–2): 81–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johns T C, Gregory J M, Ingram W J, et al. Anthropogenic climate change for 1860 to 2100 simulated with the HadCM3 model under updated emissions scenarios. Hadley Centre Technical Note, 2001, No. 22Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yang F, Kumar A, Schlesinger M E, et al. Intensity of hydrological cycles in warmer climates. J Climate, 2003, 16: 2419–2423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baumgartner A, Reichel E. The World Water Balance. London: Elsevier, 1975, 98–112Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thorpe R B, Gregory J M, Johns T C, et al. Mechanisms determining the Atlantic thermohaline circulation response to greenhouse gas forcing in a non-flux-adjusted coupled climate model. J Climate, 2001, 14: 3102–3116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Held I, Soden B. Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J Climate, in pressGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vinnikov K Y, Robock A, Stouffer R J, et al. Global warming and Northern Hemisphere sea ice extent. Science, 1999, 286:1934–1937CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science in China Press 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mu Lin 
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Wu Dexing 
    • 1
  • Chen Xue’en 
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. Jungclaus
    • 3
  1. 1.Physical Oceanography LaboratoryOcean University of ChinaQingdaoChina
  2. 2.Institute of OceanographyHamburg UniversityHamburgGermany
  3. 3.Max-Planck Institute for MeteorologyHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations