Experimental evidence for non-linear growth in compressible mixing layer

  • TieJin Wang
  • Jun Chen
  • XiaoTian Shi
  • Ning Hu
  • ZhenSu She
Article

Abstract

An experimental study of compressible mixing layers (CMLs) was conducted using planar laser Mie scattering (PLMS) visualizations from condensed ethanol droplets in the flow. Large ensembles of digital images were collected for two flow conditions at convective Mach numbers Mc = 0.11 and 0.47. The coherent vortices, braids and eruptions in the mixing zone were observed, interpreted as evidence of multi-scale, three-dimensional structures at a high Reynolds number. The mixing layers with a large visualized range present two stages along the streamwise direction, corresponding to the initial mixing and the well-developed stage. A new method, the gray level ensemble average method (GLEAM), by virtue of the similarity of the mixing layer, was applied to measure the growth rate of the CML thickness. New evidence for a nonlinear growth of CML is reported, providing an interpretation of previous observations of the scattering of the growth rate.

Keywords

compressible mixing layer growth rate coherent structures flow visualization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dimotakis P E. Turbulent free-shear layer mixing and combustion. Prog Astro Aero, 1991, 137: 265–332Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rossmann T, Mungal M G, Hanson R K. Mixing efficiency measurements using a modified cold chemistry technique. Exp Fluids, 2004, 37: 566–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen J Q, Zhuang F G. Numerical simulation of supersonic reacting mixing layer. Acta Mech Sin, 1997, 13: 98–105CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bogdanoff D W. Compressibility effects in turbulent shear layers. AIAA J, 1983, 21: 926–927ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Papamoschou D, Roshko A. The compressible turbulent shear layer: An experimental study. J Fluid Mech, 1988, 197: 453–477ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clemens N, Mungal M. Effects of sidewall disturbances on the supersonic mixing layer. J Propul Power, 1992, 8: 249–251ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rossmann T, Mungal MG, Hanson R K. Evolution and growth of largescale structures in high compressibility mixing layers. J Turb, 2002, 3: 1–19ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lele S K. Compressibility effects on turbulence. Annu Rev FluidMech, 1994, 26: 211–254ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vreman A W, Sandham N D, Luo K H. Compressible mixing layer growth rate and turbulence characteristics. J Fluid Mech, 1996, 320: 255–258ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang S Y, Fu S. Modelling of pressure-strain correlation in compressible turbulent flow. Acta Mech Sin, 2008, 24: 37–43ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang Z S, Cui G X, Xu C X. Modern turbulence and new challenges. Acta Mech Sin, 2002, 18: 309–327ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li J D, Brown R J, Bilger R W. Experimental study of a scalar mixing layer using reactive and passive scalars. In: 11th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, Hobart, 1992. 159–162Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Monin A, Yaglom A. Statistical Fluid Mechanics. Vol. 2. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1975Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Betchov R, Szewczyk A. Stability of a shear layer between parallel streams. Phys Fluids, 1963, 6: 1391–1396ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Michalke A. On the inviscid instability of the hyperbolictangent velocity profile. J Fluid Mech, 1964, 19: 543–556ADSCrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Michalke A. On spatially growing disturbances in an inviscid shear layer. J Fluid Mech, 1965, 23: 521–544ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hesselink L. Digital image processing in flow visualization. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 1989, 20: 421–485ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhao Y, Yi S H, Tian L F, et al. An experimental study of aerooptical aberration and dithering of supersonic mixing layer via BOS. Sci China-Phys Mech Astron, 2010, 53: 81–94ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fu D X, Ma YW, Zhang L B. Direct numerical simulation of transition and turbulence in compressible mixing layer. Sci China Ser A, 2000, 43: 421–429CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li X L, Fu D X, Ma Y W, et al. Direct numerical simulation of compressible turbulent flows. Acta Mech Sin, 2010, 26: 795–806ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shi X T, Chen J, She Z S. Visualization of compressibility effects on large-scale structures in compressible mixing layers. J Visual, 2010, 13: 273–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shi X T, Chen J, Bi W T, et al. Numerical simulations of compressible mixing layers with a discontinuous Galerkin method. Acta Mech Sin, 2011, 27: 318–329ADSCrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li D, Guo L, Zhang X, et al. A numerical study of a turbulent mixing layer and its generated noise. Sci China-Phys Mech Astron, 2013, 56: 1157–1164ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cottrell D C, Plesniak M W. Sensitivity of mixed subsonic-supersonic turbulent mixing layers. J Propul Power, 2001, 17: 823–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mahadevan R, Loth E. High-speed cinematography of compressible mixing layers. Exp Fluids, 1994, 17: 179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang T J, Shi X T, Chen J, et al. Multi-scale structures in compressible turbulent mxiing layers. Mod Phys Lett B, 2010, 24: 1429–1432ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li W, Nonomura T, Fujii K. On the feedback mechanism in supersonic cavity flows. Phys Fluids, 2013, 25: 056101ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • TieJin Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jun Chen
    • 1
  • XiaoTian Shi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ning Hu
    • 1
    • 2
  • ZhenSu She
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, College of EngineeringPeking UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.China Academy of Aerospace AerodynamicsBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations