Science China Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy

, Volume 56, Issue 2, pp 263–269 | Cite as

Local Reynolds number and thresholds of transition in shear flows

Article Special Topic: Fluid Mechanics
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Recent experimental and numerical investigations reveal that the onset of turbulence in plane-Poiseuille flow and plane-Couette flow has some similar stages separated with different threshold Reynolds numbers. Based on these observations and the energy equation of a disturbed fluid element, a local Reynolds number Re L is derived to represent the maximum ratio of the energy supplement to the energy dissipation in a cross section. It is shown that along the sequence of transition stages, which include transient localized turbulence, “equilibrium” localized turbulence, spatially intermittent but temporally persistent turbulence and uniform turbulence, the corresponding thresholds of Re L for plane-Couette flow, Hagen-Poiseuille flow and plane-Poiseuille flow are consistent, indicating that the critical (threshold) states during the laminar-turbulent transition are determined by the local properties of the base flow and are independent of global features, such as flow geometries (pipe or channel) and types of driving forces (shear driving or pressure driving).

Keywords

shear flow transition localized turbulence 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Busse F H. The sequence-of-bifurcations approach towards understanding turbulent fluid flow. Surv Geophys, 2003, 24: 269–288ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eckhardt B. A critical point for turbulence. Science, 2011, 333: 165–166ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Manneville P. Understanding the sub-critical transition to turbulence in wall flows. PRAMANA. J Phys, 2008, 70: 1009–1021ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daviaud F, Hegseth J, Berg P. Subcritical transition to turbulence in plane Couette flow. Phys Rev Lett, 1992, 69: 2511–2516ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tillmark N, Alfredsson P H. Experiments on transition in plane Couette flow. J Fluid Mech, 1992, 235: 89–102ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dauchot O, Daviaud F. Finite amplitude perturbation and spots growth mechanism in plane Couette flow. Phys Fluids, 1995, 7: 335–343ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wygnanski I J, Champagne F H. On transition in a pipe. Part 1. The origin of puffs and slugs and the flow in a turbulent slug. J Fluid Mech, 1973, 59: 281–335ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Darbyshire A G, Mullin T. Transition to turbulence in constant-mass-flux pipe flow. J Fluid Mech, 1995, 289: 83–114ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eckhardt B, Schneider T M, Hof B, et al. Turbulence transition in pipe flow. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 2007, 39: 447–468MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wygnanski I J, Sokolov M, Friedman D. On transition in a pipe. Part 2. The equilibrium puff. J Fluid Mech, 1975, 69: 283–304ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moxey D, Barkley D. Distinct large-scale turbulent-laminar states in transitional pipe flow. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2010, 107: 8091–8096ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Duguet Y, Schlatter P, Henningson D S. Formation of turbulent patterns near the onset of transition in plane Couette flow. J Fluid Mech, 2010, 650: 119–129ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Avila K, Moxey D, de Lozar A, et al. The onset of turbulence in pipe flow. Science, 2011, 333: 192–196ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tuckerman L S, Barkley D. Patterns and dynamics in transitional plane Couette flow. Phys Fluids, 2011, 23: 041301ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eckhardt B. Turbulence transition in pipe flow: Some open questions. Nonlinearity, 2008, 21: T1–T11MathSciNetADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Manneville P, Prigent A, Dauchot O. Banded turbulence in Taylor-Couette and plane Couette flow. APS/DFD meeting. Bull Am Phys Soc, 2001, 46: 35Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Prigent A, Grégoire G, Chaté H, et al. Large-scale finite-wavelength modulation within turbulent shear flows. Phys Rev Lett, 2002, 89: 014501ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Prigent A, Grégoire G, Chaté H, et al. Long-wavelength modulation of turbulent shear flows. Phys D, 2003, 174: 100–113CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Manneville P. Spots and turbulent domains in a model of transitional plane Couette flow. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn, 2004, 18: 169–181CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barkley D, Tuckerman L S. Mean flow of turbulent-laminar patterns in plane Couette flow. J Fluid Mech, 2007, 576: 109–137MathSciNetADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gill A E. A mechanism for instability of plane Couette flow and of Poiseuille flow in a pipe. J Fluid Mech, 1965, 21: 503–511MathSciNetADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gavarini M I, Bottaro A, Nieuwstadt F T M. The initial stage of transition in pipe flow: Role of optimal base-flow distortions. J Fluid Mech, 2004, 517: 131–165MathSciNetADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ben-Dov G, Cohen J. Critical Reynolds number for a natural transition to turbulence in pipe flows. Phys Rev Lett, 2007, 98: 064503ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tao J. Critical instability and friction scaling of fluid flows through pipes with rough inner surfaces. Phys Rev Lett, 2009, 103: 264502ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ryan N W, Johnson M. Transition from laminar to turbulent flow in pipes. AICHE J, 1959, 5: 433–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hanks R W. The laminar-turbulent transition for flow in pipe, concentric annuli, and parallel plates. AICHE J, 1963, 9: 45–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fur B Le, Martin M. Laminar and transitional flow of drilling muds and various suspensions in circular tubes. J Fluid Mech, 1967, 30: 449–463ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nouar C, Frigaard I A. Nonlinear stability of Poiseuille flow of a Bingham fluid: Theoretical results and comparison with phenomenological criteria. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech, 2001, 100: 127–149CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Peixinho J, Nouar C, Desaubry C, et al. Laminar transition and turbulent flow of yield stress fluid in a pipe. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech, 2005, 128: 172–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Leutheusser H J, Chu V H. Experiments on plane Couette flow. J Hyd Div Am Sot Civ Eng, 1971, 97: 1269–1284Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bottin S, Dauchot O, Daviaud F. Intermittency in a locally forced plane Couette flow. Phys Rev Lett, 1997, 79: 4377–4380ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Barkley D, Tuckerman L S. Computational study of turbulent laminar patterns in Couette flow. Phys Rev Lett, 2005, 94: 014502ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Eckhardt B, Faisst H, Schmiegel A, et al. Dynamical systems and the transition to turbulence in linearly stable shear flows. Phil Trans R Soc A, 2008, 366: 1297–1315MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tuckerman L S, Barkley D, Moxey O, et al. Order parameter in laminar-turbulent patterns. In: Eckhardt B, ed. Advances in Turbulence XII. NY: Springer, 2009. 132: 89–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hof B, van Doorne C W H, Westerweel J, et al. Turbulence regeneration in pipe flow at moderate Reynolds numbers. Phys Rev Lett, 2005, 95: 214502ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Peixinho J, Mullin T. Finite-amplitude thresholds for transition in pipe flow. J Fluid Mech, 2007, 582: 169–178ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Willis A P, Kerswell R R. Critical behavior in the relaminarization of localized turbulence in pipe flow. Phys Rev Lett, 2007, 98: 014501ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Faisst H, Eckhardt B. Sensitive dependence on initial conditions in transition to turbulence in pipe flow. J Fluid Mech, 2004, 504: 343–352ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hof B, Westerweel J, Schneider T M, et al. Finite lifetime of turbulence in shear flows. Nature, 2006, 443: 59–62ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Peixinho J, Mullin T. Decay of turbulence in pipe flow. Phys Rev Lett, 2006, 96: 094501ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Avila M, Willis A P, Hof B. On the transient nature of localized pipe flow turbulence. J Fluid Mech, 2010, 646: 127–136ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hof B, de Lozar A, Kuik D J, et al. Repeller or attractor? Selecting the dynamical model for the onset of turbulence in pipe flow. Phys Rev Lett, 2008, 101: 214501ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nishi M, Ünsal B, Durst F, et al. Laminar-to-turbulent transition of pipe flows through puffs and slugs. J Fluid Mech, 2008, 614: 425–446ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Patel V C, Head M R. Some observations on skin friction and velocity profiles in fully developed pipe and channel flows. J Fluid Mech, 1969, 38: 181–201ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Carlson D R, Widnall S E, Peeters M F. A flow-visualization study of transition in plane Poiseuille flow. J Fluid Mech, 1982, 121: 487–505ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Alavyoon F, Henningson D S, Alfredsson P H. Turbulent spots in plane Poiseuille flow-flow visualization. Phys Fluids, 1986, 29: 1328–1331ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Tsukahara T, Kawaguchi Y, Kawamura H, et al. Turbulence stripe in transitional channel flow with/without system rotation. IUTAM Book Ser, 2010, 18: 421–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mullin T. Experimental studies of transition to turbulence in a pipe. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 2011, 43: 1–24MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kuik D J, Poelma C, Westerweel J. Quantitative measurement of the lifetime of localized turbulence in pipe flow. J Fluid Mech, 2010, 645: 529–539ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SKLTCS and CAPT, Department of Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, College of EngineeringPeking UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations