Research on the transfers to Halo orbits from the view of invariant manifolds



This paper discusses the evolutions of invariant manifolds of Halo orbits by low-thrust and lunar gravity. The possibility of applying all these manifolds in designing low-thrust transfer, and the presence of single-impulse trajectories under lunar gravity are also explained. The relationship between invariant manifolds and the altitude of the perigee is investigated using a Poincaré map. Six types of single-impulse transfer trajectories are then attained from the geometry of the invariant manifolds. The evolutions of controlled manifolds are surveyed by the gradient law of Jacobi energy, and the following conclusions are drawn. First, the low thrust (acceleration or deceleration) near the libration point is very inefficient that the spacecraft free-flies along the invariant manifolds. The purpose is to increase its velocity and avoid stagnation near the libration point. Second, all controlled manifolds are captured because they lie inside the boundary of Earth’s gravity trap in the configuration space. The evolutions of invariant manifolds under lunar gravity are indicated from the relationship between the lunar phasic angle and the altitude of the perigee. Third and last, most of the manifolds have preserved their topologies in the circular restricted three-body problem. However, the altitudes of the perigee of few manifolds are quite non-continuous, which can be used to generate single- impulse flyby trajectories.


libration point Halo orbit transfer trajectory invariant manifolds low thrust lunar perturbation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Xu M, Xu S J. The application of libration points and Halo orbits in the Earth-Moon system to space mission design (in Chinese). Chin J Astronaut, 2006, 27(4): 695–699Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xu S J, Xu M. A new constellation configuration scheme for communicating architecture in cislunar space. In: 57th International Astronautical Congress. Valencia, Spain, 2006. IAC-06-A3.4.03Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Farquhar R W, Muhonen D P, Newman C, et al. Trajectories and orbital maneuvers for the first libration-point satellite. J Guidance Control Dyn, 1980, 3(6): 549–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gómez G, Jorba À, Masdemont J, et al. Study of the transfer from the Earth to a Halo orbit around the equilibrium point L1. Celest Mech Dyn Astron, 1993, 56(4): 541–562ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Howell K C, Barden B, Lo M W. Application of dynamical systems theory to trajectory design for a libration point mission. J Astronaut Sci, 1997, 54(2): 161–178MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xu M, Xu S J. Trajectory and correction maneuver during the transfer from Earth to Halo orbit. Chin J Aeronaut, 2008, 21(3): 200–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xu M, Xu S J. Low-energy trajectory from Earth to Moon for low-thrust spacecraft (in Chinese). Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin, 2008, 29(4): 781–787Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ozimek M T, Howell K C. Low-thrust transfers in the Earth-Moon system, including applications to libration point orbits. J Guidance Control Dyn, 2010, 33(2): 201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wilson R S, Howell K C. Trajectory design in the Sun-Earth-Moon system using multiple lunar gravity assists. J Spacecraft Rockets, 1998, 35(2): 191–198ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ren Y, Cui P Y, Luan E J. Study of low-thrust transfer to Halo Orbit with invariant manifolds (in Chinese). J Astronaut, 2007, 28(5): 1113–1118Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Qin J F, Baoyin H, Li J F. Optimal trajectory design of solar sail transfer to Halo orbits (in Chinese). J Tsinghua Univ Sci Tech, 2007, 47(6): 1361–1365Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Richardson D L. Analytical construction of periodic orbits about the collinear points. Celest Mech Dyn Astron, 1980, 22(3): 241–253MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xu M. Spacecraft Orbital Dynamics and Control Based on Libration Point Theories (in Chinese). Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Beijing: Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2008Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Howell K C, Beckman M, Patterson C. Representations of invariant manifolds for applications in three-body systems. J Astronaut Sci, 2006, 54(1): 69–93MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kechichian J A. Computational aspects of transfer trajectories to Halo orbits. J Guidance Control Dyn, 2001, 24(4): 796–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xu M, Xu S J. Exploration of distant retrograde orbits around Moon. Acta Astronaut, 2009, 65(5–6): 853–860Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Beijing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsBeijingChina
  2. 2.DFH Satellite Co. Ltd.BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations