Lunar topographic model CLTM-s01 from Chang’E-1 laser altimeter



More than 3 million range measurements from the Chang’E-1 Laser Altimeter have been used to produce a global topographic model of the Moon with improved accuracy. Our topographic model, a 360th degree and order spherical harmonic expansion of the lunar radii, is designated as Chang’E-1 Lunar Topography Model s01 (CLTM-s01). This topographic field, referenced to a mean radius of 1738 km, has an absolute vertical accuracy of approximately 31 m and a spatial resolution of 0.25° (∼7.5 km). This new lunar topographic model has greatly improved previous models in spatial coverage, accuracy and spatial resolution, and also shows the polar regions with the altimeter results for the first time. From CLTM-s01, the mean, equatorial, and polar radii of the Moon are 1737103, 1737646, and 1735843 m, respectively. In the lunar-fixed coordinate system, this model shows a COM/COF offset to be (−1.777, −0.730, 0.237) km along the x, y, and z directions, respectively. All the basic lunar shape parameters derived from CLTM-s01 are in agreement with the results of Clementine GLTM2, but CLTM-s01 offers higher accuracy and reliability due to its better global samplings.


Chang’E-1 laser altimeter (LAM) lunar topographic model 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Smith D E, Zuber M T, Neumann G A, et al. Topography of the moon from the Clementine lidar. J Geophys Res, 1997, 102: 1591–1611CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zuber M T, Smith D E, Lemoine F G, et al. The shape and internal structure of the moon from the clementine mission. Science, 1994, 266: 1839–1843CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wieczorek M A. The gravity and topography of the terrestrial planets. Treat Geophys, 2007, 10: 165–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wieczorek M A, Jolliff B L, Khan A, et al. The constitution and structure of the lunar interior. Rev Miner Geochem, 2006, 60: 221–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ping J S, Heki K, Matsumoto K, et al. A degree 180 spherical harmonic model for the lunar topography. Adv Space Res, 2003, 31(11): 2377–2382CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Margot J L, Campbell D B, Jurgens R F, et al. Topography of the lunar poles from radar interferometry: A survey of cold trap locations. Science, 1999, 284: 1658–1660CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cook A C, Watters T R, Robinson M S, et al. Lunar polar topography derived from Clementine stereoimages. J Geophys Res, 2000, 105: 12023–12033CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cook A C, Spudis P D, Robinson M S, et al. Lunar topography and basins mapped using a clementine stereo digital elevation model. Lunar and Planetary Science XXXIII, 2002Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Archinal B A, Rosiek M R, Kirk R L, et al. The unified lunar control network 2005. U. S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 2006–1367, 2006, Version 1.0Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Archinal B A, Rosiek M R, Kirk R L, et al. Report on the final completion of the unified lunar control network 2005 and lunar topographic model. U. S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 2007Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Margot J -L, Campbell D B, Jurgens R F, et al. Topography of tycho crater. J Geophys Res, 1999, 104: 11875–11882CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huang Y. Orbit determination of the first Chinese Lunar Exploration Spacecraft CE-1. Doctorial Thesis of Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences. Shanghai: Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, 2006Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Konopliv A S, Asmar S W, Yuan D N. Recent gravity models as a result of the lunar prospector mission. Icarus, 2001, 150: 1–18CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li Z L, Zhu Q. Digital Elevation Model. 2 ed. Wuhan: Wuhan University Press, 2007Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaula W M. Theory of Satellite Geodesy. New York: Dover Publicationa, 2000MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sagitov M U, Bodri B, Nazarenko V S, et al. Lunar Gravimetry. London: Academic Press, 1986Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Araki H, Tazawa S, Noda H, et al. Present status and preliminary result of the lunar topography by KAGUYA-LALT mission. Lunar and Planetary Science XXXIX, 2008Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science in China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shanghai Astronomical ObservatoryChinese Academy of SciencesShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Graduate University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Beijing Aerospace Control CenterBeijingChina
  4. 4.Shanghai Institute of Technical PhysicsChinese Academy of SciencesShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations