Cumulative activation in social networks

  • Xiaohan ShanEmail author
  • Wei ChenEmail author
  • Qiang LiEmail author
  • Xiaoming SunEmail author
  • Jialin ZhangEmail author
Research Paper


Most studies on influence maximization focus on one-shot propagation, i.e., the influence is propagated from seed users only once following a probabilistic diffusion model and users’ activation are determined via single cascade. In reality it is often the case that a user needs to be cumulatively impacted by receiving enough pieces of information propagated to her before she makes the final purchase decision. In this paper we model such cumulative activation as the following process: first multiple pieces of information are propagated independently in the social network following the classical independent cascade model, then the user will be activated (and adopt the product) if the cumulative pieces of information she received reaches her cumulative activation threshold. Two optimization problems are investigated under this framework: seed minimization with cumulative activation (SM-CA), which asks how to select a seed set with minimum size such that the number of cumulatively active nodes reaches a given requirement η; influence maximization with cumulative activation (IM-CA), which asks how to choose a seed set with fixed budget to maximize the number of cumulatively active nodes. For SM-CA problem, we design a greedy algorithm that yields a bicriteria O(ln n)-approximation when η = n, where n is the number of nodes in the network. For both SM-CA problem with η < n and IM-CA problem, we prove strong inapproximability results. Despite the hardness results, we propose two efficient heuristic algorithms for SM-CA and IM-CA respectively based on the reverse reachable set approach. Experimental results on different real-world social networks show that our algorithms significantly outperform baseline algorithms.


social networks cumulative activation influence maximization seed minimization 



This work was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61433014, 61502449, 61602440), National Basic Research Program of China (973) (Grant No. 2016YFB1000201).


  1. 1.
    Chen W, Lakshmanan L S V, Castillo C. Information and influence propagation in social networks. In: Synthesis Lectures on Data Management. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2013Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Domingos P, Richardson M. Mining the network value of customers. In: Proceeding of KDD. New York: ACM, 2001. 57–66Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kempe D, Kleinberg J, TardosÉ. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In: Proceeding of KDD. New York: ACM, 2003. 137–146Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Centola D, Macy M. Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. Am J Soc, 2007, 113: 702–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borgs C, Brautbar M, Chayes J, et al. Maximizing social influence in nearly optimal time. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, Portland, 2014. 946–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nguyen H T, Thai M T, Dinh N T. Stop-and-stare: optimal sampling algorithms for viral marketing in billion-scale networks. In: Proceeding of SIGMOD. New York: ACM, 2016. 695–710Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tang Y, Shi Y, Xiao X. Influence maximization in near-linear time: a martingale approach. In: Proceeding of SIGMOD. New York: ACM, 2015. 1539–1554Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tang Y, Xiao X, Shi Y. Influence maximization: near-optimal time complexity meets practical efficiency. In: Proceeding of SIGMOD. New York: ACM, 2014. 946–957Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Richardson M, Domingos P. Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing. In: Proceeding of KDD. New York: ACM, 2002. 61–70Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen W, Wang C, Wang Y. Scalable influence maximization for prevalent viral marketing in large-scale social networks. In: Proceeding of KDD. New York: ACM, 2010. 1029–1038Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen W, Wang Y, Yang S. Efficient influence maximization in social networks. In: Proceeding of KDD. New York: ACM, 2009. 199–208Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leskovec J, Krause A, Guestrin C, et al. Cost-effective outbreak detection in networks. In: Proceeding of KDD. New York: ACM, 2007. 420–429Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kempe D, Kleinberg J, TardosÉ. Influential nodes in a diffusion model for social networks. In: Proceeding of ICALP, 2005. 1127–1138Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen N. On the approximability of influence in social networks. SIAM J Discrete Math, 2009, 23: 1400–1415MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Long C, Wong R-W. Minimizing seed set for viral marketing. In: Proceedings of IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), 2011. 427–436Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goyal A, Bonchi F, Lakshmanan L V, et al. On minimizing budget and time in influence propagation over social networks. Social Netw Anal Min, 2013, 3: 179–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang P, Chen W, Sun X, et al. Minimizing seed set selection with probabilistic coverage guarantee in a social network. In: Proceeding of KDD. New York: ACM, 2014. 1306–1315Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    He J, Ji S, Beyah R, et al. Minimum-sized influential node set selection for social networks under the independent cascade model. In: Proceeding of MobiHoc. New York: ACM, 2014. 93–102Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gruhl D, Guha R, Liben-Nowell D, et al. Information diffusion through blogspace. In: Proceeding of WWW. New York: ACM, 2004. 491–501Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tang J, Sun J, Wang C, et al. Social influence analysis in large-scale networks. In: Proceeding of KDD. New York: ACM, 2009. 807–816Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nemhauser G L, Wolsey L A, Fisher M L. An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions-I. Math Programming, 1978, 14: 265–294MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen W, Li F, Lin T, et al. Combining traditional marketing and viral marketing with amphibious influence maximization. In: Proceeding of EC. New York: ACM, 2015. 779–796Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Feige U. A threshold of ln n for approximating set cover. J ACM, 1998, 45: 634–652MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Farajtabar M, Du N, Gomez-Rodriguez M, et al. Shaping social activity by incentivizing users. In: Proceeding of NIPS, 2014. 2474–2482Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Feige U, Peleg D, Kortsarz G. The dense k-subgraph problem. Algorithmica, 2001, 29: 410–421MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bhaskara A, Moses C, Chlamtáč E, et al. Detecting high log-densities: an o(n1/4) approximation for densest ksubgraph. In: Proceeding of STOC. New York: ACM, 2010. 201–210Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Khot S. Ruling out PTAS for graph min-bisection, dense k-subgraph, and bipartite clique. SIAM J Comput, 2006, 36: 1025–1071MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Manurangsi P. Almost-polynomial ratio eth-hardness of approximating densest k-subgraph. In: Proceeding of STOC. New York: ACM, 2017. 954–961Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hajiaghayi M T, Jain K, Konwar K, et al. The minimum k-colored subgraph problem in haplotyping and DNA primer selection. In: Proceeding of IWBRA, 2006Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Barbieri N, Bonchi F, Manco G. Topic-aware social influence propagation models. In: Proceedings of IEEE 12th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), 2012. 81–90Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Goyal A, Lu W, Lakshmanan S V L. SIMPATH: an efficient algorithm for influence maximization under the linear threshold model. In: Proceeding of ICDM, 2011. 211–220Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang C, Chen W, Wang Y. Scalable influence maximization for independent cascade model in large-scale social networks. Data Min Knowl Disc, 2012, 25: 545–576MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Brin S, Page L. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Comput Netw ISDN Syst, 1998, 30: 107–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and TechnologyTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.CAS Key Lab of Network Data Science and Technology, Institute of Computing TechnologyChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.MicrosoftBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations