Advertisement

Hybrid event- and time-triggered control for double-integrator heterogeneous networks

  • Gaopeng Duan
  • Feng Xiao
  • Long WangEmail author
Research Paper
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

This paper investigates the state consensus for double-integrator networks under heterogeneous interaction topologies. For double-integrator networks, the setting of heterogeneous topologies means that position and velocity information flows are modeled by two different graphs. The corresponding protocol proposed in this paper is based on edge-event-triggered control. The events based on position information are irrelevant to velocity information and independent of the events based on velocity information. And for different edges, the corresponding events are activated independently of each other. Once an event occurs, the agents connected by the associated edge will sample their corresponding relative state information and update their corresponding controllers. Furthermore, under the presented event-triggering rules, the state consensus of double-integrator networks can be achieved by designing appropriate parameters. In addition, the proposed protocol with the event-triggering rules can effectively improve the system performance and avoid the occurrence of Zeno behaviors. Finally, a simulation example is worked out to verify the theoretical analysis.

Keywords

consensus sampled-data control multi-agent systems edge-event-triggered control heterogeneous networks 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61751301, 61533001, 61873074).

References

  1. 1.
    Cheng D Z, He F H, Qi H S, et al. Modeling, analysis and control of networked evolutionary games. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2015, 60: 2402–2415MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cheng D Z, Qi H S. Controllability and observability of Boolean control networks. Automatica, 2009, 45: 1659–1667MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhao Y, Cheng D Z. On controllability and stabilizability of probabilistic Boolean control networks. Sci China Inf Sci, 2014, 57: 012202MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhu W, Cheng D Z. Leader-following consensus of second-order agents with multiple time-varying delays. Automatica, 2010, 46: 1994–1999MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lu Z H, Zhang L, Wang L. Controllability analysis of multi-agent systems with switching topology over finite fields. Sci China Inf Sci, 2019, 62: 012201MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lin X, Zheng Y S, Wang L. Consensus of switched multi-agent systems with random networks. Int J Control, 2017, 90: 1113–1122MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li A, Cornelius S P, Liu Y Y, et al. The fundamental advantages of temporal networks. Science, 2017, 358: 1042–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang L, Shi H, Chu T G, et al. Aggregation of foraging swarms. In: Proceedings of the 17th Australian Joint Conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Cairns, 2004. 766–777Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang L, Xiao F. A new approach to consensus problems in discrete-time multiagent systems with time-delays. Sci China Ser F-Inf Sci, 2007, 50: 625–635MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhao B, Guan Y Q, Wang L. Non-fragility of multi-agent controllability. Sci China Inf Sci, 2018, 61: 052202MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Adler J L, Satapathy G, Manikonda V, et al. A multi-agent approach to cooperative traffic management and route guidance. Transport Res Part B-Meth, 2005, 39: 297–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guan Y Q, Wang L. Structural controllability of multi-agent systems with absolute protocol under fixed and switching topologies. Sci China Inf Sci, 2017, 60: 092203MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang L, Jiang F C, Xie G M, et al. Controllability of multi-agent systems based on agreement protocols. Sci China Ser F-Inf Sci, 2009, 52: 2074–2088MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dimarogonas D V, Tsiotras P, Kyriakopoulos K J. Leader-follower cooperative attitude control of multiple rigid bodies. Syst Control Lett, 2009, 58: 429–435MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang L, Xiao F. Finite-time consensus problems for networks of dynamic agents. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2010, 55: 950–955MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Olfati-Saber R. Flocking for multi-agent dynamic systems: algorithms and theory. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2006, 51: 401–420MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xiao F, Shi Y, Ren W. Robustness analysis of asynchronous sampled-data multiagent networks with time-varying delays. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2018, 63: 2145–2152MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xiao F, Chen T W, Gao H J. Consensus in time-delayed multi-agent systems with quantized dwell times. Syst Control Lett, 2017, 104: 59–65MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xiao F, Chen T W. Adaptive consensus in leader-following networks of heterogeneous linear systems. IEEE Trans Control Network Syst, 2018, 5: 1169–1176MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jing G S, Zheng Y S, Wang L. Consensus of multiagent systems with distance-dependent communication networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, 2017, 28: 2712–2726MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Olfati-Saber R, Murray R M. Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2004, 49: 1520–1533MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ren W. On consensus algorithms for double-integrator dynamics. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2008, 53: 1503–1509MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dibaji S M, Ishii H. Resilient consensus of double-integrator multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Portland, 2014. 5139–5144Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gao Y P, Wang L. Sampled-data based consensus of continuous-time multi-agent systems with time-varying topology. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2011, 56: 1226–1231MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Borgers D P, Heemels W P M H. Event-separation properties of event-triggered control systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2014, 59: 2644–2656MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dimarogonas D V, Frazzoli E, Johansson K H. Distributed event-triggered control for multi-agent systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2012, 57: 1291–1297MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Xiao F, Meng X Y, Chen T W. Average sampled-data consensus driven by edge events. In: Proceedings of the 31st Chinese Control Conference, Hefei, 2012. 6239–6244Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Xiao F, Chen T W, Gao H J. Synchronous hybrid event- and time-driven consensus in multiagent networks with time delays. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2016, 46: 1165–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Xiao F, Meng X Y, Chen T W. Sampled-data consensus in switching networks of integrators based on edge events. Int J Control, 2015, 88: 391–402MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Xiao F, Chen T W. Sampled-data consensus in multi-agent systems with asynchronous hybrid event-time driven interactions. Syst Control Lett, 2016, 89: 24–34MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Seyboth G S, Dimarogonas D V, Johansson K H. Event-based broadcasting for multi-agent average consensus. Automatica, 2013, 49: 245–252MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cao M T, Xiao F, Wang L. Event-based second-order consensus control for multi-agent systems via synchronous periodic event detection. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2015, 60: 2452–2457MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Åström K J, Bernhardsson B. Comparison of Riemann and Lebesgue sampling for first order stochastic systems. In: Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Las Vegas, 2002. 2011–2016Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Duan G P, Xiao F, Wang L. Asynchronous periodic edge-event triggered control for double-integrator networks with communication time delays. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2018, 48: 675–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhang Z Q, Hao F, Zhang L, et al. Consensus of linear multi-agent systems via event-triggered control. Int J Control, 2014, 87: 1243–1251MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dimarogonas D V, Frazzoli E. Distributed event-triggered control strategies for multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the 47th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Monticello, 2009. 906–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kharisov E, Wang X F, Hovakimyan N. Distributed event-triggered consensus algorithm for uncertain multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Toronto, 2010Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Godsil C, Royle G. Algebraic Graph Theory. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2001Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zheng Y S, Ma J Y, Wang L. Consensus of hybrid multi-agent systems. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, 2018, 29: 1359–1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Systems and Control, College of EngineeringPeking UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Research Institute of Intelligent Control and SystemsHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations