Science China Information Sciences

, 61:092105 | Cite as

Dating ancient paintings of Mogao Grottoes using deeply learnt visual codes

  • Qingquan Li
  • Qin ZouEmail author
  • De Ma
  • Qian Wang
  • Song Wang
Research Paper


Cultural heritage is the asset of all the peoples of the world. The preservation and inheritance of cultural heritage is conducive to the progress of human civilization. In northwestern China, there is a world heritage site – Mogao Grottoes – that has a plenty of mural paintings showing the historical cultures of ancient China. To study these historical cultures, one critical procedure is to date the mural paintings, i.e., determining the era when they were created. Until now, most mural paintings at Mogao Grottoes have been dated by directly referring to the mural texts or historical documents. However, some are still left with creation-era undetermined due to the lack of reference materials. Considering that the drawing style of mural paintings was changing along the history and the drawing style can be learned and quantified through painting data, we formulate the problem of mural-painting dating into a problem of drawing-style classification. In fact, drawing styles can be expressed not only in color or curvature, but also in some unknown forms – the forms that have not been observed. To this end, besides sophisticated color and shape descriptors, a deep convolution neural network is designed to encode the implicit drawing styles. 3860 mural paintings collected from 194 different grottoes with determined creation-era labels are used to train the classification model and build the dating method. In experiments, the proposed dating method is applied to seven mural paintings which were previously dated with controversies, and the exciting new dating results are approved by the Dunhuang experts.


painting art art style painting analysis deep learning image classification 



This work was supported by National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2012CB725303), Major Program of Key Research Institute on Humanities and Social Science of the Chinese Ministry of Education (Grant No. 16JJD870002), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 91546106, 61301277). The authors would like to thank the Dunhuang Research Academia for providing the moral paintings of Dunhuang-P7, and thank Mr. Hui-Min WANG for helpful suggestions and discussions.


  1. 1.
    Taylor R P, Micolich A P, Jonas D. Fractal analysis of pollock’s drip paintings. Nature, 1999, 399: 422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lyu S, Rockmore D, Farid H. A digital technique for art authentication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004, 101: 17006–17010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnson C R, Hendriks E, Berezhnoy I J, et al. Image processing for artist identification. IEEE Signal Process Mag, 2008, 25: 37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hughes J M, Graham D J, Rockmore D N. Quantification of artistic style through sparse coding analysis in the drawings of Pieter Bruegel the Elder. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2010, 107: 1279–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hughes J M, Foti N J, Krakauer D C, et al. From the cover: quantitative patterns of stylistic influence in the evolution of literature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2012, 109: 7682–7686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Qi H, Taeb A, Hughes S M. Visual stylometry using background selection and wavelet-HMT-based Fisher information distances for attribution and dating of impressionist paintings. Signal Process, 2013, 93: 541–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim D, Son S-W, Jeong H. Large-scale quantitative analysis of painting arts. Sci Rep, 2014, 4: 7370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alameda-Pineda X, Ricci E, Yan Y, et al. Recognizing emotions from abstract paintings using non-linear matrix completion. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, 2016. 5240–5248Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ornes S. Science and culture: charting the history of Western art with math. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2015, 112: 7619–7620MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lowe D G. Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Corfu, 1999. 1150–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Perronnin F, Sánchez J, Mensink T. Improving the fisher kernel for large-scale image classification. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Computer Vision, Heraklion, 2010. 143–156Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Perronnin F, Dance C. Fisher kernels on visual vocabularies for image categorization. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Minneapolis, 2007. 1–8Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    van de Weijer J, Schmid C, Verbeek J, et al. Learning color names for real-world applications. IEEE Trans Image Process, 2009, 18: 1512–1523MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Benavente R, Vanrell M, Baldrich R. Parametric fuzzy sets for automatic color naming. J Opt Soc Am A, 2008, 25: 2582–2593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Berlin B, Kay P. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khan R, van de Weijer J, Shahbaz Khan F, et al. Discriminative color descriptors. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Portland, 2013. 2876–2883Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zou Q, Qi X B, Li Q Q, et al. Discriminative regional color co-occurrence descriptor. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing, Quebec City, 2015. 696–700Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zou Q, Ni L, Wang Q, et al. Local pattern collocations using regional co-occurrence factorization. IEEE Trans Multimedia, 2017, 19: 492–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Deng C W, Huang G B, Xu J, et al. Extreme learning machines: new trends and applications. Sci China Inf Sci, 2015, 58: 020301Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hinton G E, Salakhutdinov R R. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science, 2006, 313: 504–507MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bengio Y, Lamblin P, Popovici D, et al. Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks. In: Proceedings of Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS). Cambridge: MIT Press, 2006. 153–160Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gao W, Zhou Z H. Dropout rademacher complexity of deep neural networks. Sci China Inf Sci, 2016, 59: 072104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Deng L, Yu D. Deep learning: methods and applications. Trends Signal Process, 2013, 7: 197–387MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    LeCun Y, Boser B, Denker J S, et al. Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition. Neural Comput, 1989, 1: 541–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton G E. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Lake Tahoe, 2012. 1097–1105Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y Q, et al. Going deeper with convolutions. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, 2015. 1–9Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Simonyan K, Zisserman A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. 2015. ArXiv:1409.1556Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gatys L A, Ecker A S, Bethge M. Image style transfer using convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, 2016. 2414–2423Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Crowley E J, Zisserman A. In search of art. In: Computer Vision - ECCV 2014 Workshops. Berlin: Springer, 2014. 54–70Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nair V, Hinton G E. Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, Haifa, 2010. 807–814Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dong Z, Liang W, Wu Y W, et al. Nonnegative correlation coding for image classification. Sci China Inf Sci, 2016, 59: 012105Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chen L, Chen J, Zou Q, et al. Multi-view feature combination for ancient paintings chronological classification. J Comput Cult Herit, 2017, 10: 701–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sande K, Gevers T, Snoek C G M. Evaluating color descriptors for object and scene recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 2010, 32: 1582–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Aitken M J. Science-based dating in archaeology. New York: Routledge, 2014Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pike A W, Hoffmann D L, Garcia-Diez M, et al. U-series dating of Paleolithic art in 11 caves in Spain. Science, 2012, 336: 1409–1413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wang H. A study of shi-bao Guanyin and shi-gan-lu Guanyin images at cave 205 of the Mogao Grottes. J Dunhuang Studies, 2010, 1: 58–65Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qingquan Li
    • 1
  • Qin Zou
    • 2
    Email author
  • De Ma
    • 3
  • Qian Wang
    • 2
  • Song Wang
    • 4
  1. 1.Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Spatial Smart Sensing and ServiceShenzhen UniversityShenzhenChina
  2. 2.School of Computer ScienceWuhan UniversityWuhanChina
  3. 3.Dunhuang Research AcademiaDunhuangChina
  4. 4.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations