# Consensus control of stochastic multi-agent systems: a survey

- 370 Downloads
- 18 Citations

## Abstract

In this article, we provide a review of the consensus control problem for stochastic multi-agent systems (MASs). Recent advances are surveyed according to the method of occurrence of the stochasticity of the MASs. First, the consensus problem is discussed for MASs, wherein individual agents are corrupted by random noises, i.e., the dynamics of agents involve stochasticity in process and/or measurement equations. Both additive noises and multiplicative noises are surveyed in detail and special attention is paid to the MASs whose dynamics are governed by Itô differential equations. Moreover, particular effort is devoted to presenting the latest progress on the consensus problem for a special type of stochastic MAS with Markovian jump parameters. Subsequently, the relevant research is summarized for MASs with noisy communication environments and stochastic sampling. Further, we provide a systematic review of the consensus problems for MASs whose communication topology varies randomly in the process of data propagation among agents. Finally, conclusions are drawn and several potential future research directions are outlined.

## Keywords

stochastic multi-agent systems consensus control stochastic noises Markovian jump systems random topology## Notes

### Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 30916011337), Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 2014M551598), Research Fund for the Taishan Scholar Project of Shandong Province of China, Australian Research Council Discovery Project (Grant No. DP160103567), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61773209), Royal Society of the U.K., and Alexander von Humboldt Foundation of Germany.

## References

- 1.Langbort C, Chandra R S, Andrea R D. Distributed control design for systems interconnected over an arbitrary graph. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2004, 49: 1502–1519zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Gupta V, Hassibi B, Murray R M. A sub-optimal algorithm to synthesize control laws for a network of dynamic agents. Int J Control, 2005, 78: 1302–1313zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Dunbar W B. Distributed receding horizon control of dynamically coupled nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2007, 52: 1249–1263zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Franco E, Magni L, Parisini T, et al. Cooperative constrained control of distributed agents with nonlinear dynamics and delayed information exchange: a stabilizing receding-horizon approach. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2008, 53: 324–338zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Azuma Y, Ohtsuka T. Receding horizon Nash game approach for distributed nonlinear control. In: SICE Annual Conference, Tokyo, 2011. 380–384Google Scholar
- 6.Wang Z D, Ding D R, Dong H L, et al.
*H*_{∞}consensus control for multi-agent systems with missing measurements: the finite-horizon case. Syst Control Lett, 2013, 62: 827–836zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 7.Ming P S, Liu J C, Tan S B, et al. Consensus stabilization in stochastic multi-agent systems with Markovian switching topology, noises and delay. Neurocomputing, 2016, 200: 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Morita R, Wada T, Masubuchi I, et al. Time averaging algorithms with stopping rules for multi-agent consensus with noisy measurements. Asian J Control, 2016, 18: 1969–1982zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Ma C Q, Qin Z Y. Bipartite consensus on networks of agents with antagonistic interactions and measurement noises. IET Control Theory A, 2016, 10: 2306–2313MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Ma L F, Wang Z D, Lam H K. Event-triggered mean-square consensus control for time-varying stochastic multi-agent system with sensor saturations. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2017, 62: 3524–3531zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Ma L F, Wang Z D, Lam H K. Mean-square
*H*_{∞}consensus control for a class of nonlinear time-varying stochastic multiagent systems: the finite-horizon case. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst, 2017, 47: 1050–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 12.Andrea R, Dullerud G. Distributed control design for spatially interconnected systems. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2003, 48: 1478–1495zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Ren W, Moore K, Chen Y Q. High-order consensus algorithms in cooperative vehicle systems. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, Fort Lauderdale, 2006. 457–462Google Scholar
- 14.Fax J A, Murray R M. Information flow and cooperative control of vehicle formations. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2004, 49: 1465–1476zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Ge X H, Han Q L. Distributed formation control of networked multi-agent systems using a dynamic event-triggered communication mechanism. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2017, 64: 8118–8127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Olfati-Saber R. Flocking for multi-agent dynamic systems: algorithms and theory. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2016, 51: 401–420zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Ding D R, Wang Z D, Shen B, et al. Event-triggered distributed
*H*_{∞}state estimation with packet dropouts through sensor networks. IET Control Theory A, 2015, 9: 1948–1955MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 18.Dong H L, Wang Z D, Gao H J. Distributed
*H*_{∞}filtering for a class of Markovian jump nonlinear time-delay systems over lossy sensor networks. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2013, 60: 4665–4672CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 19.Ge X H, Han Q L. Distributed sampled-data asynchronous
*H*_{∞}filtering of Markovian jump linear systems over sensor networks. Signal Process, 2016, 127: 86–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 20.Ge X H, Han Q L. Distributed event-triggered
*H*_{∞}filtering over sensor networks with communication delays. Inform Sci, 2015, 291: 128–142zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 21.Shen B, Wang Z D, Liu X H. A stochastic sampled-data approach to distributed
*H*_{∞}filtering in sensor networks. IEEE Trans Circuits-I, 2011, 58: 2237–2246MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 22.Ugrinovskii V. Distributed robust estimation over randomly switching networks using
*H*_{∞}consensus. Automatica, 2013, 49: 160–168zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 23.Toshiyuki Y, Nakatani S, Adachi A, et al. Adaptive role assignment for self-organized flocking of a real robotic swarm. Artif Life Robot, 2016, 21: 405–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Li W Y, Wei G L, Han F, et al. Weighted average consensus-based unscented Kalman filtering. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2016, 46: 558–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Olfati-Saber R, Shamma J S. Consensus filters for sensor networks and distributed sensor fusion. In: Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and 2005 European Control Conference, Seville, 2005. 6698–6703Google Scholar
- 26.Yuan Y, Sun F C. Data fusion-based resilient control system under DoS attacks: a game theoretic approach. Int J Control Automat Syst, 2015, 13: 513–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Hatano Y, Mesbahi M. Agreement over random networks. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2005, 50: 1867–1872zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Jadbabaie A, Motee N, Barahona M. On the stability of the Kuramoto model of coupled nonlinear oscillators. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Boston, 2004. 4296–4301Google Scholar
- 29.Xu Y, Lu R Q, Peng H, et al. Asynchronous dissipative state estimation for stochastic complex networks with quantized jumping coupling and uncertain measurements. IEEE Trans Neural Netw, 2017, 28: 268–277MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Olfati-Saber R. Ultrafast consensus in small-world networks. In: Proceedings of the 2005 American Control Conference, Portland, 2005. 2372–2378Google Scholar
- 31.Yuan Y, Sun F C. Delay-dependent stability criteria for time-varying delay neural networks in the delta domain. Neurocomputing, 2013, 125: 17–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Fang L, Antsaklis P J, Tzimas A. Asynchronous consensus protocols: preliminary results, simulations and open questions. In: Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and 2005 European Control Conference, Seville, 2005. 2194–2199Google Scholar
- 33.Tron R, Thomas J, Loianno G, et al. A distributed optimization framework for localization and formation control: applications to vision-based measurements. IEEE Contr Syst Mag, 2016, 36: 22–44MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Lu Q, Han Q L, Zhang B T, et al. Cooperative control of mobile sensor networks for environmental monitoring: an event-triggered finite-time control scheme. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2016, doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2016.2601110Google Scholar
- 35.Sakthivel R, Mohanapriya S, Karimi H R, et al. A robust repetitive-control design for a class of uncertain stochastic dynamical systems. IEEE Trans Circuits-II, 2017, 64: 427–431Google Scholar
- 36.Poznyak A S. Sliding mode control in stochastic continuos-time systems:
*μ*-zone MS-convergence. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2017, 62: 863–868zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 37.Sahoo A, Jagannathan S. Stochastic optimal regulation of nonlinear networked control systems by using event-driven adaptive dynamic programming. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2017, 47: 425–438Google Scholar
- 38.Satoh S, Kappen H J, Saeki M. An iterative method for nonlinear stochastic optimal control based on path integrals. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2017, 62: 262–276.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Komaee A, Barton P I. Potential canals for control of nonlinear stochastic systems in the absence of state measurements. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol, 2017, 25: 161–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Mesbah A. Stochastic model predictive control: an overview and prespecitve for future research. IEEE Contr Syst Mag, 2016, 36: 30–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Abdollahi F, Khorasani K. A decentralized Markovian jump
*H*_{∞}control routing strategy for mobile multi-agent networked systems. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol, 2011, 19: 269–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 42.Ge X H, Han Q L. Consensus of multi-agent systems subject to partially accessible and overlapping Markovian network topologies. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2017, 47: 1807–1819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Meskin N, Khorasani K. Fault detection and isolation of discrete-time Markovian jump linear systems with application to a network of multi-agent systems having imperfect communication channels. Automatica, 2009, 45: 2032–2040zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Mu X W, Zheng B J, Liu K.
*L*_{2}−*L*_{∞}containment control of multi-agent systems with Markovian switching topologies and non-uniform time-varying delays. IET Control Theory A, 2014, 8: 863–872MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 45.Ge X H, Han Q L, Yang F W. Event-based set-membership leader-following consensus of networked multi-agent systems subject to limited communication resources and unknown-but-bounded noise. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2017, 64: 5045–5054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Fanaswala M, Krishnamurthy V. Detection of anomalous trajectory patterns in target tracking via stochastic context-free grammars and reciprocal process models. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process, 2013, 7: 76–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.Brinatti V, Guilermo D, Eduardo O, et al. Distributed temperature sensing using cyclic pseudorandom sequences. IEEE Sens J, 2017, 17: 1686–1691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.Cho Y, Park D. Sequential detector design for spectrum sensing considering instantaneously nonidentically distributed samples. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2017, 66: 2158–2169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 49.Cabell R, Palumbo D, Vipperman J. A principal component feedforward algorithm for active noise control: flight test results. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol, 2001, 9: 76–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 50.Boukhnifer M, Chaibet A. Robust control of aerial vehicle flight: simulation and experimental results. IEEE Aerosp Electron Syst Mag, 2014, 29: 4–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 51.Hafez A T, Marasco A J, Givigi S N, et al. Solving multi-UAV dynamic encirclement via model predictive control. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol, 2015, 23: 2251–2265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 52.Zhao B, Xian B, Zhang Y, et al. Nonlinear robust adaptive tracking control of a quadrotor UAV via immersion and invariance methodology. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2015, 62: 2891–2902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 53.Broek B, Wiegerinck W, Kappen B. Graphical model inference in optimal control of stochastic multi-agent systems. J Artif Intell Res, 2008, 32: 95–122zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 54.Zhang Q, Zhang J F. Adaptive tracking games for coupled stochastic linear multi-agent systems: stability, optimality and robustness. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2013, 58: 2862–2877zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 55.Zheng Y S, Chen W S, Wang L. Finite-time consensus for stochastic multi-agent systems. Int J Control, 2011, 84: 1644–1652zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 56.Ding D R, Wang Z D, Shen B, et al. Event-triggered consensus for discrete-time stochastic multi-agent systems: the input-to-state stability in probability. Automatica, 2015, 62: 284–291zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 57.Tang Y, Gao H J, Zhang W B, et al. Leader-following consensus of a class of stochastic delayed multi-agent systems with partial mixed impulses. Automatica, 2015, 53: 346–354zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 58.Feng Z, Hu G Q. Passivity-based consensus and passication for a class of stochastic multi-agent systems with switching topology. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics & Vision, Guangzhou, 2012. 1460–1465Google Scholar
- 59.Zhao L, Jia Y M. Finite-time consensus for second-order stochastic multi-agent systems with nonlinear dynamics. Appl Math Comput, 2015, 270: 278–290MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 60.Li W, Zhou H, Liu Z W, et al. Impulsive coordination of nonlinear multi-agent systems with multiple leaders and stochastic disturbance. Neurocomputing, 2016, 171: 73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 61.Zhang B, He W L. Sampled-data consensus of nonlinear multi-agent systems with stochastic disturbances. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Yokohama, 2015. 2207–2212Google Scholar
- 62.Wu X T, Tang Y, Cao J D, et al. Distributed consensus of stochastic delayed multi-agent systems under asynchronous switching. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2016, 46: 1817–1827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 63.Wu X T, Tang Y, Zhang W B. Stability analysis of stochastic delayed systems with an application to multi-agent systems. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2016, 61: 4143–4149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 64.Dong H L, Wang Z D, Gao H J. Fault detection for Markovian jump systems with sensor saturations and randomly varying nonlinearities. IEEE Trans Circuits-I, 2012, 59: 2354–2362MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 65.Karimi H R. Robust delay-dependent
*H*_{∞}control of uncertain time-delay systems with mixed neutral, discrete, and distributed time-delays and Markovian switching parameters. IEEE Trans Circuits-I, 2011, 58: 1910–1923MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 66.Karimi H R. A sliding mode approach to
*H*_{∞}synchronization of master-slave time-delay systems with Markovian jumping parameters and nonlinear uncertainties. J Franklin I, 2012, 349: 1480–1496zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 67.Karimi H R. Passivity-based output feedback control of Markovian jump systems with discrete and distributed time-varying delays. Int J Syst Sci, 2013, 44: 1290–1300zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 68.Li Q, Shen B, Liu Y R, et al. Event-triggered
*H*_{∞}state estimation for discrete-time stochastic genetic regulatory networks with Markovian jumping parameters and time-varying delays. Neurocomputing, 2016, 174: 912–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 69.Liu Y R, Liu W B, Obaid M A, et al. Exponential stability of Markovian jumping Cohen-Grossberg neural networks with mixed mode-dependent time-delays. Neurocomputing, 2016, 177: 409–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 70.Ma L F, Wang Z D, Bo Y M, et al. Finite-horizon
*H*_{2}/*H*_{∞}control for a class of nonlinear Markovian jump systems with probabilistic sensor failures. Int J Control, 2011, 84: 1847–1857zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 71.Sheng L, Zhang W H, Gao M. Relationship between Nash equilibrium strategies and
*H*_{2}/*H*_{∞}control of stochastic Markov jump systems with multiplicative noises. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2014, 59: 2592–2597zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 72.Terra M H, Ishihara J Y, Jesus G. Robust estimation for discrete-time Markovian jump linear systems. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2013, 58: 2065–2071zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 73.Wang B C, Zhang J F. Distributed output feedback control of Markov jump multi-agent systems. Automatica, 2013, 49: 1397–1402zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 74.Zhu S Y, Chen C L, Guan X P. Consensus protocol for heterogeneous multi-agent systems: a Markov chain approach. Chin Phys B, 2013, 22: 018901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 75.Azuma S, Baba I, Sugie T. Broadcast control of Markovian multi-agent systems. SICE J Control Meas Syst Integr, 2016, 9: 130–112Google Scholar
- 76.Mu X W, Zheng B J. Containment control of second-order discrete-time multi-agent systems with Markovian missing data. IET Control Theory A, 2015, 9: 1229–1237MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 77.Hou B, Sun F C, Li H B, et al. Stationary and dynamic consensus of second-order multi-agent systems with Markov jumping input delays. IET Control Theory A, 2004, 8: 1905–1913MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 78.Yi J W, Wang Y W, Xiao J W, et al. Consensus in second-order Markovian jump multi-agent systems via impulsive control using sampled information with heterogenous delays. Asian J Control, 2016, 18: 1940–1949zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 79.Yi J W, Wang Y W, Xiao J W. Consensus in Markovian jump second-order multi-agent systems with random communication delay. IET Control Theory A, 2014, 8: 1666–1675MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 80.Hu Y B, Lam J, Liang J L. Consensus control of multi-agent systems with missing data in actuators and Markovian communication failure. Int J Syst Sci, 2013, 44: 1867–1878zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 81.Park M J, Kwon O M, Park J H, et al. Randomly changing leader-following consensus control for Markovian switching multi-agent systems with interval time-varying delays. Nonlinear Anal-Hybr Syst, 2014, 12: 117–131zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 82.Huang M Y, Manton J. Coordination and consensus of networked agents with noisy measurements: stochastic algorithms and ssymptotic behavior. SIAM J Control Optim, 2009, 48: 134–161zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 83.Kar S, Moura J M F. Distributed consensus algorithms in sensor networks with imperfect communication: link failures and channel noise. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2009, 57: 355–369MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 84.Li T, Zhang J F. Consensus conditions of multi-agent systems with time-varying topologies and stochastic communication noises. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2010, 55: 2043–2057zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 85.Liu J, Zhang H T, Liu X Z, et al. Distributed stochastic consensus of multi-agent systems with noise and delayed measurements. IET Control Theory A, 2013, 7: 1359–1369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 86.Liu J, Liu X Z, Xie W C, et al. Stochastic consensus seeking with communication delays. Automatica, 2011, 47: 2689–2696zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 87.Li T, Zhang J F. Mean square average consensus under measurement noises and fixed topologies: necessary and sufficient conditions. Automatica, 2009, 45: 1929–1936zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 88.Zong X F, Li T, Zhang J F. Stochastic consensus of continuous time multi-agent systems with additive measurement noises. In: Proceedings of IEEE 54th Annual Conference on Decision and Control, Osaka, 2015. 543–548Google Scholar
- 89.Amelina N, Fradkov A. Approximate consensus in multi-agent nonlinear stochastic systems. In: Proceedings of European Control Conference (ECC), Strasbourg, 2014. 2833–2838Google Scholar
- 90.Robbins H, Monro S. A stochastic approximation method. Ann Math Stat, 1951, 22: 400–407zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 91.Chen H F. Stochastic Approximation and Its Applications. New York: Springer, 2002zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 92.Kushner H J, Yin G. Stochastic Approximation and Recursive Algorithms and Applications. New York: Springer. 2003zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 93.Spall J C. Introduction to Stochastic Search and Optimization. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2003zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 94.Morita R, Wada T, Masubuchi I, et al. Multiagent consensus with noisy communication: stopping rules based on network graphs. IEEE Trans Contr Netw Syst, 2016, 3: 358–365zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 95.Zong X F, Li T, Zhang J F. Stochastic consensus of linear multi-agent systems with multiplicative measurement noises. In: Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Control & Automation, Kathmandu, 2016. 7–12Google Scholar
- 96.Liu J C, Ming P S, Li S H. Consensus gain conditions of stochastic multi-agent system with communication noise. Int J Control Automat, 2016, 14: 1223–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 97.Schenato L, Firrentin F. Average TimeSynch: a consensus-based protocol for clock synchronization in wireless sensor networks. Automatica, 2011, 47: 1878–1886zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 98.Wu J, Shi Y. Consensus in multi-agent systems with random delays governed by a Markov chain. Syst Control Lett, 2011, 60: 863–870zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 99.Yin X X, Yue D. Event-triggered tracking control for heterogeneous multi-agent systems with Markov communication delays. J Franklin I, 2013, 350: 1312–1334zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 100.Tian Y P, Zhong S H, Cao Q Q. Structural modeling and convergence analysis of consensus-based time synchronization algorithms over networks: non-topological conditions. Automatica, 2016, 65: 64–75zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 101.Wang J, Elia N. Mitigation of complex behavior over networked systems: analysis of spatially invariant structures. Automatica, 2013, 49: 1626–1638zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 102.Ni W, Zhao D Y, Ni Y H, et al. Stochastic averaging approach to leader-following consensus of linear multi-agent systems. J Franklin I, 2016, 353: 2650–2669zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 103.Ni W, Wang X L, Xiong C. Leader-following consensus of multiple linear systems under switching topologies: an averaging method. Kybernetika, 2012, 48: 1194–1210zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 104.Ni W, Wang X L, Xiong C. Consensus controllability, observability and robust design for leader-following linear multi-agent systems. Automatica, 2013, 49: 2199–2205zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 105.Chen F T, Yu H, Xia X H. Output consensus of multi-agent systems with delayed and sampled-data. IET Control Theory A, 2017, 11: 632–639MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 106.Cui W X, Tang Y, Fang J A, et al. Consensus analysis of second-order multi-agent networks with sampled data and packet losses. IEEE Access, 2016, 4: 8127–8137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 107.Ding L, Han Q-L, Guo G. Network-based leader-following consensus for distributed multi-agent systems. Automatica, 2013, 49: 2281–2286zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 108.Guo G, Ding L, Han Q L. A distributed event-triggered transmission strategy for sampled-data consensus of multiagent systems. Automatica, 2014, 50: 1489–1496zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 109.He W L, Zhang B, Han Q-L, et al. Leader-following consensus of nonlinear multi-agent systems with stochastic sampling. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2017, 47: 327–338Google Scholar
- 110.He W L, Chen G R, Han Q-L, et al. Network-based leader-following consensus of nonlinear multi-agent systems via distributed impulsive control. Inform Sci, 2017, 380: 145–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 111.Katayama H. Design of consensus controllers for multi-rate sampled-data strict-feedback multi-agent systems. IFAC papers online, 2015, 48: 157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 112.Liu K X, Zhu H H, Lu J H. Bridging the gap between transmission noise and sampled data for robust consensus of multi-agent systems. IEEE Trans Circuits-I, 2015, 62: 1836–1844MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 113.Shen B, Wang Z D, Liu X H. Sampled-data synchronization control of complex dynamical networks with stochastic sampling. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2012, 57: 2644–2650zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 114.Wu Y J, Wang L. Sampled-data consensus for multi-agent systems with quantised communication. Int J Control, 2015, 88: 413–428zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 115.Xie T T, Liao X F, Li H Q. Leader-following consensus in second-order multi-agent systems with input time delay: an event-triggered sampling approach. Neurocomputing, 2016, 177: 130–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 116.Fan Y, Yang Y, Zhang Y. Sampling-based event-triggered consensus for multi-agent systems. Neurocomputing, 2016, 191: 141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 117.Zhao Y D, Zhang W D. Guaranteed cost consensus protocol design for linear multi-agent systems with sampled-data information: an input delay approach. ISA Trans, 2017, 67: 87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 118.Zhang X Y, Zhang J. Sampled-data consensus of general linear multi-agent systems under switching topologies: averaging method. Int J Control, 2017, 90: 291–304zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 119.Wan Y, Wen G H, Cao J D, et al. Distributed node-to-node consensus of multi-agent systems with stochastic sampling. Int J Robust Nonlin, 2016, 26: 110–124zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 120.Wei G L, Wang L C, Liu Y R.
*H*_{∞}control for a class of multi-agent systems via a stochastic sampled-data method. IET Control Theory A, 2015, 9: 2057–2065MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 121.Hu A H, Cao J D, Hu M F, et al. Event-triggered consensus of Markovian jumping multi-agent systmes with stochastic sampling. IET Control Theory A, 2015, 9: 1964–1972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 122.Shang Y L. Couple-group consensus of continuous-time multi-agent systems under Markovian switching topologies. J Franklin I, 2015, 352: 4826–4844MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 123.Zhao H, Xu S, Yuan D. Consensus of data-sampled multi-agent systems with Markovian switching topologies. Asian J Control, 2012, 14: 1366–1373zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 124.Mo L, Pan T. Mean-square consensus of heterogeneous multi-agent systems under Markov switching topologies (in Chinese). Sci Sin Inform, 2016, 46: 1621–1632Google Scholar
- 125.Miao G Y, Li T. Mean square containment control problems of multi-agent systems under Markov switching topologies. Adv Differ Equ, 2015: 157Google Scholar
- 126.Miao G Y, Xu S Y, Zhang B Y, et al. Mean square consensus of second-order multi-agent systems under Markov switching topologies. IMA J Math Control I, 2014, 31: 151–164zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 127.Pei Y Q, Sun J T. Consensus of discrete-time linear multi-agent systems with Markov switching topologies and time-delay. Neurocomputing, 2015, 151: 776–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 128.Ming P, Liu J C, Tan S B, et al. Consensus stabilization of stochastic multi-agent system with Markovian switching topologies and stochastic communication noise. J Franklin I, 2015, 352: 3684–3700MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 129.Ding L, Guo G. Sampled-data leader-following consensus for nonlinear multi-agent systems with Markovian switching topologies and communication delay. J Franklin I, 2015, 352: 369–383zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 130.Won K, Xiong R, Wu J. Multi-agent consensus control under Markovian switching topology and time-delay. Appl Mech Mater, 2013, 427–429: 750–4Google Scholar
- 131.Zhang Q, Zhang J F. Distributed consensus of continuous-time multi-agent systems with Markovian switching topologies and stochastic communication noises. J Syst Sci Math Sci, 2011, 31: 1097–1110zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 132.Zhao H, Xu S, Yuan D, et al. Minimum communication cost consensus in multi-agent systems with Markov chain patterns. IET Control Theory A, 2011, 5: 63–68MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 133.Chen J H, Xie D M, Yu M. Consensus problem of networked multi-agent systems with constant communication delay: stochastic switching topology case. Int J Control, 2012, 85: 1248–1262zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 134.Liu Q Y, Wang Z D, He X, et al. A resilient approach to distributed filter design for time-varying systems under stochastic nonlinearities and sensor degradation. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2017, 65: 1300–1309MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 135.Liu Y, Wang Z D, He X, et al.
*H*_{∞}filtering for nonlinear systems with stochastic sensor saturations and Markov time-delays: the asymptotic stability in probability. IET Control Theory A, 2016, 10: 1706–1715CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 136.Cai C X, Wang Z D, Xu J, et al. An integrated approach to global synchronization and state estimation for nonlinear singularly perturbed complex networks. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2015, 45: 1597–1609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 137.Dong H L, Wang Z D, Ding S X, et al. Event-based
*H*_{∞}filter design for a class of nonlinear time-varying systems with fading channels and multiplicative noises. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2015, 63: 3387–3395MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 138.Dong H L, Wang Z D, Ding S X, et al. Finite-horizon reliable control with randomly occurring uncertainties and nonlinearities subject to output quantization. Automatica, 2015, 52: 355–362zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 139.Ma L F, Wang Z D, Bo Y M, et al. A game theory approach to mixed
*H*_{2}/*H*_{∞}control for a class of stochastic time-varying systems with randomly occurring nonlinearities. Syst Control Lett, 2011, 60: 1009–1015zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 140.Ma L F, Wang Z D, Bo Y M, et al. Robust
*H*_{∞}sliding mode control for nonlinear stochastic systems with multiple data packet losses. Int J Robust Nonlin, 2012, 22: 473–491zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 141.Ma L F, Wang Z D, Han Q-L, et al. Variance-constrained distributed filtering for time-varying systems with multi-plicative noises and deception attacks over sensor networks. IEEE Sens J, 2017, 17: 2279–2288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 142.Zhang J, Ma L F, Liu Y R. Passivity analysis for discrete-time neural networks with mixed time-delays and randomly occurring quantization effects. Neurocomputing, 2016, 216: 657–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 143.Zhang Y, Wang Z D, Ma L F. Variance-constrained state estimation for networked multi-rate systems with measurement quantization and probabilistic sensor failures. Int J Robust Nonlin, 2016, 26: 3639–3670zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 144.Ma L F, Wang Z D, Lam H K, et al. Robust filtering for a class of nonlinear stochastic systems with probability constraints. Automat Rem Contr, 2016, 77: 37–54zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 145.Liu Y, Wang Z D, He X, et al. Finite-horizon quantized
*H*_{∞}filter design for a class of time-varying systems under event-triggered transmissions. Syst Control Lett, 2017, 103: 38–44zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 146.Wang L C, Wang Z D, Huang T W, et al. An event-triggered approach to state estimation for a class of complex networks with mixed time delays and nonlinearities. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2016, 46: 2497–2508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 147.Dong H L, Wang Z D, Shen B, et al. Variance-constrained
*H*_{∞}control for a class of nonlinear stochastic discrete time-varying systems: the event-triggered design. Automatica, 2016, 72: 28–36zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 148.Liu Q Y, Wang Z D, He X, et al. Event-based
*H*_{∞}consensus control of multi-agent systems with relative output feedback: the finite-horizon case. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2015, 60: 2553–2558zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 149.Zhang W B, Wang Z D, Liu Y R, et al. Event-based state estimation for a class of complex networks with time-varying delays: a comparison principle approach. Phys Lett A, 2017, 381: 10–18MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 150.Ge X H, Yang F W, Han Q L. Distributed networked control systems: a brief overview. Inform Sci, 2017, 380: 117–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 151.Zhang X M, Han Q L. A decentralized event-triggered dissipative control scheme for systems with multiple sensors to sample the system outputs. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2016, 46: 2745–2757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 152.Zhang X M, Han Q L, Yu X. Survey on recent advances in networked control systems. IEEE Trans Ind Inform, 2016, 12: 1740–1752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 153.Zhang X M, Han Q L, Zhang B L. An overview and deep investigation on sampled-data-based event-triggered control and filtering for networked systems. IEEE Trans Ind Inform, 2017, 13: 4–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 154.Zou L, Wang Z D, Gao H J, et al. State estimation for discrete-time dynamical networks with time-varying delays and stochastic disturbances under the Round-Robin protocol. IEEE Trans Neural Netw, 2017, 28: 1139–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 155.Zou L, Wang Z D, Gao H J. Set-membership filtering for time-varying systems with mixed time-delays under Round-Robin and Weighted Try-Once-Discard protocols. Automatica, 2016, 74: 341–348zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar