Advertisement

CW interference mitigation in GNSS receiver based on frequency-locked loop

  • Hongyu Ren
  • Yongqing WangEmail author
  • Lei Jiang
  • Siliang Wu
Research Paper

Abstract

Global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receivers are highly susceptible to continuous wave (CW) interference because the received signals are extremely weak. Current interference mitigation techniques mainly use a notch filter or transform domain. This paper proposes a computationally effective algorithm based on a frequency-locked loop (FLL) to mitigate interference in GNSS receivers. The performance of the algorithm is validated through an analysis of the characteristics of the interference reduction filter and interference estimation precision. A Monte Carlo simulation is used to compare the proposed algorithm with various previous algorithms: the adaptive IIR notch filter, adaptive linear-phase FIR filter, and N-sigma DFT algorithm. The simulation results show that the proposed algorithm exhibits excellent interference estimation precision and superior antijamming performance compared with the conventional algorithms.

Keywords

continuous wave mitigation frequency-locked loop interference reduction filter interference estimation code tracking 

References

  1. 1.
    Kaplan E D, Hegarty C J. Understanding GPS: Principles and Applications. 2nd ed. Norwood: Artech House, 2005. 153–300Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chang C L, Juang J C. Performance analysis of narrowband interference mitigation and near-far resistance scheme for GNSS receivers. Sign Proc, 2010, 90: 2676–2685CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang Y Q, Li C, Xu D, et al. A new barycenter code discriminator for multi-access interference. Sci China Inf Sci, 2014, 57: 022311zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borio D. GNSS acquisition in the presence of continuous wave interference. IEEE Trans Aero Electron Syst, 2010, 46: 47–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Savasta S, Presti L L, Rao M. Interference mitigation in GNSS receivers by a time-frequency approach. IEEE Trans Aero Electron Syst, 2013, 49: 415–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Balaei A T, Motella B, Dempster A. A preventative approach to mitigating CW interference in GPS receivers. GPS Solutions, 2008, 12: 199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borio D, Camoriano L, Savasta S, et al. Time-frequency excision for GNSS applications. IEEE Syst J, 2008, 2: 27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin T, Abdizadeh M, Broumandan A. Interference suppression for high precision navigation using vector-based GNSS software receivers. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS, Portland, 2011. 20–23Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Punchalard R. Mean square error analysis of unbiased modified plain gradient algorithm for second-order adaptive IIR notch filter. Sign Proc, 2012, 92: 2815–2820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Borio D, Camoriano L, Presti L L. Two-pole and multi-pole notch filters: a computationally effective solution for GNSS interference detection and mitigation. IEEE Syst J, 2008, 2: 38–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Petovello M, Borio D, Dovis F, et al. Impact of notch filtering on tracking loops for GNSS applications. Dissertation for Master Degree. Canada: UCalgary, 2009. 19–55Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ojeda O A, Grajal J, Lopez R G. Analytical performance of GNSS receivers using interference mitigation techniques. IEEE Trans Aero Electron Syst, 2013, 49: 885–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Capozza P T, Holland B J, Hopkinson T M, et al. A single-chip narrow-band frequency-domain excisor for a global positioning system (GPS) receiver. IEEE J Solid-State Circ, 2000, 35: 401–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Balaei A T, Dempster A G. A statistical inference technique for GPS interference detection. IEEE Trans Aero Electron Syst, 2009, 45: 1499–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ward P W. Performance comparisons between FLL, PLL and a novel FLL-assisted-PLL carrier tracking loop under RF interference conditions. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 1998), Nashville, 1998. 783–795Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Foucras M, Ekambi B, Ngayap U, et al. Performance study of FLL schemes for a successful acquisition-to-tracking transition. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium—PLANS, Monterey, 2014. 529–540Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Quinn B G. Estimating frequency by interpolation using fourier coefficients. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 1994, 42: 1264–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Provencher S. Parameters estimation of complex multitone signal in the DFT domain. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2011, 59: 3001–3012MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Betz J W, Kolodziejski K R. Generalized theory of code tracking with an early-late discriminator part ii: noncoherent processing and numerical results. IEEE Trans Aero Electron Syst, 2009, 45: 1557–1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Balaei A T, Dempster A G, Presti L L. Characterization of the effects of CW and pulse CW interference on the GPS signal quality. IEEE Trans Aero Electron Syst, 2009, 45: 1418–1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang Y Q, Gao L, Wu S L. Design of code tracking loop for spacecraft TT&C transponder (in Chinese). J Beijing Univ Posts and Telecommun, 2010, 33: 49–53Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu Y Q, Ran Y H, Ke T, et al. Code tracking performance analysis of GNSS signal in the presence of CW interference. Sign Proc, 2011, 91: 970–987CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jang J, Paonni M, Eissfeller B. CW interference effects on tracking performance of GNSS receivers. IEEE Trans Aero Electron Syst, 2012, 48: 243–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hongyu Ren
    • 1
  • Yongqing Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lei Jiang
    • 1
  • Siliang Wu
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Information and ElectronicsBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations