Science China Information Sciences

, Volume 55, Issue 11, pp 2417–2427 | Cite as

Study on co-occurrence character networks from Chinese essays in different periods

  • Wei Liang
  • YuMing ShiEmail author
  • Chi K. Tse
  • YanLi Wang
Research Paper


Co-occurrence networks of Chinese characters are constructed from collections of essays in different periods of China: the ancient Chinese language, the Chinese language in Wei, Jin, and Southern-Northern Dynasties, the recent Chinese language, and the modern Chinese language, and their statistical parameters are studied. It has been found that 99.6% networks have the scale-free feature and 95.0% networks have the smallworld effect. This study reveals some commonalities and differences among articles in different periods of China from a complex network perspective. There has been a controversial question as to whether the literatures in Wei, Jin, and Southern-Northern Dynasties should belong to the ancient Chinese language or the recent Chinese language in the linguistic study. Our work shows that the statistical parameters of networks in Wei, Jin, and Southern-Northern Dynasties are clearly different from those of networks in the other periods of China, and it seems more reasonable that the literatures in Wei, Jin, and Southern-Northern Dynasties belong to the recent Chinese language.


Chinese language essay co-occurrence character network small-world scale-free 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Steels L. Language as a complex adaptive system. In: Lecture notes in Computer science. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2000Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grimes B F. Ethnologue: Languages of the World. 14th ed. Dallas: TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics, 2000Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wei L, Li Y, Kang S, et al. Organizational structure and scale-free properties of Chinese words networks. Chin Sci Bull, 2005, 50: 1575–1579Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu Z, Sun M. Chinese word co-occurrence network: its small world effect and scale-free property. J Chin Inf Process, 2007, 6: 52–58Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhou S, Hu G, Zhang Z, et al. An empirical study of Chinese language networks. Phys A, 2008, 387: 3039–3047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu H. The complexity of Chinese synatactic dependency networks. Phys A, 2008, 387: 3048–3058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tang L, Zhang Y, Fu X. Structures of semantic networks: how do we learn semantic knowledge. J Southeast Univ, 2006, 22: 413–417Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shi Y, Liang W, Liu J, et al. Structural equivalence between co-occurrences of characters and words in Chinese language. In: Int. Symposium on Nonlinear Theory and its Appl. Budapest, 2008. 94–97Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liang W, Shi Y, Tse C K, et al. Comparison of co-occurrence networks of the Chinese and English languages. Phys A, 2009, 388: 4901–4909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang F, Zhao J. History of Ancient Chinese Literature (I). Tianjin: Nankai University Press, 2003Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ma J, Huang J. Ancient Chinese Literature. Changsha: Hunan Art Publishing House, 2006Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gao Y. Ancient Chinese system and ancient Chinese cultural type. The J Xinjiang Univ (Social Sci), 2003, 31: 84–90Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhou J. Ancient Chinese Literature. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 2003Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang Y. History of Ancient Chinese Literature (II). Tianjin: Nankai University Press, 2003Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    School of Chinese Language and Culture, Beijing Normal University. Ancient Chinese Literature. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press, 2008Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ning J, Li R. History of Ancient Chinese Literature (III). Tianjin: Nankai University Press, 2003Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang Y. A summary of upper limit of the recent Chinese language. J Henan Univ (Social Sci), 1995, 35: 52–55Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Erdös P, Rényi A. On the evolution of random graphs. Publ Math Inst Hung Acad Sci, 1960, 5: 17–60zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Watts D J, Strogatz S H. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ network. Nature, 1998, 393: 440–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cancho R Ferrer I, Solé R V. The small world of human language. Proc R Soc Lond B, 2001, 268: 2261–2265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Markošová M, Náther P. Language as a small world network. In: Proc. of the Sixth Int. Conf. on Hybrid intelligent Systems. Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 2006. 37–37Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Barabási A L, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random network. Science, 1999, 286: 509–512MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yu Y, Wang Z, Gao W, et al. Chinese language processing with complex network theory. In: Int. Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering. Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 2008. 710–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sigman M, Cecchi G. Global organization of the wordnet lexicon. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2002, 99: 1742–1747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jiang L. Interpretation of words in novel in Wei, Jin, and Southern-Northern Dynasties. Beijing: Language and Literature Press, 1988Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gao F. Notes of “Interpretation of words in novel in Wei, Jin, and Southern-Northern Dynasties”. J Jiangxi Norm Univ, 1995, 24: 98–100Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wei Liang
    • 1
    • 2
  • YuMing Shi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chi K. Tse
    • 3
  • YanLi Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsShandong UniversityJinanChina
  2. 2.School of Mathematics and Information ScienceHenan Polytechnic UniversityJiaozuoChina
  3. 3.Department of Electronic and Information EngineeringHong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations