Science China Information Sciences

, Volume 53, Issue 7, pp 1446–1460 | Cite as

Target classification with low-resolution radar based on dispersion situations of eigenvalue spectra

Research Papers

Abstract

Most low-resolution radar systems, especially ground surveillance radar systems, work at relatively low pulse repeat frequency (PRF) and with short time-on-target (TOT) (duration in scanning). Low PRF leads to Doppler ambiguity and short TOT results in low Doppler resolution, which poses a problem to target classification with low-resolution radar based on the jet engine modulation (JEM) characteristic of radar echo. From the pattern classification viewpoint, we propose a method of using dispersion situations of JEM eigenvalue spectra to categorize aeroplanes into three kinds, namely turbojet aircraft, prop aircraft and helicopter. We analyze the mathematical model of JEM echoes consisting of a series of line spectra and regard them as a sum of several series of harmonious waves. Classification features can be extracted based on the harmonious wave sum model. Some schemes for extracting features from echoes within or between pulses are proposed. Low-dimensional features are extracted to reduce computation burden. Our methods do not compensate for the fuselage echoes and are insensitive to the variation of fuselage Doppler. The feasibility of our methods is demonstrated by simulation experiment.

Keywords

jet engine modulation (JEM) low-resolution radar low pulse repeat frequency (PRF) short time-on-target (TOT) target classification 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ghadaki H, Dizaji R. Target track classification for airport surveillance radar (ASR). In: Wu S J, eds. IEEE Conference on Radar 2006. Beijing: IEEE, 2006. 24–27Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhu Z F, Ding J J. Extraction of JEM signature based decomposing the return’s amplitude and phase (in Chinese). J Air Force Radar Acad, 2006, 20: 21–24Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leung H, Wu J. Bayesian and Dempster-Shafer target identification for radar surveillance. IEEE Trans Aerospace Electron Syst, 2000, 36: 432–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pouliguen P, Lucas L, Muller F, et al. Calculation and analysis of electromagnetic scattering by helicopter rotating blades. IEEE Trans Antenna Propag, 2002, 50: 1193–1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bell M R, Grubbs R A. JEM modeling and measurement for radar target identification. IEEE Trans Aerospace Electron Syst, 1993, 29: 73–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Piazza E. Radar signals analysis and modellization presence of JEM application in the civilian ATC radars. Aerospace Electron Syst Mag, 1999, 14: 35–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martin J, Mulgrew B. Analysis of the theoretical radar return signal form aircraft propeller blades. In: The Record of the IEEE International Conference Radar-90. New York: IEEE, 1990. 569–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang S, Yeh S. Electromagnetic backscattering from aircraft propeller blades. IEEE Trans Magn, 1997, 33: 1432–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martint J, Mulgrew B. Analysis of the effects of blade pitch on the radar return signal from rotating aircraft blades. In: International Conference Radar 92. London: IET, 1992. 446–449Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Elshafei M, Akhtar S, Ahmed M S. Parametric models for helicopter identification. IEEE Trans Aerospace Electron Syst, 2000, 36: 1242–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Melendez G J, Kesler S B. Spectrum estimation by neural networks and their use for target classification by radar. In: International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal processing 1995. New York: IEEE, 1995. 3615–3618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moses R L, Carl J W. Autoregressive modeling of radar data with application to target identification. In: Proceedings of the 1988 IEEE National Radar Conference. New York: IEEE, 1988. 220–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pellegrini-S P F, Pardini C S. Radar signals analysis oriented to target characterization applied to civilian ATC radar. In: International Conference Radar 1992. London: IET, 1992. 438–445Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ding J J, Zhang X D. Studies of modulation characteristics of propeller aircraft returns in the LRR (in Chinese). J Electron Inf Tech, 2003, 25: 460–465Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ding J J, Zhang X D. Jet engine nodulations ignatures of propeller aircraft in air-defense radar signals (in Chinese). J Tsinghua Univ Sci Tech, 2003, 43: 418–421Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stove A. A Doppler-based target classifier using linear discriminants and principal components. In: The Institution of Engineering and Technology Seminar on High Resolution Imaging and Target Classification. London: IET, 2006. 171–176Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jahangir M, Pointing K M, O’Loghlen J W. A robust doppler classification technique based on hidden markov models. In: IEEE Radar 2002. New York: IEEE, 2002. 162–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jahangir M, Ponting K M, O’Loghlen J W. Correction to Robust Doppler classification technique based on Hidden Markov models. IEE Proceed Radar Sonar Navigat, 2003, 150: 387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ji H, Li J, Xie W. Bispectrum based radar target classification. In: Fourth International Conference on Signal Processing Proceedings. New York: IEEE, 1992. 419–422Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xu Z, Zhang K Y, Lu L. Fast algorithms of Toeplitz matrice (in Chinese). Xi’an: Northwest Polytechnic University Press, 2006. 212–255Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang G P, Bao C C, Zhang P. Low bit rates waveform interpolation speech coding based on singular value decomposition (in Chinese). Acta Electron Sin, 2006, 34: 135–139Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Duda R O, Hart P E, Stork D G. Pattern Classification. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2001. 259–264MATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Andric M, Durovic Z, Zrnic B. Ground surveillance radar target classification based on fuzzy logic approach. In: International Conference on Computer as a Tool. New York: IEEE, 2005. 1390–1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bullard B D, Dowdy P C. Pulse doppler signature of a rotary wing aircraft. Aerospace Electron Syst Maga, 1991, 36: 28–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yoon S, Kim B, Kim Y. Helicopter classification using time-frequency analysis. Electron Lett, 2000, 36: 1871–1872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Linde G. Use of wideband waveforms for target recognition with surveillance radars. In: The record of IEEE International Radar Conference 2000. New York: IEEE, 2000. 128–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Laboratory of Radar Signal ProcessingXidian UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations