Science China Information Sciences

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 223–235

Receding horizon control for multi-UAVs close formation control based on differential evolution

Research Papers Special Focus

Abstract

Close formation flight is one of the most complicated problems on multi-uninhabited aerial vehicles (UAVs) coordinated control. Based on the nonlinear model of multi-UAVs close formation, a novel type of control strategy of using hybrid receding horizon control (RHC) and differential evolution algorithm is proposed. The issue of multi-UAVs close formation is transformed into several on-line optimization problems at a series of receding horizons, while the differential evolution algorithm is adopted to optimize control sequences at each receding horizon. Then, based on the Markov chain model, the convergence of differential evolution is proved. The working process of RHC controller is presented in detail, and the stability of close formation controller is also analyzed. Finally, three simulation experiments are performed, and the simulation results show the feasibility and validity of our proposed control algorithm.

Keywords

uninhabited aerial vehicle (UAV) close formation receding horizon control (RHC) differential evolution (DE) Markov chain 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Paul T, Krogstad T R, Gravdahl J T. Modeling of UAV formation flight using 3D potential field. Simul Mod Pract Th, 2008, 16: 1453–1462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Keviczky T, Fregene K, Borrelli F, et al. Coordinated autonomous vehicle formations: decentralization, control synthesis and optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2006 American Control Conference. Minneapolis, 2006. 2022–2027Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fan Q J, Yang Z, Fang T. Research status of coordinated formation flight control for multi-UAVs. Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin, 2009, 30: 683–691Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Proud A W, Pachter M, D’Azzo J J. Close formation flight control. In: AIAA Guidance Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, Portland, Oregon, 1999. 1231–1246Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Binetti P, Ariyur K B, Krstic M, et al. Formation flight optimization using extremum seeking feedback. J Guid Control Dynam, 2003, 26: 132–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dargan J L, Pachter M, D’Azzo J J. Automatic formation flight control. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, 1992. 838–857Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buzogany L E, Pachter M, D’Azzo J J. Automated control of aircraft in formation flight. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, Monterey, California, 1993. 1349–1370Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pachter M, D’Azzo J J, Proud A W. Tight formation flight control. J Guid Control Dynam, 2001, 24: 246–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang J Y, Wei R X. Close Formation configuration control of cooperative UAV. Flight Dynam, 2008, 26: 34–37Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zong L B, Xie F, Qin S Y. Intelligent optimizing control of formation flight for UAVs based on MAS. Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin, 2008, 29: 1326–1333Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Singh S N, Pachter M. Adaptive feedback linearization nonlinear close formation control of UAVs. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference. Chicago, 2000. 854–858Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li Y, Li B, Sun Z, et al. Fuzzy technique based close formation flight control. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, New York, 2005. 40–44Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li B, Liao X H, Sun Z, et al. Robust autopilot for close Formation flight of multi-UAVs. In: Proceedings of the 38th Southeastern Symposium on System Theory, Cookeville, 2006. 294–298Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keviczky T, Fregene K, Borrelli F, et al. Coordinated autonomous vehicle formations: Decentralization, control synthesis and optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2006 American Control Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 2006. 2022–2027Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hu X B, Chen W H, Paolo E D. Multiairport capacity management: genetic algorithm with receding horizon. IEEE Trans Intel Syst, 2007, 8: 254–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bhattacharya R, Balas G J, Kaya A, et al. Nonlinear receding horizon control of F-16 aircraft. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Arlington, 2001. 518–522Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mayne D Q, Rawlings J B, Rao C V, et al. Constrained model predictive control: stability and optimality. Automatica, 2000, 36: 789–814MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Storn R, Price K. Differential evolution—a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces. Technical Report, International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, 1995Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Blake W, Multhopp D. Design, performance and modeling considerations for close formation flight. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Reston, Virginia, 1998. 476–486Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ding B C. Predictive Control: Theory and Methods. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2008. 12–26Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zielinski K, Laur R. Stopping criteria for differential evolution in constrained single-objective optimization. In: Advances in Differential Evolution. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer 2008, 143: 111–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zielinski K, Weitkemper P, Laur R, et al. Parameter study for differential evolution using a power allocation problem including interference cancellation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Vancouver, BC, 2006. 6748–6755Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Storn R, Price K. Differential evolution-a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Global Optim, 1997, 11: 341–359MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang W X, Liang Y. Mathematical Foundation of Genetic Algorithms. 2nd ed. Xi’an: Xi’an Jiaotong University Press, 2003. 67–117Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yang J J, Liu M, Wu C. Genetic algorithm based nonlinear model predictive control method. Control Decision, 2003, 18: 141–144Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science in China Press and Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Holistic Control, School of Automation Science and Electrical EngineeringBeihang UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations