Skip to main content
Log in

In-situ lunar dust deposition amount induced by lander landing in Chang’E-3 mission

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

China first in-situ lunar dust experiment is performed by a lunar dust detector in Chang’E-3 mission. The existed dust (less than 20 µm in diameter) properties, such as levitation, transportation and adhesion, are critical constraints for future lunar exploration program and even manned lunar exploration. Based on the problems discussed above, the in-situ lunar dust detector is originally designed to characterize dust deposition properties induced by lander landing as a function of environmental temperature, solar incident angle and orbit short circuit current on the northern Mare Imbrium, aiming to study lunar dust deposition properties induced by lander landing in depth. This paper begins with a brief of introduction of Chang’E-3 lunar dust detector design, followed by a series of experimental analysis of this instrument under different influencing factors, and concludes with lunar dust mass density deposition amount observed on the first lunar day is about 0.83 mg/cm2, which is less than that observed in Apollo 11 mission because the landing site of Chang’E-3 has the youngest mare basalts comparing with previous Apollo and lunar landing sites. The young geologic environment is less weathered and thus it has thinner layer of lunar dust than Apollo missions’; hence, the amount of kicked-up lunar dust in Chang’E-3 mission is less than that in Apollo 11 mission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O’Brien B J. Review of measurements of dust movements on the Moon during Apollo. Planet Space Sci, 2011, 59: 1708–1726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang X, Schwan J, Hsu H W, et al. Dust charging and transport on airless planetary bodies. Geophys Res Lett, 2016, 43: 6103–6110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hou X, Fu H, Yang X, et al. Study on charging mechanism model of lunar dust for technology of particle removal from detector. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA). Harbin: IEEE, 2016. 1513–1517

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kuznetsov I A, Zakharov A V, Dolnikov G G, et al. Lunar dust: Properties and investigation techniques. Sol Syst Res, 2017, 51: 611–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li L, Zhang Y T, Zhou B, et al. Dust levitation and transport over the surface of the Moon. Sci China Earth Sci, 2016, 59: 2053–2061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang J, Zhao H, Wang L, et al. Analysis of influence factors on dust removal efficiency for novel photovoltaic lunar dust removal technology. Smart Mater Struct, 2017, 26: 125025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Horányi M, Szalay J R, Kempf S, et al. A permanent, asymmetric dust cloud around the Moon. Nature, 2015, 522: 324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Brien B. Overview of 14 discoveries 1969–2015 from Apollo measured movements of lunar dust. In: Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. Vienna, 2016, 18. 1685

  9. O’Brien B J, Hollick M. Sunrise-driven movements of dust on the Moon: Apollo 12 Ground-truth measurements. Planet Space Sci, 2015, 119: 194–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Brien B J. Paradigm shifts about dust on the Moon: From Apollo 11 to Chang’e-4. Planet Space Sci, 2018, 156: 47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Janches D, Pokorný P, Sarantos M, et al. Constraining the ratio of micrometeoroids from short- and long-period comets at 1 AU from LADEE observations of the lunar dust cloud. Geophys Res Lett, 2018, 45: 1713–1722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Poppe A R, Halekas J S, Szalay J R, et al. LADEE/LDEX observations of lunar pickup ion distribution and variability. Geophys Res Lett, 2016, 43: 3069–3077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Saidan M, Albaali A G, Alasis E, et al. Experimental study on the effect of dust deposition on solar photovoltaic panels in desert environment. Renew Energy, 2016, 92: 499–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gholami A, Khazaee I, Eslami S, et al. Experimental investigation of dust deposition effects on photo-voltaic output performance. Sol Energy, 2018, 159: 346–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu H, Zhao W. Effects of particle sizes and tilt angles on dust deposition characteristics of a ground-mounted solar photovoltaic system. Appl Energy, 2018, 220: 514–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Said S A M, Hassan G, Walwil H M, et al. The effect of environmental factors and dust accumulation on photovoltaic modules and dust-accumulation mitigation strategies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2018, 82: 743–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gupta V, Raj P, Yadav A. Investigate the effect of dust deposition on the performance of solar PV module using LABVIEW based data logger. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Power, Control, Signals and Instrumentation Engineering (ICPCSI). Chennai: IEEE, 2017. 742–747

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Chikate B V, Sadawarte Y. The factors affecting the performance of solar cell. Int J Comput Appl, 2015, 1: 0975–8887

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yang W C, Lo C, Wei C Y, et al. Cell-temperature determination in InGaP-(In)GaAs-Ge triple-junction solar cells. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2011, 32: 1412–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Umachandran N, TamizhMani G S. Effect of spatial temperature uniformity on outdoor photovoltaic module performance characterization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 43rd Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC). Portland: IEEE, 2016. 2731–2737

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tang H, Li X, Zhang S, et al. A lunar dust simulant: CLDS-i. Adv Space Res, 2017, 59: 1156–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sun Y, Liu J, Zhang X, et al. Mechanisms involved in inflammatory pulmonary fibrosis induced by lunar dust simulant in rats. Environ Toxicol, 2019, 34: 131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. O’Brien B J, Hollick M. Sunrise-driven movements of dust on the Moon: Apollo 12 Ground-truth measurements. Planet Space Sci, 2015, 119: 194–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ochoa M, Yaccuzzi E, Espinet-González P, et al. 10 MeV proton irradiation effects on GaInP/GaAs/Ge concentrator solar cells and their component subcells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 2017, 159: 576–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhu L, Yoshita M, Nakamura T, et al. Characterization and modeling of radiation damages via internal radiative efficiency in multi-junction solar cells. In: Proceedings of the Physics, Simulation, and Photonic Engineering of Photovoltaic Devices V. International Society for Optics and Photonics. San Francisco, 2016. 9743: 97430U

  26. O’Brien B J. Paradigm shifts about dust on the Moon: From Apollo 11 to Chang’e-4. Planet Space Sci, 2018, 156: 47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. O’Brien B. Direct active measurements of movements of lunar dust: Rocket exhausts and natural effects contaminating and cleansing Apollo hardware on the Moon in 1969. Geophys Res Lett, 2009, 36: L09201

    Google Scholar 

  28. Xiao L, Zhu P, Fang G, et al. A young multilayered terrane of the northern Mare Imbrium revealed by Chang’E-3 mission. Science, 2015, 347: 1226–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fa W, Zhu M H, Liu T, et al. Regolith stratigraphy at the Chang’E-3 landing site as seen by lunar penetrating radar. Geophys Res Lett, 2015, 42: 10179–10187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hu B, Wang D, Zhang L, et al. Rock location and quantitative analysis of regolith at the Chang’e 3 landing site based on local similarity constraint. Remote Sens, 2019, 11: 530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gold T. Lunar-Surface Closeup Stereoscopic Photography. Apollo 14: Preliminary Science Report. NASA SP-272, Washington DC, 1971. 239

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hollick M, O’Brien B J. Lunar weather measurements at three Apollo sites 1969–1976. Space Weather, 2013, 11: 651–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhou H, Li H T, Dong G L. Relative position determination between Chang’E-3 lander and rover using in-beam phase referencing. Sci China Inf Sci, 2015, 58: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  34. Liu Z Q, Di K C, Peng M, et al. High precision landing site mapping and rover localization for Chang’E-3 mission. Sci China-Phys Mech Astron, 2015, 58: 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ye P J, Sun Z Z, Zhang H, et al. An overview of the mission and technical characteristics of Chang’E-4 Lunar Probe. Sci China Tech Sci, 2017, 60: 658–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ye P J, Sun Z Z, Rao W, et al. Mission overview and key technologies of the first Mars probe of China. Sci China Tech Sci, 2017, 60: 649–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yi Wang or He Zhang.

Additional information

This work was supported by the Beijing Institute of Spacecraft System Engineering, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11605080), and the State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry for providing the simulant lunar dust.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Wang, Y., Chen, L. et al. In-situ lunar dust deposition amount induced by lander landing in Chang’E-3 mission. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 63, 520–527 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-019-1434-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-019-1434-y

Keyword

Navigation