Advertisement

Science China Technological Sciences

, Volume 62, Issue 8, pp 1255–1276 | Cite as

Recent progress in stretchable organic field-effect transistors

  • Kai Liu
  • YunLong GuoEmail author
  • YunQi Liu
Review
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

Stretchable organic field-effect transistors (STOFETs) employing organic semiconductors as active layers are highly attractive ongoing from health monitoring to biological research owing to some favorable advantages over their inorganic counterpart, including light weight, low cost, solution processing, high flexibility and simple adjustment of functionalities through molecular design. Although the development of STOFETs with original electrical performances under large mechanical deformation remain rudimentary, major efforts have recently been devoted to the investigation on STOFETs, and remarkable advances in stretchable components and novel fabrication methods have been achieved. A detailed overview of the advantages, challenges and current achievements in STOFETs was given including stretchable electrodes, semiconductors, dielectrics and substrates. Furthermore, conclusions and prospects for the future development of STOFETs with both high stretchability and superb electrical performances fabricated using intrinsically stretchable components are proposed.

Keywords

STOFETs organic semiconductor high stretchability high carrier mobility 

References

  1. 1.
    Chortos A, Koleilat G I, Pfattner R, et al. Mechanically durable and highly stretchable transistors employing carbon nanotube semiconductor and electrodes. Adv Mater, 2016, 28: 4441–4448Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rogers J A, Someya T, Huang Y. Materials and mechanics for stretchable electronics. Science, 2010, 327: 1603–1607Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hammock M L, Chortos A, Tee B C K, et al. The evolution of electronic skin (E-Skin): A brief history, design considerations, and recent progress. Adv Mater, 2013, 25: 5997–6038Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benight S J, Wang C, Tok J B H, et al. Stretchable and self-healing polymers and devices for electronic skin. Prog Polymer Sci, 2013, 38: 1961–1977Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tee B C K, Chortos A, Dunn R R, et al. Tunable flexible pressure sensors using microstructured elastomer geometries for intuitive electronics. Adv Funct Mater, 2014, 24: 5427–5434Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roh E, Hwang B U, Kim D, et al. Stretchable, transparent, ultrasensitive, and patchable strain sensor for human-machine interfaces comprising a nanohybrid of carbon nanotubes and conductive elastomers. ACS Nano, 2015, 9: 6252–6261Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yamada T, Hayamizu Y, Yamamoto Y, et al. A stretchable carbon nanotube strain sensor for human-motion detection. Nat Nanotech, 2011, 6: 296–301Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tee B C K, Chortos A, Berndt A, et al. A skin-inspired organic digital mechanoreceptor. Science, 2015, 350: 313–316Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Son D, Lee J, Qiao S, et al. Multifunctional wearable devices for diagnosis and therapy of movement disorders. Nat Nanotech, 2014, 9: 397–404Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kang S K, Murphy R K J, Hwang S W, et al. Bioresorbable silicon electronic sensors for the brain. Nature, 2016, 530: 71–76Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim D H, Lu N, Ghaffari R, et al. Materials for multifunctional balloon catheters with capabilities in cardiac electrophysiological mapping and ablation therapy. Nat Mater, 2011, 10: 316–323Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ying M, Bonifas A P, Lu N, et al. Silicon nanomembranes for fingertip electronics. Nanotechnology, 2012, 23: 344004Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lim S, Son D, Kim J, et al. Transparent and stretchable interactive human machine interface based on patterned graphene heterostructures. Adv Funct Mater, 2015, 25: 375–383Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim J, Lee M, Shim H J, et al. Stretchable silicon nanoribbon electronics for skin prosthesis. Nat Commun, 2014, 5: 5747Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li S, Zhao H, Shepherd R F. Flexible and stretchable sensors for fluidic elastomer actuated soft robots. MRS Bull, 2017, 42: 138–142Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rus D, Tolley M T. Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature, 2015, 521: 467–475; Muth J T, Vogt D M, Truby R L, et al. Embedded 3D printing of strain sensors within highly stretchable elastomers. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 6307–6312; Yan C, Wang J, Wang X, et al. An intrinsically stretchable nanowire photodetector with a fully embedded structure. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 943–950Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liang J, Li L, Chen D, et al. Intrinsically stretchable and transparent thin-film transistors based on printable silver nanowires, carbon nanotubes and an elastomeric dielectric. Nat Commun, 2015, 6: 7647Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shin G, Yoon C H, Bae M Y, et al. Stretchable field-effect-transistor array of suspended SnO2 nanowires. Small, 2011, 7: 1181–1185Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pang C, Koo J H, Nguyen A, et al. Highly skin-conformal microhairy sensor for pulse signal amplification. Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 634–640Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chortos A, Lim J, To J W F, et al. Highly stretchable transistors using a microcracked organic semiconductor. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 4253–4259Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chatterjee P, Pan Y, Stevens E C, et al. Controlled morphology of thin film silicon integrated with environmentally responsive hydrogels. Langmuir, 2013, 29: 6495–6501Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wong W S, Salleo A. Flexible Electronics: Materials and Applications. Berlin: Springer, 2009Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sun Y, Rogers J. Inorganic semiconductors for flexible electronics. Adv Mater, 2007, 19: 1897–1916Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kaltenbrunner M, White M S, Głowacki E D, et al. Ultrathin and lightweight organic solar cells with high flexibility. Nat Commun, 2012, 3: 1–7Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schwartz G, Tee B C K, Mei J, et al. Flexible polymer transistors with high pressure sensitivity for application in electronic skin and health monitoring. Nat Commun, 2013, 4: 1859Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shyu T C, Damasceno P F, Dodd P M, et al. A kirigami approach to engineering elasticity in nanocomposites through patterned defects. Nat Mater, 2015, 14: 785-789Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Blees M K, Barnard A W, Rose P A, et al. Graphene kirigami. Nature, 2015, 524: 204–207Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yokota T, Zalar P, Kaltenbrunner M, et al. Ultraflexible organic photonic skin. Sci Adv, 2016, 2: e1501856Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    White M S, Kaltenbrunner M, Głowacki E D, et al. Ultrathin, highly flexible and stretchable PLEDs. Nat Photon, 2013, 7: 811–816Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sun Y, Choi W M, Jiang H, et al. Controlled buckling of semiconductor nanoribbons for stretchable electronics. Nat Nanotech, 2006, 1: 201–207Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lee H, Choi T K, Lee Y B, et al. A graphene-based electrochemical device with thermoresponsive microneedles for diabetes monitoring and therapy. Nat Nanotech, 2016, 11: 566–572Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lee S K, Kim B J, Jang H, et al. Stretchable graphene transistors with printed dielectrics and gate electrodes. Nano Lett, 2011, 11: 4642–4646Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Smith Z C, Wright Z M, Arnold A M, et al. Increased toughness and excellent electronic properties in regioregular random copolymers of 3-alkylthiophenes and thiophene. Adv Electron Mater, 2017, 3: 1600316Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kang I, Yun H J, Chung D S, et al. Record high hole mobility in polymer semiconductors via side-chain engineering. J Am Chem Soc, 2013, 135: 14896–14899Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Luo C, Kyaw A K K, Perez L A, et al. General strategy for selfassembly of highly oriented nanocrystalline semiconducting polymers with high mobility. Nano Lett, 2014, 14: 2764–2771Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jung I, Xiao J, Malyarchuk V, et al. Dynamically tunable hemispherical electronic eye camera system with adjustable zoom capability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2011, 108: 1788–1793Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pattanasattayavong P, Yaacobi-Gross N, Zhao K, et al. Hole-transporting transistors and circuits based on the transparent inorganic semiconductor copper(I) thiocyanate (CuSCN) processed from solution at room temperature. Adv Mater, 2013, 25: 1504–1509Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tseng H R, Phan H, Luo C, et al. High-mobility field-effect transistors fabricated with macroscopic aligned semiconducting polymers. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 2993–2998Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mei J, Kim D H, Ayzner A L, et al. Siloxane-terminated solubilizing side chains: Bringing conjugated polymer backbones closer and boosting hole mobilities in thin-film transistors. J Am Chem Soc, 2011, 133: 20130–20133Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Matthews J R, Niu W, Tandia A, et al. Scalable synthesis of fused thiophene-diketopyrrolopyrrole semiconducting polymers processed from nonchlorinated solvents into high performance thin film transistors. Chem Mater, 2013, 25: 782–789Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wang G J N, Gasperini A, Bao Z. Stretchable polymer semiconductors for plastic electronics. Adv Electron Mater, 2018, 4: 1700429Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Xu J, Wang S, Wang G J N, et al. Highly stretchable polymer semiconductor films through the nanoconfinement effect. Science, 2017, 355: 59–64Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Oh J Y, Rondeau-Gagn;e S, Chiu Y C, et al. Intrinsically stretchable and healable semiconducting polymer for organic transistors. Nature, 2016, 539: 411–415Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Scott J I, Xue X, Wang M, et al. Significantly increasing the ductility of high performance polymer semiconductors through polymer blending. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 8: 14037–14045Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sekitani T, Zschieschang U, Klauk H, et al. Flexible organic transistors and circuits with extreme bending stability. Nat Mater, 2010, 9: 1015–1022Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yi H T, Payne M M, Anthony J E, et al. Ultra-flexible solutionprocessed organic field-effect transistors. Nat Commun, 2012, 3: 1259Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kim D H, Song J, Mook Choi W, et al. Materials and noncoplanar mesh designs for integrated circuits with linear elastic responses to extreme mechanical deformations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2008, 105: 18675–18680Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chae S H, Yu W J, Bae J J, et al. Transferred wrinkled Al2O3 for highly stretchable and transparent grapheme-carbon nanotube transistors. Nat Mater, 2013, 12: 403–409Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Savagatrup S, Printz A D, Rodriquez D, et al. Best of both worlds: Conjugated polymers exhibiting good photovoltaic behavior and high tensile elasticity. Macromolecules, 2014, 47: 1981–1992Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Müller C, Goffri S, Breiby D, et al. Tough, semiconducting polyethylene- poly(3-hexylthiophene) diblock copolymers. Adv Funct Mater, 2007, 17: 2674–2679Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sekitani T, Nakajima H, Maeda H, et al. Stretchable active-matrix organic light-emitting diode display using printable elastic conductors. Nat Mater, 2009, 8: 494–499Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Song E, Kang B, Choi H H, et al. Stretchable and transparent organic semiconducting thin film with conjugated polymer nanowires embedded in an elastomeric matrix. Adv Electron Mater, 2016, 2: 1500250Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wang S, Xu J, Wang W, et al. Skin electronics from scalable fabrication of an intrinsically stretchable transistor array. Nature, 2018, 555: 83–88Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Tey J N, Wijaya I P M, Wang Z, et al. Laminated, microfluidicintegrated carbon nanotube based biosensors. Appl Phys Lett, 2009, 94: 013107Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Shin M, Song J H, Lim G H, et al. Highly stretchable polymer transistors consisting entirely of stretchable device components. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 3706–3711Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Choi J S, Chan W P, Na B S, et al. Stretchable organic thin-film transistors fabricated on wavy-dimensional elastomer substrates using stiff-island structures. IEEE Electron Device Letters, 2014, 35: 762–764Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Wu H, Kustra S, Gates E M, et al. Topographic substrates as strain relief features in stretchable organic thin film transistors. Org Electron, 2013, 14: 1636–1642Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Rao Y L, Chortos A, Pfattner R, et al. Stretchable self-healing polymeric dielectrics cross-linked through metal-ligand coordination. J Am Chem Soc, 2016, 138: 6020–6027Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Choi T, Kim S J, Park S, et al. Roll-to-roll continuous patterning and transfer of graphene via dispersive adhesion. Nanoscale, 2015, 7: 7138–7142Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Wang Y, Wang L, Yang T, et al. Wearable and highly sensitive graphene strain sensors for human motion monitoring. Adv Funct Mater, 2014, 24: 4666–4670Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Koo J H, Kim D C, Shim H J, et al. Flexible and stretchable smart display: Materials, fabrication, device design, and system integration. Adv Funct Mater, 2018, 28: 1801834Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Xu F, Zhu Y. Highly conductive and stretchable silver nanowire conductors. Adv Mater, 2012, 24: 5117–5122Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Amjadi M, Pichitpajongkit A, Lee S, et al. Highly stretchable and sensitive strain sensor based on silver nanowire-elastomer nanocomposite. ACS Nano, 2014, 8: 5154-5163Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Zhang R, Engholm M. Recent progress on the fabrication and properties of silver nanowire-based transparent electrodes. Nanomaterials, 2018, 8: 628Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kwon J, Suh Y D, Lee J, et al. Recent progress in silver nanowire based flexible/wearable optoelectronics. J Mater Chem C, 2018, 6: 7445–7461Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Zhu Y, Qin Q, Xu F, et al. Size effects on elasticity, yielding, and fracture of silver nanowires: In situ experiments. Phys Rev B, 2012, 85: 045443Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Araki T, Mandamparambil R, Martinus Peterus van Bragt D, et al. Stretchable and transparent electrodes based on patterned silver nanowires by laser-induced forward transfer for non-contacted printing techniques. Nanotechnology, 2016, 27: 45LT02Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Lee P, Lee J, Lee H, et al. Highly stretchable and highly conductive metal electrode by very long metal nanowire percolation network. Adv Mater, 2012, 24: 3326–3332Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Liu Y, Zhang J, Gao H, et al. Capillary-force-induced cold welding in silver-nanowire-based flexible transparent electrodes. Nano Lett, 2017, 17: 1090–1096Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Di J, Hu D, Chen H, et al. Ultrastrong, foldable, and highly conductive carbon nanotube film. ACS Nano, 2012, 6: 5457–5464Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Morales P, Moyanova S, Pavone L, et al. Self-grafting carbon nanotubes on polymers for stretchable electronics. Eur Phys J Plus, 2018, 133: 214Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Lei T, Pochorovski I, Bao Z. Separation of semiconducting carbon nanotubes for flexible and stretchable electronics using polymer removable method. Acc Chem Res, 2017, 50: 1096–1104Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Kaskela A, Nasibulin A G, Timmermans M Y, et al. Aerosol-synthesized SWCNT networks with tunable conductivity and transparency by a dry transfer technique. Nano Lett, 2010, 10: 4349–4355Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Yu Z, Niu X, Liu Z, et al. Intrinsically stretchable polymer lightemitting devices using carbon nanotube-polymer composite electrodes. Adv Mater, 2011, 23: 3989–3994Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Lipomi D J, Vosgueritchian M, Tee B C K, et al. Skin-like pressure and strain sensors based on transparent elastic films of carbon nanotubes. Nat Nanotech, 2011, 6: 788–792Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Xu F, Wang X, Zhu Y, et al. Wavy ribbons of carbon nanotubes for stretchable conductors. Adv Funct Mater, 2012, 22: 1279–1283Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Rangari V K, Yousuf M, Jeelani S, et al. Alignment of carbon nanotubes and reinforcing effects in nylon-6 polymer composite fibers. Nanotechnology, 2008, 19: 245703Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Shin M K, Oh J, Lima M, et al. Elastomeric conductive composites based on carbon nanotube forests. Adv Mater, 2010, 22: 2663–2667Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Gilshteyn E P, Lin S, Kondrashov V A, et al. A one-step method of hydrogel modification by single-walled carbon nanotubes for highly stretchable and transparent electronics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018, 10: 28069–28075Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Huang X, Zeng Z, Fan Z, et al. Graphene-based electrodes. Adv Mater, 2012, 24: 5979–6004Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Zang J, Ryu S, Pugno N, et al. Multifunctionality and control of the crumpling and unfolding of large-area graphene. Nat Mater, 2013, 12: 321–325Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Bronsgeest M S, Bendiab N, Mathur S, et al. Strain relaxation in CVD graphene: Wrinkling with shear lag. Nano Lett, 2015, 15: 5098–5104Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Nicholl R J T, Conley H J, Lavrik N V, et al. The effect of intrinsic crumpling on the mechanics of free-standing graphene. Nat Commun, 2015, 6: 8789Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    An B W, Hyun B G, Kim S Y, et al. Stretchable and transparent electrodes using hybrid structures of grapheme-metal nanotrough networks with high performances and ultimate uniformity. Nano Lett, 2014, 14: 6322–6328Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Chen T, Xue Y, Roy A K, et al. Transparent and stretchable highperformance supercapacitors based on wrinkled graphene electrodes. ACS Nano, 2014, 8: 1039–1046Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Cai C, Jia F, Li A, et al. Crackless transfer of large-area graphene films for superior-performance transparent electrodes. Carbon, 2016, 98: 457–462Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Ding J, Du K, Wathuthanthri I, et al. Transfer patterning of large-area graphene nanomesh via holographic lithography and plasma etching. J Vacuum Sci Tech B Nanotechnol MicroElectron-Mater Processing Measurement Phenomena, 2014, 32: 06FF01Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Ding J, Fisher F T, Yang E H. Direct transfer of corrugated graphene sheets as stretchable electrodes. J Vacuum Sci Tech B Nanotechnol MicroElectron-Mater Processing Measurement Phenomena, 2016, 34: 051205Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Hong J Y, Kim W, Choi D, et al. Omnidirectionally stretchable and transparent graphene electrodes. ACS Nano, 2016, 10: 9446–9455Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Liu N, Chortos A, Lei T, et al. Ultratransparent and stretchable graphene electrodes. Sci Adv, 2017, 3: e1700159Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Choi T Y, Hwang B U, Kim B Y, et al. Stretchable, transparent, and stretch-unresponsive capacitive touch sensor array with selectively patterned silver nanowires/reduced graphene oxide electrodes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2017, 9: 18022–18030Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Lee J, Woo J Y, Kim J T, et al. Synergistically enhanced stability of highly flexible silver nanowire/carbon nanotube hybrid transparent electrodes by plasmonic welding. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2014, 6: 10974–10980Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Deng B, Hsu P C, Chen G, et al. Roll-to-roll encapsulation of metal nanowires between graphene and plastic substrate for high-performance flexible transparent electrodes. Nano Lett, 2015, 15: 4206–4213Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Li Q, Ullah Z, Li W, et al. Wide-range strain sensors based on highly transparent and supremely stretchable graphene/Ag-nanowires hybrid structures. Small, 2016, 12: 5058–5065Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Ding J, Fu S, Zhang R, et al. Graphene.Vertically aligned carbon nanotube hybrid on PDMS as stretchable electrodes. Nanotechnology, 2017, 28: 465302Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Chun K Y, Oh Y, Rho J, et al. Highly conductive, printable and stretchable composite films of carbon nanotubes and silver. Nat Nanotech, 2010, 5: 853–857Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Jin L, Chortos A, Lian F, et al. Microstructural origin of resistancestrain hysteresis in carbon nanotube thin film conductors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2018, 115: 1986–1991Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Zu M, Li Q, Wang G, et al. Carbon nanotube fiber based stretchable conductor. Adv Funct Mater, 2013, 23: 789–793Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Akter T, Kim W S. Reversibly stretchable transparent conductive coatings of spray-deposited silver nanowires. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2012, 4: 1855–1859Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Yao S, Zhu Y. Wearable multifunctional sensors using printed stretchable conductors made of silver nanowires. Nanoscale, 2014, 6: 2345–2352Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Ge J, Yao H B, Wang X, et al. Stretchable conductors based on silver nanowires: Improved performance through a binary network design. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2013, 52: 1654–1659Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Lee P, Ham J, Lee J, et al. Highly stretchable or transparent conductor fabrication by a hierarchical multiscale hybrid nanocomposite. Adv Funct Mater, 2014, 24: 5671–5678Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Xie Y, Liu Y, Zhao Y, et al. Stretchable all-solid-state supercapacitor with wavy shaped polyaniline/graphene electrode. J Mater Chem A, 2014, 2: 9142–9149Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Lee M S, Lee K, Kim S Y, et al. High-performance, transparent, and stretchable electrodes using graphene-metal nanowire hybrid structures. Nano Lett, 2013, 13: 2814–2821Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Liu J, Yi Y, Zhou Y, et al. Highly stretchable and flexible graphene/ITO hybrid transparent electrode. Nanoscale Res Lett, 2016, 11: 108Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Qian Y, Zhang X, Xie L, et al. Stretchable organic semiconductor devices. Adv Mater, 2016, 28: 9243–9265Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Gelinck G, Heremans P, Nomoto K, et al. Organic transistors in optical displays and microelectronic applications. Adv Mater, 2010, 22: 3778–3798Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Trung T Q, Lee N E. Recent progress on stretchable electronic devices with intrinsically stretchable components. Adv Mater, 2017, 29: 1603167Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Takacs C J, Treat N D, Kramer S, et al. Remarkable order of a highperformance polymer. Nano Lett, 2013, 13: 2522–2527Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Wang C, Dong H, Hu W, et al. Semiconducting π-conjugated systems in field-effect transistors: A material odyssey of organic electronics. Chem Rev, 2012, 112: 2208–2267Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Li R, Hu W, Liu Y, et al. Micro- and nanocrystals of organic semiconductors. Acc Chem Res, 2010, 43: 529–540Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Reyes-Martinez M A, Crosby A J, Briseno A L. Rubrene crystal field-effect mobility modulation via conducting channel wrinkling. Nat Commun, 2015, 6: 6948Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Briseno A, Tseng R, Ling M M, et al. High-performance organic single-crystal transistors on flexible substrates. Adv Mater, 2006, 18: 2320–2324Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Cai X, Ji D, Jiang L, et al. Solution-processed high-performance flexible 9, 10-bis(phenylethynyl)anthracene organic single-crystal transistor and ring oscillator. Appl Phys Lett, 2014, 104: 063305Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Tang K, Song Z, Tang Q, et al. Effect of the deformation state on the response of a flexible H2S sensor based on a Ph5T2 single-crystal transistor. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2018, 39: 119–122Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Wang H, Deng L, Tang Q, et al. Flexible organic single-crystal field-effect transistor for ultra-sensitivity strain sensing. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2017, 38: 1598–1601Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Kim T H, Lee J H, Kim J, et al. Field-effect transistors of tetracene single crystal on top of a flexible substrate. MRS Proc, 2006, 920: 0920–S02–04Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Rang Z, Haraldsson A, Kim D M, et al. Hydrostatic-pressure dependence of the photoconductivity of single-crystal pentacene and tetracene. Appl Phys Lett, 2001, 79: 2731–2733Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Rang Z, Nathan M I, Ruden P P, et al. Hydrostatic pressure dependence of charge carrier transport in single-crystal rubrene devices. Appl Phys Lett, 2005, 86: 123501Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Jedaa A, Halik M. Toward strain resistant flexible organic thin film transistors. Appl Phys Lett, 2009, 95: 103309Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Sokolov A N, Cao Y, Johnson O B, et al. Mechanistic considerations of bending-strain effects within organic semiconductors on polymer dielectrics. Adv Funct Mater, 2012, 22: 175–183Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Savagatrup S, Makaram A S, Burke D J, et al. Mechanical properties of conjugated polymers and polymer-fullerene composites as a function of molecular structure. Adv Funct Mater, 2014, 24: 1169–1181Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    McCulloch I, Heeney M, Bailey C, et al. Liquid-crystalline semiconducting polymers with high charge-carrier mobility. Nat Mater, 2006, 5: 328–333Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Reddy C M, Padmanabhan K A, Desiraju G R. Structure-property correlations in bending and brittle organic crystals. Cryst Growth Des, 2006, 6: 2720–2731Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    O’Connor B, Chan E P, Chan C, et al. Correlations between mechanical and electrical properties of polythiophenes. ACS Nano, 2010, 4: 7538–7544Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    O’Connor B, Kline R J, Conrad B R, et al. Anisotropic structure and charge transport in highly strain-aligned regioregular poly(3-hexylthiophene). Adv Funct Mater, 2011, 21: 3697–3705Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Sekitani T, Someya T. Stretchable, large-area organic electronics. Adv Mater, 2010, 22: 2228–2246Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Zhang X, Bronstein H, Kronemeijer A J, et al. Molecular origin of high field-effect mobility in an indacenodithiophene-benzothiadiazole copolymer. Nat Commun, 2013, 4: 2238Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Venkateshvaran D, Nikolka M, Sadhanala A, et al. Approaching disorder-free transport in high-mobility conjugated polymers. Nature, 2014, 515: 384–388Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Wu H C, Benight S J, Chortos A, et al. A rapid and facile soft contact lamination method: Evaluation of polymer semiconductors for stretchable transistors. Chem Mater, 2014, 26: 4544–4551Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Lu C, Lee W Y, Gu X, et al. Effects of molecular structure and packing order on the stretchability of semicrystalline conjugated poly (tetrathienoacene-diketopyrrolopyrrole) polymers. Adv Electron Mater, 2017, 3: 1600311Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Yang H, Shin T J, Yang L, et al. Effect of mesoscale crystalline structure on the field-effect mobility of regioregular poly(3-hexyl thiophene) in thin-film transistors. Adv Funct Mater, 2005, 15: 671–676Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Kim J S, Kim J H, Lee W, et al. Tuning mechanical and optoelectrical properties of poly(3-hexylthiophene) through systematic regioregularity control. Macromolecules, 2015, 48: 4339–4346Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Son S Y, Kim Y, Lee J, et al. High-field-effect mobility of low-crystallinity conjugated polymers with localized aggregates. J Am Chem Soc, 2016, 138: 8096–8103Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Palaniappan K, Hundt N, Sista P, et al. Block copolymer containing poly(3-hexylthiophene) and poly(4-vinylpyridine): Synthesis and its interaction with CdSe quantum dots for hybrid organic applications. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem, 2011, 49: 1802–1808Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Sommer M, Lang A S, Thelakkat M. Crystalline-crystalline donoracceptor block copolymers. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2008, 47: 7901–7904Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    Nguyen H Q, Bhatt M P, Rainbolt E A, et al. Synthesis and characterization of a polyisoprene-b-polystyrene-b-poly(3-hexylthiophene) triblock copolymer. Polym Chem, 2013, 4: 462–465Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    Peng R, Pang B, Hu D, et al. An ABA triblock copolymer strategy for intrinsically stretchable semiconductors. J Mater Chem C, 2015, 3: 3599–3606Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Khang D Y, Jiang H, Huang Y, et al. A stretchable form of singlecrystal silicon for high-performance electronics on rubber substrates. Science, 2006, 311: 208–212Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Park K, Lee D K, Kim B S, et al. Stretchable, transparent zinc oxide thin film transistors. Adv Funct Mater, 2010, 20: 3577–3582Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    Kim D H, Xiao J, Song J, et al. Stretchable, curvilinear electronics based on inorganic materials. Adv Mater, 2010, 22: 2108–2124Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    Graz I M, Cotton D P J, Robinson A, et al. Silicone substrate with in situ strain relief for stretchable thin-film transistors. Appl Phys Lett, 2011, 98: 124101Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    Khang D Y, Rogers J A, Lee H H. Mechanical buckling: Mechanics, metrology, and stretchable electronics. Adv Funct Mater, 2009, 19: 1526–1536Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    Kaltenbrunner M, Sekitani T, Reeder J, et al. An ultra-lightweight design for imperceptible plastic electronics. Nature, 2013, 499: 458–463Google Scholar
  145. 145.
    Shin M, Oh J Y, Byun K E, et al. Polythiophene nanofibril bundles surface-embedded in elastomer: A route to a highly stretchable active channel layer. Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 1255–1261Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    Street R A. Thin-film transistors. Adv Mater, 2009, 21: 2007–2022Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    Yang S Y, Shin K, Park C E. The effect of gate-dielectric surface energy on pentacene morphology and organic field-effect transistor characteristics. Adv Funct Mater, 2005, 15: 1806–1814Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Zhao X, Wang S, Li A, et al. Universal solution-processed high-k amorphous oxide dielectrics for high-performance organic thin film transistors. RSC Adv, 2014, 4: 14890–14895Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    Jiang Y, Guo Y, Liu Y. Engineering of amorphous polymeric insulators for organic field-effect transistors. Adv Electron Mater, 2017, 3: 1700157Google Scholar
  150. 150.
    Lee J, Kaake L G, Cho J H, et al. Ion gel-gated polymer thin-film transistors: Operating mechanism and characterization of gate dielectric capacitance, switching speed, and stability. J Phys Chem C, 2009, 113: 8972–8981Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    Lee J, Panzer M J, He Y, et al. Ion gel gated polymer thin-film transistors. J Am Chem Soc, 2007, 129: 4532–4533Google Scholar
  152. 152.
    Pu J, Yomogida Y, Liu K K, et al. Highly flexible MoS2 thin-film transistors with ion gel dielectrics. Nano Lett, 2012, 12: 4013–4017Google Scholar
  153. 153.
    Yomogida Y, Pu J, Shimotani H, et al. Ambipolar organic singlecrystal transistors based on ion gels. Adv Mater, 2012, 24: 4392–4397Google Scholar
  154. 154.
    Xu F, Wu M Y, Safron N S, et al. Highly stretchable carbon nanotube transistors with ion gel gate dielectrics. Nano Lett, 2014, 14: 682–686Google Scholar
  155. 155.
    Wu M Y, Zhao J, Xu F, et al. Highly stretchable carbon nanotube transistors enabled by buckled ion gel gate dielectrics. Appl Phys Lett, 2015, 107: 053301Google Scholar
  156. 156.
    Kim B J, Jang H, Lee S K, et al. High-performance flexible graphene field effect transistors with ion gel gate dielectrics. Nano Lett, 2010, 10: 3464–3466Google Scholar
  157. 157.
    Pu J, Zhang Y, Wada Y, et al. Fabrication of stretchable MoS2 thinfilm transistors using elastic ion-gel gate dielectrics. Appl Phys Lett, 2013, 103: 023505Google Scholar
  158. 158.
    Qian C, Sun J, Yang J, et al. Flexible organic field-effect transistors on biodegradable cellulose paper with efficient reusable ion gel dielectrics. RSC Adv, 2015, 5: 14567–14574Google Scholar
  159. 159.
    Trung T Q, Ramasundaram S, Hwang B U, et al. An all-elastomeric transparent and stretchable temperature sensor for body-attachable wearable electronics. Adv Mater, 2016, 28: 502–509Google Scholar
  160. 160.
    Xia M, Cheng Z, Han J, et al. Extremely stretchable all-carbonnanotube transistor on flexible and transparent substrates. Appl Phys Lett, 2014, 105: 143504Google Scholar
  161. 161.
    Du P, Lin X, Zhang X. Dielectric constants of PDMS nanocomposites using conducting polymer nanowires. In: Proceedings of 16th International Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference. Brijing: IEEE, 2011. 645–648Google Scholar
  162. 162.
    Lee Y, Oh J Y, Kim T R, et al. Deformable organic nanowire fieldeffect transistors. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 1704401Google Scholar
  163. 163.
    Grigorescu R M, Ciuprina F, Ghioca P, et al. Mechanical and dielectric properties of SEBS modified by graphite inclusion and composite interface. J Phys Chem Solids, 2016, 89: 97–106Google Scholar
  164. 164.
    Kong D, Pfattner R, Chortos A, et al. Capacitance characterization of elastomeric dielectrics for applications in intrinsically stretchable thin film transistors. Adv Funct Mater, 2016, 26: 4680–4686Google Scholar
  165. 165.
    Son D, Kang J, Vardoulis O, et al. An integrated self-healable electronic skin system fabricated via dynamic reconstruction of a nanostructured conducting network. Nat Nanotech, 2018, 13: 1057–1065Google Scholar
  166. 166.
    Kang J, Son D, Wang G J N, et al. Tough and water-insensitive selfhealing elastomer for robust electronic skin. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 1706846Google Scholar
  167. 167.
    Huang J, Zhang L, Tang Z, et al. Bioinspired engineering of sacrificial bonds into rubber networks towards high-performance and functional elastomers. Compos Commun, 2018, 8: 65–73Google Scholar
  168. 168.
    Li C H, Wang C, Keplinger C, et al. A highly stretchable autonomous self-healing elastomer. Nat Chem, 2016, 8: 618–624Google Scholar
  169. 169.
    Zhang B, Zhang P, Zhang H, et al. A transparent, highly stretchable, autonomous self-healing poly(dimethyl siloxane) elastomer. Macromol Rapid Commun, 2017, 38: 1700110Google Scholar
  170. 170.
    Huang Y, Zhong M, Huang Y, et al. A self-healable and highly stretchable supercapacitor based on a dual crosslinked polyelectrolyte. Nat Commun, 2015, 6: 10310Google Scholar
  171. 171.
    Wang H, Zhu B, Jiang W, et al. A mechanically and electrically self-healing supercapacitor. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 3638–3643Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Organic Solid Laboratory, Institute of ChemistryChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations